HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Proks, P. Articles by Ashcroft, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Proks, P. Articles by Ashcroft, F. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Sulfonylurea Stimulation of Insulin Secretion

¹ University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford University, Oxford, U.K
² Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, U.K

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
Sulfonylureas are widely used to treat type 2 diabetes because they stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic ß-cells. They primarily act by binding to the SUR subunit of the ATP-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channel and inducing channel closure. However, the channel is still able to open to a limited extent when the drug is bound, so that high-affinity sulfonylurea inhibition is not complete, even at saturating drug concentrations. K_ATP channels are also found in cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscle, but in these tissues are composed of different SUR subunits that confer different drug sensitivities. Thus tolbutamide and gliclazide block channels containing SUR1 (ß-cell type), but not SUR2 (cardiac, smooth muscle types), whereas glibenclamide, glimepiride, repaglinide, and meglitinide block both types of channels. This difference has been exploited to determine residues contributing to the sulfonylurea-binding site. Sulfonylurea block is decreased by mutations or agents (e.g., phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate) that increase K_ATP channel open probability. We now propose a kinetic model that explains this effect in terms of changes in the channel open probability and in the transduction between the drug-binding site and the channel gate. We also clarify the mechanism by which MgADP produces an apparent increase of sulfonylurea efficacy on channels containing SUR1 (but not SUR2).

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

The K_ATP channel is a hetero-octameric complex of two different types of protein subunits: an inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel, Kir6.x, and a sulfonylurea receptor, SUR (6,7). Kir6.x belongs to the family of inwardly rectifying K⁺ (Kir) channels and assembles as a tetramer to form the channel pore (Fig. 1A). Binding of ATP to the intracellular domains of this subunit produces channel inhibition (8). SUR is a member of the ABC transporter family, with 17 transmembrane helices (TMs), arranged as one group of 5 TMs, and two repeats each of 6 TMs followed by a large cytosolic loop containing consensus sequences for nucleotide binding and hydrolysis. Interaction of Mg nucleotides with the nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) mediates activation of the K_ATP channel (9–12). SUR also endows Kir6.2 with sensitivity to certain drugs, such as the inhibitory sulfonylureas and the stimulatory K⁺ channel openers (6,7).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. A: Schematic of the transmembrane topology of Kir6.2 and SUR1. B: Mean relation between gliclazide concentration and inhibition of the Kir6.2/SUR1 current, measured in inside-out patches (n = 5–8). The conductance in the presence of gliclazide (G) is expressed as a fraction of its amplitude in the absence of the drug (Gc). The line is fit to (equation 2) G/Gc = (L + (1 - L)/(1 + ([S]/IC50–1)h1)) x (1/(1 + ([S]/IC50–2)h2)), where IC50–1 = 51 nmol/l, h1 = 1.0, IC50–2 = 3.1 mmol/l, h2 = 1, and L = 0.40 (19); [S] is the concentration of sulphonylurea; IC50–1 and IC50–2 are the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations at the high- and low-affinity sites, respectively; h1 and h2 are the Hill coefficients for the high- and low-affinity sites, respectively; and L is the fraction of current that remains unblocked when all high-affinity sites are occupied.

Inhibitors of K_ATP channel activity fall into two groups: those that interact with Kir6.2 and those that interact with SUR. Imidazolines (e.g., phentolamine, cibenzoline) and antimalarials (e.g., quinine, mefloquine) block K_ATP channels by binding to Kir6.2 (16–18). In contrast, sulfonylureas (e.g., tolbutamide, gliclazide, glimepiride), and benzamido derivatives (e.g., meglitinide) close K_ATP channels by binding with high affinity to SUR (19–21). Sulfonylureas also interact with Kir6.2, but with low affinity. All drugs that block K_ATP channels stimulate insulin secretion, but only those that interact with the SUR subunit are used therapeutically to treat type 2 diabetes. Thus, in this review, we focus on how studies of recombinant K_ATP channels have helped to elucidate the molecular mechanism of sulfonylurea inhibition.

	SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP CHANNELS AT TWO SITES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
When measured in excised patches in the absence of nucleotides, sulfonylurea block of K_ATP channels is best described by a two-site model (Fig. 1B). The low-affinity site is independent of SUR, as a similar block is seen when Kir6.2 is expressed in the absence of SUR (20). The high-affinity site lies on SUR, as it is only present when SUR is coexpressed with Kir6.2. The presence of both low- and high-affinity sites for sulfonylureas on the K_ATP channel introduces important considerations when interpreting experiments with these drugs. First, at high concentrations these drugs may mediate their effects via Kir6.2, and channel inhibition therefore cannot be taken to support the idea that they interact with the sulfonylurea receptor. Second, as discussed below, different SURs endow the K_ATP channel with variable sensitivity to low concentrations of sulfonylureas, a property that can be used to distinguish the type of sulfonylurea receptor expressed in different tissues. Finally, to isolate effects mediated by the high-affinity site, it is best to use a drug that shows a wide separation between its low- and high-affinity actions, such as gliclazide or glibenclamide. The low-affinity site is of no clinical relevance, because the concentrations required to inhibit the Kir6.2 subunit are much higher than those found in the plasma of patients treated with the drugs. Thus, in this review, we focus on the high-affinity drug-binding site.

	STOICHIOMETRY

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
Because four SUR subunits contribute to the K_ATP channel complex, the question arises as to how many subunits must bind drug to close the channel. This topic is currently controversial. Dörschner et al. (22) found that the affinity of sulfonylurea binding to Kir6.2/SUR1 or Kir6.2/SUR2B channels is between three- and sevenfold lower than their potency on channel inhibition (Table 1). Consequently, they concluded that occupation of a single binding site is sufficient to induce channel closure. In contrast, Russ et al. (23) found that the concentration-response relation for [³H]glibenclamide binding to Kir6.1/SUR2B lies to the left of that for glibenclamide block of channel activity, so that the K_d is sevenfold lower than the half-maximal inhibitory concentration on channel activity (IC₅₀) (Table 1). They therefore suggested that glibenclamide can bind independently to four identical sites on the channel and that occupation of all four sites is required for channel closure (23). Interestingly, the different proposed stoichiometries arise from the different binding affinities measured by these groups (Table 1). It is not clear why the affinities were found to be so different, but possible confounding factors include the nature of the Kir6.x subunit (Kir6.2 or Kir6.1) and the nucleotide concentrations used. The conflicting results suggest that conclusions based on comparing binding affinities with potencies of channel inhibition may not be reliable.

	SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN STILL OPEN

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

The maximal extent of block at the high-affinity site can be modulated by mutations or truncations in either Kir6.2 or SUR (25–28), or by membrane phospholipids such as phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate (PIP₂) (29). All these modulators share the common property that they increase the channel P_O (25–27,30,31). We therefore simulated the effect of P_O on sulfonylurea block using the kinetic scheme given in Fig. 2B and rate constants calculated from single Kir6.2/SUR1 channel kinetics recorded in the absence and presence of gliclazide.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. A: Single-channel currents recorded at -60 mV in the absence (top) or presence (bottom) of a saturating concentration of gliclazide (10 µmol/l). B: Kinetic scheme for KATP channel gating in the presence of sulfonylureas. Agents that increase PO usually mediate their effects by increasing the burst duration and reducing the frequency of the interburst closed states (i.e., they reduce k2). The relation between k2, PO, and IC50 was derived as described previously (27). When drug is bound but untransduced, the channel can exist in states OB, C1B, or C2B. The closed states that result following the conformational change permitted by drug binding are given by CT and CT2. O, open state; C1, intraburst closed state; C2, lumped interburst closed states; gray box, burst state. C and D: Relation between channel PO and the fraction of current that remains unblocked in the presence of a saturating concentration of sulfonylurea (L) (C) or IC50 (D). The PO in the presence of sulfonylurea predicted by the kinetic scheme in B is given by where 2 = k2/k-2; = kB/k-B; TO = kTO/k-TO, and TC = kTC/k-TC. Equating Pos/PO with I/IO leads to where IC50 = 1/{ x [1 + x (Pmax - PO)]}, where GC2T,CT = GC2T - GCT. For these plots, the values of and were obtained from the IC50 and L (0.4) measured for gliclazide block of Kir6.2/SUR1 currents (19), assuming a PO of 0.32 (25). IC50 = 50 nmol/l for the high-affinity site and 3 mmol/l for the low-affinity site. E: Relation between the inhibition of the KATP current and drug concentration at various values of PO, calculated using the kinetic scheme given in B and the equations in C and D. The low-affinity block is assumed to be unchanged by alterations in channel PO, as found experimentally (25). The curves are fit to equation 2.

This model explains the incomplete block by sulfonylureas, because, even when drug is bound, the channel does not inevitably enter the closed states C_2B and C_T. Entry into these closed states is not, therefore, directly proportional to the drug concentration, and channel opening is still possible, even at very high concentrations of the drug.

The concentration-response curve for the high-affinity site is described by the following:

1

where G is the conductance in the presence of the drug, G_c is the conductance in the absence of drug, L is the fraction of current that remains unblocked in the presence of a saturating concentration of sulfonylurea, h is the Hill coefficient, and IC₅₀ is the drug concentration ([S]) at which the fraction of the current inhibitable with high affinity is blocked by 50%. The kinetic scheme depicted in Fig. 2B allowed us to derive analytical equations that could be used to calculate the relation between the channel P_O and L (Fig. 2C), and between P_O and IC₅₀ (Fig. 2D). It is clear that both L and IC₅₀ increase with P_O. The value of L reaches unity when the P_O is maximal, which, in the case of the K_ATP channel, is 0.85, so that the model predicts that there will be no channel inhibition when P_O is maximal. This has in fact been observed for channels containing the mutation C166S, which have a P_O close to maximum (27). As predicted, reducing the P_O of Kir6.2-C166S/SUR1 channels with ATP partially restored sulfonylurea sensitivity (25). The predicted effect of P_O on the concentration-response curve is illustrated in Fig. 2E, and resembles that found experimentally with increasing concentrations of PIP₂, which also increases P_O (29).

Deletion of the NH₂-terminus of Kir6.2 (Kir6.2N) results in an increase in the channel P_O and a concomitant reduction in tolbutamide block when Kir6.2N is co-expressed with SUR1 (25). The reduction in block produced by deletion of up to nine residues can be accounted for simply by the increase in P_O. However, deletion of the first fourteen NH₂-terminal residues produced a complete loss of tolbutamide inhibition, an observation that cannot be explained solely by an increase in P_O. In addition, decreasing P_O with ATP was unable to restore the tolbutamide sensitivity of this deletion mutant (25). Thus it appears that NH₂-terminal residues may be involved in transducing sulfonylurea binding to SUR1 into closure of the Kir6.2 pore.

	SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY SULFONYLUREA BLOCK

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
Studies of cloned channels have revealed that certain K_ATP channel inhibitors (tolbutamide, gliclazide, and mitiglinide) (19–21,32,33) block K_ATP channels containing SUR1, but not SUR2A or SUR2B, subunits with high affinity. In contrast, meglitinide blocks all three types of cloned K_ATP channel with similar affinities (21). This finding has been interpreted to indicate that sulfonylureas resembling tolbutamide in structure interact with a binding site that is specific to SUR1, whereas benzamido compounds and their derivatives (like meglitinide) interact with a site that is common to all SUR subtypes. Glibenclamide and glimepiride, which contain both sulfonylurea and nonsulfonylurea moieties and block both SUR1- and SUR2-containing channels, are postulated to interact with both sites on SUR1, but only a single (benzamido-derivative) site on SUR2 (21,34). The binding affinities and inhibitory potencies of these drugs for the high-affinity sites of different types of K_ATP channels are illustrated in Table 1.

	LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA BINDING SITE ON SUR

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
A single residue within the COOH-terminal set of transmembrane domains accounts for the difference in tolbutamide sensitivity of SUR1- and SUR2-containing channels. Mutation of serine 1237 in the cytoplasmic loop between TMs 15 and 16 to tyrosine abolishes the high-affinity block of Kir6.2/SUR1 channels by tolbutamide (35), mitiglinide (33), and nateglinide (55). It is likely that this residue also interacts with the sulfonylurea moiety of drugs such as glibenclamide and glimepiride. This is suggested by the fact that glibenclamide block of Kir6.2/SUR1, or native ß-cell K_ATP channels, is not easily reversed in electrophysiological recordings, whereas glibenclamide block is rapidly reversed when SUR1 contains the S1237Y mutation. Kir6.2/SUR2 channels, which already possess a tyrosine at this position, also show reversible block by glibenclamide and glimepiride. In addition, glibenclamide binding to SUR1 is greatly decreased by the S1237Y mutation (35), whereas glibenclamide binding to SUR2B is enhanced by the reverse mutation (36,37). Thus S1237 must contribute to the binding site for sulfonylureas on SUR1. It is possible that the bulkier volume of the tyrosine side chain, as compared to serine, sterically hinders the binding of the sulfonylurea moiety, thereby accounting for its inability to interact with SUR2.

The fact that glibenclamide blocks Kir6.2/SUR1-S1237Y channels indicates that residues other than S1237 are critical for binding of this drug. Likewise, the block of Kir6.2/SUR1 by meglitinide and repaglinide, which do not possess a sulfonylurea moiety, is unaltered by the S1237Y mutation (35,53), suggesting that these drugs do not interact with this residue. Recent studies have shown that two nonadjacent cytosolic loops of SUR1, linking TMs 5 and 6 and TMs 15 and 16, are critical for [³H]glibenclamide binding (38). Because the TM 15–16 loop contains S1237, this raises the possibility that the TM 5–6 loop may interact with benzamido compounds and their derivatives. Interestingly, the drug-binding site of the related ABC transporter MRP1 also involves sites in both NH₂- and COOH-terminal parts of the protein, and the TM 5–6 loop is essential for high-affinity drug binding (39).

These data do not imply that only residue S1237 in the TM 15–16 loop and unidentified residues in the TM 5–6 loop interact with sulfonylureas. However, it is clear that these residues are critical for high-affinity interactions. This suggests that despite their separate location in the primary structure of SUR, the cytosolic loops between TMs 5–6 and TMs 15–16 lie in close proximity in the three-dimensional structure of the channel. The maximal distance between them must be the length of the glibenclamide molecule (17 Å), but because the molecule is very flexible, they could be much closer. The location of the sulfonylurea binding site(s) within the cytosolic loops of SUR is consistent with earlier studies suggesting an intracellular site of action for sulfonylureas (40).

	INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND SUR

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
It is well established that the sulfonylurea receptor can modulate the activity of Kir6.2, because binding of sulfonylureas or MgADP to SUR results in a decrease or increase of channel activity, respectively. There is growing evidence that Kir6.x can also affect the properties of SUR. Co-expression of Kir6.1 with SUR2A, or mutant SUR2B, has been shown to increase the affinity of [³H]glibenclamide binding by fivefold and fourfold, respectively (23,36). An even greater increase in affinity (eightfold) was found when Kir6.2 was co-expressed with mutant SUR2B (36). Coexpression of Kir6.2 with SUR1 has variously been reported to increase the affinity of [³H]glibenclamide binding (32) and to not affect it (22,41). Interestingly, Dörschner and colleagues (22) found no change in the [³H]glibenclamide binding affinity of SUR1 or SUR2 on co-expression with Kir6.x. These discrepancies may be a result of the different experimental conditions used by the groups or different fractions of uncoupled SUR subunits in the presence of Kir6.x. It is clear that additional experiments are needed to resolve this controversy.

	MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK BY PIP2

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
The phospholipid PIP₂ reduces the maximal block produced by saturating concentrations of tolbutamide (28) and glibenclamide (29). It also increases the IC₅₀ of the drug-sensitive fraction of channels. The effects of PIP₂ are attenuated by the mutation R176A in Kir6.2 (29), which is believed to reduce PIP₂ binding to this subunit. Furthermore, negatively charged lipids reduce glibenclamide block with similar potency, whereas neutral or weakly charged lipids have no effect. As described above, the effects of PIP₂ on sulfonylurea sensitivity can be largely accounted for by the increase in channel P_O produced by the phospholipid. However, it is also possible that PIP₂ (like the NH₂-terminal deletions) has additional effects on sulfonylurea block that are masked by the effect on the channel P_O.

The amount of PIP₂ in the membrane can vary as a result of altered phospholipid metabolism. Thus PIP₂ is expected to fall in response to ischemia (because falling ATP levels reduce its generation from PIP by phosphorylation) and increase when phosphatidylinositol kinases are stimulated. This means that PIP₂ regulation of glibenclamide block will also be subject to regulation.

	MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK BY MG NUCLEOTIDES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
As Fig. 1B shows, in the excised patch, the concentration-response curve for K_ATP channel inhibition by sulfonylureas is best fit by assuming both high- and low-affinity sites, with a maximum of 60–70% block at the high-affinity site. This is not the case when sulfonylurea block is measured in whole cells. Remarkably, sulfonylureas produce complete (>90%) high-affinity inhibition of both the native ß-cell K_ATP channel (42,43) and its cloned counterpart, Kir6.2/SUR1 (44), when measured in the whole-cell configuration. This difference may arise because experiments on recombinant K_ATP channels have largely been carried out in excised patches, whereas experiments on native K_ATP channels have mainly been carried out in whole cells. We therefore compared the concentration-response curve for gliclazide block of Kir6.2/SUR1 currents in the intact cell with that in the inside-out patch.

Figure 3A and B shows that there was no significant difference in the gliclazide concentration producing half-maximal block of Kir6.2/SUR1 channels or native ß-cell K_ATP channels when measured in the whole cell (108 ± 3 and 184 ± 30 nmol/l, respectively), and the maximum block was similar, being >90% in both cases. In contrast, there was a marked difference in the maximal extent of gliclazide block of Kir6.2/SUR1 currents when measured in the intact cell and in the excised patch, which amounted to 93 and 60%, respectively.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. A: Whole-cell KATP currents recorded using a two-electrode voltage clamp from an intact oocyte expressing Kir6.2/SUR1, in response to a series of depolarizing and hyperpolarizing 10-mV pulses from a holding potential of -10 mV. Azide (3 mmol/l) and gliclazide (1 mmol/l) were added to the extracellular solution, as indicated. Methods are the same as those described in ref. 42. B: Mean relation between gliclazide concentration and inhibition of the Kir6.2/SUR1 current, measured in the intact oocyte (n = 6). The current evoked by a voltage step to -100 mV in the presence of gliclazide (I) is expressed as a fraction of its amplitude in the absence of the drug (IO). The solid line is the best fit of equation 1 to the data, with IC50 = 108 ± 3 nmol/l (n = 5), h = 0.81, and L = 0. The dotted line shows the fit obtained for gliclazide block of Kir6.2/SUR1 currents in the excised patch configuration (see Fig. 1). The dashed line shows the fit obtained for gliclazide block of the native ß-cell KATP channel in whole-cell recordings from mouse pancreatic ß-cells (IC50 = 184 nmol/l) (42). C: Relation between gliclazide concentration and inhibition of the Kir6.2/SUR1 current, measured in the inside-out patch in the presence of 100 µmol/l MgADP (n = 5). The current evoked by a voltage step to -100 mV in the presence of gliclazide (I) is expressed as a fraction of its mean amplitude in the absence of the drug (IO). The solid line is the best fit of equation 1 to the data, with IC50 = 204 nmol/l, h = 1.13, and L = 0.065. The dashed line shows the fit obtained in the absence of added nucleotide (adapted from Gribble et al. [19]).

MgADP has both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on the K_ATP channel, mediated by the SUR and Kir6.2 subunits, respectively (8). It has previously been hypothesized that the nucleotide produces an apparent enhancement of sulfonylurea block of Kir6.2/SUR1 currents, because the drug abolishes the stimulatory action of MgADP, while leaving the inhibitory effect untouched (20). Consequently, the combined inhibitory effects of sulfonylurea and nucleotide result in an enhanced inhibition. If this idea is correct, then gliclazide block of mutant K_ATP channels that show reduced nucleotide inhibition should be unaffected by MgADP.

Mutation of the arginine at position 50 of Kir6.2 to glycine (Kir6.2-R50G) strongly reduces nucleotide block at the inhibitory site on Kir6.2 (46). The extent of this reduction can be quantified by examining the effect of ADP in the absence of Mg²⁺, because, in Mg-free solution, the stimulatory effect of ADP is abolished and the inhibitory effect of ADP is unmasked (20). As Fig. 4A shows, when tested in the absence of Mg²⁺, ADP potently blocked Kir6.2/SUR1 currents, but blocked Kir6.2-R50G/SUR1 currents much less effectively (<15%). As a result of this reduction in nucleotide block, ADP produced an enhanced stimulation of Kir6.2-R50G/SUR1 currents (compared with control currents) when applied in the presence of Mg²⁺.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. A: Mean Kir6.2/SUR1 or Kir6.2-R50G/SUR1 conductance in the presence of 100 µmol/l ADP (), 100 µmol/l ADP + 2 mmol/l Mg2+ (), or 100 µmol/l ATP plus 2 mmol/l Mg2+ (). B and C: Mean Kir6.2/SUR1 or Kir6.2-R50G/SUR1 conductance in the presence of 10 µmol/l gliclazide (), 10 µmol/l gliclazide plus 100 µmol/l ADP (), or 10 µmol/l gliclazide plus 100 µmol/l ATP (), in the presence (B) or absence (C) of 2 mmol/l Mg2+. Conductance (G) is expressed as a fraction of that in the absence of the drug and nucleotide (Gc). The number of patches is given above each bar. The dashed line indicates the control conductance level.

If gliclazide prevents the stimulatory action of MgADP, and unmasks its inhibitory effect, then the combined block by gliclazide and ADP on wild-type channels should be similar in the absence and presence of Mg²⁺. This was in fact observed (Fig. 4B and C). When Mg²⁺ was absent, Kir6.2-R50G/SUR1 currents were of similar amplitude in the presence of gliclazide or gliclazide plus ADP (Fig. 4C). This is presumably because ADP did not cause substantial block of the mutant channel. Because MgATP is the predominant Mg nucleotide in vivo, we also examined the effect of gliclazide on MgATP activation. Kir6.2-R50G/SUR1 currents were activated by MgATP (Fig. 4A), because the inhibitory effect of the nucleotide was impaired by the R50G mutation (10). As with ADP, the stimulatory action of ATP in the presence of Mg²⁺ was abolished by gliclazide (Fig. 4B).

The potency of gliclazide block was significantly different when measured in the absence and presence of 100 µmol/l MgADP in excised patches (IC₅₀ of 50 and 204 nmol/l, respectively). It is therefore possible that MgADP caused a small reduction in drug potency. This might also explain why gliclazide was somewhat less potent in intact oocytes (108 nmol/l). It also would be consistent with the fact that gliclazide block of Kir6.2-R50G/SUR1 currents is less in the presence of MgADP than in its absence. Although the effects of Mg nucleotides on gliclazide binding have not been investigated, it is known that [³H]glibenclamide binding to native ß-cell K_ATP channels is decreased by MgADP (47). It is not clear whether gliclazide displaces MgADP from the nucleotide-binding domains of SUR1, or if it uncouples MgADP binding from channel activation. However, glibenclamide has been shown to cause unbinding of 8-azido-[³²P]ATP to NBD1 of SUR1 in the presence of MgADP (48), lending some support to the former hypothesis.

	TRANSDUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
Binding of sulfonylureas to the cytoplasmic domains of SUR1 ultimately results in closure of the pore formed by Kir6.2. Precisely how this transduction occurs is unknown. There must be a close physical association between the glibenclamide binding site on SUR and the Kir6.2 subunit, as both proteins can be photoaffinity labeled by [¹²⁵I]glibenclamide (7). Five residues within the first TM of Kir6.2 are essential for interaction with SUR (49), and recent studies have indicated that the first five TMs of SUR1 are also involved (50). However, although these regions are required for structural interactions, it is not clear whether they are also involved in functional coupling. Mutagenesis studies, however, have implicated the NH₂-terminus of Kir6.2 and the COOH-terminus of SUR1 in coupling sulfonylurea binding to channel inhibition (25,26).

	CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 
Sulfonylureas have been used for many years to treat type 2 diabetes, but it is only now that the details of their molecular mechanism of action are beginning to be unraveled. As first proposed by Henquin and colleagues (51), antidiabetogenic sulfonylureas, benzamido compounds, and their derivatives appear to interact with more than one part of the K_ATP channel. This suggests that, like other ATP-binding cassette transporters, SUR possesses a large multifaceted drug-binding pocket that can accommodate several structurally distinct compounds. Individual compounds differ in the residues within this pocket with which they interact. Studies of recombinant K_ATP channels suggest that the sulfonylurea moiety interacts with residues in the TM 15–16 linker of SUR1, whereas benzamido derivatives may interact with the TM 5–6 linker in the NH₂-terminal part of the protein. How these different parts of the sulfonylurea receptor contribute to drug binding, and how this is transduced into changes in channel activity, remains far from clear and awaits determination of the structure of SUR, and its relation to Kir6.2, at atomic resolution.

Currently, sulfonylureas are classified as first- and second-generation drugs, although there is no structural or functional basis for this classification. We now know that some sulfonylureas bind with high-affinity to SUR1, but not SUR2, whereas others interact with both types of SUR. We therefore propose that the classification of sulfonylureas, meglitinide derivatives, and structurally related compounds be changed to reflect the functional differences among these drugs, and that they be referred to instead as SUR1-specific and non-SUR1-specific.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank the Wellcome Trust and the Beit Memorial Trust for support. F.A. is the Royal Society GlaxoSmithKline Research Professor, P.P. is a Beit Memorial Trust Fellow, F.G. is Wellcome Trust Clinician Scientist Fellow, and F.R. is a Diabetes U.K. R.D. Lawrence Fellow.

	FOOTNOTES

 
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Frances M. Ashcroft, University Laboratory of Physiology, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, U.K. E-mail: frances.ashcroft{at}physiol.ox.ac.uk.

Received for publication 12 March 2002 and accepted in revised form 8 May 2002.

IC₅₀, half-maximal inhibitory concentration value; K_ATP channel, ATP-sensitive potassium channel; Kir channel, inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel; NBD, nucleotide-binding domain; P_O, open probability; SUR, sulfonylurea receptor; TM, transmembrane helix.

P.P., F.G., and F.A. receive honoraria from Servier for speaking engagements. F.A. is a paid consultant for NovoNordisk.

The symposium and the publication of this article have been made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from Servier, Paris.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION SULFONYLUREAS BLOCK KATP... STOICHIOMETRY SULFONYLUREA-BOUND CHANNELS CAN... SPECIFICITY OF HIGH-AFFINITY... LOCATION OF THE SULFONYLUREA... INTERACTIONS BETWEEN Kir6.2 AND... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... MODULATION OF SULFONYLUREA BLOCK... TRANSDUCTION CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES REFERENCES

 

1. Ashcroft FM, Rorsman P: Electrophysiology of the pancreatic beta-cell. Prog Biophys Mol Biol54 :87 –143, 1989[Medline]
2. Nichols CG, Lederer WJ: Adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels in the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol261 :H1675 –H1686, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Miki T, Liss B, Minami K, Shiuchi T, Saraya A, Kashima Y, Horiuchi M, Ashcroft F, Minokoshi Y, Roeper J, Seino S: ATP-sensitive K⁺ channels in the hypothalamus are essential for the maintenance of glucose homeostasis. Nat Neurosci4 :507 –512, 2001[Medline]
4. Yamada K, Ji JJ, Yuan H, Miki T, Sato S, Horimoto N, Shimizu T, Seino S, Inagaki N: Protective role of ATP-sensitive potassium channels in hypoxia-induced generalized seizure. Science292 :1543 –1546, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Quayle JM, Nelson MT Standen NB: ATP-sensitive and inwardly rectifying potassium channels in smooth muscle. Physiol Rev77 :1165 –1232, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Ashcroft FM, Gribble FM: ATP-sensitive K⁺ channels and insulin secretion: their role in health and disease. Diabetologia42 :903 –919, 1999[Medline]
7. Aguilar-Bryan L, Bryan J: Molecular biology of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels. Endocr Rev20 :101 –135, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Tucker SJ, Gribble FM, Zhao C, Trapp S, Ashcroft FM: Truncation of Kir6.2 produces ATP-sensitive K-channels in the absence of the sulphonylurea receptor. Nature387 :179 –181, 1997[Medline]
9. Nichols CG, Shyng SL, Nestorowicz A, Glaser B, Clement JP, Gonzalez G, Aguilar-Bryan L, Permutt MA, Bryan J: Adenosine diphosphate as an intracellular regulator of insulin secretion. Science272 :1785 –1787, 1996[Abstract]
10. Gribble FM, Tucker SJ, Haug T, Ashcroft FM: MgATP activates the beta-cell K_ATP channel by interaction with its SUR1 subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A95 :7185 –7190, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Gribble FM, Tucker SJ, Ashcroft FM: The essential role of the Walker A motifs of SUR1 in K-ATP channel activation by Mg-ADP and diazoxide. EMBO J16 :1145 –1152, 1997[Medline]
12. Shyng S, Ferrigni T, Nichols CG: Regulation of K_ATP channel activity by diazoxide and MgADP: distinct functions of the two nucleotide binding folds of the sulfonylurea receptor. J Gen Physiol110 :643 –654, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Aguilar-Bryan L, Nichols CG, Wechsler SW, Clement JP 4th, Boyd AE 3rd, Gonzalez G, Herrera-Sosa H, Nguy K, Bryan J, Nelson DA: Cloning of the beta-cell high-affinity sulphonylurea receptor: a regulator of insulin secretion. Science268 :423 –425, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Inagaki N, Gonoi T, Clement JP, Wang CZ, Aguilar-Bryan L, Bryan J, Seino, S: A family of sulfonylurea receptors determines the properties of ATP-sensitive K⁺ channels. Neuron16 :1011 –1017, 1996[Medline]
15. Isomoto S, Kondo C, Yamada M, Matsumoto S, Horio Y, Matsuzawa Y, Kurachi Y: A novel sulphonylurea receptor forms with BIR (Kir6.2) a smooth muscle type of ATP-sensitive K⁺ channel. J Biol Chem271 :24321 –24325, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Mukai E, Ishida H, Horie M, Noma A, Seino Y, Takano M: The antiarrhythmic agent cibenzoline inhibits K-ATP channels by binding to Kir6.2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun251 :477 –481, 1998[Medline]
17. Proks P, Ashcroft FM: Phentolamine block of K-ATP channels is mediated by Kir6.2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A94 :11716 –11720, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Gribble FM, Davis TME, Higham CE, Clark A, Ashcroft FM: The antimalarial agent mefloquine inhibits ATP-sensitive K-channels. Br J Pharmacol131 :756 –760, 2000[Medline]
19. Gribble FM, Ashcroft FM: Differential sensitivity of ß-cell and extrapancreatic K_ATP channels to gliclazide. Diabetologia42 :845 –848, 1999[Medline]
20. Gribble FM, Tucker SJ, Ashcroft FM: The interaction of nucleotides with the tolbutamide block of K-ATP currents: a reinterpretation. J Physiol504 :35 –45, 1997[Medline]
21. Gribble FM, Tucker SJ, Seino S, Ashcroft FM: Tissue specificity of sulphonylureas: studies on cloned cardiac and beta-cell K_ATP channels. Diabetes47 :1412 –1418, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Dörschner H, Brekardin E, Uhde I, Schwanstecher C, Schwanstecher M: Stoichiometry of sulfonylurea-induced ATP-sensitive potassium channel closure. Mol Pharmacol55 :1060 –1066, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Russ U, Hambrock A, Artunc F, Löffler-Walz C, Horio Y, Kurachi Y, Quast U: Coexpression with the inward rectifier K⁺ channel Kir6.1 increases the affinity of the vascular sulfonylurea receptor SUR2B for glibenclamide. Mol Pharmacol56 :955 –961, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Barrett-Jolley R, Davies NW: Kinetic analysis of the inhibitory effect of glibenclamide on K_ATP channels of mammalian skeletal muscle. J Membr Biol155 :257 –262, 1997[Medline]
25. Reimann F, Tucker SJ, Proks P, Ashcroft FM: Involvement of the N-terminus of Kir6.2 in coupling to the sulphonylurea receptor. J Physiol518 :325 –336, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Sakura H, Trapp S, Liss B, Ashcroft FM: Altered functional properties of K_ATP channel conferred by a novel splice variant of SUR1. J Physiol521 :337 –350, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Trapp S, Proks P, Tucker SJ, Ashcroft FM: Molecular analysis of ATP-sensitive K channel gating and implications for channel inhibition by ATP. J Gen Physiol112 :333 –349, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Koster JC, Sha Q, Nichols CG: Sulfonylurea and K⁺-channel opener sensitivity of K_ATP channels: functional coupling of Kir6.2 and SUR1 subunits. J Gen Physiol114 :203 –213, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Krauter T, Ruppersberg JP, Baukrowitz T: Phospholipids as modulators of K_ATP channels: distinct mechanisms for control of sensitivity to sulphonylureas, K⁺ channel openers, and ATP. Mol Pharmacol59 :1086 –1093, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Shyng S-L, Nichols CG: Membrane phospholipid control of nucleotide-sensitivity of K_ATP channels. Science282 :1139 –1141, 1998
31. Baukrowitz T, Schulte U, Oliver D, Herlitze S, Krauter T, Tucker SJ, Ruppersberg JP, Fakler B: PIP₂ and PIP as determinants for ATP-inhibition of K_ATP channels. Science282 :1141 –1144, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Sunaga Y, Gonoi T, Shibasaki T, Ichikawa K, Kusama H, Yano H, Seino S: The effects of mitiglinide (KAD-1229), a new anti-diabetic drug, on ATP-sensitive K⁺ channels and insulin secretion: comparison with the sulfonylureas and nateglinide. Eur J Pharmacol431 :119 –125, 2001[Medline]
33. Reimann F, Proks P, Ashcroft FM: Effects of mitiglinide (S 21403) on Kir6.2/SUR1, Kir6.2/SUR2A and Kir6.2/SUR2B types of ATP-sensitive potassium channel. Br J Pharmacol132 :1542 –1548, 2001[Medline]
34. Song DK, Ashcroft FM: Glimepiride block of cloned ß-cell, cardiac and smooth muscle K-ATP channels. Br J Pharmacol133 :193 –199, 2001[Medline]
35. Ashfield R, Gribble FM, Ashcroft SJH, Ashcroft FM: Identification of the high-affinity tolbutamide site on the SUR1 subunit of the K_ATP channel. Diabetes48 :1341 –1347, 1999[Abstract]
36. Hambrock A, Löffler-Walz C, Russ U, Lange U, Quast U: Characterization of a mutant sulfonylurea receptor SUR2B with high affinity for sulfonylureas and openers: differences in the coupling to Kir6.x subtypes. Mol Pharmacol60 :190 –199, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Löffler-Walz C, Hambrock A, Quast U: Interaction of K-ATP channel modulators with sulfonylurea receptor SUR2B: implication for tetramer formation and allosteric coupling of subunits. Mol Pharmacol61 :407 –414, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Mikhailov MV, Mikhailova EA, Ashcroft SJH: Molecular structure of the glibenclamide binding site of the beta-cell K-ATP channel. FEBS Lett499 :154 –160, 2001[Medline]
39. Qian YM, Qiu W, Gao M, Westlake CJ, Cole SP, Deeley RG: Characterization of binding of leukotriene C4 by human multidrug resistance protein 1: evidence of differential interactions with NH2- and COOH-proximal halves of the protein. J Biol Chem276 :38636 –38644, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Schwanstecher M, Schwanstecher C, Dickel C, Chudziak F, Moshiri A, Panten U: Location of the sulphonylurea receptor at the cytoplasmic face of the beta-cell membrane. Br J Pharmacol113 :903 –1011, 1994[Medline]
41. Mikhailov MV, Mikhailova EA, Ashcroft SJH: Investigation of the molecular assembly of ß-cell K_ATP channels. FEBS Lett482 :59 –64, 2000[Medline]
42. Trube G, Rorsman P, Ohno-Shosaku T: Opposite effects of tolbutamide and diazoxide on the ATP-dependent K⁺ channel in mouse pancreatic beta-cells. Pflügers Arch407 :493 –499, 1986[Medline]
43. Lawrence CL, Proks P, Rodrigo GC, Jones P, Hayabuchi Y, Standen NB, Ashcroft FM: Gliclazide produces high-affinity block of K_ATP channels in mouse isolated pancreatic ß-cells but not rat heart or arterial smooth muscle cells. Diabetologia44 :1019 –1025, 2001[Medline]
44. Zünckler BJ, Lins S, Ohno-Shosaku T, Trube G, Panten U: Cytosolic ADP enhances the sensitivity of tolbutamide of ATP-dependent K⁺ channels from pancreatic ß-cells. FEBS Lett239 :241 –244, 1988[Medline]
45. Schwanstecher C, Dickel C, Panten U: Cytosolic nucleotides enhance the tolbutamide sensitivity of the ATP-dependent K-channel in mouse pancreatic beta-cells by their combined actions at inhibitory and stimulatory sites. Mol Pharmacol41 :480 –486, 1992[Abstract]
46. Proks P, Gribble FM, Adhikari R, Tucker SJ, Ashcroft FM: Involvement of the N-terminus of Kir6.2 in the inhibition of the K_ATP channel by ATP. J Physiol514 :19 –25, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Schwanstecher M, Loser S, Rietze I, Panten U: Phosphate and thiophosphate group donating adenine and guanine nucleotides inhibit glibenclamide binding to membranes from pancreatic islets. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol343 :83 –89, 1991[Medline]
48. Ueda K, Komine J, Matsuo M, Seino S, Amachi T: Cooperative binding of ATP and MgADP in the sulphonylurea receptor is modulated by glibenclamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A96 :1268 –1272, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Schwappach B, Zerangue N, Jan YN, Jan LY: Molecular basis for K_ATP assembly: transmembrane interactions mediate association of a K⁺ channel with an ABC transporter. Neuron26 :155 –67, 2000[Medline]
50. Chan KW, Logothetis DE: The first transmembrane domain of SUR1 enhances functional expression of Kir6.2 (Abstract). Biophys J80 :2820 , 2001
51. Henquin JC, Garrino MG, Nenquin M: Stimulation of insulin release by benzoic acid derivatives related to the non-sulphonylurea moiety of glibenclamide: structural requirements and cellular mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol141 :243 –251, 1987[Medline]
52. Giblin JP, Leaney JL, Tinker A: The molecular assembly of ATP-sensitive potassium channels: determinants of the pore forming subunit. J Biol Chem274 :22652 –22659, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Dabrowski M, Wahl P, Holmes WE, Ashcroft FM: Effect of repaglinide on cloned beta cell, cardiac and smooth muscle types of ATP-sensitive potassium channel. Diabetologia44 :747 –756, 2001[Medline]
54. Babenko AP, Gonzalez G, Aguilar-Bryan L, Bryan J: Reconstituted human cardiac KATP channels. Circ Res83 :1132 –1143, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Hansen AMK, Christensen IT, Hansen JB, Carr RD, Ashcroft FM, Wahl P: Differential actions of nateglinide and repaglinide on the human sulphonylurea receptor 1. Diabetes51 :2789 –2795, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]