Diabetes 54:629-637, 2005 © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc. Free Fatty Acid Regulation of Glucose-Dependent Intrinsic Oscillatory Lipolysis in Perifused Isolated Rat AdipocytesFrom the Obesity Research Center, Department of Molecular Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Free fatty acids (FFAs) and glycerol oscillate in plasma. This study examined intrinsic lipolytic oscillations within adipocytes. Rat adipocytes were perifused with Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer: 1) ± 2 mmol/l glucose; 2) +1 µmol/l isoproterenol ± 2 mmol/l glucose; 3) + increasing oleate; and 4) + increasing percent BSA. At 2 mmol/l glucose, there were 9 ± 1 glycerol, FFAs, and lactate pulses per hour with a pulse duration of 5 ± 1 min. Lipolytic stimulation caused a 5080% increase in the amplitude of lipolytic oscillations. Removal of glucose caused a 4070% decrease in the amplitude of lipolytic oscillations and disturbed the pulsatility. Exogenous FFAs suppressed lipolysis and oscillatory amplitude, possibly because of increased cytosolic long-chain coenzyme A (LC-CoA). Increasing percent BSA increased stimulated lipolysis and oscillatory amplitude, possibly because of decreased intracellular LC-CoA. These data show, for the first time, intrinsic lipolytic oscillations, which are glucose dependent and modulated by FFAs. We hypothesize that lipolytic oscillations are driven by oscillatory glucose metabolism, which leads to oscillatory relief of LC-CoA inhibition of triglyceride lipase(s). The results contribute to the understanding of physiological and biochemical regulators of lipolysis, such as glucose and FFAs. Lipolytic oscillations may be beneficial in the delivery of FFAs to liver, pancreas, and other tissues.
Abnormal fat metabolism plays an important role in the pathogenesis of obesity-related type 2 diabetes (14), and elevated plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations are associated with peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance (57). Adipose tissue is a dynamic organ that is vital to the regulation of glucose homeostasis, whole-body energy fuel regulation, feeding behavior, and body composition. It has previously been shown by Getty et al. (8), in dogs, that in the basal fasted state, FFA and glycerol oscillate in plasma with an average of nine pulses per hour and an average pulse duration of 5 min. It has also been shown that there is oscillatory lipolysis from the omentum with an average of 10 pulses per hour and an average pulse length of 6 min. Because lipolysis is primarily regulated by adrenergic modulation and insulin concentration, it is possible that either could be driving the plasma FFA oscillation. With the plasma insulin oscillation removed by the insulin clamp, FFAs still showed an oscillation in plasma, suggesting that insulin does not drive the FFA oscillation (8). The study also looked at the effect of ß-adrenergic blockade. In three of the nine dogs studied, propranolol infusion seemed to suppress the FFA oscillation. In dogs where the FFA oscillation remained, propranolol infusion significantly disrupted the regularity of the plasma FFA oscillation (9,10). Further investigation of the role of the central nervous system in the regulation of in vivo lipolytic oscillations by Hucking et al. (11) suggested that lipolysis in the fasting state consisted of an oscillatory component dependent upon sympathetic innervation and a nonoscillatory component. In both above-mentioned studies, it is possible that lipolysis was still oscillating on the level of individual fat pads or even individual adipocytes and that these oscillations became unsynchronized and thus were lost, dampened, or below detection when sympathetic input was blocked. Thus, the present study determined whether the plasma FFA oscillation originates within the adipocyte from an internal pacemaker similar to that seen in the ß-cell of the pancreas (1214). The basal profiles of FFA, glycerol, and lactate release from isolated perifused adipocytes were determined in the basal state (± glucose), during stimulation of lipolysis with 1 µmol/l isoproterenol (± glucose), during perifusion with increasing concentrations of oleate, and during perifusion with increasing percent BSA (+ isoproterenol). The results demonstrated that there were intrinsic lipolytic oscillations in adipocytes that were dependent on glucose and regulated by FFAs. The study also showed that glucose metabolism oscillated and that there appeared to be a link between glycolytic and lipolytic oscillations. The data support a model where lipolytic oscillations are driven by oscillatory glucose metabolism, which leads to oscillatory relief of inhibition of triglyceride lipase(s) (TGL) by long-chain coenzyme A (LC-CoA).
Sprague-Dawley male rats weighing 150250 g were used. The animals were housed in the Laboratory Animal Science Center at Boston University Medical Center. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Boston University Medical Center. The animals were fed normal rat chow and water ad libitum until time of death by anesthesia and cervical dislocation. The perifusing buffer consisted of Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (KRBB) composed of the following: 120 mmol/l NaCl, 25 mmol/l NaHCO3, 5 mmol/l KCl, 1.2 mmol/l KH2PO4, 1.2 mmol/l MgSO4, 2.5 mmol/l CaCl2, and 20 mmol/l MOPS. The final pH of the perifusing buffer was 7.4 at 37°C and contained either 0.05% or 0.1% BSA as indicated. Dulbeccos PBS, isoproterenol, and oleic acid were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). BSA, fraction V, was purchased from U.S. Biochemical (Cleveland, OH). The BSA was purified by charcoal treatment to remove lipids (15) and then dialyzed against KRBB (16). Collegenase, type 1, was purchased from Worthington Biochemical (Lakewood, NJ).
Adipocyte isolation.
Adipocyte perifusion. In all experiments, samples of the effluent were collected every minute and measured for FFA, glycerol, and lactate. Samples were stored at 20°C until processing. Because of the low levels of FFA, glycerol, and lactate in the collected effluent, the samples were concentrated. Samples were dried down in a high-performance vacuum pump (Speedvac system, model SS11; Savant Instruments, Holbrook, NY), reconstituted in distilled water, and then assayed.
Assays.
Calculations. To determine that oscillations were due to oscillations in lipolysis and not due to an artifact from sample collection or handling, effluent from basally treated adipocytes was collected, pooled, realiquoted, concentrated, assayed, and analyzed with ULTRA. No significant pulses were detected (data not shown). The FFA-to-glycerol ratio was determined at each time point and then averaged. The FFA-to-glycerol ratio was not calculated from the average FFA and glycerol concentrations.
Statistical analysis.
Lipolytic oscillations in isolated adipocytes. The time courses of FFA, glycerol, and lactate release from perifused adipocytes were examined in the basal and stimulated state and can be seen in Fig. 1 (summary in Table 1). Figure 1A shows basal lipolysis and lactate release (100 min of the 120-min basal experiment), Fig. 1B shows the effect of isoproterenol (last 100 min of the stimulated experiment; the entire response to isoproterenol can be seen in Fig. 2B), and Fig. 1C shows basal and stimulated FFA and glycerol oscillatory profiles together to demonstrate the correlation of the two profiles (data in Fig. 1A, B, and C are from separate experiments). Adipocytes were perifused with KRBB containing 0.05% BSA and 2 mmol/l glucose for 1 h to determine basal lipolysis and lactate release. After the basal period, the adipocytes were either continued in the basal state for 1 h or were stimulated with 1 µmol/l isoproterenol for 2 h. The open circles show raw data, whereas the solid lines show the significant pulse profile as determined by ULTRA (Fig. 1C shows only the ULTRA profiles). There were an average of 9 ± 1 pulses per hour (pulse frequency) of FFA, glycerol, and lactate, with each pulse ("burst" of release) lasting an average of 5 ± 1 min (pulse duration).
Isoproterenol caused the expected significant increase in FFA and glycerol release with an increase in the FFA-to-glycerol ratio. Isoproterenol caused a significant decrease in lactate release, suggesting that glucose was being used to re-esterify FFA rather than being metabolized to lactate. Interestingly, as can be seen in Fig. 1B, isoproterenol caused a significant increase in the amplitude of FFA and glycerol oscillations and a significant decrease in the amplitude of lactate oscillations. Stimulation with isoproterenol did not change FFA, glycerol, or lactate pulse frequency or pulse duration when compared with basal. For the duration of most experiments, the FFA and glycerol oscillations remained in phase and appeared to be correlated (Fig. 1C).
Glucose dependence of oscillatory lipolysis. The effects of glucose removal on the profiles of FFA, glycerol, and lactate release during isoproterenol stimulation are illustrated in Fig. 2B (Table 1). The stimulation of lipolysis and the increase in the amplitude of lipolytic oscillation by isoproterenol seen in the presence of glucose was not seen when glucose was removed from the perifusing buffer. However, stimulation did prevent the fall in lipolytic oscillatory amplitude. With stimulation in the absence of glucose, lactate release was suppressed by >80% and even transiently dropped below the detection level of the assay.
Fatty acid regulation of oscillatory lipolysis.
This study provides the first documentation of intrinsic lipolytic oscillations in isolated adipocytes. The oscillations had a pulse duration and pulse frequency similar to that seen in plasma in vivo. When lipolysis was stimulated with isoproterenol, there was a significant increase in FFA and glycerol release, with a significant increase in the pulse amplitude with no change in the pulse duration or number of pulses per hour. The discovery of an intrinsic lipolytic oscillation is important, since it contributes to the understanding of the normal physiological and biochemical processes that control whether FFAs are re-esterified to be stored as fat or released through the process of lipolysis to be used as fuel. Recognition of the regulators of lipolytic oscillations, such as glucose and FFAs, may help in determining the pathophysiology of dyslipidemia, which occurs in obesity and obesity-related type 2 diabetes. The data suggested that there was oscillatory glucose metabolism within adipocytes, since release of lactate was oscillatory. This result is consistent with previous work done by Lipkin et al. (24), who examined glucose oxidation to CO2 in isolated perifused rat adipocytes and showed that initiation of perifusion with insulin induced oscillatory glucose oxidation. Also, preliminary data from our laboratory have shown oscillations in oxygen consumption in the minute time range from single 3T3-L1 adipocytes (R.F. Corkey, B.E. Corkey, unpublished data). It is well known that oscillations in glycolysis exist in many cell types (2529). Like oscillatory insulin secretion from ß-cells, we suggest that oscillatory glycolysis may be the pacemaker for the intrinsic lipolytic oscillation in adipocytes. The mechanism of glycolytic oscillations in skeletal muscle extracts involves autocatalytic AMP-dependent activation of phosphofructokinase by its product fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, thus leading to bursts in phosphofructokinase activity (26). It is possible that glycolytic oscillations would cause secondary oscillations in most of cellular metabolism, including lipolysis (29,30). Because the similarity in frequency between glycolytic and lipolytic oscillations suggested a relationship between the two pathways, we examined the requirement for glucose in lipolytic oscillations. In the basal state, glucose removal from the perifusion buffer tended to decrease the amount of FFA and glycerol released, while markedly decreasing lactate release. Interestingly, the absence of glucose disrupted the pulsatility of lipolytic oscillations in that no significant pulses were detected in the range of pulse duration expected. Furthermore, the absence of glucose caused a significant decrease in the amplitude of the FFA and glycerol pulses that were detected. These results show that lipolytic oscillations depended on the presence of glucose, suggesting that oscillatory glucose metabolism may play a role in generating the lipolytic oscillation. The results also showed that the lipolytic response to isoproterenol depended on glucose. Without glucose, there was no increase in lipolysis or in the amplitude of lipolytic oscillations upon stimulation with isoproterenol. Although lipolytic oscillations depended on glucose to maintain their amplitude, removal of glucose did not completely abolish either lipolytic or lactate oscillations or significantly suppress lipolysis, suggesting that 1) basal lipolysis does not depend on external glucose and 2) there must be an internal source of glucose metabolism within the adipocyte. It is probable that the adipocyte was able to provide glucose from the breakdown of glycogen, and this source was enough to maintain basal lipolysis. McMahon and Frost (31) showed that in glucose-deprived 3T3-L1 cells, glycogen is depleted in a time-dependent manner with a half-time of 6 h. In interpreting the results of this study, one must keep in mind the role that glucose, BSA, and ATP play in lipolysis. Both Fassina et al. (32) and Giudicelli et al. (33) have shown that omission of glucose from the incubation buffer reduced the basal intracellular ATP level in adipocytes, as well as decreased the amount of cAMP formation. However, removal of glucose did not affect dibutyryl cyclic AMP-induced lipolysis, suggesting that ATP issued from glucose oxidation is not essential for stimulation of hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL). Thus, Giudicelli et al. (33) concluded that, in conditions of reduced glucose availability, activation of lipolysis by HSL is still possible, with the ATP required being supplied in sufficient amounts by mitochondrial oxidation of noncarbohydrate substrates such as fatty acids. This may also play a role in the results from this study, where basal lipolysis continued even in the absence of glucose. It is also important to note that all the above-mentioned experiments were carried out at a very low BSA concentration (0.05%). It has been shown that the accumulation of intracellular FFA in adipocytes inhibits the rate of lipolysis and that this effect can be diminished by the presence of albumin (3336). Burns et al. (35) showed that when human adipocytes were incubated in albumin-free buffer, isoproterenol failed to stimulate lipolysis or increase cAMP and that this was due to the increase of intracellular FFA. This is similar to the results of this study, where lipolytic stimulation was abolished in the presence of low BSA and no glucose.
Model of lipolytic oscillations in adipocytes.
In our model, oscillatory glycolysis would result in oscillatory formation of -GP, leading to oscillatory removal of LC-CoA to form triglycerides, thus causing oscillatory levels of LC-CoA. These oscillatory levels of LC-CoA within the cytosol would cause oscillatory inhibition of TGL and thus lead to oscillatory release of FFA and glycerol. LC-CoA could inhibit only HSL, all triglyceride lipases present in the adipocyte, or perhaps a specific non-HSL lipase. The model is consistent with our results showing that glucose is necessary to maintain lipolytic oscillations and the response to isoproterenol. Without sufficient glucose, there would be inadequate production of -GP, causing LC-CoA levels to rise. This would inhibit TGL and thus suppress lipolysis and dampen lipolytic oscillations. However, as mentioned earlier, basal lipolysis, while decreased, was not significantly suppressed in the absence of glucose. This could be due to the above-mentioned contribution of glycogen to -GP formation or to the above-mentioned presence of other triglyceride lipases besides HSL that may not be sensitive to LC-CoA inhibition and may maintain basal lipolysis. One way to test this model is to examine the effect of increased intracellular LC-CoA on lipolytic oscillations. We hypothesized that an increase in FFA within the adipocyte would decrease lipolysis and lipolytic oscillations, whereas a decrease in FFA would increase lipolysis and lipolytic oscillations. Increasing concentrations of exogenous FFA significantly suppressed both lipolysis and lactate release in a concentration-dependent manner, consistent with suppression due to increased cytosolic LC-CoA. And more importantly, exogenous FFA suppressed the amplitude of both lipolytic and lactate oscillations. In a further test of the model, we examined the effect of increasing the percent BSA of the perifusion buffer on stimulated lipolysis and lipolytic oscillations. Increasing the percent BSA significantly stimulated lipolysis and the amplitude of lipolytic oscillations in a concentration-dependent manner. These results suggested that in conditions of low BSA, increased intracellular FFA, due to lipolytic stimulation, inhibited lipolysis and lipolytic oscillations due to increased LC-CoA. Increasing BSA concentrations outside the cell allowed for increased outward movement of FFA and thus diminished the LC-CoA inhibition of lipolysis. These results support our hypothesis and suggest that in situations of high plasma FFA, LC-CoA inhibition of TGL may play a role in preventing further increases in plasma FFA.
Although all the above-mentioned experiments support our hypothesis of glycolytically driven oscillatory LC-CoA regulation of triglyceride lipase(s) within the adipocyte, there are other mechanisms for oscillatory lipolysis that should be considered. It is possible that the intracellular levels of One question that arises is how the isolated adipocytes are synchronized to release FFA, glycerol, and lactate in an oscillatory manner. One possibility is that the released FFA act in a paracrine manner to synchronize neighboring cells. Another possibility is that the proximity of the cells to each other allows for cell-to-cell communication, as has been suggested in perifusion studies measuring insulin secretion (43). Also, a recent study by Deeney et al. (29) showed synchronous oscillations in insulin release among clonal ß-cells grown in separate wells. These cells were physically separated from each other and yet were stimulated by glucose to act in unison. Similar results were shown by Lipkin et al. (24), who showed that the oscillations in glycolysis in isolated adipocytes were not apparent until a step-jump in insulin or hydrogen peroxide was imposed. Although the role of lipolytic and glycolytic oscillations in adipose tissue is unknown, we anticipate that they may be important in maintaining normal fuel homeostasis and insulin sensitivity in various tissues. FFA oscillations may prevent insulin resistance and promote insulin secretion. It is not yet known whether FFA oscillations are lost or diminished in type 2 diabetes. Lipkin et al. (24) suggest that the oscillations of glycolysis in fat cells may allow metabolic efficiency to be optimized. This may also be true for lipolytic oscillations, in that delivery of FFA in an oscillatory pattern to tissues such as the liver and the ß-cell may be beneficial, providing the optimum balance between FFA and glucose uptake and metabolism, thus contributing to the maintenance of glucose homeostasis. In conclusion, there are basal intrinsic lipolytic oscillations present within adipocytes with a pulse duration of 5 min. The lipolytic oscillations depend on glucose and are regulated by FFA. It is hypothesized that lipolytic oscillations are driven by oscillatory glucose metabolism, which leads to oscillatory removal of LC-CoA inhibition of TGL. The results of this study contribute to the understanding of physiological and biochemical regulators of lipolysis, such as glucose and FFA. It is anticipated that lipolytic oscillations in adipose tissue may play an important role in the delivery of FFA to liver, ß-cells, muscle, and other tissues.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (DK56690 and 1F32DK1011001). The authors extend extreme gratitude to their colleagues. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Barbara E. Corkey, PhD, Obesity Research Center, Boston Medical Center, EBRC 840, 650 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118. E-mail: bcorkey{at}bu.edu Received for publication April 5, 2004 and accepted in revised form December 7, 2004
Abbreviations:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||