Diabetes 54:582-586, 2005 © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a master regulator of fatty acid catabolism, and PPAR
activators delay the onset of type 2 diabetes. We examined association between three PPAR
gene polymorphisms (an A
C variant in intron 1, the L162V variant, and the intron 7 G
C variant) and age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in 912 Caucasian type 2 diabetic subjects. Individually, PPAR
gene variants did not influence age at diagnosis, but in combination, the rare alleles of both the intron 1 A
C (P < 0.001) and intron 7 G
C (P = 0.025) variants synergistically lowered age at diagnosis (interaction P < 0.001). Overall, the PPAR
haplotype signficantly influenced age at diagnosis (P = 0.027), with the C-L-C and C-V-C haplotypes (intron 1-L162V-intron 7) accelerating onset of diabetes by 5.9 (P = 0.02) and 10 (P = 0.03) years, respectively, as compared with the common A-L-G haplotype, and was associated with an odds ratio for early-onset diabetes (age at diagnosis
45 years) of 3.75 (95% CI 1.65–8.56, P = 0.002). Intron 1 C-allele carriers also progressed more rapidly to insulin monotherapy (AA 9.4 ± 1.5 and AC + CC 5.3 ± 1.1 years, P = 0.002). These data indicate that PPAR
gene variation influences the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes.
Abbreviations: EDSC, Ealing Diabetic Study of Coagulation; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; UDACS, University College Diabetes and Cardiovascular Study
The etiology of type 2 diabetes involves the progressive development of insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and culminates in pancreatic ß-cell failure. Fatty acids contribute to the development and progression of type 2 diabetes. Increased fatty acid concentrations reduce skeletal muscle glucose uptake and oxidation, stimulate hepatic gluconeogenesis while inhibiting insulin suppression of gluconeogenesis, and inhibit insulin production and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic ß-cells (rev. in 1). Increased fasting plasma fatty acid concentrations predict the deterioration of glucose tolerance (2) and are a risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes (3).
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
is a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-regulated transcription factors for which ligands include long-chain fatty acids, eicosanoids, and the fibrate class of lipid-lowering drugs (4). PPAR
is expressed at high levels in tissues that catabolize fatty acids, notably liver, skeletal muscle, and heart, and at lower levels in other tissues, including pancreas (5). PPAR
is a master regulator of fatty acid utilization (6), and activation of PPAR
causes a dramatic lowering of plasma, hepatic, and intramuscular triglycerides (7). In rodent models of type 2 diabetes, administration of PPAR
agonists reduces adiposity, normalizes fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, and improves insulin suppresson of endogeneous glucose production (8–10). Furthermore, insulin secretion and pancreatic hypertrophy and degeneration were improved by PPAR
activation (9,10). Recently, bezafibrate was shown to reduce the incidence and delay the onset of type 2 diabetes, indicating that such effects may also occur in humans (11).
These data indicate that PPAR
acts pleiotropically to ameliorate insulin resistance in the major cell types involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Variation in the PPAR
gene influences plasma lipid levels (12,13), cardiac growth (14), and risk of coronary artery disease (15). We therefore examined association between variation in the PPAR
gene and age at diagnosis (as a surrogate for age of onset) and progression to type 2 diabetes in Caucasian type 2 diabetic participants in the University College Diabetes and Cardiovascular Study (UDACS) (16) and Ealing Diabetic Study of Coagulation (EDSC).
| RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genotyping.
The intron 1 A/C variant (refsnp 135539) was genotyped using forward primer CCAGGGGGAGGAAAGAGTGAA and reverse primer GCCACAACTAAGCAGGCAGTG to generate a product of 210 bp, which, when digested with HinfI, gave products of 148 and 62 bp in the presence of the C-allele. The L162V (refsnp 1800206) and intron 7 G/C (refsnp 4253778) variants were genotyped as previously described (15).
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed by univariate ANOVA and linear regression using SPSS (version 12; SPSS, Chicago, IL). Factors and covariates, together with all two-way interactions, were entered into the statistical model and removed in a stepwise manner until a parsimonious model containing only factors or interactions that were statistically significant was obtained. Mean age at diagnosis, adjusted for family history of diabetes, sex, and smoking, was generated by calculating residuals and adding to the overall mean value. Haplotype frequencies and effects were determined using THESIAS (18). Smoking status and BMI at diagnosis were not available; therefore, measures at recruitment were used. BMI, triglycerides, and duration of diabetes before insulin treatment were log10 transformed to normalize distribution. The three V162 allele homozygotes were combined with V162 allele carriers in all analyses. Data are shown as means ± SE, and a P value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C variant is situated
12.5 kb 3' of the site of transcriptional initiation of the PPAR
gene, 55 kb 5' of L162V, and 71 kb 5' of the intron 7 G
C variant. Rare allele frequencies were intron 1 A
C 0.404 (95% CI 0.381–0.427), L162V 0.064 (0.053–0.076), and intron 7 G
C 0.187 (0.169–0.205). The intron 1 A
C variant was selected due to its rare allele frequency and close proximity to the 5' end of the PPAR
gene, whereas the L162V and intron 7 G
C variants have previously shown positive results in association studies (12–15). No other PPAR
variants were examined. Genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and were not different between the two study centers. Allele frequencies were not significantly different between type 2 diabetic subjects and those previously reported in healthy U.K. middle-aged men (15). All three variants were in linkage disequilibrium (intron 1-L162V D' = 0.57, P = 0.0001; intron 1-intron 7 D' = 0.46, P = 2.6 x 10–8; L162V-intron 7 D' = 0.58, P = 2.7 x 10–23).
|
gene variants did not influence age at diagnosis when examined by ANOVA (Table 2), but when examined in combination, both the intron 1 A
C (P < 0.001) and intron 7 G
C (P = 0.025) variants significantly influenced age at diagnosis and showed a significant interaction (intron 1 x intron 7 interaction, P < 0.001), acting synergistically to lower age at diagnosis (Table 3). In multivariate linear regression, sex (P = 0.001), currently smoking (P = 0.026), family history of diabetes (P < 0.001), intron 1 genotype (P = 0.001), intron 7 genotype (P = 0.045), and the intron 1 x intron 7 interaction (P = 0.003) were independent predictors of age at diagnosis. The effects of PPAR
genotype were the same by study center, which did not independently influence age at diagnosis. Haplotype analysis revealed that PPAR
haplotype significantly influenced age at diagnosis (P = 0.037) (Table 4). Haplotypes 6 and 8, comprising the intron 1 C- and intron 7 C-alleles with the L162V L162 allele (haplotype 6, C-L-C) or the V162 allele (haplotype 8, C-V-C), were associated with an age at diagnosis of 5.86 ± 2.57 (P = 0.02) and 9.98 ± 4.65 (P = 0.03) years, respectively, earlier than the common haplotype.
|
|
|
in early-onset type 2 diabetes was examined. PPAR
haplotype frequency was calculated in subjects stratified by age of diagnosis of
45 or >45 years, based on the previous use of this cutoff age in a linkage scan for age at diagnosis (19). Overall, PPAR
haplotype frequency was highly significantly different between young-onset and later-onset subjects (P = 1.4 x 10–7), with haplotype 6 increasing risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes (odds ratio 3.75, 95% CI 1.65–8.56, P = 0.002). Haplotype frequencies were not different between the entire type 2 diabetes sample and middle-aged U.K. men without overt type 2 diabetes (P = 0.50) but were significantly different between middle-aged U.K. men and early-onset subjects (P = 0.024) (Table 4).
We investigated whether PPAR
variants influence the progression of type 2 diabetes, as estimated by the duration of diabetes before commencing insulin monotherapy. In UDACS, carriers and homozygotes of the rare C-allele progressed to insulin treatment significantly earlier than A allele homozygotes (AA 9.4 ± 1.5 and AC + CC 5.3 ± 1.1 years, P = 0.002). The L162V and intron 7 G
C variants did not influence duration before insulin therapy. PPAR
genotype did not influence whether subjects were on an oral hypoglycemic agent, insulin, or both an oral hypoglycemic agent and insulin therapy (not shown). Measures of progression were not available in EDSC.
Treatment with PPAR
activators beneficially alters plasma lipid profile, and we previously demonstrated that variation in the PPAR
gene influences plasma lipid levels in dyslipidemic type 2 diabetic subjects (12). We therefore examined whether PPAR
gene variation influences plasma lipid levels in type 2 diabetic subjects, but observed no significant association with plasma triglycerides or LDL, HDL, or total cholesterol concentrations (not shown).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene influences the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes, in concurrence with the recent observation that bezafibrate reduces the incidence and delays the onset of type 2 diabetes (11). Allele and haplotype frequencies were not different between healthy middle-aged U.K. men and the type 2 diabetes sample, but haplotype frequency was different between subjects with age at diagnosis
45 years and both those with later age at diagnosis and with healthy middle-aged U.K. men without overt type 2 diabetes, indicating that PPAR
predisposes to early-onset type 2 diabetes. PPAR
gene variants influenced age at diagnosis in combination and in haplotype analysis. Carriers of the intron 1 and 7 rare C-alleles had a dramatically younger age at diagnosis, an effect confirmed in haplotype analysis, in which haplotypes 6 and 8, comprising the intron 1 C- and intron 7 C-alleles with the L162 or V162 alleles, respectively, were associated with an age at diagnosis 5.8 and 10.0 years earlier than the common haplotype. Genome scans have identified several loci linked to age at diagnosis (19,20), one of which maps in a subset of families with age at diagnosis <45 years to chromosome 22q11 (19), 28 Mb centromeric to the PPAR
gene.
The PPAR
intron 1 genotype was also associated with a more rapid progression to insulin monotherapy, suggesting that PPAR
influences the rate of development of insulin resistance and/or progression to ß-cell failure. PPAR
is expressed in liver, skeletal muscle, and pancreas (5) and could therefore affect the disease process at multiple levels. In rodents, PPAR
activators lowered fasting plasma triglycerides, and free fatty acids, as well as lowered visceral adiposity and muscle and hepatic steatosis, resulting in improved hepatic and muscle insulin sensitivity and improved pancreatic ß-cell function. Genetically determined reduced PPAR
levels may influence any of the above-mentioned factors. We did not observe association between PPAR
variation and plasma triglyceride levels (fasting triglyceride levels were not available for all subjects), thus decreasing the power to observe an effect. Studies that directly assess the impact of PPAR
gene variants on levels of intramuscular and intrahepatic triglycerides, whole-body glucose uptake, and ß-cell function will elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed effects.
The PPAR
genotype influences the risk of coronary artery disease (15), and it is conceivable that it could increase the likelihood of subjects presenting with heart disease and subsequently being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, thus confounding the current study. The presence of cardiovascular disease was in fact associated with later age at diagnosis (absence 53.4 ± 0.5 years, presence 56.5 ± 0.7 years, P = 0.001) and did not influence the effect of PPAR
genotype on age at diagnosis, indicating that these data are not confounded by cardiovascular disease. The differences between UDACS and EDSC in BMI, measures of glycemic control, blood pressure, and plasma lipids did not confound the effect of PPAR
haplotype on age at diagnosis.
Mechanistically, several lines of evidence lead us to speculate that the intron 1 C- and intron 7 C-alleles mark a haplotype with reduced PPAR
gene expression. First, in previous studies, the intron 7 C-allele shows opposing effects to the V162 allele (14,15), which encodes a more active PPAR
in vitro (12). Furthermore, the intron 7 C-allele is associated with reduced response to fenofibrate in the DAIS (Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study) (21). Finally, PPAR
activators delay onset of type 2 diabetes in humans (11) and rats (10), indicating that increased PPAR
activity protects against the onset of type 2 diabetes.
PPAR
interacts with several genes that influence type 2 diabetes. Hepatic PPAR
gene expression is regulated by hepatocyte nuclear factor 4
(22), a closely related member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily that is associated with risk of type 2 diabetes (23). Additionally, genetic variation in PPAR
coactivator-1, which also coactivates PPAR
, influences the insulin secretory response in Pima Indians (24). The retinoid X receptor
, with which PPAR
forms heterodimers, also influences insulin resistance (25). It will be interesting to examine interaction between PPAR
and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4
, PPAR
coactivator-1, and retinoid X receptor
gene variants in subsequent studies.
In summary, we demonstrate that PPAR
gene variation influences the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes in human subjects. The mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear and warrant future investigation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank the medical staff and patients who contributed to the UDACS and EDSC.
Received for publication June 2, 2004 and accepted in revised form October 27, 2004
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activation lowers muscle lipids and improves insulin sensitivity in high fat-fed rats: comparison with PPAR-
activation. Diabetes 50:411–417, 2001
activators improve insulin sensitivity and reduce adiposity. J Biol Chem 275: 2000
agonist treatment in a transgenic model of type 2 diabetes reverses the lipotoxic state and improves glucose homeostasis. Diabetes 52:1770–1778, 2003
activation prevents diabetes in OLETF rats: comparison with PPAR-
activation. Diabetes 52:2331–2337, 2003
gene is associated with altered function in vitro and plasma lipid concentrations in type II diabetic subjects. Diabetologia 43:673–680, 2000[Medline]
gene: association of the L162V mutation with hyperapobetalipoproteinemia. J Lipid Res 41:945–952, 2000
gene variants influence progression of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of coronary artery disease. Circulation 105:1440–1445, 2002
gene on chromosome 20q is associated with type 2 diabetes and appears to contribute to the evidence for linkage in an Ashkenazi Jewish population. Diabetes 53:1134–1140, 2004
coactivator-1 is associated with altered lipid oxidation and early insulin secretion in Pima Indians. Diabetes 52:895–898, 2003This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. T. Villarreal-Molina, M. T. Flores-Dorantes, O. Arellano-Campos, M. Villalobos-Comparan, M. Rodriguez-Cruz, A. Miliar-Garcia, A. Huertas-Vazquez, M. Menjivar, S. Romero-Hidalgo, N. H. Wacher, et al. Association of the ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter A1 R230C Variant With Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes in a Mexican Population Diabetes, February 1, 2008; 57(2): 509 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tanaka, J. M. Ordovas, J. Delgado-Lista, F. Perez-Jimenez, C. Marin, P. Perez-Martinez, P. Gomez, and J. Lopez-Miranda Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {alpha} polymorphisms and postprandial lipemia in healthy men J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 1402 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Andrulionyte, T. Kuulasmaa, J.-L. Chiasson, M. Laakso, and for the STOP-NIDDM Study Group Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} Gene (PPARA) Influence the Conversion From Impaired Glucose Tolerance to Type 2 Diabetes: The STOP-NIDDM Trial Diabetes, April 1, 2007; 56(4): 1181 - 1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J O'Loughlin, E Dugas, K Maximova, and N Kishchuk Reporting of ethnicity in research on chronic disease: update Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2006; 82(973): 737 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Gilde, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors at the Crossroads of Obesity, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 27, 2006; 48(9_Suppl_A): A24 - A32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lalloyer, B. Vandewalle, F. Percevault, G. Torpier, J. Kerr-Conte, M. Oosterveer, R. Paumelle, J.-C. Fruchart, F. Kuipers, F. Pattou, et al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Improves Pancreatic Adaptation to Insulin Resistance in Obese Mice and Reduces Lipotoxicity in Human Islets Diabetes, June 1, 2006; 55(6): 1605 - 1613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Diabetes | Diabetes Care | Clinical Diabetes | Diabetes Spectrum |