Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 45, Issue 2 205-208, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Immunological and metabolic effects of prophylactic insulin therapy in the NOD-scid/scid adoptive transfer model of IDDM

MA Bowman, L Campbell, BL Darrow, TM Ellis, A Suresh and MA Atkinson
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0275, USA.

Prophylactic insulin therapy prevents IDDM in spontaneous animal models of the disease and has shown promise in preventing the disease in humans. Although large clinical trials have been formed to use this therapy, a comparative analysis of the efficiency of different pharmaceutical forms and doses of insulin in preventing IDDM has not been performed, and the mechanism underlying the observed prevention of disease is unknown. In the NOD-scid/scid adoptive transfer model of IDDM (10(7) new-onset NOD splenocytes injected intravenously into 6- to 8-week NOD/scid-scid recipients; insulitis develops at 6-9 days post-transfer and 100% IDDM by 32 days post-transfer), life-table (log-rank) analyses revealed that IDDM can be delayed (compared with insulin-free diluent, once daily, n = 8) with equivalent efficiency by prophylactic administration (-9-50 days post-transfer) of high (metabolism-altering) doses of short-acting (0.5 U, once daily, regular, n = 13) or long-acting (0.5 U, once daily, ultralente, n = 9) insulin as well as non-metabolism-altering low-dose insulin (0.02 U, once daily, regular, n = 8). Furthermore, IDDM was delayed with somatostatin (0.2 microgram, twice daily, n = 11), an agent that suppresses endogenous insulin production. No significant difference was seen between the preventative effects of these agents. In an assessment of when therapies can be initiated and still maintain clinical efficiency, only prophylactic somatostatin therapy delayed IDDM (n = 10, P = 0.02) when initiated at 14 days post-transfer, whereas the short-acting insulin regimen did not retard the onset of IDDM (n = 8, P = 0.25) compared with diluent-treated controls. The 24-h urinary C-peptide levels were significantly reduced with short-acting (-56%, P = 0.01) and long-acting (-67%, P = 0.02) insulin products and somatostatin (-59%, P = 0.02) compared with diluent-treated controls. These results indicate that both immunological and metabolic (i.e., beta-cell rest) factors may contribute to the beneficial effects of prophylactic insulin therapy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1996 by the American Diabetes Association.