Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toguchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toguchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 34, Issue 9 855-860, Copyright © 1985 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Cytotoxic islet cell surface antibodies (ICSA) in patients with type I diabetes and their first-degree relatives

Y Toguchi, F Ginsberg-Fellner and P Rubinstein

We describe a nonradioactive microcytotoxicity assay for ICSA using a cloned rat insulinoma cell line. This assay system had good reproducibility (r = 0.93) and was suitable for the study of large numbers of samples. The following results were obtained by testing the sera of 111 patients with IDDM (type I diabetes) and all of their first-degree relatives. (1) Thirty-five percent of IDDM patients had ICSA, as compared with only 2% of healthy controls. (2) ICSA was found more frequently in patients within 2 yr of onset (45%) than in those with disease for longer than 2 yr (27%) (P less than 0.05). (3) The prevalence of ICSA was associated with the presence of cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies (ICA) (P less than 0.05). (4) No association was found between the prevalence of ICSA and specific HLA-DR alleles. Association with the HLA haplotypes in families with ICSA-positive probands, on the other hand, is suggested although not proven by these data. (5) Among the nondiabetic relatives of IDDM patients, 5% of the parents and 14% of the sibs had ICSA. Increased prevalence of ICSA occurred in the unaffected sibs of ICSA-positive probands (31%) but not in those of ICSA-negative probands (4%) (P less than 0.001); in fact, the relatives of ICSA-negative probands had ICSA with a frequency not higher than in unrelated controls. (6) Female relatives of ICSA-positive probands were more often ICSA-positive than males, but no such difference was found among probands. (7) In multiplex sibships, ICSA were not associated with disease in the sibs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1985 by the American Diabetes Association.