Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swai, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Alberti, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swai, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Alberti, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 40, Issue 4 516-520, Copyright © 1991 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Study in Tanzania of impaired glucose tolerance. Methodological myth?

AB Swai, DG McLarty, HM Kitange, PM Kilima, G Masuki, BI Mtinangi, L Chuwa and GM Alberti
Department of Medicine, Muhimbili Medical Center, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

During a study of diabetes prevalence in six rural Tanzanian communities, a repeat oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was carried out in 514 subjects greater than or equal to 15 yr of age within 1 wk of an initial 75-g OGTT. In 498 subjects, blood glucose was measured 2 h after the glucose load on both occasions, and in 175 subjects, fasting blood glucose measurement was also repeated. Of the 498 subjects, 245 had normal glucose tolerance in the first test and were selected at random for further testing; 223 subjects had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 30 had diabetic values. Diabetes and IGT were diagnosed on the basis of the 2-h blood glucose values. In the second test, 241 (98.4%) of the 245 subjects with normal tolerance continued in this category and 4 (1.6%) showed IGT. Of the 223 with IGT in the first test, 171 (76.2%) reverted to normal on the second test, 7 (3.1%) had diabetic values, and 45 (20.2%) persisted with IGT. Of the 30 subjects diagnosed as diabetic in the first test, 8 (26.7%) remained with diabetic values, 11 (36.7%) had IGT, and 11 (36.7%) were normal. Based on the second test, the population-prevalence rates of diabetes and IGT would have been 0.5 and 3.3% vs. 1 and 7.6% based on the first test. There was a significant downward trend in the mean 2-h blood glucose values in all three diagnostic groups. Regression toward the mean could not account for the downward shift in blood glucose values observed on retesting.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. S. Feig, V. A. Palda, L. Lipscombe, and with The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health
Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus to prevent vascular complications: updated recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 18, 2005; 172(2): 177 - 180.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Harris, K. Donahue, S. S. Rathore, P. Frame, S. H. Woolf, and K. N. Lohr
Screening Adults for Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 215 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1991 by the American Diabetes Association.