© 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
The Proline 12 Alanine Substitution in the Peroxisome ProliferatorActivated Receptor-
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a nuclear receptor regulating lipid and glucose metabolism, and a PPAR-responsive element is present in the LPL promoter. We determined the Pro12Ala polymorphism in the PPAR-
2 gene in 194 male CAD patients because this allele is associated with decreased PPAR activity and reduced LPL promoter activity in vitro. Presence of 12Ala was associated with 20% lower LPL activity in postheparin plasma (141 ± 58 vs. 177 ± 77 nmol · ml-1 · min-1, P < 0.005). Remarkably, the influence of 12Ala on LPL was greater than that of the frequent polymorphisms (HindIII +9%, PvuII ±0%, 447stop +12%) in the LPL gene itself. To confirm these results in a different group of patients, we analyzed 100 diabetic patients in whom the 12Ala allele was also associated with lower LPL activity (12Ala: 132 ± 88 vs. 190 ± 129 nmol · ml-1 · min-1, P < 0.05). Our data demonstrate that the Pro12Ala substitution in PPAR-
2 is associated with lower LPL activity in vivo and provides a new target for the analysis of genetic influences on LPL activity and CAD risk.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PPAR-
is a transcription factor that belongs to the nuclear receptor family. In humans, alternate use of promoters and differential splicing of PPAR-
results in three different isoforms, PPAR-
1, PPAR-
2, and PPAR-
3. The three isoforms differ in their tissue distribution, but all of them are expressed in adipose tissue, where PPAR-
2 predominates. The PPARs have been implicated in the regulation of adipocyte differentiation and lipid and fatty acid metabolism. They also play a role in glucose homeostasis as molecular targets for thiazolidinediones (4).
PPAR-
induces the transcription of target genes after ligand-dependent activation (5) or in a ligand-independent manner (6). A rare mutation (Pro115Glu) in the ligand-independent activation domain suggested a possibly distinct and essential role of the PPAR-
2 isoform in obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes and, moreover, a possible explanation of this effect by functional differences in the NH2 terminus (7).
Recently, a Pro12Ala substitution in exon B of PPAR-
2 was reported to be associated with lower BMI, improved insulin sensitivity, and higher HDL cholesterol in a Finnish population of middle-aged men and women (8). In a multiple-sample study on genetic associations of diabetes, the 12Ala allele was less frequent among patients with type 2 diabetes (9). PPAR-
function appears to be a key factor in mediating conditions such as dyslipidemia, obesity, and insulin resistance and has also been implicated in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Because the LPL promoter was shown to be
30% less efficiently transactivated in the presence of the Ala allele in PPAR-
2 in vitro (8), we hypothesized that the Pro12Ala substitution may lead to decreased LPL activity in vivo.
To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of the Pro12Ala substitution on common metabolic variables and LPL activity in 194 male patients who underwent elective coronary angiography. The allele frequency of the Pro12Ala substitution in PPAR-
was 0.103 and therefore within the range of earlier publications. Table 1 shows the anthropometric and metabolic parameters of the 194 male patients according to PPAR-
2 genotype. 12Ala was associated with a highly significant, 20% lower LPL activity (141 ± 58 vs. 177 ± 77 nmol · ml-1 · min-1, P < 0.005) (Fig. 1). Of this group, 32 patients had type 2 diabetes. When these patients were omitted from the analysis, those in whom the polymorphism was present also had significantly lower LPL activity (n = 36, 135 ± 49 vs. 172 ± 70 nmol · ml-1 · min-1, P = 0.001).
|
|
2 polymorphism was not in linkage dysequilibrium with the LPL polymorphisms. To simultaneously quantitate the effect of the four polymorphisms, we performed a multivariate regression analysis with LPL activity as the dependent variable. Of the four tested polymorphisms, only Pro12Ala was significantly associated with LPL activity (P = 0.005), and it was the only variable with a value >2.0 in the T statistics. These data demonstrate that the influence of the Pro12Ala polymorphism in the PPAR-
2 gene on LPL activity is significantly greater than that of the polymorphisms in the LPL gene itself.
|
|
2 polymorphism on LPL gene expression is most likely due to an effect on a functional PPAR response element in the LPL promoter (3), and the lower transactivation capacity of the PPAR-
2 isoform on the LPL gene seen in vitro (8). The effect of the Pro12Ala polymorphism on LPL activity that we found in vivo was greater than that of the common polymorphisms in the LPL gene itself, and it was independent of age, BMI, lipid levels, diabetic control, and insulin levels (Tables 1 and 2) as well as medication (data not shown). Stepwise multiple regression analysis confirmed that the association of the Pro12Ala polymorphism with LPL activity was independent of potential confounding factors such as age, BMI, insulin levels, hypertension, and pack-years (data not shown). Our data of the association of a PPAR-
2 polymorphism that is characterized by lower transcriptional activity with lower LPL activity in vivo supports the recent observation that treatment with troglitazone, a PPAR-
agonist, increases LPL concentration in postheparin plasma (12).
|
2 is mainly expressed in adipose tissue, and the effect of the PPAR-
2 polymorphism we observed on LPL activity in vivo was only slightly smaller than that seen in vitro (8). This suggests that a significant portion, perhaps even the majority of postheparin LPL activity, is derived from adipose tissue. Lower plasma LPL activity as well as mutations and polymorphisms in the LPL gene have been suggested to be proatherogenic (14,15,16) and associated with endothelial dysfunction (17). LPL activity in postheparin plasma is difficult to measure and appears to be an insensitive measure of CAD risk (18). The identification of a novel genetic factor modulating LPL activity in vivo will therefore help to elucidate the influence of LPL on CAD risk.
In summary, our data show that the Pro12Ala polymorphism in the PPAR-
2 gene significantly modulates LPL activity in patients, and that the influence on LPL activity is greater than that of the frequent polymorphisms within the LPL gene itself. These findings provide a new target for the analysis of genetic influences on LPL activity and CAD risk.
| RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Determination of LPL activity.
EDTA blood was obtained before and 10 min after a bolus injection of heparin (60 IU/kg body wt). The samples were immediately chilled to 4°C, centrifuged, divided into aliquots, flash-frozen on dry ice, and stored at -70°C until assayed. Pre- and postheparin LPL activity was quantified using a triolein-phosphatidylcholine emulsion. Lipase activity is expressed as nanomoles of free fatty acids released per milliliter per minute.
Genotyping.
Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood, using the QIAmp Blood kit (Qiagen). The Pro12Ala genotype in exon B of PPAR
2 was determined by modifying PCR, followed by digestion with the restriction endonuclease BstUI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and agarose gel electrophoresis, as described elsewhere (19). Additionally, three common polymorphisms within the gene for LPL were determined in the 194 male patients, as described elsewhere (20).
Statistical analysis.
Data are means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows, release 10.05 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). A
2 analysis was used to evaluate the allelic and genotypic frequencies that were calculated from the observed genotypic counts and to assess Hardy-Weinberg expectations. Two-tailed bivariate correlations were determined by the Pearson coefficient for parameters with normal distribution, and with the Spearman coefficient for parameters with other distributions. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of independent variables on LPL activity. Because of the small number of Ala/Ala homozygous subjects, they were combined with the Pro12Ala heterozygous group for statistical analysis. Comparisons of quantitative variables between the two sets of patients were performed by the unpaired t test and the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication 28 June 2001 and accepted in revised form 28 November 2001.
CAD, coronary artery disease; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Knouff and J. Auwerx Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Calls for Activation in Moderation: Lessons from Genetics and Pharmacology Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2004; 25(6): 899 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Masud and S Ye Effect of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-{gamma} gene Pro12Ala variant on body mass index: a meta-analysis J. Med. Genet., October 1, 2003; 40(10): 773 - 780. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kolehmainen, M. I. J. Uusitupa, E. Alhava, M. Laakso, and H. Vidal Effect of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism in the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) {gamma}2 Gene on the Expression of PPAR{gamma} Target Genes in Adipose Tissue of Massively Obese Subjects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 1717 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Diabetes | Diabetes Care | Clinical Diabetes | Diabetes Spectrum |