Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakano, S.
Right arrow Articles by Uchida, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakano, S.
Right arrow Articles by Uchida, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes, Vol 47, Issue 9 1501-1506, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Reversed circadian blood pressure rhythm is associated with occurrences of both fatal and nonfatal vascular events in NIDDM subjects

S Nakano, M Fukuda, F Hotta, T Ito, T Ishii, M Kitazawa, M Nishizawa, T Kigoshi and K Uchida
Department of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Ishikawa, Japan. nakano-s@kanazawa-med.ac.jp

To assess the significance of reversed circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythms as a predictive factor of vascular events in NIDDM, vital status after an average 4-year follow-up was determined in 325 NIDDM subjects in whom the circadian BP profile had been monitored between 1988 and 1996. Circadian BP rhythm was analyzed by the COSINOR (a compound word for cosine and vector) method, as previously described. After exclusion of 37 dropped-out subjects, 288 were recruited to the further analysis, of which 201 had a normal circadian BP rhythm (group N) and the remaining 87 had a reversed one (group R). There was no difference in sex, HbA1c, the prevalence of smokers, serum lipids, or serum electrolytes between groups N and R at baseline, whereas age, the prevalence of hypertension, serum creatinine, and diabetic complications were more pronounced in group R than in group N. During the follow-up period (which averaged 52 months in group N and 36 months in group R), fatal and nonfatal vascular (cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, peripheral vascular arteries, and retinal artery) events occurred in 20 subjects in group N and 56 in group R. Unadjusted survival times and event-free times were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method, and there was a significant difference in both unadjusted survival and event-free survival rates between groups N and R (P < 0.001 each; log-rank test). The Cox proportional-hazards model adjusted for age, sex, circadian BP pattern, duration of diabetes, therapy for diabetes, various diabetic complications, and hypertension demonstrated that circadian BP pattern and age exhibited significant, high adjusted relative risks for fatal events, and that diabetic nephropathy, postural hypotension, and hypertension as well as circadian BP pattern exhibited significant, high adjusted relative risks with respect to the occurrence of various nonfatal vascular events. These results suggest that reversed circadian BP rhythm is associated with occurrences of both fatal and nonfatal vascular events in NIDDM subjects.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. Nakano, K. Konishi, K. Furuya, K. Uehara, M. Nishizawa, A. Nakagawa, T. Kigoshi, and K. Uchida
A Prognostic Role of Mean 24-h Pulse Pressure Level for Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects Under 60 Years of Age
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2005; 28(1): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. Verdecchia, F. Angeli, and R. Gattobigio
Clinical Usefulness of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2004; 15(90010): S30 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
K. Eguchi, K. Kario, and K. Shimada
Greater Impact of Coexistence of Hypertension and Diabetes on Silent Cerebral Infarcts
Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2471 - 2474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. L. Clement, M. L. De Buyzere, D. A. De Bacquer, P. W. de Leeuw, D. A. Duprez, R. H. Fagard, P. J. Gheeraert, L. H. Missault, J. J. Braun, R. O. Six, et al.
Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Recordings in Patients with Treated Hypertension
N. Engl. J. Med., June 12, 2003; 348(24): 2407 - 2415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Covic and D. Goldsmith
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: an essential tool for blood pressure assessment in uraemic patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 1737 - 1741.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Verdecchia, G. Reboldi, C. Porcellati, G. Schillaci, S. Pede, M. Bentivoglio, F. Angeli, S. Norgiolini, and G. Ambrosio
Risk of cardiovascular disease in relation to achieved office and ambulatory blood pressure control in treated hypertensive subjects
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 878 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. Ritz, V. Schwenger, M. Zeier, and I. Rychlik
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: fancy gadgetry or clinically useful exercise?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1550 - 1554.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
P. L. Poulsen, E. Ebbehøj, H. Arildsen, S. T. Knudsen, K. W. Hansen, H. Mølgaard, and C. E. Mogensen
Increased QTc Dispersion Is Related to Blunted Circadian Blood Pressure Variation in Normoalbuminuric Type 1 Diabetic Patients
Diabetes, April 1, 2001; 50(4): 837 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. Verdecchia
Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood Pressure : Current Evidence and Clinical Implications
Hypertension, March 1, 2000; 35(3): 844 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. Ritz and S. R. Orth
Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
N. Engl. J. Med., October 7, 1999; 341(15): 1127 - 1133.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1998 by the American Diabetes Association.