Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heise, T.
Right arrow Articles by Draeger, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heise, T.
Right arrow Articles by Draeger, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes 53:1614-1620, 2004
© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.

Lower Within-Subject Variability of Insulin Detemir in Comparison to NPH Insulin and Insulin Glargine in People With Type 1 Diabetes

Tim Heise1, Leszek Nosek1, Birgitte Biilmann Rønn2, Lars Endahl2, Lutz Heinemann1, Christoph Kapitza1, and Eberhard Draeger2

1 Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung, Neuss, Germany
2 Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark

The aim of this randomized double-blind study was to compare the within-subject variability of the glucose-lowering effect of a novel insulin analog, insulin detemir, with that of insulin glargine and NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes. Fifty-four subjects (32 males and 22 females, age 38 ± 10 years [mean ± SD], BMI 24 ± 2 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.5 ± 1.2%, diabetes duration 18 ± 9 years) participated in this parallel group comparison. Each subject received four single subcutaneous doses of 0.4 units/kg of either insulin detemir (n = 18), insulin glargine (n = 16), or human NPH insulin (n = 17) under euglycemic glucose clamp conditions (target blood glucose concentration 5.5 mmol/l) on four identical study days. The pharmacodynamic (glucose infusion rates [GIRs]) and pharmacokinetic (serum concentrations of insulin detemir, human insulin, and insulin glargine) properties of the basal insulin preparations were recorded for 24 h postdosing. Insulin detemir was associated with significantly less within-subject variability than both NPH insulin and insulin glargine, as assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV) for the pharmacodynamic end points studied [GIR-AUC(0–12 h) 27% (detemir) vs. 59% (NPH) vs. 46% (glargine); GIR-AUC(0–24 h) 27 vs. 68 vs. 48%; GIRmax 23 vs. 46 vs. 36%; P < 0.001 for all comparisons]. Insulin detemir also provided less within-subject variability in the pharmacokinetic end points: maximal concentration (Cmax) 18 vs. 24 vs. 34%; INS-AUC(0–{infty}) 14 vs. 28 vs. 33%. The results suggest that insulin detemir has a significantly more predictable glucose-lowering effect than both NPH insulin and insulin glargine.


Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tim Heise, MD, Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung, Hellersbergstr. 9, D-41460 Neuss, Germany. E-mail: tim.heise{at}profil-research.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. E. Fineberg, T. T. Kawabata, D. Finco-Kent, R. J. Fountaine, G. L. Finch, and A. S. Krasner
Immunological Responses to Exogenous Insulin
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2007; 28(6): 625 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
F. Porcellati, P. Rossetti, N. R. Busciantella, S. Marzotti, P. Lucidi, S. Luzio, D. R. Owens, G. B. Bolli, and C. G. Fanelli
Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics of the Long-Acting Insulin Analogs Glargine and Detemir at Steady State in Type 1 Diabetes: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2447 - 2452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
K. Rave, A. de la Pena, F. S. Tibaldi, L. Zhang, B. Silverman, M. Hausmann, L. Heinemann, and D. B. Muchmore
AIR Inhaled Insulin in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Pharmacokinetics, glucodynamics, safety, and tolerability
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(7): 1777 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
K. Ekstrom, J. Salemyr, I. Zachrisson, C. Carlsson-Skwirut, E. Ortqvist, and P. Bang
Normalization of the IGF-IGFBP Axis by Sustained Nightly Insulinization in Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2007; 30(6): 1357 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. Hassan
Hyperglycemia management in the hospital setting
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2007; 64(10_Supplement_6): S9 - S14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
F. Porcellati, P. Rossetti, N. B. Ricci, S. Pampanelli, E. Torlone, S. H. Campos, A. M. Andreoli, G. B. Bolli, and C. G. Fanelli
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Long-Acting Insulin Analog Glargine After 1 Week of Use Compared With Its First Administration in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2007; 30(5): 1261 - 1263.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
M. C. Jones and M. Patel
Insulin detemir: A long-acting insulin product
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 15, 2006; 63(24): 2466 - 2472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
K. Hermansen, M. Davies, T. Derezinski, G. Martinez Ravn, P. Clauson, P. Home, and on behalf of the Levemir Treat-to-Target Study Gro
A 26-Week, Randomized, Parallel, Treat-to-Target Trial Comparing Insulin Detemir With NPH Insulin as Add-On Therapy to Oral Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Insulin-Naive People With Type 2 Diabetes.
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2006; 29(6): 1269 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. S. Schade and V. Valentine
Counterpoint: Are Insulin Pumps Underutilized in Type 1 Diabetes? No.
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2006; 29(6): 1453 - 1455.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. Wiesli, C. Schmid, O. Kerwer, C. Nigg-Koch, R. Klaghofer, B. Seifert, G. A. Spinas, and K. Schwegler
Acute Psychological Stress Affects Glucose Concentrations in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Following Food Intake but not in the Fasting State
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2005; 28(8): 1910 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. Plank, M. Bodenlenz, F. Sinner, C. Magnes, E. Gorzer, W. Regittnig, L. A. Endahl, E. Draeger, M. Zdravkovic, and T. R. Pieber
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Dose-Response Study Investigating the Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Long-Acting Insulin Analog Detemir
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2005; 28(5): 1107 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. D Goldman-Levine and K. W Lee
Insulin Detemir--A New Basal Insulin Analog
Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2005; 39(3): 502 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2004 by the American Diabetes Association.