Diabetes 54:2396-2403, 2005 © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Disruption of the
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(studied in combination with interleukin [IL]-1ß)-mediated cell death (92 ± 4% viable cells in STAT-1–/– mice vs. 56 ± 3% viable cells in wild-type controls, P
0.001) and had preserved insulin release after exposure to IL-1ß and IFN-
. Moreover, analysis of cell death in cytokine-exposed purified ß-cells confirmed that protection was due to absence of STAT-1 in the ß-cells themselves. Deficiency of STAT-1 in islets completely prevented cytokine-induced upregulation of IL-15, interferon inducible protein 10, and inducible nitric oxide synthase transcription but did not interfere with monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and macrophage inflammatory protein 3
expression. In vivo, STAT-1–/– mice were partially resistant to development of diabetes after multiple low-dose streptozotocin injections as reflected by mean blood glucose at 12 days after first injection (159 ± 28 vs. 283 ± 81 mg/dl in wild-type controls, P
0.05) and diabetes incidence at the end of the follow-up period (39 vs. 73% in wild-type controls, P
0.05). In conclusion, the present results indicate that STAT-1 is a crucial transcription factor in the process of IFN-
–mediated ß-cell death and the subsequent development of immune-mediated diabetes.
Abbreviations:
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; IP, interferon-inducible protein; IPGTT, intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test; IRF, interferon regulatory factor; JAK, janus kinase; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; MLDS, multiple low-dose streptozotocin; NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B; SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription
The main focus in studies on the pathogenesis of autoimmune type 1 diabetes has been on the role of the immune system, with much less attention directed to the target of the immune assault, namely the insulin-secreting ß-cells. ß-Cells under inflammatory attack have massive changes in gene expression, as evaluated by microarray analysis (1,2). These genes are controlled by families of transcription-regulating signaling molecules, such as signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) and nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) (3,4), which become activated after exposure to proinflammatory cytokines. Blocking one of these transcription factors, namely NF-
B, prevents cytokine-induced ß-cell death (3,5). These observations suggest that aberrant activation of key intracellular signaling pathways in the ß-cells ultimately determine ß-cell survival or death.
Pancreatic ß-cells are exposed to many inflammatory assaults such as cytokines during insulitis (6,7), and in vitro studies indicate that interferon (IFN)-
is of particular importance to sensitize human and rodent islets for ß-cell death induced by another cytokine, namely interleukin (IL)-1ß (8). Indeed, although IL-1ß alone does not suffice to induce the death of human and rodent ß-cells, a combination of IL-1ß plus IFN-
kills half of the cells after 6–9 days (9,10). Moreover, IFN-
, in combination with double-stranded RNA produced during viral infections, is a potent inducer of ß-cell dysfunction and death (11). Although IL-1ß exerts its main effects through the NF-
B pathway, IFN-
acts mostly via janus kinase (JAK) activation, with the intracellular transcription factor STAT-1 playing a central role in the downstream pathway. Upon IFN-
ligand-receptor coupling, STAT-1 is recruited to receptor phosphotyrosine residues that provide docking sites for the Src-homology-2 domain of STAT-1. Next, STAT-1 phosphorylation on tyrosine-701 leads to STAT-1 dimerization and translocation to the nucleus where it regulates gene expression by binding to
-activated sequences in the promoter of target genes (12). Depending on the cell type and on the parallel induction of other signaling pathways, activation of STAT-1 may lead to either pro- or antiapoptotic effects (14).
Several genes with putative roles in ß-cell death are activated by IFN-
, including major histocompatibility complex class I (15–17), the adhesion molecule intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (18,19), inducible NO synthase (iNOS) (20), the death receptor Fas (21), caspase-1 (22,23), the chemokine interferon inducible protein (IP)-10, and the cytokine IL-15 (7) as well as interferon-regulated factor (IRF)-1 (24,25) but whether regulation of all of these genes in primary ß-cells is dependent on STAT-1 activation is still under investigation. Of note, we have previously shown that inhibition of IRF-1, a transcription factor located immediately downstream of STAT-1, does not prevent cytokine-induced apoptosis (9).
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether disruption of STAT-1 prevents cytokine-mediated ß-cell death in vitro and in vivo. For this purpose, we isolated islets and purified primary ß-cells from wild-type mice or mice lacking STAT-1 and exposed them to cytokines in vitro. There was a complete protection against ß-cell death, as well as a modified chemokine and cytokine expression profile. In line with these in vitro observations, STAT-1 knockout mice were less susceptible to multiple low-dose streptozotocin (MLDS)-induced diabetes in vivo. Our results indicate that STAT-1 plays a central role in inflammation-induced ß-cell death. Disrupting IFN-
signaling at this level but not at the level of IRF-1 confers ß-cell protection.
| RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation, culture, and cytokine treatment of whole islets and primary ß-cells.
Islets were obtained from 10-week-old male and female wild-type control and STAT-1–/– mice as previously described (9,27). To obtain purified ß-cells, islets were dissociated and sorted by FACStar flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Sunnyvale, CA), as previously described for rat ß-cells (28). The preparations used in the present experiments contained 84 ± 3% and 84 ± 4% ß-cells for wild-type and STAT-1–/– mice, respectively. Cell culture was performed in Hams F-10 medium supplemented with 10 mmol/l glucose, 50 µmol/l isobutylmethylxanthine, 0.5% BSA (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), and 2 mmol/l L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Paisley, Scotland). These culture conditions, originally developed for the maintenance of rat ß-cells, have been validated for mouse islet or ß-cell culture (10).
Whole islets were cultured in suspension, whereas fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS)–purified single ß-cells were cultured attached to polylysine-coated dishes. The effect of cytokines was examined after 2 and 5 days of culture in the presence of recombinant murine IFN-
(1,000 units/ml, 107 units/mg; PeproTech) and recombinant human IL-1ß (50 units/ml, 38 units/ng; kind gift of Dr. C.W. Reynolds from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). These concentrations of cytokines were selected based on our previous studies with mouse pancreatic islets and ß-cells (9,10,29).
Assessment of ß-cell viability and medium insulin release.
The viability of islet cell preparations was assessed after 2 and 5 days exposure to cytokines. Whole islets or isolated ß-cells were incubated for 15 min with propidium iodide (10 mg/ml) and Hoechst 342 (20 mg/ml). The approximate percentage of dead islet cells was estimated by two individual observers, with one of them unaware of the sample identity (9,10). Evaluation of cell death in whole islets is complicated by the superposition between cells, and these observations should thus be considered as semiquantitative. The percentages of apoptotic cells in the single ß-cell preparations were assessed by propidium iodide and Hoechst after 2 or 5 days exposure to cytokines, as previously described for mouse ß-cells (9,10). This fluorescence assay for single ß-cells is quantitative and has been validated by systematic comparisons with electron microscopy observations (30). The apoptosis and necrosis indexes were calculated as [(percent apoptotic or necrotic cells in experimental condition – percent apoptotic or necrotic cells in control)/(100 – percent dead cells in control)] x 100. The percent viability in control single ß-cells (not exposed to cytokines) was in the range of 55–70%. These values were similar after 2 or 5 days of culture and were not significantly different between wild-type and STAT-1–/– ß-cells (data not shown).
Culture media were collected after 24 and 48 h, stored at –20°C and assayed for immune-reactive insulin. Insulin release in the culture media was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test.
Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (IPGTTs) were carried out in 8-week-old male wild-type and STAT-1–/– mice after an overnight fast. Briefly, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 2 g/kg body wt D-glucose dissolved in sterile PBS. Blood samples were drawn at different time points (0, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min) from the tail vein. Plasma glucose concentrations were assayed by a glucose oxidase method using an automatic glucometer (Glucocard, Menarini).
Streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
For MLDS induction, 8-week-old male STAT-1–/– and wild-type mice were injected intraperitoneally with freshly dissolved streptozotocin (50 mg/kg) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 5 consecutive days. Development of glucosuria was monitored with Clinistix (Bayer Diagnostics) and glucose concentrations of venous blood were determined using a glucometer (Glucocard, Menarini) as described above. Clinical diabetes was defined by positive glucosuria and hyperglycemia (blood glucose levels >250 mg/dl) on 2 consecutive days in nonfasted animals. Mice were followed until 40 days after the last injection of streptozotocin. At that time point, animals were killed and pancreata were removed for histology and insulin content measurement. In a separate set of wild-type and STAT-1–/– animals, the pancreas was removed 3 days (experimental day 8) after the start of streptozotocin for histology.
Histology and insulin content determination.
Pancreata were removed from killed mice and dissected free of adipose tissue and lymph nodes in PBS at 4°C under a stereomicroscope. Half of each pancreas was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen-chilled isopentane and stored at –20°C until processing. For histology, serial cryostat sections (5-µm thickness) were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to assess pancreatic islet integrity and immune cell infiltration. The remaining half of the pancreas was used for insulin content determination. Briefly, protein was extracted overnight at 4°C in acid–ethanol. Insulin concentrations in the extracts were measured using an ultrasensitive rat insulin ELISA kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden) with rat insulin as standard as previously described (31).
Real-time PCR analysis.
Cultured islet cells (24 h of cytokine exposure) were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C until RNA extraction (TRIzol reagent, Invitrogen). cDNA was created using Superscript II RT (Invitrogen) and quantitative PCR analysis was performed with the ABI prism 7700 Sequence detector (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described (32). PCR conditions were 2 min at 50°C and 10 min at 94°C, followed by a total of 40–45 two-temperature cycles (15 s at 94°C and 1 min at 60°C). Primer and probe sequences for the determination of mouse cDNAs for housekeeping gene ß-actin (33), IL-1ß (33), IL-15 (33), IFN-
(33), iNOS (33), MCP-1 (34), IP-10 (34), and MIP-3
(34) were as described in the indicated references. The target cDNAs present in each sample were corrected for the respective ß-actin values. The primer and probe sequences used for determination of mouse cDNA for STAT-1 were: FW, 5'-CACCAGAACCGATGGAGCTT-3'; RV, 5'-TCCGGGACATCTCATCAAACT-3'; and TP, 5'-CACCCTTCTAGACTTCAGACCACAGACAACCT-3'.
Statistical analysis.
The statistical software NCSS 2000 (Kaysville, UT) was used for statistical analysis. Data are expressed as means ± SE. Areas under the curve were determined for analysis of IPGTT, whereas the
2 test was performed for the incidence of MLDS-induced diabetes. ANOVA and Students t test were used for multiple comparisons whenever appropriate. Significance was defined as P
0.05. Unless indicated otherwise, the graphs show triplicate determinations from at least three independent experiments.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in islets from STAT-1–/– mice (Fig. 1). In contrast, STAT-1 expression was clearly upregulated in islets from wild-type mice after stimulation with IL-1ß + IFN-
(CYTK) (Fig. 1).
|
significantly decreased cell viability of wild-type islets after 48 h of cytokine exposure (Fig. 2A). After 5 days of cytokine exposure, only 22 ± 13% wild-type viable cells were left compared with 93 ± 1% viable cells in control conditions (Fig. 2B). Islets from STAT-1–/– mice showed resistance to cytokine-induced islet destruction, as reflected by fully preserved islet viability after 48 h (Fig. 2A) and 5 days of cell culture (Fig. 2B). In parallel, insulin release into the medium by wild-type islets decreased significantly upon exposure to the cytokine combination IL-1ß plus IFN-
, whereas insulin secretion was fully preserved in STAT-1–/– islets exposed to cytokines (Fig. 2C and D).
|
|
, IP-10, and iNOS mRNAs at comparable levels (Fig. 3), but there was no expression for IL-15 in STAT-1–/– islets in basal culture conditions.
|
, but induction of IL-15, IP-10, and iNOS was completely prevented by the STAT-1 disruption (Fig. 3).
Streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
We next examined the effects of STAT-1 disruption in vivo in a model of immune-mediated ß-cell destruction, namely MLDS. To assure that the basal conditions were similar between wild-type and STAT-1–/– mice, we first demonstrated that deletion of STAT-1 does not affect normal glucose tolerance. IPGTTs, performed in wild-type and STAT-1–/– mice 8 weeks of age, showed similar responses as reflected by the area under the glucose curve (Fig. 4). In addition, no differences were noted between control and knockout pancreatic insulin content (164 ± 15 vs. 148 ± 46 pmol/mg pancreas in wild-type and STAT-1–/– mice, respectively).
|
A clear difference in sensitivity to MLDS was, however, observed between wild-type and STAT-1–/– mice. At the start of the five daily injections of streptozotocin, plasma glucose levels were 98 ± 17 mg/dl in wild-type mice and 95 ± 6 mg/dl in STAT-1–/– mice (NS). On experimental day 10, glucose levels were significantly higher in wild types than in STAT-1–/– mice and increased rapidly on day 17, continuing to rise until reaching a plateau level after 30 days. On the other hand, glucose levels remained virtually constant in streptozotocin-treated STAT-1–/– mice until day 45 (Fig. 5A).
|
0.05 vs. controls) (Fig. 5B), suggesting that absence of STAT-1 provides a partial protection against development of diabetes. That this protection was only partial is confirmed by the pancreatic insulin content determination at the end of the experiment, where a clearly higher insulin level is still present in the STAT-1–/– pancreata versus controls (21.8 ± 3.9 vs. 5.8 ± 1.7 pmol/mg pancreas, P
0.01), although a 85% decrease was observed compared with the levels present before streptozotocin administration (see above). This was also reflected by the histological image at the end of the study where mostly small islets were present in both groups (data not shown). | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, in synergy with other stimuli, triggers in the ß-cells the expression and secretion of a large number of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, costimulatory molecules, and enzymes, which are known to control cellular immune reactions that contribute to ß-cell destruction (1,11). For many of these genes, mRNA expression is regulated at the transcriptional level by binding of IFN-
-activated STAT-1 (itself upregulated in ß-cells after costimulation with inflammatory cytokines) to respective binding sites (
-activated sequences) within the target promoters (1,11).
In the present study, we used mice with a knockout of the transcription factor STAT-1 to determine whether JAK-STAT activation is essential for cytokine-stimulated gene expression and ß-cell death in vitro and to investigate whether these findings are translated into protection against in vivo ß-cell destruction. We found that absence of STAT-1 in whole islets protects them against IFN-
(studied in combination with IL-1ß)–induced cell death. Moreover, the observation of complete protection of FACS-purified ß-cells from STAT-1–/– mice against cytokine-induced apoptosis confirms that the protection is due to the absence of STAT-1 in the ß-cells themselves and not to its absence in putative passenger leukocytes. In line with our observations, other studies have recently shown that ß-cell-specific overexpression of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins 1 and 3, which block IFN-
activation of the JAK-STAT signaling cascade, prevents diabetes in different mouse models (35–37). Overexpression of SOCS-1, however, impairs both STAT-1 tyrosine phosphorylation and toll-like receptor signaling (38), whereas upregulation of SOCS-3 blocks NF-
B activation (39) and modifies signaling via the insulin receptor (40) in ß-cells. Significantly, our data demonstrate that interfering exclusively with IFN-
-activated JAK-STAT signaling protects insulin-secreting ß-cells from cytokine-elicited inflammatory responses and death in vitro. We have previously shown that IL-1ß contributes to ß-cell death via activation of NF-
B (3,5). Taken together with the present data, we suggest that STAT-1 and NF-
B are key transcription factors regulating the gene networks that trigger ß-cell apoptosis.
We have previously demonstrated that expression of IL-15, IP-10, and iNOS is regulated by IFN-
, whereas the expression of MCP-1 and MIP-3
is IL-1ß–dependent (7). In the case of IFN-
, many responsive genes are induced through interaction of phosphorylated STAT-1 homodimers and an inducible enhancer termed
-activated sequences. Other potential downstream effectors responsible for gene induction by IFN-
are IRF-1 (41), the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (42), NF-
B (p65/p50) (43), and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-ß. An important observation in the present study is that STAT-1–deficient islets, in contrast to wild-type islets, are unable to upregulate expression of mRNAs for IL-15, IP-10, and the enzyme iNOS after cytokine exposure, suggesting that JAK/STAT activation is crucial for such responses. On the other hand, no inhibitory effects of STAT-1 deficiency were observed on cytokine-elicited MCP-1 and MIP-3
expression in ß-cells.
STAT-1 actions are cell- and context-dependent and may lead to opposite outcomes, such as increasing survival or apoptosis (44). Studies using cells and mice deficient in STAT-1 have shown that the transcription factor mediates most immune/inflammatory effects of IFN-
, including the induction of immune effector and inflammatory genes (26,45,46) and both pro- and antiapoptotic genes (14). Of note, recent studies have identified several IFN-
–induced but STAT-1–independent genes in diverse cell types (47–49), leading to a currently ongoing reevaluation of the role of STAT-1 for IFN-
signaling. We found that a targeted deletion of STAT-1 protein in mice did not affect the ß-cell mass homeostasis, as demonstrated by normal IPGTT and comparable pancreatic insulin content to wild-type controls, but causes a partial protection against ß-cell destruction by multiple low doses of streptozotocin. On the other hand, no direct protection was observed against the toxic effects of a high dose of streptozotocin on ß-cells, suggesting that absence of STAT-1 prevents ß-cell death in MLDS-induced diabetes by interfering with immune-mediated ß-cell death, not by interfering with the alkylating actions of streptozotocin. Because these mice were deficient for STAT-1 at both the ß-cell and immune-system levels, the present data do not allow us to conclude whether the observed protection was due to beneficial effects of STAT-1 absence on the immune system or ß-cells or, more probably, in both. Of note, the degree of immune-cell infiltration in the islets after MLDS treatment was similar between wild-type and STAT-1–/– mice, suggesting that under similar immune attack ß-cells from STAT-1–/– mice are more resistant to cell death.
These data, together with our previous observations, suggest a dual role for IFN-
signaling in ß-cell destruction. Thus, we have previously shown that disruption of the transcription factor IRF-1 not only failed to prevent cytokine-induced ß-cell death in vitro (9), but it also aggravated MLDS-induced diabetes in vivo (50). This is in marked contrast with the present findings and suggests that although STAT-1–regulated genes have mainly a proapoptotic role in ß-cells, genes regulated by the downstream transcription factor IRF-1 have a protective role against ß-cell destruction. New experiments, including microarray analysis, are now required to identify the nature of these STAT-1–and/or IRF-1–regulated genes.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a central role of STAT-1 in inflammation-induced ß-cell death. Disruption of the STAT-1–mediated signaling cascade prevents upregulation of several chemokines and iNOS and completely prevents IFN-
(studied in combination with IL-1ß)-mediated ß-cell death in vitro. Moreover, blocking STAT-1 partially protects ß-cells against destruction in vivo. These data suggest that STAT-1 may become a therapeutic target in our efforts to increase ß-cell resistance against immune destruction.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank the personnel of the laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Endocrinology at KUL (in particular J. Depovere, D. Valckx, and J. Laureys) and of the Laboratory of Experimental Medicine at ULB (in particular M. Neef, J. Schoonheydt, and M. Urbain) for their excellent technical support and constructive discussions.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication February 2, 2005 and accepted in revised form May 3, 2005
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B-dependent genes in primary rat pancreatic ß-cells. J Biol Chem 276:48879–48886, 2001
B activation by adenovirus-mediated expression of a NF-
B super-repressor prevents ß-cell apoptosis. Diabetes 50:2219–2224, 2001
induce the expression of diverse chemokines and IL-15 in human and rat pancreatic islet cells, and in islets from pre-diabetic NOD mice. Diabetologia 46:255–266, 2003[Medline]
-induced genes in rat pancreatic ß cells. Diabetologia 46:1641–1657, 2003[Medline]
action on pancreatic ß cells causes class I MHC upregulation but not diabetes. J Clin Invest 102:1249–1257, 1998[Medline]
-dependent intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression using dominant-negative Stat1. J Biol Chem 272:28582–28589, 1997
-induced apoptosis in STAT1-null cells due to low constitutive levels of caspases. Science 278:1630–1632, 1997
induces interleukin-1 converting enzyme expression in pancreatic islets by an interferon regulatory factor-1-dependent mechanism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:830–836, 2000
-induced interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) expression in rodent and human islet cells precedes nitric oxide production. Endocrinology 138:2747–2753, 1997
-Interferon signaling in pancreatic ß-cells is persistent but can be terminated by overexpression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1. Diabetes 50:2744–2751, 2001
-mediated toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:12191–12196, 2001
B-regulated proapoptotic pathways. Diabetologia 47:1998–2011, 2004[Medline]
B by IFN-
in a STAT1-independent pathway. J Immunol 166:6170–6180, 2001
-induced inhibition of neuronal vesicular stomatitis virus infection is STAT1 dependent. J Neurovirol 10:57–63, 2004[Medline]
. J Immunol 164:1286–1292, 2000
through Stat1-dependent and independent pathways. EMBO J 19:263–272, 2000[Medline]
-dependent signaling. Trends Immunol 23:96–101, 2002[Medline]
signalling pathway in sensitivity of pancreatic ß cells to immune destruction. Diabetologia 44:567–574, 2001[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Dogusan, M. Garcia, D. Flamez, L. Alexopoulou, M. Goldman, C. Gysemans, C. Mathieu, C. Libert, D. L. Eizirik, and J. Rasschaert Double-Stranded RNA Induces Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Apoptosis by Activation of the Toll-Like Receptor 3 and Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 Pathways Diabetes, May 1, 2008; 57(5): 1236 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim, H. S. Kim, K. W. Chung, S. H. Oh, J. W. Yun, S.-H. Im, M.-K. Lee, K.-W. Kim, and M.-S. Lee Essential Role for Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-1 in Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Death and Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes of Nonobese Diabetic Mice Diabetes, October 1, 2007; 56(10): 2561 - 2568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. I. Callewaert, C. A. Gysemans, L. Ladriere, W. D'Hertog, J. Hagenbrock, L. Overbergh, D. L. Eizirik, and C. Mathieu Deletion of STAT-1 Pancreatic Islets Protects Against Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes and Early Graft Failure but Not Against Late Rejection Diabetes, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 2169 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. K. Mullarky, F. M. Szaba, L. W. Kummer, L. B. Wilhelm, M. A. Parent, L. L. Johnson, and S. T. Smiley Gamma Interferon Suppresses Erythropoiesis via Interleukin-15 Infect. Immun., May 1, 2007; 75(5): 2630 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Dong, Q-X Wang, C-Y Zhou, X-F Ma, and Y-C Zhang Activation of the STAT1 signalling pathway in lupus nephritis in MRL/lpr mice Lupus, February 1, 2007; 16(2): 101 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ortis, A. K. Cardozo, D. Crispim, J. Storling, T. Mandrup-Poulsen, and D. L. Eizirik Cytokine-Induced Proapoptotic Gene Expression in Insulin-Producing Cells Is Related to Rapid, Sustained, and Nonoscillatory Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Activation Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 20(8): 1867 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vecchione, A. Aretini, G. Marino, U. Bettarini, R. Poulet, A. Maffei, M. Sbroggio, L. Pastore, M. T. Gentile, A. Notte, et al. Selective Rac-1 Inhibition Protects From Diabetes-Induced Vascular Injury Circ. Res., February 3, 2006; 98(2): 218 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||