Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Diabetes 55:1529-1533, 2006
DOI: 10.2337/db06-0047
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scarpelli, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sesti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scarpelli, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sesti, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Brief Genetics Reports

Variants of the Interleukin-10 Promoter Gene Are Associated With Obesity and Insulin Resistance but Not Type 2 Diabetes in Caucasian Italian Subjects

Daniela Scarpelli1, Marina Cardellini2, Francesco Andreozzi1, Emanuela Laratta1, Marta Letizia Hribal1, Maria Adelaide Marini2, Vittorio Tassi3, Renato Lauro2, Francesco Perticone1, and Giorgio Sesti1

1 Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Grjcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Rome-Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
3 Unità di Diabetologia ed Endocrinologia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Giorgio Sesti, MD, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Policlinico Mater Domini, Via Tommaso Campanella 88100, Catanzaro, Italy. E-mail: sesti{at}unicz.it

Abbreviations: HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; IL, interleukin


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
The -1082G/A polymorphism.
 The -592 C/A polymorphism.
 Haplotype analysis.
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Interleukin (IL)-10 is a major anti-inflammatory cytokine that has been associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes. The three polymorphisms –1082G/A, –819C/T, and –592C/A in the IL10 promoter were reported to influence IL10 transcription. We investigated whether these polymorphisms were associated with type 2 diabetes and related traits in a cohort of Italian Caucasians comprising 551 type 2 diabetic and 1,131 control subjects. The –819C/T and –592C/A polymorphisms were in perfect linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 1.0). The –1082G/A polymorphism was not associated with type 2 diabetes or related traits. Although the –592C/A polymorphism was not associated with type 2 diabetes, nondiabetic homozygous carriers of the A allele showed increased BMI and insulin resistance and lower plasma IL-10 levels compared with the other genotypes. In the nondiabetic group, the ATA haplotype was associated with an increased risk for obesity (odds ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.02–1.60]; P = 0.02). The ATA/ATA composite genotype was associated with an increased risk for obesity (1.96 [1.16–3.31]; P = 0.01) and insulin resistance (1.99 [1.12–3.53]; P = 0.01). This study suggests that polymorphisms and haplotypes of the IL10 promoter may be associated with obesity and insulin resistance in a large sample of Italian Caucasians.

Increasing evidence suggests a link between a low-grade inflammatory state and the development of obesity and the coexisting conditions of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome (1–4). Proinflammatory cytokines can cause insulin resistance and anti-inflammatory cytokines can counteract these negative effects, suggesting that an unpaired balance between proinflammatory versus anti-inflammatory cytokines may have a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and related traits. Interleukin (IL)-10 is a major anti-inflammatory cytokine that plays a crucial role in the regulation of the immune system. It has strong deactivating properties on the inflammatory host response mediated by macrophages and lymphocytes and potently inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines (5–8). Recently, it has been reported that cotreatment with IL-10 prevented IL-6–induced defects in both hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin action in rats (9). Low IL-10 circulating levels have been reported to be associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome (10). Moreover, it has been shown that low IL-10 production is associated with hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes (11). Some polymorphisms in the promoter of the IL10 gene have been associated with its transcription levels. The best documented are the IL10 gene promoter polymorphisms –1082G/A, –819C/T, and –592C/A, which form three major haplotypes (GCC, ACC, and ATA) among Caucasian subjects (12,13). The ATA haplotype has been associated with lower transcriptional activity than the GCC haplotype, and the ATA/ATA genotype was associated with lower IL-10 production under lipopolysaccharide stimulation than other genotypes (14–17). In this study, we have examined whether the –1082G/A, –819C/T, and –592C/A polymorphisms in the IL10 promoter gene separately or in combination are associated with type 2 diabetes and related quantitative traits.

The –819C/T and –592C/A variants were in perfect linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 1.0). Hence, only data for the –1082G/A and –592 C/A polymorphisms are presented in the single-variant association studies. Hardy-Weinberg expectations were fulfilled in both nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects for both the –1082G/A and the –592 C/A polymorphisms. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the 1,131 nondiabetic subjects and the 551 type 2 diabetic patients are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1 Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study subjects

 

   The –1082G/A polymorphism.
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 The -1082G/A polymorphism.
The -592 C/A polymorphism.
 Haplotype analysis.
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
In the type 2 diabetes case-control study, there was no significant difference between genotype frequencies of the –1082G/A variant between type 2 diabetic case and nondiabetic control subjects (Table 1) even after adjustment for age, sex, and waist-to-hip ratio in a logistic regression analysis (odds ratio [OR] 1.17 [95% CI 0.95–1.33]; P = 0.17). When the analysis was repeated in a subgroup consisting of 239 obese type 2 diabetic and 429 obese nondiabetic subjects, no association was found between the –1082G/A variant and type 2 diabetes (P = 0.11 by {chi}2 test). In the nondiabetic group, no phenotypic differences were observed among subjects carrying the three genotypes (Table 2). In the diabetic group, no differences in BMI (P = 0.11) were observed among subjects carrying the three genotypes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2 Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the nondiabetic group according to the IL-10 genotype

 

   The –592 C/A polymorphism.
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 The -1082G/A polymorphism.
 The -592 C/A polymorphism.
Haplotype analysis.
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
In the type 2 diabetes case-control study, there was no significant difference between frequencies of the –592C/A variant between type 2 diabetic case and nondiabetic control subjects (Table 1) even after adjustment for age, sex, and waist-to-hip ratio in a logistic regression analysis (OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.81–1.18]; P = 0.84). When the analysis was repeated in the obese subjects subgroup, no association was found between the –592G/A variant and type 2 diabetes (P = 0.11 by {chi}2 test). However, in a genotype-quantitative trait study, nondiabetic subjects homozygous for the A allele (A/A) showed increased BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, systolic blood pressure, fasting insulin levels, and insulin resistance, estimated by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) compared with homozygous (C/C) and heterozygous (C/A) carriers of the C allele (Table 2). After Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, differences in BMI, fasting insulin levels, and HOMA-IR remained significant (Table 2). By contrast, no differences were observed between subjects carrying the –592C/A genotype and those carrying the –592C/C genotype, thus suggesting a recessive effect of the A allele. Differences in BMI (P = 0.02), fasting insulin levels (P = 0.0001), and HOMA-IR (P = 0.002) among the three genotypes remained significant after adjusting for age and sex. After adjusting for BMI in addition to age and sex, the differences in fasting insulin levels (P = 0.02) and HOMA-IR (P = 0.008) among the three genotypes remained significant, indicating that the effect of the polymorphism on insulin sensitivity was not mediated by increased body weight. Plasma IL-10 concentration was assayed in a subgroup of subjects (n = 236), for which samples were available. IL-10 levels were significantly lower in carriers of the –592A/A genotype (n = 12) compared with carriers of the –592C/A (n = 93) and –592C/C genotype (n = 131).

In the diabetic group, carriers of the –592A/A genotype showed a tendency toward increased BMI (30.8 ± 6.4 kg/m2) compared with subjects carrying the –592C/A genotype (29.8 ± 5.6 kg/m2) and those carrying the –592C/C genotype (29.9 ± 4.9 kg/m2), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.2). It is possible that in diabetic subjects secondary weight loss induced by either diet or pharmacological treatments could mask the effects of this polymorphism on BMI.


   Haplotype analysis.
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 The -1082G/A polymorphism.
 The -592 C/A polymorphism.
 Haplotype analysis.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
We found only three of eight different theoretically possible allele combinations in our study group, i.e., GCC, ACC, and ATA (Table 3). Frequencies of the haplotypes were not significantly different between type 2 diabetic case and nondiabetic control subjects (P = 0.53 by {chi}2 test). By contrast, the ATA haplotype was significantly associated with an increased risk for obesity (P = 0.02 by {chi}2 test). No association was observed between the ATA haplotype and insulin resistance, defined as the highest quartile of HOMA-IR index (P = 0.53 by {chi}2 test). A logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age and sex showed a nominally significant association between the ATA haplotype and obesity (OR 1.28 [95% CI 1.02–1.60]; P = 0.02). We next analyzed the effect of the number of copies of the ATA haplotype on phenotype. In the nondiabetic group, because all subjects carrying the –592A/A genotype were also bearing the –1082A/A genotype, the phenotypic characteristics of subjects with the ATA/ATA composite genotype were identical to those of carriers of the –592A/A genotype reported in Table 2.

In the nondiabetic group, a higher number of copies of the ATA haplotype was associated with a nominally significant increased risk for obesity (P = 0.025 by {chi}2 test) and insulin resistance (P = 0.001 by {chi}2 test) (Table 3). A logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age and sex showed that subjects with two copies of the ATA haplotype have a nominally significant risk for both obesity (OR 1.96 [95% CI 1.16–3.31]; P = 0.01) and insulin resistance (1.99 [1.12–3.53]; P = 0.01) compared with subjects with no copy of the ATA haplotype.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3 Haplotype frequencies in type 2 diabetic patients and nondiabetic control subjects

 
Overall, we provide evidence that single nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes of the IL10 promoter are associated with obesity and insulin resistance but not with type 2 diabetes. The genotype-quantitative trait interaction study in nondiabetic subjects suggested that the –592C/A, but not the –1082G/A, IL10 promoter polymorphism contributes to the interindividual variation in BMI and insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, in the obesity case-control study, we found that the ATA haplotype is more frequent in obese subjects than among nonobese subjects and that subjects with two copies of the ATA haplotype have a nominally significant increased risk also for insulin resistance.

The mechanisms by which the IL10 promoter polymorphisms might cause an increase in BMI are unknown. The ATA haplotype has been associated with lower transcriptional activity than the GCC haplotype, and the ATA/ATA composite genotype has been associated with lower IL-10 production by peripheral-blood mononuclear cells than other genotypes (14–17), although these results have not been replicated in another study showing that the –1082A allele or the ATA haplotype were associated with a decreased production of IL-10 (18). We found that carriers of the –592A/A genotype (as well as carriers of the ATA/ATA composite genotype) have lower levels of circulating IL-10 compared with other genotypes supporting in vitro data, suggesting that these allele combinations may affect IL10 transcription. Because proinflammatory cytokine such as tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and IL-6 have been associated to obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes, and IL-10 downregulates the production of these proinflammatory cytokines (5–7,8), it is tempting to speculate that impaired IL-10 production in carriers of the ATA/ATA composite genotype may result in increased production of proinflammatory cytokines, which in turn affect insulin action in peripheral tissues. Interestingly, we failed to show any impact of IL10 promoter polymorphisms on type 2 diabetes, although they are associated with both obesity and insulin resistance, two well-known risk factors for type 2 diabetes. This apparent paradox might partly be related to the fact that IL10 promoter polymorphisms did not affect insulin secretion, as estimated by HOMA of ß-cell function index, thus allowing compensatory response to increased peripheral demand by pancreatic ß-cells.

This study has some limitations. We were not able to measure plasma IL-10 concentrations in all of the involved subjects, in particular in type 2 diabetic subjects. Also, a possible linkage disequilibrium of the three polymorphisms of the IL10 promoter with other functional coding or noncoding variants in the region cannot be excluded. Furthermore, we did not correct for multiple testing in our haplotype analysis so that these findings are only nominally significant. Finally, the present findings obtained in a cross-sectional study are explorative in nature, and replication in independent prospective population-based studies with different ethnicity is needed to determine whether these IL10 promoter polymorphisms influence insulin action and whether they are truly implicated in the development of obesity.

In conclusion, we show that the –592A/A genotype and the ATA/ATA composite genotype are associated with low circulating IL-10 levels and increased risk of both obesity and insulin resistance in a large sample of Italian Caucasians.


   RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 The -1082G/A polymorphism.
 The -592 C/A polymorphism.
 Haplotype analysis.
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
REFERENCES
 
The study involved two groups of Caucasian subjects: 1) a group of type 2 diabetic patients and 2) a group of nondiabetic subjects. Subjects with type 2 diabetes were consecutively recruited according to the following criteria: onset of diabetes after age 35 years, absence of ketonuria at diagnosis, and anti-GAD antibody negative, as previously described (19). Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed according to the American Diabetes Association criteria (20). The nondiabetic subjects were participating in a metabolic disease prevention campaign for cardiovascular risk factors including age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, glucose tolerance, and obesity, as previously described (21). A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was performed in a subset of the nondiabetic control subjects (734 of 1,131 subjects).

Biochemical measurements.
Plasma glucose was measured by the glucose oxidation method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer II; Milan, Italy). Plasma insulin concentration was determined by a specific radioimmunoassay (Adaltis, Bologna, Italy). IL-10 concentrations were measured using a high-sensitivity enzyme immunoassay (Quantikine kit; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). In the nondiabetic group, insulin sensitivity was estimated by the HOMA-IR index (22). Quartiles for the population distribution for the HOMA-IR were Q1, 0.40–1.60; Q2, 1.61–2.50; Q3, 2.51 –3.84; and Q4, 3.85–34.04 units. Nondiabetic subjects with insulin resistance were defined as the highest quartile of HOMA-IR. Insulin secretion in the fasting state was estimated by the HOMA for ß-cell function index (22).

Genotyping.
Genomic DNA was isolated from human leukocytes using standard methods. IL10 –1082G/A, –819C/T, and –592C/A promoter variants (rs1800896, rs1800871, and rs1800872, respectively) were genotyped by direct sequencing using an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems).

Statistical analysis.
Variables not normally distributed were logarithmically transformed before statistical analyses. ANOVA was used to compare the effect of genotypes on continuous variables with Bonferroni correction. Student’s t test was used to compare phenotypic differences between two groups. Categorical variables were compared by {chi}2 test. Haplotypes, as well as their relative frequencies, were inferentially reconstructed by PHASE 2.0 (23). Linkage disequilibrium between polymorphisms was calculated by using Haploview 3.2 (24). Logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age and sex was used to test for significant association between genotype or haplotypes frequencies and type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, or obesity. For all analyses, a P value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS software program Version 12.0 for Windows.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by the European Community’s FP6 EUGENE2 no. LSHM-CT-2004-512013 Grant (to G.S.).


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received for publication January 11, 2006 and accepted in revised form February 16, 2006


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 The -1082G/A polymorphism.
 The -592 C/A polymorphism.
 Haplotype analysis.
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Pickup JC, Mattock MB, Chusney GD, Burt D: Inflammation and activated innate immunity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:813–823, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fernandez-Real JM, Ricart J: Insulin resistance and chronic cardiovascular inflammatory syndrome. Endocrine Reviews 24:278–301, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Frohlich M, Imhof A, Berg G, Hutchinson WL, Pepys MB, Boeing H, Muche R, Brenner H, Koenig W: Association between C-reactive protein and features of the metabolic syndrome: a population-based study. Diabetes Care 23:1835–1839, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Festa A, D’Agostino R, Howard G, Mykkanen L, Tracey RP, Haffner SM: Chronic subclinical inflammation as part of the insulin resistance syndrome: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). Circulation 101:42–47, 2000
  5. Moore KW, de Waal-Malefyt R, Coffman RL, O’Garra A: Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol 19:683–765, 2001[Medline]
  6. Fiorentiono DF, Zlotnik A, Mosmann TR, Howard M, O’Garra A: IL-10 inhibits cytokine production by activated macrophages. J Immunol 147:3815–3822, 1991[Abstract]
  7. Donnelly RP, Dickensheets H, Finbloom DS: The interleukin-10 signal transduction pathway and regulation of gene expression in mononuclear phagocytes. J Interferon Cytokine Res 19:563–573, 1999[Medline]
  8. Schottelius AJG, Mayo MW, Sartor RB, Baldwin AS: Interleukin-10 signaling blocks inhibitor of _B kinase activity and nuclear factor kB DNA binding. J Biol Chem 274:31868–31874, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kim H-J, Higashimori T, Park S-Y, Choi H, Dong J, Kim Y-J, Noh H-L, Cho Y-R, Cline G, Kim Y-B, Kim JK: Differential effects of interleukin-6 and -10 on skeletal muscle and liver insulin action in vivo. Diabetes 53:1060–1067, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Esposito K, Postillo A, Giugliano F, Giugliano G, Martella R, Nicoletti G, Giugliano D: Association of low interleukin-10 levels with the metabolic syndrome in obese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1055–1058, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. van Exel E, Gussekloo J, de Craen AJM, Frolich M, Bootsma-van der Wiel A, Westendorp RGJ: Low production capacity of interleukin-10 associates with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: the Leiden 85-Plus Study. Diabetes 51:1088–1092, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lim S, Crawley E, Woo P, Barnes PJ: Haplotype associated with low interleukin-10 production in patients with severe asthma (Letter). Lancet 352:113, 1998[Medline]
  13. Edwards-Smith CJ, Jonsson JR, Purdie DM, Bansal A, Shorthouse C, Powell EE: Interleukin-10 promoter polymorphism predicts initial response of chronic hepatitis C to interferon alfa. Hepatology 30:526–530, 1999[Medline]
  14. Crawley E, Kay R, Sillibourne J, Patel P, Hutchinson I, Woo P: Polymorphic haplotypes of the interleukin-10 5' flanking region determine variable interleukin-10 transcription and are associated with particular phenotypes of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 42:1101–1118, 1999[Medline]
  15. Turner DM, Williams DM, Sankaran D, Lazarus M, Sinnott PJ, Hutchinson IV: An investigation of polymorphism in the interleukin-10 gene promoter. Eur J Immunogenet 24:1–8, 1997[Medline]
  16. Hutchinson IV, Pravica V, Hajeer A, Sinnott PJ: Identification of high and low responders to allografts. Rev Immunogenet 1:323–333, 1999[Medline]
  17. Koss K, Satsangi J, Fanning GC, Welsh KI, Jewell DP: Cytokine (TNF alpha, LT alpha and IL-10) polymorphisms in inflammatory bowel diseases and normal controls: differential effects on production and allele frequencies. Genes Immun 1:185–190, 2000[Medline]
  18. Keijsers V, Verweij CL, Westendorp RGJ, Breedveld FC, Huizinga TWJ: IL10 polymorphisms in relation to production and rheumatoid arthritis (Abstract). Arthritis Rheum 40 (Suppl. 9):S179, 1997
  19. Sesti G, Marini MA, Cardellini M, Sciacqua A, Frontoni S, Andreozzi F, Irace C, Lauro D, Gnasso A, Federici M, Perticone F, Lauro R: The Arg972 variant in insulin receptor substrate-1 is associated with an increased risk of secondary failure to sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:1394–1398, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus: Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 26:3160–3167, 2003[Free Full Text]
  21. Sesti G, Sciacqua A, Cardellini M, Marini MA, Maio R, Vatrano M, Succurro E, Lauro R, Federici M, Perticone F: Plasma concentration of insulin-like growth factor-I is independently associated with insulin sensitivity in subjects with different degree of glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care 28:132–137, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and ß-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–419, 1985[Medline]
  23. Stephens M, Donnelly P: A comparison of Bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1162–1169, 2003[Medline]
  24. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21:263–265, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
X. Zhang, P. Hei, L. Deng, and J. Lin
Interleukin-10 gene promoter polymorphisms and their protein production in peritoneal fluid in patients with endometriosis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 13(2): 135 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scarpelli, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sesti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scarpelli, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sesti, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum