Diabetes 51:1779-1784, 2002 © 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc. Inhibition of Thrombin Abrogates the Instant Blood-Mediated Inflammatory Reaction Triggered by Isolated Human IsletsPossible Application of the Thrombin Inhibitor Melagatran in Clinical Islet Transplantation
1 Department of Radiology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Division of Clinical Immunology, the Rudbeck Laboratory, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
A thrombotic/inflammatory reaction is elicited when isolated islets of Langerhans come in contact with ABO-compatible blood. The detrimental effects of this instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) provide a reasonable explanation for the observation that an unexpectedly high number of islets, from several donors, are needed to produce normoglycemia in transplant patients with type 1 diabetes. In this study, the hypothesis that a specific thrombin inhibitor, Melagatran, could reduce IBMIR in an in vitro model in which human islets are exposed to ABO-compatible blood was tested. The administration of Melagatran abrogated IBMIR dose-dependently. Islets exposed to blood, in the absence or presence of 0.4 µmol/l Melagatran, exhibited a loss of integrity and were found to be trapped in macroscopic clots containing platelets and CD11b+ leukocytes. At concentrations from 1 to 10 µmol/l, Melagatran inhibited both coagulation and complement activation. Also, platelet and leukocyte activation and consumption were decreased. Islet morphology was maintained with almost no platelets adhering to the surface, and infiltration by CD11b+ leukocytes was considerably reduced. In conclusion, Melagatran significantly reduced IBMIR in this model system. This protective effect indicates that thrombin plays a pivotal role in IBMIR and suggests that thrombin inhibition can improve the outcome of clinical islet transplantation.
A major breakthrough was made in the use of clinical islet transplantation as a cure for type 1 diabetes when Shapiro et al. (1) demonstrated that insulin independence could be obtained using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen. However, islets from more than one donor were needed to achieve insulin independence (1). In a follow-up study, it was estimated that the metabolic capacity in these patients corresponded to only 20% of that in healthy subjects (2). Because glucocorticoids had not been used and thus could not have been responsible for any adverse effects on islet function, the authors concluded that some other adverse process(es) must be involved in the loss of islet tissue. We have previously reported that a thrombotic/inflammatory reaction is elicited when islets come in direct contact with blood in an in vitro tubing loop model. Similar reactions have also been observed in clinical islet transplantation (3) and in vivo in an allogenic pig model of intraportal islet transplantation (4). The detrimental effects of this instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) could provide a reasonable explanation for the relatively low success rate in clinical islet transplantations and could explain the need for islets from several donors to obtain normoglycemia in the transplantation series performed by Shapiro and co-workers (1,2). The initial event in IBMIR is a rapid loss of platelets, with a simultaneous secretion of ß-thromboglobulin (ß-TG) that indicates platelet activation. At the same time, activated platelets bind to the islets and contribute to a continuous fibrin formation that eventually generates a capsule containing platelets and infiltrating CD11b+ leukocytes. Extensive generation of the coagulation and complement activation products thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) and FXIa-antithrombin (FXIa-AT) complexes, C3a, and sC5b-9 indicate that both the complement and coagulation cascade systems have been activated. Taken together, these reactions point toward a platelet-amplified reaction. A strategy to prevent or decrease IBMIR could be of utmost importance in minimizing islet loss in the immediate posttransplantation period. Several steps in the process of IBMIR could serve as targets for pharmacological intervention as a means of preventing the reaction and promoting engraftment of the islets. One obvious candidate drug that affects platelet function is acetylsalicylic acid. However, in doses required to inhibit platelet aggregation completely, we have not observed any effects on IBMIR in vitro in the tubing loop model (unpublished observations). Another approach to affect platelet function is to inhibit thrombin. Thrombin, a serine proteinase generated from the zymogen prothrombin, is considered to be the key enzyme in the clotting reaction. Thrombin is a potent platelet activator, acting via the specific cell-surface receptors PAR-1 and PAR-4 (5,6). Thrombin-activated platelets provide an appropriate surface for the assembly of coagulation complexes involved in the amplification of the clotting cascade (7). Several established thrombin inhibitors are available, including unfractionated heparin (8) and hirudin (9). These drugs, however, are limited in terms of their efficacy and safety because of a narrow therapeutic window and poor penetration into the thrombus (10). In the present study, we examined the effect of a reversible and highly specific low-molecular-weight inhibitor of thrombin, Melagatran (Astra Zeneca, Hässle, Gothenburg, Sweden) (1115). Because of its small size (430 Da) and high affinity, the drug has the ability to inhibit thrombin rapidly also within the developing clot (16). Melagatran has been used extensively in clinical studies and shown to have a wide therapeutic window, with minimal bleeding complications (12,16). By using this inhibitor in an in vitro tubing loop model, we have been able to investigate the role of thrombin in the thrombotic reaction elicited when human islets come in contact with ABO-compatible blood. Our findings indicate that thrombin may play an important role in the IBMIR reaction that occurs under these conditions and that Melagatran may be effective in reducing the adverse effects of IBMIR in clinical islet transplantation.
Islet isolation. Pancreata were obtained from cadaver donors after consent was obtained either from the organ donor registry or from relatives. The organs were obtained from three female and two male normoglycemic donors (aged 5985 years, three with blood group O and two with blood group A). The islets were isolated at the Division of Clinical Immunology at the University of Uppsala using a modification of previously described semiautomated digestion-filtration methods (1719). This isolation procedure was followed by further purification on a continuous density gradient in a refrigerated COBE 2991 centrifuge (COBE Blood Component Technology, Lakewood, CO). The islets were placed in untreated culture flasks and maintained in suspension culture at 37°C (5% CO2) for 15 days. The culture medium (CMRL 1066; ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, CA) was changed every other day. The volume and purity of the islets were determined by microscopic sizing on a grid after staining with diphenylthiocarbazone. The purity of the islet preparations used in this study ranged from 40 to 95% (70 ± 6.3%). Viability was assessed in terms of insulin secretion in response to a glucose challenge in a dynamic perfusion system (in 1.67 mmol/l glucose, then in 16.7 mmol/l, and finally back to 1.67 mmol/l) in the presence and absence of 10 µmol/l Melagatran.
Heparin treatment.
Preparation of blood.
Tubing loops as a model. A rocking apparatus, placed in a 37°C incubator, was used to generate blood flow inside the loops. The loops were rocked at a setting that prevented the blood from coming in contact with the connectors. Up to 12 devices could be rocked at the same time. Ten 60-min islet experiments were performed, with islets isolated from five different donors.
Melagatran, dissolved in 5 mmol/l citrate buffer containing 0.15 mol/l NaCl (pH 5.5), was tested at 0, 0.4, 1, 4, and 10 µmol/l. For each experiment, two loops of fresh human blood without islets, one containing CMRL 1066 (GibcoBRL) and one containing 10 µmol/l Melagatran, were included as controls. Fresh ABO-compatible human blood from the same donor (5 ml) was added to each loop. The loops were placed on the rocking device for a 10-min preincubation with Melagatran or citrate buffer. Thereafter, the loops were opened, and 150 µl CMRL 1066, with or without 4 µl islets ( After every perfusion, the loop contents were filtered through 70-µm-diameter filters (Filcons, Cuptype; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). Both macroscopic blood clots and tissue recovered on the filters were frozen in liquid nitrogen for immunohistochemical staining. For immunohistochemical comparison, nonperfused islets were also frozen and stained by the same procedure. The remaining filtered blood was collected in 4.1 mmol/l EDTA (final concentration) and used for hematologic analysis (platelets, lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes) and assays of coagulation activation (prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, TAT and FXIa-AT), complement activation (C3a and sC5b-9), platelet activation (ß-TG), and insulin. Samples taken at 0 min were also included. In these samples, the blood was not added to the tubing loop but was instead transferred immediately to the EDTA-containing tubes. The blood samples were centrifuged at 4°C at 3,290g for 20 min, and the plasma was collected and stored at -70°C until analyzed.
Activation of complement in wells of microtiter plates. To detect bound C3 fragments, we washed the wells of the microtiter plates with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 20 and incubated with 100 µl of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-C3c (DAKO) for 60 min at 37°C. The binding of antibody was detected by the addition of 1,2-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Buchs, Fluka, Switzerland), and the staining was monitored at 492 nm.
Blood and plasma analysis.
Enzyme immunoassays
FXIa-AT.
ß-TG.
C3a.
sC5b-9.
Insulin.
Immunohistochemical staining.
Statistical analysis.
Islet function is not affected by Melagatran. To confirm that Melagatran had no adverse effect on islet function, we cultured islets at 10 µmol/l Melagatran for 3 days and then tested them in a dynamic perfusion system in which insulin secretion was assessed after stimulation with glucose. Melagatran showed no effect on islet function (Fig. 1).
Perfusion of human islets with fresh human ABO-compatible blood in the tubing loop model. Glucose concentrations in the blood before islet perfusion ranged from 4.5 to 7.4 mmol/l. After a 60-min incubation of fresh nonanticoagulated human blood without islets in the control tubing loops, a slight drop was seen in the blood cell counts when compared with the 0-min samples (Table 1). In addition, increases (3- to nearly 50-fold) in the coagulation (TAT, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, and FXIa-AT), platelet (ß-TG), and complement (C3a and sC5b-9) parameters were seen (Table 1). All of these alterations, however, were in absolute values small and considered to be normal background changes resulting from interactions of the blood with the tubing surface and the fluid-air interphase.
In tubing loops without Melagatran, nearly all of the platelets were consumed after 60 min (Table 1), concurrently with a pronounced secretion of ß-TG. Granulocytes and monocytes were also consumed after 60 min, whereas lymphocytes were essentially unaffected. In addition, in the absence of Melagatran, macroscopic clotting was seen and was accompanied by a significant rise in TAT, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, and FXIa-AT complex levels. Marked increases in the complement activation product C3a and in plasma insulin levels were also observed; also, sC5b-9 increased but to a lesser extent.
Melagatran inhibits IBMIR in a dose-dependent manner.
To investigate whether Melagatran had any direct effect on the complement system, we tested its effects in human serum in which complement was activated on the polystyrene surface of microtiter plate wells (Fig. 3). Melagatran had no effect on the binding of C3 fragments to the polystyrene surface or on the generation of C3a, indicating that it does not directly affect the complement serine proteases.
Immunohistochemical staining of human islets after perfusion in the tubing loop model.
In contrast, islets that had been incubated with fresh human blood in the presence of 10 µmol/l Melagatran showed no signs of clot formation. There were almost no CD41+ platelets surrounding the islet surface (Fig. 4C), and only a few CD11b+ cells were found to have penetrated into the islets (Fig 4D). No CD41+ or CD11b+ staining was observed in control islets that had not been exposed to blood (not shown).
In the present study, we demonstrated that Melagatran is a potent inhibitor of the thrombotic IBMIRs that occur in vitro when human islets come in contact with ABO-compatible blood. In this system, the inhibition of thrombin by Melagatran completely blocked the generation of prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 and of TAT. Production of prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 directly reflects the cleavage of prothrombin to thrombin, whereas the binding of TAT mirrors the proteolytic function of thrombin (26). Notably, the concentration of Melagatran needed to inhibit the generation of prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 was higher than that for TAT, suggesting that the thrombin activity was relatively more affected than was the generation of thrombin. Similarly, other parameters reflecting the proteolytic function of thrombin, such as FXIa-AT generation and platelet activation, were affected to the same extent as TAT. A possible explanation for this discrepancy between actual thrombin generation and thrombin function lies in the fact that thrombin is generated by two pathways: the tissue factor pathway (extrinsic pathway) and an amplification loop involving the intrinsic pathway (27). Whereas the intrinsic pathway is driven directly by thrombin and therefore can be inhibited by Melagatran, the tissue factor pathway is initially independent of thrombin. However, in later stages, this pathway of coagulation activation is amplified by thrombin-activated platelets. This difference might explain why Melagatran was able to inhibit the generation of prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 only at the highest concentration, when no further platelet activation occurred. Notably, complement activation was also completely abrogated by Melagatran. This effect was evident even at a low concentration (1 µmol/l) of Melagatran. To rule out the possibility that Melagatran nonspecifically inhibited complement serine proteinases, we applied a serum system in which complement was activated on a polystyrene surface. In this model, with no islets present, concentrations of up to 10 µmol/l Melagatran showed no inhibitory effect on complement activation. Because Melagatran abrogated the complement activation observed in blood containing islets, it seems that the clotting reaction of IBMIR was responsible for this activation. Complement activation in IBMIR seems to play a central role in regulating islet infiltration by CD11b+ cells because sCR1 in combination with heparin can inhibit this leukocyte infiltration (4). However, heparin alone, even in high doses (not clinically applicable), is unable to abrogate complement activation and leukocyte infiltration (4). Notably, despite the combined treatment of sCR1 and heparin in high concentration, extensive platelet accumulation and fibrin formation around the islets were observed. In contrast, Melagatran alone had a pronounced inhibitory effect not only on complement and coagulation activation but also on the number of platelets that adhered to the islet surface and the number of infiltrating leukocytes. Administration of Melagatran in the loop model abrogated platelet consumption as well as PMN and monocyte consumption. Our immunohistochemical analyses showed that platelet binding was considerably diminished, although trace amounts of platelets surrounding the islets were still observed. The effect of these remaining platelets is, however, not necessarily a disadvantage. Animal studies have shown that after transplantation, at least 1 week elapses before revascularization of the islets (28). Platelets contain a number of important growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor (29,30), that may support revascularization and islet engraftment in the liver. This possibility is supported by previous studies demonstrating that blood-borne metastatic cells are dependent on platelet adhesion as they bind to the endothelium of distant organs and invade and colonize these sites (30). Moreover, platelet adherence to tumor cells and the capacity to form metastases are attenuated in P-selectindeficient mice (31). In clinical islet transplantation, when islets are embolized into the portal vein, a wreath of adhering platelets might, in a similar way, support their engraftment and survival in the liver tissue. Hence, a complete blockade of IBMIR is not necessarily the optimal strategy for intraportal islet transplantation; instead, a fine-tuned balance between successful islet engraftment and thrombosis might be preferred. Our data indicate that Melagatran at the highest concentration tested (10 µmol/l) did not exert any toxic effect on the islets or abrogate glucose-induced insulin secretion. Consequently, the unexpectedly high insulin release registered in the loop with both Melagatran and islets present (Table 1) was not related to any toxic effect of Melagatran. Similarly, a high level of insulin release was observed in our previous study (4) in which IBMIR was inhibited by the combined effects of heparin and sCR1. A potential explanation for the high insulin levels observed in the loops where clotting was prevented is the mechanical force, created by the blood flow in the loops, exerted on the islets. In contrast, in loops with no Melagatran added, the islets are buried in blood clots, which protect the islets from mechanical stress. In the present study, the most striking effects of Melagatran were seen at 14 µmol/l, a range that is approximately 310 times higher than that used in patients being treated for deep venous thrombosis (16). An in vitro system generates more thrombin and consumes more prothrombin than would be the case in the dynamic in vivo situation. Thus, inhibition of thrombin in vitro usually requires much higher concentrations of an inhibitor. The concentration of Melagatran required to abrogate IBMIR in clinical islet transplantation therefore must be estimated from data in preclinical animal studies. Melagatran can also be given orally as a prodrug (32). Under these conditions, the concentration in the portal vein, into which the islets are injected, will be higher than the rest of the circulation. In conclusion, the present study indicates that thrombin is the main driving force in platelet, coagulation, and complement activation during the process of IBMIR. Our results suggest that Melagatran, an effective inhibitor of thrombin activity, is a possible candidate drug for protecting the islets from IBMIR in clinical islet transplantation. Forthcoming animal studies should indicate whether Melagatran alone is able to control IBMIR in vivo or whether the thrombin inhibitor should be combined with some additional drug.
This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (16P-13568 and 16X-12219), the Åke Wiberg Foundation, the Nordic Insulin Fund, the Torsten and Ragnar Söderbergs Foundation, the Ernfors Family Fund, Barn Diabetes Fonden, the Göran Gustafsson Foundation, the Swedish Diabetes Association, the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation, and the Novo Nordic Foundation. We thank Margareta Engkvist, Selina Bari, and Ulrika Johansson for excellent technical assistance.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Bo Nilsson, MD, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Division of Clinical Immunology, the Rudbeck Laboratory, University Hospital, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail: bo.nilsson{at}klinimm.uu.se. Received for publication 5 November 2001 and accepted in revised form 25 February 2002. ß-TG, ß-thromboglobulin; FXIa-AT, factor XIa-antithrombin complex; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; IBMIR, instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction; PMN, polymorphonuclear cells; TAT, thrombin-antithrombin complex.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||