Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundsgaard, D.
Right arrow Articles by Markholst, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundsgaard, D.
Right arrow Articles by Markholst, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes 54:1040-1047, 2005
© 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.

In Vivo Control of Diabetogenic T-Cells by Regulatory CD4+CD25+ T-Cells Expressing Foxp3

Dorthe Lundsgaard, Thomas Lindebo Holm, Lars Hornum, and Helle Markholst

From the Hagedorn Research Institute, Gentofte, Denmark


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To understand the ability of regulatory T-cells to control diabetes development in clinically relevant situations, we established a new model of accelerated diabetes in young DP-BB rats by transferring purified T-cells from DR-BB rats made acutely diabetic. Transfer of 3, 5, 10, or 23 million pure in vitro–activated T-cells accelerated diabetes onset in >90% of the recipients, with the degree of acceleration being dosage dependent. Cotransfer of unfractionated leukocytes from healthy donors prevented diabetes. Full protection was achieved when protective cells were transferred 3–4 days before diabetogenic cells, whereas transfer 2 days before conferred only partial protection. Protection resided in the CD4+ fraction, as purified CD4+ T-cells prevented the accelerated diabetes. When CD25+ cells were depleted from these cells before they were transferred, their ability to prevent diabetes was impaired. In contrast, two million CD4+CD25+ cells (expressing Foxp3) prevented the accelerated diabetes when transferred both before and simultaneously with the diabetogenic T-cells. In addition, 2 million CD4+CD25+ T-cells prevented spontaneous diabetes, even when given to rats age 42 days, whereas 20 million CD4+CD25– cells (with low Foxp3 expression) were far less effective. We thus demonstrated that CD4+CD25+ cells exhibit powerful regulatory potential in rat diabetes.

Autoimmune destruction of pancreatic ß-cells arises as a result of a loss of tolerance. Regulatory T-cells, particularly subsets of CD4+ T-cells, are essential for maintaining self-tolerance. Several forms of regulatory CD4+ cells are known: in vitro–generated Tr1 and Th3 and naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ cells. Regulatory CD4+CD25+ T-cells can control the expansion of other CD4+ subsets (CD25–) and pathogenic subsets (CD4+CD45RBhigh) in vitro (1–4). They also control naive CD8+ cells (5) and memory CD8+ cells (6,7). However, reports on their ability to control pathogenic cells in vivo are fewer and more recent. In vitro–generated regulatory CD4+ T-cell clones prevent colitis (8) and gastritis (9). Natural CD4+CD25+ cells prevent Th1- and Th2-induced colitis as well as Leishmania major infection (10), control active experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (11), and ameliorate established colitis (12).

In the NOD mouse model of human type 1 diabetes, regulatory T-cells were first defined as a subpopulation of cells expressing CD4+CD45RBlow or CD4+CD62L+ (13–15). Later, these regulatory T-cells were shown to coexpress CD62L and CD25 (16).

In the other spontaneous model of type 1 diabetes, the DP-BB, regulatory cells have not been characterized with regard to their expression of CD25. Previously, spontaneous disease was prevented by a single transfer of spleen cells (17) and the prevention was enhanced by enrichment for CD4+ cells (18). However, transfer of leukocytes from normal rats has so far been successful only if the transfer takes place before the initiation of insulitis (i.e., at about age 1 month) (17,19); transfers conducted at 2 months accelerate diabetes (19). Protection is dependent on the engraftment of the ART2+ (formerly RT6) cells (20); in the control strain, the DR-BB, depletion of these induces diabetes (21). We recently showed that accelerated diabetes induced by the transfer of in vitro phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) plus ionomycin–activated unfractionated splenocytes from acutely diabetic donors is delayed by transfer of DR-BB–derived leukocytes (22).

In this study, we proposed to prevent diabetes using a new rat model where diabetes onset was accelerated by transfer of pure, in vitro PMA plus ionomycin–activated T-cells; that is, without activated antigen-presenting cells as were used in our previous study (22). Using preactivated diabetogenic T-cells in the current study allowed us to explore a situation that is relevant to understanding how such already activated T-cells can be controlled in patients with ongoing ß-cell destruction. Establishing the conditions required for preventing diabetes by cotransferring various leukocytes from healthy DR-BB rats allowed us to narrow a powerful regulatory potential to CD4+CD25+ T-cells. This new model in rats is well suited to testing preventive strategies for preclinical proof-of-concept, as such studies in mice alone have not been entirely predictive (23). Moreover, it allowed us to track diabetes-inducing and -protective subsets in vivo.


   RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
DP-BB and DR-BB rats were taken from our colony at the Hagedorn Research Institute; the housing conditions have been previously described (22). During the period of these experiments, the incidence of spontaneous diabetes before age 120 days was 93% (n = 491). The DR-BB rats have been without diabetes for decades. The animals were tested to ensure they were free of viruses, bacteria, Mycoplasma, and fungi according to recommendations of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (http://www.felasa.org). All experiments were conducted with approval from the Danish Animal Experimentation Inspectorate.

Induction of diabetes in DR-BB rats and screening for diabetes.
Diabetes was induced in young DR-BB rats by treating them with PolyI:C (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and concentrated hybridoma culture supernatant (clone DS4.23; secretes depleting rat antibody against rat ART2; kindly donated by Dr. J. Rozing), as previously described (22). These rats as well as DP-BB rats receiving cell transfers were screened from day 1 after intervention, as previously described (22). Diabetes was always confirmed by a blood glucose test >10 mmol/l.

Purification of diabetogenic T-cells and reactivation.
Spleens were excised within 8 days after diabetes onset and single-cell suspensions were made as previously described (22). The T-cells were purified on T-cell columns (R&D, Abingdon, U.K., or Cedarlane, Ontario, Canada) or with the MACS system (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). We observed no differences in the ability to transfer diabetes related to the purification method used. Positive purification with the MACS system was performed with direct rat Pan T-cell microbeads after dead cells were removed with the dead cell removal kit (Miltenyi Biotech). A twofold higher than recommended amount of Pan T-Cell microbeads was added. The cells were activated in vitro, harvested, and analyzed by flow cytometry, as previously described (22), using the lower concentration of ionomycin (0.3 µmol/l). Cells were transferred as previously described (22) into 25- to 35-day-old DP-BB rats.

Purification and transfer of protective cells from healthy DR-BB rats.
The spleen and/or mesenteric lymph nodes (mLNs) from healthy DR-BB rats age >65 days were removed into cold Hanks’ balanced salt solution without calcium and magnesium supplemented with 7.5% NaHCO3 (both from Life Technologies). A single-cell suspension was either transferred directly or further purified. Before all transfers, an aliquot of cells was used to analyze the subset distribution and estimate the frequency of apoptotic cells by flow cytometric analysis, as described below.

Unfractionated pooled cells were transferred 2, 3, or 4 days before the transfer of reactivated autoreactive cells, as indicated below. Cell subset distribution was as previously described (22, data not shown).

CD4+ cells were purified from mLNs by first labeling B-, NK-, and NKT-cells and CD8+ T-cells with purified antibodies (all mouse IgG1 isotype; CD45RA [OX-33], NKR-P1 [10/78], and CD8{alpha} [OX8], respectively; Pharmingen), then incubating cells with dynabeads M-450 rat anti-mouse IgG1 (Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway), according to the manufacturer’s description, except that only one bead was added per target cell. The purity of CD4+ cells was 96 ± 2%; <0.2% were CD8ß+. The CD4+ subset displayed a similar distribution of ART2high and CD25+ cells before and after purification (65 and 8.5%, respectively).

CD25+ or CD25– subsets of pure CD4+ T-cells were obtained with the MACS system. CD4+ T-cells were purified from mLNs, dead cells were removed, and live cells were labeled with mouse anti-CD25 phycoerythrin (PE; OX39; Pharmingen) and then labeled with anti-PE microbeads before being fractionated. Before fractionation, the frequency of CD25+ cells among CD4+ cells was 8 ± 2%; after fractionation, the CD25+ fraction was 78 ± 8% pure, with a mean FL2-fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 128 ± 32. The corresponding CD25– fraction was 98 ± 0.4% pure, with an MFI of 1.4 ± 0.4 (all data n = 7).

Monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry.
The antibodies used to characterize cells before they were transferred have been previously described (22). Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCalibur with 4th color option equipped with CellQuest and Attractor software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), as previously described (22); ≥10,000 events were acquired within the live T-cell gate. In transfer experiments using cells obtained without the dead cell removal kit, the viability of the cells was always tested with propidium iodide and annexin V antibody (Pharmingen). The frequency of the wanted cell subset was calculated to include only cells within a live FSC/SSC gate.

In vivo tracking of the cells.
Purified CD4+ protective cells were labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester (CFDA-SE; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) immediately before being transferred, as previously described (22). In vitro–activated diabetogenic cells were labeled with CellTracker Orange (CTO; Molecular Probes). In brief, the cells were resuspended in PBS with BSA at a concentration of 5 x 107 cells/ml, CTO was added (final concentration 25 µmol/l), cells were incubated for 40 min at 37°C in the dark, and then cells were washed at least twice. Successful labeling was assessed by flow cytometry.

In two experiments, 10 x 106 CD4+ CFDA-SE–labeled protective cells were transferred and 4 days later 3 x 106 CTO-labeled diabetogenic T-cells were transferred; in some recipients, only one subset was transferred. We removed cervical lymph nodes (cLN), pancreatic lymph nodes (panLN), mLNs, and spleens in ice-cold cell wash buffer (BD Biosciences) 2 or 4 days after the last transfer. Single-cell suspensions were stained first with biotinylated anti–T-cell receptor or anti-CD25 antibody and then streptavidin-APC conjugate and processed for flow cytometry, as previously described.

Foxp3 expression in CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– T-cells.
RNA was extracted from an aliquot of the purified CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– T-cells (before in vivo testing) with an RNA Microprep Kit (Stratagene). Quantitative differences in the levels of Foxp3 were determined using semiquantitative RT-PCR on cDNA made with Superscript (Life Technologies). [32P]-labeled dCTP was added to the PCRs, which were then run on standard sequencing gels (Gel-Mix 6; Life Technologies). Primer-specific bands were quantitated using a Typhoon 8600 Variable Mode Imager (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, U.K.). Primers specific for Foxp3 were 5'-GCTTGTTTGCTGTGCGGAGAC-3' and 5'-GTTTCTGAAGTAGGCGAACAT-3' (from GenBank accession no. XM_228771), and primers specific for the housekeeping gene G6pd were 5'-GACCTGCAGAGCTCCAATCAAC-3' and 5'-CACGACCCTCAGTACCAAAGGG-3' (from GenBank accession no. NM_017006) were used as an internal control in all reactions.

Statistical analysis.
Frequency data were analyzed by a log-rank test and differences in T-cell ratios were evaluated by Student’s t test. Equal or nonequal variance was evaluated by the F test.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characterization and transfer of purified diabetogenic T-cells to prediabetic DP-BB rats.
Before the transfer, the frequency of T-cells among reactivated, live cells from diabetic DR-BB donors was 96 ± 3%, with >85% CD62L+ (69 ± 4% being CD4+ and 31 ± 4% being CD8+) (n = 10). The percentage of CD4+ T-cells positive for CD25 was 55 ± 5%; 77 ± 7% expressed the CD4 blast marker CD134 and <2% expressed CD122. Among the CD8+ T-cells, 69 ± 9% were positive for CD25. The marker CD90, which discriminates recent thymic emigrants from more experienced T-cells, was expressed on 10 ± 7% of the CD4+ T-cells and 44 ± 16% of the CD8+ T-cells. A minor fraction of T-cells (6 ± 2%) expressed ART2 on the day of transfer.

We transferred these in vitro–activated, pure T-cells intravenously into DP-BB rats age 25–35 days and screened the rats for diabetes. Doses of 3, 5, 10, and 23 x 106 T-cells all resulted in an accelerated onset of diabetes compared with no transferred T-cells (Table 1). Diabetes developed in nearly 100% of the rats. The time to onset of diabetes decreased significantly by increasing the dosage to between 10 and 23 x 106.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1 Accelerated diabetes after transfer of purified, diabetogenic T-cells

 
Control of diabetes-inducing cells by unpurified cells from healthy donors.
We then tested the ability of unfractionated leukocytes from healthy DR-BB rats to prevent accelerated diabetes induced by transfer of 10 x 106 purified T-cells (Fig. 1). We transferred cells containing 64 x 106 T-cells as a means to prevent spontaneous diabetes (22). Subset analysis of the protective cells before transfer was similar to that previously described (22). Transfer of protective cells 3 days before rats received diabetogenic cells resulted in 0 of 4 rats becoming diabetic, while transfer 4 days before resulted in 1 of 10 rats becoming diabetic by age 62 days; transfer of only diabetogenic cells resulted in 32 of 34 rats developing diabetes by age 42–59 days (Fig. 1). Transfer of protective cells 2 days before diabetogenic cell transfer produced a partial but significant prevention of accelerated diabetes, as 4 of 8 rats developed diabetes by age 43–51 days. In all experiments, a group of DP-BB rats receiving only protective cells was included; of these, 97% (n = 29) were protected from developing spontaneous diabetes (data not shown).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Prevention of accelerated diabetes by prior transfer of unpurified leukocytes. DP-BB rats (age 26–33 days) received 10 x 106 diabetogenic T-cells (D); one group (n = 34) received no protective transfer. Unpurified protective cells containing 64 x 106 T-cells (P) significantly affected diabetes onset compared with no protective cells when protective cells were transferred 2 (n = 8; P < 0.05), 3 (n = 4; P < 0.002), or 4 (n = 10; P < 0.0001) days before transfer of diabetogenic cells. Data are pooled from four experiments. The dashed line (n = 491) is the spontaneous diabetes incidence in DP-BB rats reared within the same room at the same time.

 
Protection resides in the CD4+ subset of T-cells.
To test whether the observed protection resides in the CD4+ compartment of T-cells, we purified CD4+ T-cells from mLNs by negative methods. The CD4+ subset displayed a similar distribution of ART2high and CD25+ cells before and after purification (65 and 8.5%, respectively). We transferred different numbers of these cells 4 days before transferring diabetogenic cells (Table 2). The 43 x 106 CD4+ T-cells corresponded to the number present in the previous experiment with unfractionated cells. Accelerated diabetes induced by 5 x 106 diabetogenic T-cells was effectively prevented by 43 x 106 CD4+ T-cells, whereas accelerated diabetes induced by 3 x 106 diabetogenic T-cells was prevented by both 21.5 x 106 and 10 x 106 CD4+ T-cells. Two rats developed diabetes late in life; thus, the rats were protected against diabetes for the first period after transfer, but this protection was not long lasting. The rest of the cotransfer recipients all remained free of diabetes up to at least age 120 days (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2 Prevention of accelerated diabetes by prior transfer of pure CD4+ T cells

 
Homing of diabetogenic T-cells and CD4+ protective T-cells.
To evaluate the migration pattern of the diabetogenic and protective T-cells, we transferred protective CFDA-SE–labeled CD4+ T-cells and then 4 days later transferred diabetogenic CTO-labeled T-cells. We found that 2 or 4 days after the last transfer diabetogenic cells had homed to panLNs, mLNs, and cLNs as well as the spleen, but with a significant preference for the panLNs (Fig. 2A). Protective cells displayed distinct CFDA-SE dilution, indicating cell divisions in all lymph nodes (Fig. 2B) and were found at equal frequencies (11–21% of total live T-cells), with no difference between panLNs and other lymph nodes irrespective of transfer of protective cells only or of both cell types (data not shown). The lymph node cells were harvested 7 days after transfer of protective cells alone and stained with an anti-CD25 antibody (Fig. 2C). Both nondividing and dividing fractions of the CD4+ T-cells contained cells that coexpressed CD25.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Tracking of CTO-labeled diabetogenic T-cells and CFDA-SE–labeled protective CD4+ T-cells after transfer. A: Ratio of diabetogenic donor T-cells to recipient T-cells on day 2 or 4 after transfer of diabetogenic cells (n = 6). *P < 0.05 vs. cLNs and spleen; {dagger}P < 0.05 vs. mLNs, cLNs, and spleen. B: Representative fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) dot plot (of n = 9) displaying all live T-cells in panLNs 2 days after transfer of diabetogenic cells. Recipient T-cells were double negative. C: Representative FACS dot plot (of n = 3) from recipient that had received CD4+ protective T-cells 7 days earlier.

 
Protection of CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– subsets in the accelerated model.
We next attempted to elucidate whether protection resided within the CD25+ or CD25– subset of the 21.5 x 106 CD4+ T-cells. We transferred protective T-cells 4 days before transferring 3 x 106 diabetogenic T-cells (Fig. 3A). Diabetes onset was significantly delayed in rats receiving 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ (1 of 6 developed diabetes at age 93 days), compared with controls receiving diabetogenic T-cells only (8 of 8 developed diabetes at age 52–66 days). We also observed that five of eight rats receiving 20 x 106 CD4+CD25– T-cells became diabetic at age 59–76 days, which was significantly different from the finding in controls (Fig. 3A).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Prevention of accelerated diabetes by CD25+ and CD25– subsets. Rats received 3 x 106 diabetes-inducing T-cells. A: Transfer 4 days before. Purified CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25– T-cells significantly affected diabetes onset (P < 0.0004 and P < 0.006, respectively) when transferred to prediabetic DP-BB rats age 29–33 days. The rats received no protective transfer (n = 8), 20 x 106 CD4+CD25– T-cells (n = 8), or 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells (n = 6). Data are pooled from two experiments. B: Simultaneous transfer. Purified CD4+CD25+ T-cells significantly affected diabetes onset (P < 0.001), whereas CD4+CD25– T-cells did not (NS) when transferred to prediabetic DP-BB rats age 27–29 days. The rats received no protective transfer (n = 9), 20 x 106 CD4+CD25– T-cells (n = 11), or 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells (n = 12). Data are pooled from two experiments.

 
Next, we performed the protective transfers simultaneously with diabetogenic transfer of 3 x 106 T-cells (Fig. 3B). Diabetes onset was significantly delayed in rats receiving both diabetogenic and 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells (2 of 12 became diabetic at age 78 and 85 days, respectively) compared with rats receiving diabetogenic cells only (8 of 9 developed diabetes at age 57–71 days). However, this was not the case in rats receiving both diabetogenic and 20 x 106 CD4+CD25– cells (5 of 11 developed diabetes at age 63–97 days).

Protection of CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– subsets in the spontaneous diabetes model.
Because 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells appeared to harbor a powerful regulatory potential, we tested whether transfer of these cells to otherwise untreated DP-BB rats could prevent spontaneous diabetes (Fig. 4). When the cells were transferred to 14 rats age 27 ± 2 days (Fig. 4A), only 3 rats became diabetic (at age 91–103 days) as opposed to 93% in rats not receiving the transferred cells (age 77 ± 10 days). Moreover, only 2 of 18 rats became diabetic (age 71 and 85 days, respectively) among littermates that received transfer of the reciprocal subset of 20 x 106 CD4+CD25– T-cells.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Prevention of spontaneous diabetes by CD25+ and CD25– subsets. DP-BB rats (n = 52) received protective transfers of purified CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25– T-cells. Data are pooled from three experiments. The dashed line (n = 491) is the spontaneous diabetes incidence in DP-BB rats reared within the same room at the same time. A: Transfer of protective subsets at age 27 ± 2 days. Transfer of 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells (n = 14; P < 0.0001) and 20 x 106 CD4+CD25– T-cells (n = 18; P < 0.0001) significantly affected diabetes onset compared with no transfer. There was no significant difference between the two test groups. B: Transfer of protective subsets at age 42 days. Transfer of 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells (n = 10; P < 0.0001) and 20 x 106 CD4+CD25– T-cells (n = 10; P < 0.0004) significantly affected diabetes onset compared with no transfer. There was a significant difference between the two test groups (P < 0.004).

 
When 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells were transferred to 10 rats age 42 days, none became diabetic (Fig. 4B). By contrast, 6 of 10 littermates became diabetic at age 83–91 days after the reciprocal subset of 20 x 106 CD4+CD25– T-cells were transferred, which was significantly different from the former group as well as from the controls.

Foxp3 expression in CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– subsets.
Because the transcription factor, Foxp3 is specifically expressed in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells in mice and humans (24–27), we evaluated Foxp3 mRNA levels in our cell subsets by RT-PCR. We found that the CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell subset expressed >40-fold more message for Foxp3 than the CD4+CD25– subset (Fig. 5). Moreover, Foxp3 levels were almost undetectable in cells used for diabetogenic transfers (data not shown).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. Semiquantitative RT-PCR of rat Foxp3 in CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25– subsets. Data are means + SD of four different sets of purified cells (each set tested in triplicate).

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
We previously observed that unfractionated cells from healthy donors could not fully prevent diabetes induced by unpurified PMA plus ionomycin–activated splenocytes, but only delayed onset (22). In this study, we found that such protective cells prevent diabetes induced by purified PMA plus ionomycin–activated T-cells. Thus, there appears to be a large number of cells within diabetes-inducing unpurified splenocytes that cannot be controlled. What subset this is needs to be formally tested, but antigen-presenting cells that are activated by PMA plus ionomycin are obvious candidates. In this study, however, we focused on defining subsets within the unfractionated cells that protect against diabetes in the purified T-cell model and against spontaneous diabetes because of the clinical relevance of these situations.

Indeed, transfer models have been widely used for studying diabetes development in BB rats (22,28–32). In the present study, we extended these models and showed that a wide range (3 to 23 x 106) of reactivated, pure diabetogenic T-cells is able to accelerate diabetes in young DP-BB rats. The finding that the high number (23 x 106) is associated with more rapid diabetes development contrasts with the inflammatory bowel disease transfer model studied by Barthlott et al. (33), where only 1 x 106 or fewer cells transferred colitis. In that model it appears that massive homeostatic expansion of colitis-inducing cells is required within the recipient for disease to develop. In our model this seems not to be the case.

We found that the transfer of protective leukocytes needs to precede the transfer of diabetogenic T-cells to be 100% effective. There were ~43 x 106 CD4+ T-cells within the unfractionated pool, which contained considerable and normal fractions of both ART2high and CD25+ cells and, in an interesting finding, as many as 17 x 106 CD45RChigh cells (data not shown), which are known to transfer wasting disease and autoimmunity, including diabetes (34–36).

We further found that pure CD4+ T-cells control accelerated diabetes. This finding is new, as previously it has been reported only that the transfer of cells enriched for this subset can control spontaneous diabetes (18). Moreover, cotransfer of an equal dose of lymph node T-cells from untreated DR-BB rats containing both CD4 and CD8 subsets, with 60% being ART2high cells, prevents adoptively transferred diabetes in WAG nude rats (28). However, in this study, pure CD4+ T-cells protected the DP-BB recipient fully when they were transferred before diabetogenic cells.

From our data with 10 x 106 protective, pure CD4+ cells containing <1 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells and 3 x 106 diabetogenic T-cells, we can deduce that a ratio of protective to diabetogenic cells of 1:3 seems to approach the lower limit for complete prevention. When we fractionated CD4+ T-cells according to their level of CD25 expression, we observed that CD4+CD25+ cells at a ratio of 2:3 protective to diabetogenic cells prevent diabetes. This protection was evident whether cells were transferred before or together with the diabetogenic subset. This finding correlates with a true regulatory phenotype (37) compared with other models of autoimmunity in which regulatory T-cells are able to prevent adoptively transferred disease at similar ratios (11,33,38).

The most important finding was that CD4+CD25+ T-cells were able to prevent spontaneous diabetes development during the interval where the activation of autoreactive cells is believed to occur (19); that is, as late as age 42 days. Previous studies have shown that reconstitution by transfer of purified and normal T-cells into DP-BB recipients age 2 months precipitates the onset of diabetes rather than confers protection (19). In contrast, we show that transfer of the reciprocal 20 x 106 CD25– subset is far less protective, although the diabetes incidence is lowered.

Other studies (39,40) in rat models of induced diabetes also point to a role for the CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells. Thus, CD4+CD25+ T-cells protect in the virus-induced diabetic DR-BB model (39). In the adult thymectomy and split-dose gamma irradiation PVG rat model, CD4+ single positive thymocytes expressing CD25 control diabetes, whereas peripheral CD4+ T-cells both positive and negative for CD25 were found to have regulatory functions (40). The fact that we also observed some protective potential in the CD4+CD25– fraction supports the hypothesis that regulatory CD4+CD25– cells also exist in rats, as in mice (38).

In the NOD mouse, simultaneous cotransfer of CD4+CD25+ cells and autoreactive cells isolated from inflamed pancreatic islets only delay diabetes development (16). This apparent discrepancy may be explained by the source of regulatory T-cells in the NOD mouse, as these, and those in all reported experiments, are harvested from prediabetic mice that later in life develop diabetes.

The fact that CD25 is also expressed on conventionally activated T-cells hampers its use as a marker for regulatory cells. In contrast, the transcription factor Foxp3 appears to be a specific marker, as it has been found only in cells with regulatory function and is expressed in naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ cells in both mice (24–26) and humans (27). Recently, Foxp3-expressing CD4+CD25+ T-cells were shown to prevent diabetes in a mouse model (41), and retroviral transduction of Foxp3 in nonregulatory T-cells rendered these cells capable of inhibiting colitis (24,25). We found Foxp3 to be upregulated in rat CD4+CD25+ T-cells compared with CD4+CD25– T-cells. Ours is the first study to report that Foxp3 is also a marker of naturally occurring regulatory CD4+CD25+ T-cells in the rat.

The transfer of CD4+ T-cells into the lymphopenic recipients was associated with immediate and massive expansion of the protective cells (Fig. 2), as evidenced by the serial dilution of CFDA-SE. Expansion of regulatory T-cells has been associated with their ability to prevent unwanted transfer-induced immune reactions (33). Although CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells are hyporesponsive to antigenic stimuli in vitro, they exhibit a robust proliferative response in vivo and upregulate their regulatory function (42). This in vivo expansion was recently demonstrated to be a response to an encounter with their cognate antigen rather than to lymphopenia (43). In our study, ~10% of the remaining undivided cells also expressed CD25.

Expansion per se does not entirely explain the observed, specific protection by CD4+ or CD4+CD25+ cells, as CD4+CD25– cells also divide after being transferred into lymphopenic hosts (42). We therefore suggest that there are functional differences and perhaps different mechanisms behind the ability of CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– T-cells to regulate the autoreactive T-cells. A tantalizing suggestion would be that CD4+CD25+ T-cells are able to prevent the expansion of the spontaneously occurring diabetogenic T-cells, as the transfer of as few as 2 x 106 CD4+CD25+ T-cells to 42 day-old DP-BB rats completely prevented diabetes. Because we tracked the autoreactive cells with CTO, we could not detect the number of cell divisions. However, in the inflammatory bowel disease model, it was shown that CD4+CD25+CD45RBlow regulatory T-cells regulate cell division in the CD4+CD45RBhigh compartment early after cotransfer, and that they themselves display a limited potential for expansion (38). It was thus demonstrated that CD4+CD25+ T-cells can regulate other CD4+ T-cells in lymphopenic recipients. In contrast, it has not been previously shown that regulatory cells control autoreactive effector CD8+ T-cells in vivo, albeit CD4+CD25+ T-cells can prevent intra-islet differentiation of CD8+ T-cells into effector cytotoxic T-lymphocytes in the Tet–tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}/CD80 B6 model for type 1 diabetes (44). In DP-BB rats, both CD4 and CD8 T-cells act synergistically in inducing ß-cell destruction (28); our observation that this can be prevented by CD4+CD25+ T-cells is new.

We further found that diabetogenic T-cells preferentially homed to the panLNs. The ability to enter the lymph nodes correlated well with the high levels of CD62L on the cells before transfer. In NOD mice, the panLNs have been shown to be important for diabetes development (45); however, the involvement of CD62L for homing in transfer models is not clear (46,47).

In human type 1 diabetes, loss of ß-cell mass is believed to have considerably slower kinetics than in the BB rat model. Thus, the finding that regulatory cells controlled highly activated diabetogenic cells in our models suggests that they could possibly do so in human type 1 diabetes also. Tolerogenic strategies (achieved by T-cell–depleting antibodies) have been able to halt or prevent human type 1 diabetes, apparently by reducing the number of autoreactive T-cells and thus favoring the number of regulatory T-cells (48,49). Because the feeding of insulin ß-chain has been shown to slow disease progression in NOD mice via induction of bystander immune suppression (50), another possibility would be to increase the number of regulatory cells in humans.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The Hagedorn Research Institute is an independent basic research component of Novo Nordisk A/S. D.L. is the recipient of a Ph.D. fellowship from the Danish Research Academy.

The authors wish to thank Camilla Knudsen and Stine Bisgaard for expert technical help. Furthermore, we wish to thank our animal unit and our laboratory technicians’ trainees for taking care of the animals. We are grateful to Claus Haase for critical reading of the manuscript.


   FOOTNOTES
 
D.L., T.L.H., L.H., and H.M. are employed by Novo Nordisk A/S; D.L., L.H., and H.M. hold stock in Novo Nordisk A/S; and Novo Nordisk A/S has contributed funds supporting the work of H.M.’s laboratory.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Helle Markholst, MD, Hagedorn Research Institute, Niels Steensens Vej 6, DK-2820, Gentofte, Denmark. E-mail: hmar{at}hagedorn.dk

Received for publication June 21, 2004 and accepted in revised form January 5, 2005

Abbreviations: CFDA-SE carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester; cLN, cervical lymph node; CTO, CellTracker Orange; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; mLN, mesenteric lymph node; panLN, pancreatic lymph node; PE, phycoerythrin; PMA, phorbol myristate acetate


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Thornton AM, Shevach EM: CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T-cells suppress polyclonal T-cell activation in-vitro by inhibiting interleukin-2 production. J Exp Med188 :287 –296,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Takahashi T, Tagami T, Yamazaki S, Uede T, Shimizu J, Sakaguchi N, Mak TW, Sakaguchi S: Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+CD4+ regulatory T-cells constitutively expressing cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. J Exp Med192 :303 –309,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Chai JG, Tsang JYS, Lechler R, Simpson E, Dyson J, Scott D: CD4+CD25+ T-cells as immunoregulatory T-cells in vitro. Eur J Immunol32 :2365 –2375,2002[Medline]
  4. Read S, Mauze S, Asseman C, Bean A, Coffman R, Powrie F: CD38+CD45RBlowCD4+ T-cells: a population of T-cells with immune regulatory activities in vitro. Eur J Immunol28 :3435 –3447,1998[Medline]
  5. Piccirillo CA, Shevach EM: Cutting edge: control of CD8+ T-cell activation by CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory cells. J Immunol167 :1137 –1140,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Murakami M, Sakamoto A, Bender J, Kappler J, Marrack P: CD25+CD4+T-cells contribute to the control of memory CD8+ T-cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A99 :8832 –8837,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kursar M, Bonhagen K, Fensterle J, Kohler A, Hurwitz R, Kamradt T, Kaufmann SHE, Mittrucker HW: Regulatory CD4+CD25+ T-cells restrict memory CD8+ T-cell responses. J Exp Med196 :1585 –1592,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Groux H, Ogarra A, Bigler M, Rouleau M, Antonenko S, Devries JE, Roncarolo MG: A CD4+ T-cell subset inhibits antigen-specific T-cell responses and prevents colitis. Nature389 :737 –742,1997[Medline]
  9. Suripayer E, Amar AZ, Thornton AM, Shevach EM: CD4+CD25+ T-cells inhibit both the induction and effector function of autoreactive T-cells and represent a unique lineage of immunoregulatory cells. J Immunol160 :1212 –1218,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Xu DM, Liu HY, Komai-Koma M, Campbell C, McSharry C, Alexander J, Liew FY: CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells suppress differentiation and functions of Th1 and Th2 cells, Leishmania major infection, and colitis in mice. J Immunol170 :394 –399,2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kohm AP, Carpentier PA, Anger HA, Miller SD: Cutting edge: CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells suppress antigen-specific autoreactive immune responses and central nervous system inflammation during active experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol169 :4712 –4716,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mottet C, Uhlig HH, Powrie F: Cutting edge: cure of colitis by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells. J Immunol170 :3939 –3943,2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Shimada A, Charlton B, Rohane P, Taylor-Edwards C, Fathman CG: Immune regulation in type-1 diabetes. J Autoimmun9 :263 –269,1996[Medline]
  14. Shimada A, Rohane P, Fathman CG, Charlton B: Pathogenic and protective roles of CD45RBlowCD4+ cells correlate with cytokine profiles in the spontaneously autoimmune diabetic mouse. Diabetes45 :71 –78,1996[Abstract]
  15. Lepault F, Gagnerault MC: Characterization of peripheral regulatory CD4+ T-cells that prevent diabetes onset in nonobese diabetic mice. J Immunol164 :240 –247,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Szanya V, Ermann J, Taylor C, Holness C, Fathman CG: The subpopulation of CD4+CD25+ splenocytes that delays adoptive transfer of diabetes expresses L-selectin and high levels of CCR7. J Immunol169 :2461 –2465,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Burstein D, Mordes JP, Greiner DL, Stein D, Nakamura N, Handler ES, Rossini AA: Prevention of diabetes in BB/Wor rat by single transfusion of spleen cells: parameters that affect degree of protection. Diabetes38 :24 –30,1989[Abstract]
  18. Mordes JP, Gallina DL, Handler ES, Greiner DL, Nakamura N, Pelletier A, Rossini AA: Transfusions enriched for W3/25+ helper/inducer T lymphocytes prevent spontaneous diabetes in the BB/W rat. Diabetologia30 :22 –26,1987[Medline]
  19. Ramanathan S, Poussier P: T-cell reconstitution of BB/W rats after the initiation of insulitis precipitates the onset of diabetes. J Immunol162 :5134 –5142,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mordes JP, Bortell R, Doukas J, Rigby M, Whalen B, Zipris D, Greiner DL, Rossini AA: The BB/Wor rat and the balance hypothesis of autoimmunity. Diabetes Metab Rev12 :103 –109,1996[Medline]
  21. Greiner DL, Mordes JP, Handler ES, Angelillo M, Nakamura N, Rossini AA: Depletion of RT6.1+ T lymphocytes induces diabetes in resistant biobreeding/Worcester (BB/W) rats. J Exp Med166 :461 –475,1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lundsgaard D, Markholst H: A co-transfer system in young prediabetic BB rats: reactivated autoreactive T-cells can be partly controlled. J Autoimmun21 :325 –338,2003[Medline]
  23. Greiner DL, Rossini AA, Mordes JP: Translating data from animal models into methods for preventing human autoimmune diabetes mellitus: caveat emptor and primum non nocere. Clin Immunol100 :134 –143,2001[Medline]
  24. Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY: Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells. Nat Immunol4 :330 –336,2003[Medline]
  25. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S: Control of regulatory T-cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science299 :1057 –1061,2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Khattri R, Cox T, Yasayko SA, Ramsdell F: An essential role for Scurfin in CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. Nat Immunol4 :337 –342,2003[Medline]
  27. Walker MR, Kasprowicz DJ, Gersuk VH, Benard A, Van Landeghen M, Buckner JH, Ziegler SF: Induction of FoxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4+CD25– T-cells. J Clin Invest112 :1437 –1443,2003[Medline]
  28. Whalen BJ, Greiner DL, Mordes JP, Rossini AA: Adoptive transfer of autoimmune diabetes mellitus to athymic rats: synergy of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and prevention by RT6+ T-cells. J Autoimmun7 :819 –831,1994[Medline]
  29. Whalen BJ, Love LC, Mordes JP, Rossini AA, Greiner DL: Intravital dye-labeled diabetogenic rat T-cells retain dye, home to the pancreas, and induce diabetes. Transplant Proc31 :1611 –1614,1999[Medline]
  30. Metroz-Dayer MD, Mouland A, Brideau C, Duhamel D, Poussier P: Adoptive transfer of diabetes in BB rats induced by CD4 T lymphocytes. Diabetes39 :928 –932,1990[Abstract]
  31. Edouard P, Hiserodt JC, Plamondon C, Poussier P: CD8+ T-cells are required for adoptive transfer of the BB rat diabetic syndrome. Diabetes42 :390 –397,1993[Abstract]
  32. MacKay P: Adoptive transfer of diabetes to and from old normoglycaemic BB rats. Diabetologia38 :145 –152,1995[Medline]
  33. Barthlott T, Kassiotis G, Stockinger B: T-cell regulation as a side effect of homeostasis and competition. J Exp Med197 :451 –460,2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Powrie F, Mason D: OX-22high CD4+ T-cells induce wasting disease with multiple organ pathology: prevention by the OX-22low subset. J Exp Med172 :1701 –1708,1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Fowell D, Mason D: Evidence that the T-cell repertoire of normal rats contains cells with the potential to cause diabetes: characterization of the CD4+ T-cell subset that inhibits this autoimmune potential. J Exp Med177 :627 –636,1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Seddon B, Mason D: Regulatory T-cells in the control of autoimmunity: the essential role of transforming growth factor beta and interleukin 4 in the prevention of autoimmune thyroiditis in rats by peripheral CD4+CD45RC– cells and CD4+CD8– thymocytes. J Exp Med189 :279 –288,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M: Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T-cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25): breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol155 :1151 –1164,1995[Abstract]
  38. Annacker O, Pimenta-Araujo R, Burlen-Defranoux O, Barbosa TC, Cumano A, Bandeira A: CD25+ CD4+ T-cells regulate the expansion of peripheral CD4 T-cells through the production of IL-10. J Immunol166 :3008 –3018,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Zipris D, Hillebrands JL, Welsh RM, Rozing J, Xie JX, Mordes JP, Greiner DL, Rossini AA: Infections that induce autoimmune diabetes in BBDR rats modulate CD4+CD25+ T-cell populations. J Immunol170 :3592 –3602,2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Stephens LA, Mason D: CD25 is a marker for CD4+ thymocytes that prevent autoimmune diabetes in rats, but peripheral T-cells with this function are found in both CD25+ and CD25– subpopulations. J Immunol165 :3105 –3110,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Peng YF, Laouar Y, Li MO, Green EA, Flavell RA: TGF-beta regulates in vivo expansion of Foxp3-expressing CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells responsible for protection against diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A101 :4572 –4577,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Gavin MA, Clarke SR, Negrou E, Gallegos A, Rudensky A: Homeostasis and anergy of CD4+CD25+ suppressor T-cells in vivo. Nat Immunol3 :33 –41,2002[Medline]
  43. Cozzo C, Larkin J, Caton AJ: Cutting edge: self-peptides drive the peripheral expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells. J Immunol171 :5678 –5682,2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Green EA, Choi YW, Flavell RA: Pancreatic lymph node-derived CD4+CD25+ Treg cells: highly potent regulators of diabetes that require TRANCE-RANK signals. Immunity16 :183 –191,2002[Medline]
  45. Gagnerault MC, Luan JJ, Lotton C, Lepault F: Pancreatic lymph nodes are required for priming of beta cell reactive T-cells in NOD mice. J Exp Med196 :369 –377,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Fabien N, Bergerot I, Orgiazzi J, Thivolet C: Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1, integrin alpha-4, and L-selectin mediate T-cell homing to the pancreas in the model of adoptive transfer of diabetes in NOD mice. Diabetes45 :1181 –1186,1996[Abstract]
  47. Lepault F, Gagnerault MC, Faveeuw C, Bazin H, Boitard C: Lack of L-selectin expression by cells transferring diabetes in NOD mice: insights into the mechanisms involved in diabetes prevention by mel-14 antibody treatment. Eur J Immunol25 :1502 –1507,1995[Medline]
  48. Cooke A, Phillips JM, Parish NM: Tolerogenic strategies to halt or prevent type I diabetes. Nat Immunol2 :810 –815,2001[Medline]
  49. Masteller EL, Bluestone JA: Immunotherapy of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Immunol14 :652 –659,2002[Medline]
  50. Polanski M, Melican NS, Zhang J, Weiner HL: Oral-administration of the immunodominant B-chain of insulin reduces diabetes in a co-transfer model of diabetes in the NOD mouse and is associated with a switch from Th1 to Th2 cytokines. J Autoimmun10 :339 –346,1997[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 LupusHome page
S. Barath, M. Aleksza, T. Tarr, S. Sipka, G. Szegedi, and E. Kiss
Measurement of natural (CD4+CD25high) and inducible (CD4+IL-10+) regulatory T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, July 1, 2007; 16(7): 489 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 DiabetesHome page
J. M. Fuller, A. E. Kwitek, T. J. Hawkins, D. H. Moralejo, W. Lu, T. D. Tupling, A. J. MacMurray, G. Borchardt, M. Hasinoff, and A. Lernmark
Introgression of F344 Rat Genomic DNA on BB Rat Chromosome 4 Generates Diabetes-Resistant Lymphopenic BB Rats
Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 3351 - 3357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
J.-L. Hillebrands, B. Whalen, J. T. J. Visser, J. Koning, K. D. Bishop, J. Leif, J. Rozing, J. P. Mordes, D. L. Greiner, and A. A. Rossini
A Regulatory CD4+ T Cell Subset in the BB Rat Model of Autoimmune Diabetes Expresses Neither CD25 Nor Foxp3
J. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 177(11): 7820 - 7832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
R. Geoffrey, S. Jia, A. E. Kwitek, J. Woodliff, S. Ghosh, A. Lernmark, X. Wang, and M. J. Hessner
Evidence of a Functional Role for Mast Cells in the Development of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in the BioBreeding Rat
J. Immunol., November 15, 2006; 177(10): 7275 - 7286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
D. Tischner, A. Weishaupt, J. v. d. Brandt, N. Muller, N. Beyersdorf, C. W. Ip, K. V. Toyka, T. Hunig, R. Gold, T. Kerkau, et al.
Polyclonal expansion of regulatory T cells interferes with effector cell migration in a model of multiple sclerosis
Brain, October 1, 2006; 129(10): 2635 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DiabetesHome page
D. Bruder, A. M. Westendorf, W. Hansen, S. Prettin, A. D. Gruber, Y. Qian, H. von Boehmer, K. Mahnke, and J. Buer
On the Edge of Autoimmunity: T-Cell Stimulation by Steady-State Dendritic Cells Prevents Autoimmune Diabetes
Diabetes, December 1, 2005; 54(12): 3395 - 3401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundsgaard, D.
Right arrow Articles by Markholst, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundsgaard, D.
Right arrow Articles by Markholst, H.
Social Bookmarking