Diabetes 54:3326-3330, 2005 © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
The Fatty Acid–Binding Protein-2 A54T Polymorphism Is Associated With Renal Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
1 Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
The intestinal fatty–acid binding protein-2 (FABP2) gene codes a protein responsible for the absorption of long-chain fatty acids. To test whether FABP2 is a candidate gene for renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, a functional A54T polymorphism was genotyped in 1,042 Brazilians with type 2 diabetes. Patients were classified as having normoalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion [UAE] <20 µg/min; n = 529), microalbuminuria (UAE 20–199 µg/min; n = 217), or proteinuria (UAE >199 µg/min; n = 160). Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (n = 136) were also included. The prevalence of the TT genotype was higher in patients with renal involvement compared with those with normoalbuminuria (odds ratio [95% CI] 2.4 [1.1–5.4]) following adjustment for type 2 diabetes duration, BMI, hypertension, A1C, and cholesterol levels. The risk was similar considering different stages of renal involvement. In a second independent patient sample (483 type 2 diabetic Caucasians residing in Massachusetts), a significant association was also observed between the TT genotype and proteinuria or ESRD (2.7 [1.0–7.3]; P = 0.048). This study thus provides evidence that FABP2 confers susceptibility to renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jorge Luiz Gross, Serviço de Endocrinologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350-Prédio 12-4° andar 90035-003 Porto Alegre, RS–Brazil. E-mail: jorgegross{at}terra.com.br
Abbreviations: ESRD, end-stage renal disease; FABP2, fatty acid–binding protein-2; IHD, ischemic heart disease; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; UAE, urinary albumin excretion
Diabetic nephropathy develops in up to 40% of diabetic patients at most, even when high glucose levels are maintained for long periods of time (1). Epidemiological (2) and familial (3,4,5) studies have demonstrated that genetic susceptibility contributes to the development of diabetic nephropathy in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The precise genetic model underlying diabetic nephropathy susceptibility is uncertain, but several genes with a minor effect have been associated with diabetic nephropathy (6). Insulin resistance has been implicated in the development of diabetic nephropathy (7), and aggregation of components of the metabolic syndrome is associated with a high prevalence of diabetic nephropathy (8). The intestinal fatty acid–binding protein-2 (FABP2) gene codes a protein expressed in enterocytes and is responsible for the absorption of long-chain fatty acids (9). A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the FABP2 gene at codon 54 causes an amino acid change (Ala
A total of 1,042 patients with type 2 diabetes were identified from a multicentric study that started recruiting patients in southern Brazil in 2002. That project aimed to study risk factors for chronic complications of diabetes. It included four centers located at general hospitals in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, namely Grupo Hospitalar Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Hospital São Vicente de Paula, Hospital Universitário de Rio Grande, and Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. All patients with type 2 diabetes attending the endocrine clinics in these hospitals, as well as the patients receiving dialysis in these institutions, were included. Type 2 diabetes was defined by diagnosis of diabetes after the age of 35 years with no use of insulin during the 1st year after diagnosis. Patients renal status was categorized according to urinary albumin excretion (UAE; three samples, 6 months apart, without ACE inhibitors or angiotensin type I receptor blockers for at least 1 week) into normoalbuminuria (n = 529), microalbuminuria (n = 217), proteinuria (n = 160) (14), or the presence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD; n = 136).
Patients underwent a standardized evaluation consisting of a questionnaire, physical examination, and laboratory tests. Weight without shoes and in light outdoor clothes and height were measured, and BMI was calculated. Measurements of waist circumference at the narrowest point as viewed from the front and hip at the widest point were performed, and waist-to-hip ratio was calculated. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure The possible association between A54T and renal involvement was also tested in an independent patient sample consisting of Caucasians with type 2 diabetes residing in Massachusetts. The characteristics of this patient collection have already been previously described in detail (15). Briefly, this is a case-control study where case subjects were patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced renal disease as indicated by the presence of persistent proteinuria or impaired renal function, whereas control subjects were normoalbuminuric despite having type 2 diabetes for >6 years. At the time of this study, DNA was available for 201 control subjects and 282 case subjects; 41% of case subjects had impaired renal function. The Committee on Human Subjects of the Joslin Diabetes Center approved the protocols and informed consent procedures for this study.
Laboratory analysis.
Molecular analysis. To define the linkage disequilibrium between the A54T polymorphism and other polymorphisms located in FABP2, the International HapMap Project website (www.hapmap.org) was consulted. There were three SNPs genotyped in the Caucasian samples that were located within the FABP2 locus, not including our SNP. To determine linkage disequilibrium among these SNPs, we genotyped the 90 subjects from the HapMap sample for A54T polymorphisms. A Haploview file was created to evaluate linkage disequilibrium among the polymorphisms (95% CI), as described by Gabriel et al. (17).
Statistical analysis.
Brazilian sample. Brazilian patients with type 2 diabetes and some degree of renal involvement were more often males, had longer type 2 diabetes duration, and had higher systolic blood pressure levels (Table 1). Increased prevalence of diabetic retinopathy corresponded to renal status (P < 0.001). Patients with proteinuria and ESRD had a higher prevalence of IHD than normo- or microalbuminuric patients (P = 0.001). Patients with ESRD had lower BMI and total cholesterol than the other patients. Patients with proteinuria and ESRD had lower HDL cholesterol, and proteinuric patients had higher triglyceride levels than normoalbuminuric patients. Metabolic control was similar in all groups.
The distribution of the A54T genotypes is presented in Table 1. The frequency of the T allele (risk allele) was 0.25, and the genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Patients with renal involvement (microalbuminuria, proteinuria, or ESRD) had increased frequency of the TT genotype (10.1%) compared with normoalbuminuric patients (4.5%; P = 0.002). Assuming a dominant model (AA vs. AT/TT), the presence of the T allele was not associated with the presence of renal involvement (OR [95% CI] 1.2 [0.93–1.5]; P = 0.162). However, considering a recessive model, the TT genotype was associated with the presence of renal disease (AA/AT vs. TT, 2.4 [1.4–4.0]; P = 0.0005). In the recessive model, the OR adjusted for type 2 diabetes duration, BMI, hypertension, A1C, and cholesterol levels was similar to the crude estimate (adjusted OR 2.4 [1.1–5.4]), suggesting that the TT genotype is independently associated with renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Assuming the recessive model (AA/AT vs. TT), we evaluated the effect of the polymorphism on the different stages of renal involvement. The adjusted ORs (type 2 diabetes duration, BMI, hypertension, A1C, and cholesterol) are presented in Fig. 1.
Patients with the TT (n = 76) genotype were similar to patients with AA (n = 553) and AT (n = 413) genotypes regarding the proportion of males (54, 42, and 45%, respectively, P = 0.105), ethnicity (Caucasians 80, 75, and 80%, respectively, P = 0.718), mean age (60 ± 10, 59 ± 10, and 58 ± 11 years, respectively, P = 0.250), known type 2 diabetes duration (12 ± 8, 12 ± 1, and 12 ± 1 years, respectively, P = 0.837), BMI (29.3 ± 5.4, 28.7 ± 5.2, and 28.9 ± 5.1 kg/m2, respectively, P = 0.543), waist-to-hip ratio (0.95 ± 0.08, 0.94 ± 0.08, and 0.95 ± 0.08, respectively, P = 0.157), blood pressure levels (systolic 139 ± 21, 143 ± 24, and 143 ± 23 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.444; diastolic 85 ± 13, 86 ± 12, and 87 ± 15 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.414), and prevalence of hypertension (68, 67, and 68%, respectively, P = 0.852). Glycemic control (A1C 7.12 ± 1.98, 6.63 ± 1.90, and 6.76 ± 2.08, respectively, P = 0.145; fasting plasma glucose 200 ± 87, 178 ± 75, and 180 ± 71 mg/dl, respectively, P = 0.196) and lipid profile (total cholesterol 206 ± 48, 215 ± 47, and 220 ± 51 mg/dl, respectively, P = 0.218; HDL cholesterol 43 ± 17, 44 ± 12, and 44 ± 11 mg/dl, respectively, P = 0.828; triglycerides OR [95% CI] 168 [34–999], 149 [29–1,470], and 156 [43–1,439] mg/dl, respectively, P = 0.266) were also similar in the three genotypes. When patients with serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dl were analyzed to avoid interference of the renal status on the lipid profile, the triglyceride levels were higher in those with the TT genotype (171 [34–899] mg/dl) than those with the AA genotype (147 [27–600], P = 0.019), but similar to those with the AT genotype (162 [37–877] mg/dl). The group with the TT genotype also had lower total cholesterol compared with the group with the AA genotype (191 ± 50 vs. 217 ± 44 mg/dl, P = 0.026). The levels of total cholesterol in the AT group (220 ± 42 mg/dl) were not different from the AA or TT groups. None of the other clinical and laboratory parameters differed across the genotypes in this subset of patients (data not shown). The frequency of the TT genotype was the same for patients with normoalbuminuria and known duration of type 2 diabetes >5 years (4.7%) or >10 years (4.8%), indicating that type 2 diabetes duration >5 years did not cause further depletion of the TT genotype among normoalbuminuric patients. Considering only white Brazilians, the TT genotype distribution was similar to the entire group (4.7% normoalbuminuric, 10.8% renal disease).
Joslin sample. Thus, concurring with the results of the Brazilian study, the FABP2 polymorphism was significantly associated with proteinuria and ESRD, with the TT genotype conferring greater risk of disease compared with genotypes bearing the A allele.
Haplotype analyses.
In these two samples of patients with type 2 diabetes, the presence of the A54T polymorphism of the FABP2 gene was associated with a two- to threefold increased risk for renal involvement. The magnitude of the association was the same for microalbuminuria, proteinuria, and/or ESRD, suggesting that this DNA variant is associated with the development of renal disease beginning in its early stages. To our knowledge, this is the first time this association has been reported. The A54T polymorphism of the FABP2 gene has been associated with an increase in FABP2 affinity for long-chain fatty acids such as stearic and palmitic acids and consequently with higher levels of these fatty acids after a test meal (18). We have previously reported that patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria had higher levels of saturated fatty acids, especially stearic and palmitic acids, than normoalbuminuric patients (12). Saturated fatty acids might be related to endothelial dysfunction (10), and there is epidemiological evidence that they are risk factors for cardiovascular mortality (11). The possible mechanism through which the A54T polymorphism causes renal disease has not been established but might be related to endothelial dysfunction and glomerular damage due to higher levels of saturated fatty acids. Moreover, this polymorphism has also been associated with insulin resistance (19,20,21) and higher levels of triglycerides in the fasting state and after a fatty meal challenge (18,22). In the present study, the association of the TT genotype with elevated triglycerides was only evident among patients without renal function impairment (serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dl). In the total group, this effect was not seen probably due to interference from the renal failure or dietary orientation. None of these patients were on lipid-lowering drugs at the time of the evaluation. We should be cautious regarding the results of positive associations in cross-sectional studies. Many of the associations reported are spurious and not confirmed by replication studies. To minimize such effect, it has been proposed that genetic association studies should include a large number of patients, low P values, and a priori clear biological hypothesis (23). In the present study, the a priori hypothesis was based on our previous observations; the sample was large enough to detect an OR of 2.4 with a power of 92% and to reach a low P value (P = 0.0005). To assess whether these results could be replicated, a sample of American patients with type 2 diabetes was evaluated. In this independent group, the same pattern and magnitude of association was observed. Furthermore, the frequency of the T allele observed in the Brazilian sample was similar to that observed in other diabetic populations (Pima Indians, white Europeans) but lower than described for Guadeloupe Indians or Asians (9). The linkage disequilibrium map showed that the A54T polymorphism is located in a haploblock that spans 50 kb and includes 22 SNPs. However, among the frequent haplotypes (>2%), the T54 allele is present in only one of six possibilities. It is interesting that in this haploblock, there are no other known or putative genes except for FABP2. At present, we cannot exclude that one of the other DNA sequence differences on this haplotype but within the FABF2 locus could be causally related to diabetic kidney disease. However, this would require sequencing this very long haplotype together with functional studies, a task that is beyond the scope of this study. Another aspect that needs to be considered in association studies is survival bias. In the scenario of an important survival effect, the increased prevalence of the TT genotype among case subjects would reflect that this polymorphism is associated with increased survival. Since this is a cross-sectional study, we cannot completely rule out this possibility. However, there is evidence suggesting that this was not the case. Based on the putative mechanism of the polymorphism, one concern was the association with IHD. These data were available for only a subset of the patients, and no association was demonstrated. Furthermore, if survival were an important contribution to our findings, we would expect that the TT frequency would change according to type 2 diabetes duration. This was not observed.
In conclusion, the A54T FABP2 polymorphism is associated with renal involvement in type 2 diabetic patients even in early stages such as microalbuminuria. However, this gene seems to have a minor effect, since the frequency of the risk genotype among case subjects was only
This study was partially supported by grants from Projeto de Núcleos de Excelência do Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia and Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Additional support was provided by grant DK-058549 from the National Institutes of Health and grant NMRC/0,850/2004 from the National Medical Research Council, Singapore. L.H.C. is the recipient of a postdoctoral grant, and C.C. is the recipient of a scholarship from the Fundação de Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (Fundação CAPES).
Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org. Received for publication January 17, 2005 and accepted in revised form July 22, 2005
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||