Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baer, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dupre, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baer, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dupre, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 34, Issue 11 1108-1112, Copyright © 1985 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Effects of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in the response to prolonged parenteral or enteral alimentation in rats

AR Baer and J Dupre

To examine the effects of long-term elevation of plasma gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), the responses to parenteral (PA) or enteral (EA) alimentation were studied in conscious rats with duodenal and venous cannulae. A weight-maintaining liquid diet (84% as glucose, 16% as amino acids) was infused at a constant rate for 6 days by either route, and daily blood samples were taken. A subset of animals receiving PA also received porcine GIP with the infusate (PA plus GIP; plateau plasma immunoreactive GIP, IRGIP, 610 +/- 120 pg/ml). With PA, plasma IRGIP did not change from basal levels, whereas with EA IRGIP rose to virtual plateau levels (mean 530 +/- 110 pg/ml). In the steady state, plasma immunoreactive insulin (IRI) was significantly lower with EA (mean, 153 +/- 5 microU/ml) than with PA (mean, 226 +/- 15 microU/ml), which in turn was lower than with PA plus GIP (mean, 375 +/- 23 microU/ml, P less than 0.001 by ANOVA). A similar ranking of plasma glucose levels occurred in the steady state, with means of 113 +/- 7 (EA), 126 +/- 3 (PA), and 184 +/- 9 (PA plus GIP) mg/dl (P less than 0.001 by ANOVA). To assess the response to transient hyperglycemia in the steady state, an intravenous glucose bolus was given to each group on the fifth day. Peak plasma IRI levels did not differ among the three groups; however, the glucose disappearance rate was significantly slower with PA plus GIP compared with either EA or PA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1985 by the American Diabetes Association.