Diabetes 53:865-869, 2004 © 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Scrutiny of the Glutamine-Fructose-6-Phosphate Transaminase 1 (GFPT1) Locus Reveals Conserved Haplotype Block Structure not Associated With Diabetic Nephropathy
1 Section on Genetics and Epidemiology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase 1 (GFAT) is the rate-limiting enzyme of the hexosamine pathway that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. As such, we hypothesized that GFPT1, which encodes for GFAT, may confer genetic susceptibility to this complication among Caucasians. Screening of all known functional regions of GFPT1 revealed six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were located in the promoter, introns, and 3' untranslated region. The 60 kb GFPT1 locus was encompassed in a single conserved haplotype block, and two tagging SNPs were sufficient to capture >90% of the haplotype diversity. Analysis of these SNPs in a case-control study made up of type 1 diabetic subjects (324 case subjects with diabetic nephropathy and 289 control subjects with normoalbuminuria despite >15 years of diabetes) revealed no significant association even after stratification by sex, diabetes duration, glucose control, and blood pressure. Similar results were obtained among type 2 diabetic subjects (202 case and 114 control subjects). Genetic variation in GFPT1 is thus unlikely to have a major impact on susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy.
The hexosamine biosynthetic pathway is an alternative pathway of glucose metabolism that has recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy (1). Glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase 1 (GFAT) is the rate-limiting enzyme of this pathway and converts fructose 6-phospate to glucosamine 6-phosphate. Glucosamine 6-phosphate is subsequently converted to uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine, which is used for the O-glycosylation of intracellular proteins, including transcription factors. Concerning diabetic nephropathy, the hexosamine pathway mediates hyperglycemia-induced transforming growth factor-ß1 production by glomerular mesangial cells, an effect that could be prevented by GFAT inhibition (2). Overexpression of GFAT in rat mesangial cells increases the expression of transforming growth factor-ß1 and its receptors, even under normoglycemic conditions (3). A similar phenomenon has been reported for NIH-3T3 fibroblasts overexpressing GFAT (4). Gene expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 is also dependent on the hexosamine pathway as mediated by protein kinase C isoforms and activation of the transcription factor Sp1 by O-glycosylation (3,5,6).
With mounting evidence implicating GFAT in diabetic nephropathy, we hypothesized that GFPT1 (OMIM: 138292, human chromosome 2p13) may be an important susceptibility gene for diabetic nephropathy because it encodes for this enzyme. In this first report to examine the issue, we screened the GFPT1 locus for common DNA polymorphisms by sequencing all known functional regions, including the promoter, all exons, and exon/intron junctions. In total, 17% of the
As recent reports have suggested that chromosomal regions contain SNPs that could be partitioned into "haplotype blocks" within which there is substantial linkage disequilibrium (7,8), we calculated the linkage disequilibrium between the six SNPs using Lewontins D', a commonly used measure of linkage disequilibrium (9). All SNPs were in strong linkage disequilibrium with each other (range of D' = 0.88 to 1.00) (data not shown). The frequencies of six SNP haplotypes were estimated from genotype data from 200 randomly selected Caucasian type 1 diabetic individuals (100 case and 100 control subjects). Three haplotypes (denoted A, B, C) predominated, each with an estimated frequency >0.10. Together, these accounted for >90% of the haplotype diversity at this locus (Fig. 1). A conserved haplotype block thus spans the GFPT1 locus and two tagging SNPs (tagSNPs) (IVS5 + 25T>C and IVS5 + 102G>T) were sufficient to define haplotypes A, B, and C (Fig. 1).
These tagSNPs were tested for association with diabetic nephropathy using a population-based case-control study design. Among both type 1 and 2 diabetic patients, case subjects were defined as having advanced diabetic nephropathy indicated by persistent proteinuria, chronic renal failure, or end-stage renal disease. Control subjects with type 1 diabetes had normoalbuminuria despite a diabetes duration 15 years. Control subjects with type 2 diabetes had normoalbuminuria despite a known diabetes duration 6 years, allowing for the fact that the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes is generally established many years after the onset of hyperglycemia. Clinical characteristics of the study groups are shown in Table 2.
No significant difference in allele or genotype distributions was observed for either IVS5 + 25T>C or IVS5 + 102G>T between case and control subjects with type 1 diabetes; estimated haplotype frequencies were also similar between these two groups of patients (Table 3). Stratification according to sex, median values for diabetes duration (26 years), HbA1c (8.5%), and systolic (127 mmHg) or diastolic (77 mmHg) blood pressure revealed no significant association between these tagSNPs and diabetic nephropathy (data not shown). Similarly, among the type 2 diabetic subjects, allele and genotype distributions of the tagSNPs were comparable between case and control subjects, and haplotype frequencies were also similar in the two groups (Table 3). No significant association was detected after stratifying according to sex, median values for HbA1c (8.2%), duration of diabetes (12 years), and systolic (135 mmHg) or diastolic (78 mmHg) blood pressure (data not shown).
Our current findings, therefore, do not support GFPT1 as being an important susceptibility gene for diabetic nephropathy among Caucasians with type 1 or 2 diabetes. This was the case for genotypes at individual SNPs as well as haplotypes formed from the two tagSNPs. This combination of tagSNPs is capable of capturing >90% of the haplotype diversity at this gene locus in our Caucasian sample, although its performance in other human populations (e.g., Chinese and African populations) should be assessed empirically. Besides reducing the genotyping workload by utilizing tagSNPs, employment of both geno- and haplotype analyses also permitted us to evaluate the contribution of common SNPs and currently unidentified, rarer polymorphisms to diabetic nephropathy. Although examination of individual SNPs tested whether their genotypes were common susceptibility determinants of diabetic nephropathy, haplotype analysis addressed the possibility that a putative rarer polymorphism, residing on a haplotype, may also contribute to this genetic risk. Although our study largely excludes a major susceptibility role for GFPT1 for diabetic nephropathy among Caucasians, a minor effect cannot be easily ruled out, and the question as to whether this gene confers susceptibility in other human populations remains open. Genome scans recently conducted at the Joslin Diabetes Center in Caucasian families with type 1 and 2 diabetes have provided suggestive evidence for linkage between diabetic nephropathy and a large region on chromosome 2p that includes GFPT1 (A.S.K., unpublished data). Our current findings, however, do not support this gene locus as being a contributor to these linkage results. Since additional genes are likely related to the hexosamine pathway and its regulation, these may form the focus of future investigations (10).
Since 1991, individuals with type 1 diabetes have been recruited for studies of the genetics of nephropathy from among patients attending the Joslin Clinic. Diabetes has been classified as type 1 if it was diagnosed at <30 years of age and continuous treatment with insulin began within 1 year of diagnosis. As of 2001, 352 case subjects with diabetic nephropathy and 307 control subjects with normoalbuminuria had been enrolled in the study. Details of the procedures for recruiting these patients were described previously (11). Since 1998, individuals with type 2 diabetes have also been recruited for studies of the genetics of nephropathy from among patients attending the Joslin Clinic. Diabetes has been classified as type 2 if it was diagnosed between ages 30 and 64 years and was treated for at least 2 years with diet or oral hypoglycemic agents. Only patients <75 years of age at enrollment are included in the study. As of 2002, 303 case subjects with diabetic nephropathy and 168 control subjects with normoalbuminuria had been enrolled into the study.
Diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy.
Patients were classified as control subjects if they had type 1 diabetes with a duration
Examination of study participants.
GFPT1 DNA polymorphisms screening.
Genotyping. Genotyping of GFPT1 polymorphisms was performed by DNA hybridization using allele-specific oligonucleotides probes, as previously described (15). DNA sequences of the allele-specific oligonucleotide probes and PCR primers are detailed in Table 1. The two tagSNPs, IVS5 + 25T>C and IVS5 + 102G>T, were also genotyped as restriction fragment length polymorphisms. IVS5 + 25T>C was genotyped using PshAI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) so that when the C allele was present, the restriction site was absent and the 581-bp PCR product migrated intact as a single band. When the T allele was present, two bands of sizes 302 and 279 bp were seen after digestion. For IVS5 + 102G>T, genotyping was performed using AseI (New England Biolabs). When the G allele was present, the restriction site was absent, but when the T allele was present, digestion occurred and two fragments of 383 and 198 bp were seen. Genotypes of 80 individuals obtained using allele-specific oligonucleotides and restriction fragment length polymorphism methods were in strong agreement for both IVS5 + 25T>C (99% concordant) and IVS5 + 102G>T (100% concordant), consistent with the absence of any significant genotyping error.
Statistical analysis.
Power analysis.
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK041526, DK053534, and DK058549. We thank Adam Smiles of the Joslin Diabetes Center for development and maintenance of genetic and phenotypic databases.
Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Andrzej S. Krolewski, MD, PhD, Section on Genetics and Epidemiology, Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin Pl., Boston, MA 02215. E-mail: andrzej.krolewski{at}joslin.harvard.edu Received for publication July 25, 2003 and accepted in revised form December 5, 2003
Abbreviations: GFAT, glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; tagSNP, tagging SNP
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||