Diabetes 52:2279-2286, 2003 © 2003 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc. DcR3/TR6 Effectively Prevents Islet Primary Nonfunction After Transplantation
1 Laboratory of Transplantation Immunology, Centre hospitalier de lUniversite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Islet primary nonfunction (PNF) is defined as the loss of islet function after transplantation for reasons other than graft rejection. It is a major obstacle to successful and efficient islet transplantation. DcR3/TR6 is a soluble death decoy receptor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, and it can block apoptosis mediated by several TNF receptor family members such as Fas and LTßR. In this study, we used TR6 to protect islets from PNF after transplantation. Untreated isogeneic or allogeneic islet transplantation had PNF incidence of 25 and 26.5%, respectively. Administration of TR6 totally prevented PNF in allogeneic islet transplantation. In vitro experiments showed an increased apoptosis among islets that were treated with FasL and -interferon (IFN- ) in combination. TR6 significantly reduced such apoptosis. Functional study showed that insulin release was compromised after FasL and IFN- treatment, and the compromise could be prevented with TR6-Fc. This indicates that TR6 indeed protected ß-cells from damage caused by FasL and IFN- . Further in vivo experiments showed that syngeneic islet transplantation between lpr/lpr and gld/gld mice was significantly more efficacious than that conducted between wild-type mice. These results suggest that Fas-mediated apoptosis plays an important role in PNF, and use of TR6 may be a novel strategy to prevent PNF in clinical islet transplantation.
Islet transplantation is an effective treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes. There are two major obstacles to successful islet transplantation: islet primary nonfunction (PNF) and graft rejection. PNF is defined as the loss of islet function after transplantation for reasons other than graft rejection. PNF frequency can be very high in islet transplant models (1). In humans, pancreas transplantation has produced better results [7080% insulin independence at 3 years (2)] in reversing the diabetic state than islet transplantation conducted several years ago, suggesting that PNF of islets significantly contributes to the high failure rate of the procedure. The recent high success rate of the Edmonton group (3) with islet transplantation probably reflects better islet isolation and immunosuppression management. It is to be noted, however, that all patients fail to achieve insulin independence after islet transplantation from the first donor, and on average 8 x 105 islets (from two or more donors) are transplanted, even though 3 x 105 islets are sufficient for insulin independence (4). This suggests that PNF remains a problem in current islet transplantation. During isolation and transplantation, islets experience extreme conditions, such as enzyme digestion, mechanical sheer, endotoxins present in various solutions, osmotic shock, deprivation of obligatory trophic support, inflammatory cytokines, and free radicals (4). This may cause the ß-cells to undergo substantial apoptosis when cultured in vitro after isolation (5,6). It is consistent with this finding that immunoisolated, microencapsulated islets that are injected into the dog peritoneal cavity fail within 6 months and that islets that are placed in a vascularized, biohybrid pancreas also fail at 1 year (7,8). Histologic evaluation shows a major loss of islet mass in these devices. Therefore, PNF is probably one of the major reasons for the large number of islets needed to achieve euglycemia. Consequently, prevention of PNF will likely improve outcomes from islet transplantation.
Decoy receptor 3 (DcR3), also known as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family receptor 6 (TR6), is a new member of the TNFR family (9). TR6 lacks an apparent transmembrane domain in its sequence and is a secreted protein (10,11). The mRNA of TR6 is expressed at high levels in several normal human tissues such as the stomach, spinal cord, colon, lymph node, and spleen (9,12), whereas its mRNA expression in the thymus and peripheral blood lymphocytes is weak and undetectable, respectively. TR6 can bind to a TNF family member FasL and prevent FasL-induced apoptosis in lymphocytes and several tumor cell lines (9). TR6 can also bind to LIGHT, another member of the TNF family (11). LIGHT, a ligand for both TR2/HVEM and LTßR (13), is expressed on activated T-cells (13) and immature dendritic cells (14). LIGHT is found to induce apoptosis in cells that express both TR2 and LTßR (15). However, Rooney et al. (16) showed that LTßR is necessary and sufficient for LIGHT-mediated apoptosis of tumor cells. As TR6 is a soluble receptor that interacts with several ligands, one of the physiologic functions of TR6 may be to act as a death decoy to prevent apoptosis mediated by TNF receptor family members such as Fas and LTßR. In connection with islet transplantation, DcR3/TR6 might exert beneficial effects by functioning as a death decoy to reduce islet ß-cell apoptosis mediated by Fas and/or LTßR, hence ameliorating PNF. TR6 can also bind to a third TNF family member, TL1A, and block its apoptosis-inducing effect via DR3 (17). As DR3 is mainly expressed on cells of hematopoietic origin, its relevance to ß-cell apoptosis and PNF is not clear. In the present study, we demonstrated that TR6-Fc reduced PNF from
Preparation of recombinant human TR6-Fc. The mouse counterpart of human TR6 might not exist, because a BLAST search of the mouse genome using the human TR6 cDNA sequence as a query failed to yield significant homologues. We therefore used human TR6 to study the role of TR6 in mouse PNF. Full-length TR6 fused with human IgG Fc (TR6-Fc) was prepared for this purpose, as described in our previous publication (10). The purified TR6-Fc protein was analyzed with 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing or nonreducing conditions, showing that the protein is a disulfide-linked dimer under nonreducing conditions (Fig. 1). Light-scattering analysis also confirmed that it behaves as a disulfide-linked dimer in solution (data not shown). NH2-terminal sequencing revealed that the mature secreted TR6-Fc had the predicted sequence of VAETP (single-letter code of amino acids), starting at amino acid 30. The estimated purity of the protein preparation was >95% according to SDS-PAGE.
Flow cytometry. Murine L929 cells (1 x 106) with or without murine FasL transfection were incubated with 1 µg of Fas-Fc, 10 ng of TR6-Fc, or 1 µg of phycoethrin-conjugated anti-murine FasL (clone Kay-10; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) in 100 µl of buffer for 20 min at room temperature. In certain samples, unlabeled soluble TR6 without Fc was added (1 µg/sample) as a competitor at this step. The cells were washed twice. For detection of the human-Fc fusion proteins, cells were reacted with goat F(ab)2 anti-human IgG (Southern Biotechnology, Birmingham, AL) for 15 min at room temperature. After washing, the cells were resuspended in 0.5 µg/ml propidium iodide, and live cells were gated and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Islet purification.
Islet transplantation.
Islet viability staining and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling.
Insulin release assay.
Human TR6-Fc binds to mouse FasL. As we were to use human TR6 in a mouse model, it is essential to establish whether human TR6 could associate with mouse FasL, which might be involved in PNF. As shown in Fig. 2, both Fas-Fc and anti-mouse FasL monoclonal antibodies (mAb) bound to the mouse FasL-transfected L929 cells (solid lines) but not to untransfected wild-type cells (shaded areas). TR6-Fc presented similar binding to transfected L929 cells as Fas-Fc and anti-FasL mAb. Binding by Fas-Fc, anti-FasL mAb, and TR6-Fc to the transfected cells could be inhibited by soluble TR6 at 1 µg/ml, demonstrating the binding specificity. This result proved for the first time that human TR6 could associate with mouse FasL and established a molecular basis for inhibition of mouse Fas-mediated apoptosis by human TR6-Fc.
TR6 prevents PNF in mouse islet transplantation. PNF, one of the major problems occurring during islet transplantation, can be easily demonstrated in animal models. When transplanted with a lower-than-optimal number of BALB/c islets ( 400), 26.5% diabetic C57BL/6 (H-2b) recipient mice failed to achieve a blood glucose level <18 mmol/l with in 48 h after transplantation (Fig. 3), indicative of PNF. This was not due to allograft rejection responses, in which cytotoxic T-cells need 45 days to complete processes of activation, proliferation, and differentiation; our test confirmed that within 48 h of mixed lymphocyte culture, cytotoxic lymphocyte activity was not detectable (data not shown). In support of this notion, the control isogeneic islet transplantation from C57BL/6 donors to C57BL/6 diabetic recipients with 400 islets per recipient had a similar incidence (25%) of PNF 48 h after transplantation. When TR6-Fc was administered at 15 mg · kg-1 · day-1 intraperitoneally twice a day to the allograft recipients, PNF was completely prevented. This result showed that TR6 could prevent islet PNF in vivo.
TR6 protects islets from IFN- plus FasL-induced damage.We next explored mechanisms with which TR6 protected islets from damage. Islets were cultured in complete medium for 24 h after isolation and then treated with different apoptosis-inducing factors. After an additional 48-h culture, they were stained with EB/AO for viability assessment. As shown in Fig. 4A, FasL (SuperFasL; Q-Biogene, Carlsbad, CA) at 60 ng/ml or IFN- at 1,000 units/ml alone had no apparent effect on viability of the islets after 48 h. However, when these two factors were combined, they significantly decreased islet viability. This was apparent as yellow staining on the islets was increased. TR6-Fc at 10 µg/ml protected the islets from death caused by the combination of FasL and IFN- , as the yellow staining in TR6-Fctreated islets was reduced. Semiquantitative assessment confirmed the impression above. As shown in Fig. 4B, islets that were treated with FasL or IFN- alone had no statistical difference from islets that were cultured in medium in the EB/AO staining (89.6, 82.8, and 89.9% viable, respectively). When FasL and IFN- were combined, the viability of the islets decreased to 58.4%, and this was statistically different from all of the above-mentioned three treatments (P < 0.01 in all three comparisons, i.e., medium versus FasL/IFN- , FasL versus FasL/IFN- , and IFN- versus FasL/IFN- ). When TR6-Fc was added to the culture, it significantly reversed the FasL plus IFN- induced islet death with the viability raised to 82.8% (P < 0.01, FasL/IFN- versus FasL/IFN- /TR6-Fc). This showed that TR6 had a protective effect against islet death induced by a combination of FasL and IFN- .
The TUNEL assay was performed after islet culture to assess whether islet death was due to apoptosis and whether TR6 could prevent the apoptosis. IFN- (1,000 units/ml) plus FasL (60 ng/ml)-treated islets showed significantly increased apoptosis as seen in the photos and bar graph of Fig. 5 (P < 0.01, control versus IFN- /FasL). TR6-Fc (10 µg/ml) significantly protected the islets from IFN- plus FasL-induced apoptosis (P < 0.01, IFN- /FasL versus IFN- /FasL/TR6-Fc). The results of this section disclosed that a possible mechanism of the protective effect of TR6 on PNF was inhibition of islet apoptosis.
ß-cell function was protected by TR6-Fc in FasL- and IFN- treated islets.We next assessed ß-cell function using islets treated with FasL and IFN- in the presence or absence of TR6-Fc. As shown in Fig. 6, as with the EB/AO staining, a combination of FasL and IFN- caused significant compromise in insulin release upon stimulation with 16.7 mmol/l glucose (P < 0.01, control versus FasL/IFN- ), and such compromise could be prevented in the presence of TR6-Fc (P < 0.01, FasL/IFN- versus FasL/IFN- /TR6-Fc). The result suggests that the morphologic damage on islets seen in EB/AO staining and in TUNEL assays occurred on ß-cells. It is to be noted that we intentionally used a condition under which the damage caused by FasL and IFN- was moderate and was sensitive to the rescue effect of TR6. The compromise in insulin release and the rescue effect of TR6 was comparable in scale to the islet viability and apoptosis as shown in the previous section.
The in vivo role of FasL and Fas in PNF. To confirm the contribution of FasL and Fas to PNF in vivo, we conducted islet transplantation from lpr/lpr mice to diabetic gld/gld recipients. The former strain has mutation in FasL and the latter, in Fas. As a consequence, the FasL and Fas interaction is not functional in this in vivo model. As the lpr/lpr and gld/gld mice used both were in the C57BL/6 background, this model represents isogeneic islet transplantation with no allograft rejection involved. A marginal dose of 250270 islets was used per recipient. The recipient mice had blood glucose levels between 20 and 30 mmol/l before islet transplantation (day 0). After islet transplantation, blood glucose was monitored daily. At such an islet dosage, normoglycemia was restored only in 20% of the control C57BL/6-to-C57BL/6 (B6 to B6) group around day 13 posttransplantation. Therefore, this regimen was sensitive for the detection of the putative contribution of FasL and Fas to in vivo islet damage after transplantation. As shown Fig. 7A, starting from day 6 posttransplantation, the lpr/lpr-to-gld/gld group had significantly lower blood glucose than the B6-to-B6 group (P < 0.05 at all points, starting from day 6; ANOVA). Figure 7B depicted the percentage of mice returned to normoglycemia (defined as 12 mmol/l) after the isogeneic islet transplantation. In the B6-to-B6 group, only 20% of the mice had normoglycemia until day 13 posttransplantation. However, in the lpr/lpr-to-gld/gld group, 33% of the mice achieved normoglycemia on day 5 (with some fluctuation between day 5 and day 10), and 44% of the mice achieved that on day 13. The difference between the two groups was highly significant (P < 0.001, two-way repeated measurement of ANOVA). These data indicate that with nonfunctional FasL and Fas in the donors and recipients, respectively, the efficiency of islet transplantation was improved. This suggests that Fas-mediated apoptosis contributes to PNF.
In this study, we reported that a soluble death decoy DcR3/TR6 could prevent islet PNF, and this protective effect was, at least in part, due to interference of TR6 with Fas-mediated islet apoptosis. The mechanisms of PNF have not been clearly delineated, but multiple factors, such as inflammatory cytokines, free radicals, macrophages, and withdrawal of trophic support from tissues surrounding the islets, are likely involved. The effective prevention of PNF by TR6 suggested that Fas-mediated islet apoptosis was an essential mechanism for PNF, because TR6 is known to bind to FasL and prevent FasL-triggered apoptosis. Indeed, Fas is reported being expressed on murine islets (18), which undergo apoptosis when infected ex vivo with FasL-expression adenovirus vector, resulting in PNF when transplanted into isogeneic or allogeneic diabetic recipients (19). Using lpr/lpr mice as donors and syngeneic gld/gld mice as recipients, we demonstrated that without effective FasL and Fas interaction, the efficacy of islet transplantation was significantly improved. This convincingly confirms that after transplantation, in the absence of allograft rejection, there is significant loss of islet function (i.e., PNF) as a result of Fas-mediated apoptosis. Soluble FasL alone at the concentration used (60 ng/ml) or at a higher concentration (1 µg/ml, data not shown) did not cause significant islet death in our in vitro experiments, even though the FasL used was in a form capable of inducing apoptosis of many cell lines at a concentration of 10100 ng/ml in solution. In vivo, leukocytes of donor origin or leukocytes attracted to islets by inflammatory cytokines might be a source of membrane-bound FasL, which might give a more potent signal through Fas. Alternatively, soluble FasL needed cofactors to effectively induce islet apoptosis.
In many in vitro apoptosis models, cells need to be sensitized or conditioned by measures such as protein synthesis inhibition, using cycloheximide, in addition to FasL, for apoptosis induction (20,21). In our model, when FasL was applied in combination with IFN- In addition to FasL, TR6 could bind to LIGHT, which is a ligand of LTßR and is sufficient to trigger apoptosis via LTßR in some tumor cells (16). This has raised a possibility that TR6 might also inhibit islet apoptosis mediated by LTßR in vivo. Two recent articles showed that the administration of soluble LTßR-Ig or transgenic overexpression of LTßR-Ig effectively prevents or reverses insulinitis and diabetes in NOD mice (24,25); prevention of LTßR-mediated islet apoptosis by soluble LTßR-Ig might be implicated in these models. Therefore, the protective action of TR6 might involve multiple mechanisms.
It is worth pointing out that for the purpose of quantifying, we arbitrarily defined the PNF as failure of glucose decrease <18 mmol/l with 48 h after islet transplantation. Although TR6 treatment rescued all PNF under such a definition, The Edmonton protocol has proved that islet transplantation is a successful treatment for diabetes. Rough calculations show that >60% of transplanted islets are nonfunctional. PNF and rejection are the chief reasons for such a low efficiency. Considering the organ donor shortage, to reduce the number of islets needed for successful transplantation becomes an essential task to significantly enhance our capability for treating more patients with diabetes. Many preclinical and clinical studies are under way to optimize immunosuppressant regimens in islet transplantation, but the problem of PNF remains to be addressed. In vivo, tumor cells may use TR6 to protect themselves from immune surveillance and gain survival advantages (9). By the same token, islets can benefit from the protective role of TR6. Our animal study proved that this is indeed the case. We envision that such an approach could be applied for clinical islet transplantation. Soluble TR6 can be added to buffers used for islet isolation, transportation, and injection. Alternatively, islets can be transfected with TR6 expression adenovirus vectors for long-lasting secretion of TR6 in situ. As discussed above, such treatments with TR6 might not totally prevent PNF, but they could probably reduce PNF significantly and bring down the number of islets needed for insulin independence after islet transplantation.
This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; MOP57697 and PPP57321); the CIHR/Canadian Blood Service Partnership Program; the Kidney Foundation of Canada; the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Quebec; the Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation, Switzerland (ROTRF 280039611); the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (5-2001-540); and the J-Louis Levesque Foundation to J.W. This work was also supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 30070724 and 30271273) and National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang, China (nos. 399124 and 300479) to Y.W. Y.W is a recipient of a Wyeth-Ayerst/CIHR fellowship, and R.R. was supported by a fellowship from Swiss National Science Foundation. J.W. is a National Researcher of Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec (FRSQ). We sincerely thank Ovid Da Silva and Robert Boileau of the Research Support Office, CHUM Research Center, for editorial assistance and statistical analysis, and Dr. Stephen Ullrich of Human Genome Sciences for reviewing the manuscript.
T.S.W., P.A.M., and J.Z. are employees of Human Genome Sciences, which owns intellectual property of some of the reagents, such as TR6 and LIGHT, used in this article. R.R. is currently affiliated with the Division of Medical Genetics, CHUV-University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jiangping Wu, Laboratory of Transplantation Immunology, Research Center, CHUM-Notre Dame Hospital, Pavilion DeSève, Room Y-5616, 1560 Sherbrooke Street East, Montreal, Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada. E-mail: jianping.wu{at}umontreal.ca Received for publication May 15, 2002 and accepted in revised form May 22, 2003
Abbreviations: AO, acridine orange; DcR3, decoy receptor 3; EB, ethidium bromide; HBSS, Hanks balanced salt solution; mAB, monoclonal antibodies; PNF, primary nonfunction; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TNFR, tumor necrosis factor receptor; TR6, tumor necrosis factor family receptor 6; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||