Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yue, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Turtle, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yue, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Turtle, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 24, Issue 7 625-632, Copyright © 1975 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Antigenicity of "monocomponent" pork insulin in diabetic subjects

DK Yue and JR Turtle

"Single-peak," "single-component," and "monocomponent" insulins have been produced in an attempt to eliminate insulin antigenicity. Recently "single-peak insulin" has been shown to be antigenic. From animal experiments and preliminary human studies it has been claimed that monocomponent (MC) insulin is nonantigenic or only negligibly so. In this study the antigenicity of MC insulin was determined in two groups of diabetic patients. In group 1, seven patients treated with insulin for the first time were given MC insulin for seven to fifteen months. Four of the seven patients developed significant IgG insulin antibodies after four to ten months. In one patient the IgG insulin antibody concentration was high (8.51 mU./ml.). In two patients, IgG proinsulin-specific antibodies were detected. In group 2, fourteen patients with unstable diabetes, insulin allergy, or resistance were changed from conventional to MC insulin. Treatment with MC insulin did not decrease insulin requirement or improve diabetic control when assayed by the M factor. After seven to eleven months of therapy there was no significant fall in insulin antibodies except in two patients in whom corticosteroids had been administered simultaneously. These results differ significantly from those previously reported and could be interpreted as suggesting that insulin itself is antigenic. When the purity of the MC insulin was determined, significant contaminants could be demonstrated in all of ten separate batches of MC insulin. Gel chromatography, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and proinsulin radioimmunoassay were used to identify the presence of nonconvertible insulin dimer, proinsulin, and monodesamido insulin in antigenically significant concentrations. The generation of IgG insulin antibodies in MC-insulin-treated patients cannot be interpreted as a true indication that insulin itself is antigenic. The problem of insulin antigenicity has not been resolved and will not be until a highly purified insulin is available. Unfortunately, the MC insulins do not meet these requirements.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1975 by the American Diabetes Association.