Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hazuda, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stern, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hazuda, H. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 42, Issue 5 706-714, Copyright © 1993 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Predicting diabetes. Moving beyond impaired glucose tolerance

MP Stern, PA Morales, RA Valdez, A Monterrosa, SM Haffner, BD Mitchell and HP Hazuda
Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7873.

We developed predictive models for type II diabetes using stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses of a cohort of 844 Mexican Americans and 641 non-Hispanic whites who were nondiabetic at baseline and who were then followed for 8 yr. Models were developed for the overall population and separately for each sex and ethnic group. For optimal models, the multiple logistic regression program selected potential risk factors from a panel of 5 categorical and 14 continuous demographic, anthropometric, metabolic, and hemodynamic variables. For reduced models, the list of candidate variables was restricted to those commonly used in ordinary clinical practice, i.e., skinfolds, and serum insulin and postural glucose load variables were excluded. For all models, the stepwise process selected a mixture of anthropometric, glucose, lipid, and hemodynamic variables. The top 15% of the risk continuum for each model was defined as high risk to compare the performance of the models with the performance of impaired glucose tolerance (15% prevalence) as a predictor of diabetes. The relative risk of being high risk ranged from 12.16 to 35.29, whereas the relative risk of having impaired glucose tolerance ranged from 7.11 to 10.0. The sensitivity of the multiple logistic regression models ranged from 67.7 to 83.3% compared with 56.5 to 62.1% for impaired glucose tolerance. The results indicate that multivariate predictive models perform at least as well, if not better than impaired glucose tolerance in predicting type II diabetes but need not require an oral glucose load. Moreover, the models highlight the complex metabolic and hemodynamic syndrome that precedes diabetes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. P. Stern, P. Fatehi, K. Williams, and S. M. Haffner
Predicting Future Cardiovascular Disease: Do we need the oral glucose tolerance test?
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2002; 25(10): 1851 - 1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
R. Arya, J. Blangero, K. Williams, L. Almasy, T. D. Dyer, R. J. Leach, P. O'Connell, M. P. Stern, and R. Duggirala
Factors of Insulin Resistance Syndrome-Related Phenotypes Are Linked to Genetic Locations on Chromosomes 6 and 7 in Nondiabetic Mexican-Americans
Diabetes, March 1, 2002; 51(3): 841 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. P. Stern
Do Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease Share Common Antecedents?
Ann Intern Med, January 1, 1996; 124(1_Part_2): 110 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1993 by the American Diabetes Association.