Diabetes, Vol 46, Issue 10 1557-1562, Copyright © 1997 by American Diabetes Association
Relative hyperproinsulinemia of NIDDM persists despite the reduction of hyperglycemia with insulin or sulfonylurea therapy
J Rachman, JC Levy, BA Barrow, SE Manley and RC Turner
Diabetes Research Laboratories, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, U.K.
Subjects with NIDDM have increased plasma proinsulin concentrations,
compared with nondiabetic subjects, both in absolute terms and as a
proportion of circulating insulin-like molecules. It remains uncertain
whether this reflects a primary beta-cell defect in proinsulin processing
or is secondary to hyperglycemia. We addressed this question by assessing
the effects of reducing hyperglycemia on relative hyperproinsulinemia in
subjects with NIDDM. Eight subjects with NIDDM underwent three 8-week
periods in a randomized crossover design of therapy with diet alone,
sulfonylurea (gliclazide), or insulin (ultralente). The effects on
beta-cell peptide concentrations were assessed 1) fasting, 2) in response
to hyperglycemic clamping, and 3) in response to an injection of the
nonglucose secretogogue arginine and compared with measurements in seven
nondiabetic control subjects. Both sulfonylurea and insulin therapy
substantially reduced fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin
(HbA1e) concentrations, compared with diet therapy alone. The diabetic
subjects on diet therapy had relative hyperproinsulinemia, assessed
relative to C-peptide concentrations, fasting and in response to
hyperglycemic clamping and arginine, compared with control subjects.
Neither sulfonylurea nor insulin therapy altered the relative
hyperproinsulinemia. Insulin therapy reduced fasting proinsulin
concentrations from geometric mean 29.4 (1 SD range, 14.6-59.0) pmol/l on
diet therapy to 18.7 (7.3-48.1) pmol/l (P < 0.05). A similar trend was
evident with fasting C-peptide concentrations with a reduction from 0.9
(0.6-1.4) nmol/l on diet therapy to 0.6 (0.4-0.9) nmol/l (P = 0.06), so
that the relative hyperproinsulinemia, assessed as the ratio of fasting
proinsulin to C-peptide, was unchanged by insulin. Similarly, insulin
therapy failed to reduce the ratio of proinsulin to C-peptide
concentrations in response to a hyperglycemic clamp and in the acute
incremental response to arginine. Failure to improve the relative
hyperproinsulinemia of NIDDM, despite significant reduction of
hyperglycemia with exogenous insulin therapy, supports the hypothesis that
relative hyperproinsulinemia in NIDDM is a reflection of a primary
beta-cell defect rather than being secondary to hyperglycemia.