Diabetes, Vol 36, Issue 5 578-584, Copyright © 1987 by American Diabetes Association
Progress toward standardization of cytoplasmic islet cell-antibody assay
H Gleichmann and GF Bottazzo
Cytoplasmic islet cell autoantibodies (ICAs) of 13 coded sera were
determined by 26 laboratories. ICAs were determined by 24 laboratories
according to a standard protocol based on the conventional
indirect-immunofluorescence technique on cryostat sections of human
pancreas. In addition, these 24 laboratories had performed any of 8
modifications of the assay. Test samples were titrated to end point, and
the results obtained with the different methods were compared with those
obtained by the standard protocol. The remaining 2 laboratories used either
exclusively pancreatic sections of monkey instead of human as substrate
(lab 23) or applied immunohistochemical staining (lab 22). By following the
standard protocol, interlaboratory concordance was greater than 90% for the
presence or absence of islet cell antibodies in 7 of the 13 samples
circulated. However, a wide variability of titers was recorded, ranging
from negative to 128. Of the modifications, prolonged incubation in the
presence of aprotinin was performed by 10 laboratories and was found to
improve the sensitivity in 57 of 70 (81%) determinations with samples that
had been ICA positive by the standard protocol. Improved sensitivity was
also noted by 2 laboratories with sections of monkey pancreas.
Acetone-fixed sections, used by 6 laboratories, or a two-color
immunofluorescence method, applied by 3 laboratories, did not change the
titers in 27 of 35 (77%) and 14 of 25 (56%) determinations with samples
that had been ICA positive by the standard protocol. In contrast, heat
inactivation of the samples before testing, performed by 5 laboratories,
resulted in a decrease in titers in 25 of 39 (64%) determinations.(ABSTRACT
TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)