Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rayat, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Korbutt, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rayat, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Korbutt, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 47, Issue 9 1406-1411, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Expression of Gal alpha(1,3)gal on neonatal porcine islet beta-cells and susceptibility to human antibody/complement lysis

GR Rayat, RV Rajotte, JF Elliott and GS Korbutt
Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Neonatal porcine pancreases may be a potential source of islets for transplantation into patients with type 1 diabetes; however, whether these cellular grafts will be susceptible to damage by human natural antibody-mediated rejection remains controversial. Although we and others have demonstrated that porcine islets bind human IgG and IgM, it remains unknown if they express the xenoreactive antigen Gal alpha(1,3)Gal beta(1,4)GlcNAc-R (Gal epitope). In this study, by using the Gal-specific lectin IB4 for immunohistochemistry and fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis, we determined which cell types present in porcine neonatal islet cell (NIC) aggregates express the Gal epitope and which ones are susceptible to lysis by activation of the human complement. After FACS analysis, 30.0 +/- 3.0% of porcine NICs were shown to express Gal, whereas 70.0 +/- 2.0% did not. Histological assessment of Gal-expressing cells revealed that 54.9 +/- 8.8% stained positive for either insulin or glucagon. In contrast, 68.8 +/- 8.4% of the Gal-negative population stained positive for the pancreatic hormones insulin and glucagon. Incubation of either the Gal-positive or -negative cells with human AB serum plus complement for 1.5 h resulted in the lysis of >90% of the cells. These results demonstrate that porcine NIC aggregates are composed of Gal-expressing cells and that expression of Gal is not restricted to nonendocrine cells. Furthermore, both Gal-positive and Gal-negative cells are susceptible to human antibody/complement-mediated cytolysis, suggesting that this form of immunological destruction is an obstacle that will need to be overcome before porcine NIC aggregates can be used clinically.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Dufour, M. Hamilton, R. V. Rajotte, and G. S. Korbutt
Neonatal Porcine Sertoli Cells Inhibit Human Natural Antibody-Mediated Lysis
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2005; 72(5): 1224 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DiabetesHome page
G. Mattsson, L. Jansson, and P.-O. Carlsson
Decreased Vascular Density in Mouse Pancreatic Islets After Transplantation
Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1362 - 1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1998 by the American Diabetes Association.