Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, L.
Right arrow Articles by Langer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, L.
Right arrow Articles by Langer, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 35, Issue 6 692-697, Copyright © 1986 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Controlled release of insulin from polymer matrices. Control of diabetes in rats

L Brown, C Munoz, L Siemer, E Edelman and R Langer

The controlled release of insulin from ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer matrices was demonstrated for over 100 days in vivo. The matrices were designed to release sodium insulin at near-constant rates. These 0.06-cm3 implants were coated completely with an impermeable layer of polymer. An aperture was drilled in the center of one face of the matrix, restricting release through this opening. These devices were implanted into 13 streptozocin-induced diabetic rats. Plasma glucose concentrations fell from 386 +/- 18 to 119 +/- 35 mg/dl (mean +/- SEM), and urinary glucose was eliminated. Thee parameters were controlled for up to 105 days by a single implant. Glycosylated hemoglobin concentrations measured 90 days after implantation were 3.86 +/- 0.11% for the polymer-treated rats, 3.10 +/- 0.18% for the normal controls, and 5.42 +/- 0.33% for the diabetic controls. The average weight gain of the treated rats was similar to that of the controls, whereas the diabetic controls failed to thrive. In addition, all of the diabetic controls developed cataracts 1 mo after diabetes induction, whereas none of the treated rats developed cataracts.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
E. R. Edelman, M. Simons, M. G. Sirois, and R. D. Rosenberg
c-myc in Vasculoproliferative Disease
Circ. Res., February 1, 1995; 76(2): 176 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R Langer
New methods of drug delivery
Science, September 28, 1990; 249(4976): 1527 - 1533.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1986 by the American Diabetes Association.