Diabetes 54:2235-2244, 2005 © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc. Long-Term Treatment With Rosiglitazone and Metformin Reduces the Extent of, but Does Not Prevent, Islet Amyloid Deposition in Mice Expressing the Gene for Human Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
1 Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Islet amyloid deposition in type 2 diabetes is associated with reduced ß-cell mass. Therefore, interventions aimed at reducing islet amyloid formation may help preserve ß-cell mass in type 2 diabetes. Rosiglitazone and metformin act by different mechanisms to improve insulin sensitivity and thereby reduce ß-cell secretory demand, resulting in decreased release of insulin and islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP), the unique constituent of islet amyloid deposits. We hypothesized that this reduced ß-cell secretory demand would lead to reduced islet amyloid formation. Human IAPP (hIAPP) transgenic mice, a model of islet amyloid, were treated for 12 months with rosiglitazone (1.5 mg · kg–1 · day–1, n = 19), metformin (1 g · kg–1 · day–1, n = 18), or control (n = 17). At the end of the study, islet amyloid prevalence (percent islets containing amyloid) and severity (percent islet area occupied by amyloid), islet mass, ß-cell mass, and insulin release were determined. Islet amyloid prevalence (44 ± 8, 13 ± 4, and 11 ± 3% for control, metformin-, and rosiglitazone-treated mice, respectively) and severity (9.2 ± 3.0, 0.22 ± 0.11, and 0.10 ± 0.05% for control, metformin-, and rosiglitazone-treated mice, respectively) were markedly reduced with both rosiglitazone (P < 0.001 for both measures) and metformin treatment (P < 0.001 for both measures). Both treatments were associated with reduced insulin release assessed as the acute insulin response to intravenous glucose (2,189 ± 857, 621 ± 256, and 14 ± 158 pmol/l for control, metformin-, and rosiglitazone-treated mice, respectively; P < 0.05 for metformin vs. control and P < 0.005 for rosiglitazone vs. control), consistent with reduced secretory demand. Similarly, islet mass (33.4 ± 7.0, 16.6 ± 3.6, and 12.2 ± 2.1 mg for control, metformin-, and rosiglitazone-treated mice, respectively) was not different with metformin treatment (P = 0.06 vs. control) but was significantly lower with rosiglitazone treatment (P < 0.05 vs. control). When the decreased islet mass was accounted for, the islet amyloid–related decrease in ß-cell mass (percent ß-cell mass/islet mass) was ameliorated in both rosiglitazone- and metformin-treated animals (57.9 ± 3.1, 64.7 ± 1.4, and 66.1 ± 1.6% for control, metformin-, and rosiglitazone-treated mice, respectively; P < 0.05 for metformin or rosiglitazone vs. control). In summary, rosiglitazone and metformin protect ß-cells from the deleterious effects of islet amyloid, and this effect may contribute to the ability of these treatments to alleviate the progressive loss of ß-cell mass and function in type 2 diabetes.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Rebecca L. Hull, PhD, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System (151), 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108. E-mail: rhull{at}u.washington.edu
Abbreviations: hIAPP, human islet amyloid polypeptide; hIAPP-LI, human IAPP-like immunoreactivity; IAPP, islet amyloid polypeptide; IRI, immunoreactive insulin
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||