Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes 55:2620-2625, 2006
DOI: 10.2337/db06-0592
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zerbini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chiumello, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zerbini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chiumello, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Persistent Renal Hypertrophy and Faster Decline of Glomerular Filtration Rate Precede the Development of Microalbuminuria in Type 1 Diabetes

Gianpaolo Zerbini1, Riccardo Bonfanti2, Franco Meschi2, Emilio Bognetti2, Pier Luigi Paesano3, Luigi Gianolli4, Marialuisa Querques1, Anna Maestroni1, Giliola Calori5, Alessandro Del Maschio6, Ferruccio Fazio4, Livio Luzi1, and Giuseppe Chiumello6

1 Renal Pathophysiology Unit, Section Nutrition-Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
2 Endocrine Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
3 Department of Radiology, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
4 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
5 Epidemiology Unit, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
6 Universitá Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gianpaolo Zerbini, Department of Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy. E-mail: g.zerbini{at}hsr.it

Abbreviations: GFR, glomerular filtration rate


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Soon after the onset of type 1 diabetes, renal hypertrophy and hyperfiltration become manifest, particularly among patients who will subsequently develop diabetic nephropathy. Whether these early renal dysfunctions are involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy is currently unclear. We evaluated, during the same day, kidney volume and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in 146 patients with type 1 diabetes and normal renal function. All the individuals were then monitored for a mean of 9.5 ± 4.4 years for the development of microalbuminuria. Kidney volume and GFR were reevaluated in a subset of 68 patients 4 years after baseline. During follow-up, microalbuminuria developed in 27 of 146 diabetic patients. At baseline, kidney volume (312.8 ± 52.6 vs. 281.4 ± 46.1 vs. 236.8 ± 41.6 ml/1.73 m2, P < 0.05) but not GFR was increased in patients predisposed to microalbuminuria. Risk of progression was higher in patients with increased kidney volume (P = 0.0058). Patients predisposed to microalbuminuria showed a stable increase in kidney volume (P = 0.003), along with a faster decline of GFR (P = 0.01). Persistent renal hypertrophy and faster decline of GFR precede the development of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. These findings support the hypothesis that renal hypertrophy precedes hyperfiltration during the development of diabetic nephropathy.

From a clinical perspective, the first sign of diabetic nephropathy is represented by an increased urinary albumin excretion rate (known as microalbuminuria) that usually develops after a few years of duration of diabetes (1). From a morphological and functional point of view, however, it is well established that kidney volume and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increase promptly after the onset of type 1 diabetes (2,3) and that this phenomenon is particularly accentuated in the subset of individuals who, years later, will develop diabetic nephropathy (46). After these initial reports, a number of studies have subsequently confirmed that increased kidney volume (79) and faster GFR (1012) are associated with a poor renal prognosis in patients affected by type 1 diabetes. Altogether these findings suggest that the very beginning of this renal complication might coincide with the onset of diabetes itself and that abnormal kidney volume and GFR may be part of the process.

Two hypotheses have been formulated to explain early renal dysfunctions induced by diabetes. According to the "vascular hypothesis," hyperfiltration is the primary event, a consequence of defects in vascular control including increases in plasma flow and glomerular capillary pressure (13,14). Hypertrophy would follow, probably after compensatory changes of tubular function aimed to prevent the urinary loss of water and electrolytes (15). The "tubular hypothesis" suggests instead that the initial event is renal hypertrophy (1618), a consequence of hyperglycemia and hyperglycemia-induced overproduction of growth factors and cytokines (19,20). In brief, renal hypertrophy resulting from hyperplasia and hypertrophy of the nephron and, in particular, of the proximal tubule (21,22) would cause increased proximal tubular reabsorption, thus reducing the amount of salt reaching the macula densa. The consequent activation of the tubuloglomerular feedback would finally result, via an increase of GFR, in the normalization of salt delivery to the distal tubule.

During the early stages of diabetes, renal hyperfiltration and hypertrophy show up simultaneously. Thus, to distinguish at this point the cause from the effect appears to be rather difficult (14).

That renal hypertrophy and hyperfiltration may in some cases dissociate from each other is, however, suggested by previous studies showing that, in patients with type 1 diabetes, renal hyperfiltration but not hypertrophy is reduced by intensive insulin treatment (23,24). More recently, indirect support for this notion has been provided by two independent studies demonstrating reduced GFR in patients with long-standing normoalbuminuria who have type 1 diabetes predisposed to nephropathy (25) and an increased kidney volume in the early phases of microalbuminuria (26).

Whether repeated evaluations of kidney volume and GFR before the development of microalbuminuria might help in clarifying their role in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy is currently unknown. To explore this issue, we evaluated on two occasions kidney volume and GFR during a prospective study aimed to evaluate the rate of development of microalbuminuria in patients with type 1 diabetes and normal renal function.


    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
One hundred forty-six patients with type 1 diabetes who regularly attended the outpatient clinic of the pediatric department of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute were considered for this study. To be enrolled, an individual was required to have a duration of diabetes of at least 4 years (range at baseline 4–22 years, median 9 years) and a normal albumin excretion rate (measured by immunoturbidimetric technique on a Cobas Mira autoanalyzer; Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Normoalbuminuria was defined as a median albumin excretion rate <20 µg/min in three consecutive overnight collections of sterile urine. The presence of diabetic nephropathy and proliferative retinopathy at baseline resulted in exclusion from the study. Thirty subjects not affected by diabetes, similar for age and sex distribution, were considered for control purposes.

The study was performed according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. When a subject was <18 years of age, a parent gave informed consent.

Every subject attended a morning visit, when clinical features were recorded. BMI was expressed as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. The prescribed insulin dose was also recorded. Resting blood pressure (Korotkoff phases I/V) was measured once in the right arm by ordinary mercury sphygmomanometry with approximation to the nearest 2 mmHg. No subjects were receiving antihypertensive therapy. Patients with type 1 diabetes were otherwise treated only with insulin, were studied in ordinary glycemic control, and did not have any other known disease.

At the beginning of the study, measurement of kidney volume and GFR and clinical evaluation were performed during the same day in both patients with type 1 diabetes and control subjects (baseline). These same parameters were reevaluated in a subset of 68 patients with type 1 diabetes who were still normoalbuminuric 4 years after the baseline and who agreed to repeat the entire procedure (second evaluation). Three of the 146 patients with type 1 diabetes who entered the study developed microalbuminuria in the 4 years after baseline and were therefore excluded from the second evaluation. Patients with type 1 diabetes who underwent the second evaluation were not selected in any particular way.

Since the beginning of the study, clinical evaluation and measurement of microalbuminuria (in three consecutive overnight collections) were performed on a yearly basis in all subjects involved in the study until the end of follow-up or the development of microalbuminuria. Persistent microalbuminuria was defined as a median albumin excretion rate between 20 and 200 µg/min in three overnight collections of sterile urine. Once microalbuminuria was diagnosed, patients with type 1 diabetes were removed from the study and treated with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers.

Kidney volume.
Kidney volume was measured by ultrasound technique (27) performed by a single observer using 3.5–5 MHz convex and linear probes (SSA-250–10; Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan), who was blinded to the clinical characteristics of the subjects. Kidney volume was calculated according to the equation for an ellipsoid (28) and expressed as the mean volume of both kidneys corrected for body surface area; the mean coefficient of variation between measurements done on the same day was 5.9% (8).

GFR.
GFR was estimated for each individual via 51Cr-EDTA clearance, as previously described (29,30). Briefly, 1 µCi of 51Cr-EDTA/kg body wt was given as a single injection. Thereafter, venous blood samples were drawn at 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 300 min. Radioactivity of each blood sample was measured by gamma counter. A bicompartment model was used to fit the slope of decay of EDTA-associated radioactivity, and GFR was finally expressed as milliliters per minute after correction for body surface area.

Statistical analysis.
Data are shown as arithmetical means ± SD. Comparisons between groups were addressed by ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were performed with the Tukey-Kramer test (JMP software for the Apple Macintosh; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Parametric comparisons between groups were checked by nonparametric tests for unpaired observations where appropriate. The null hypothesis was rejected at the 5% level (two tailed). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the probability that microalbuminuria would develop in patients with type 1 diabetes who had a normal or increased kidney volume; the two groups were compared by log-rank test.

A multiple regression analysis was performed to verify which variables were associated with kidney volume at baseline. GFR and kidney volume changes over time were evaluated by ANOVA for repeated measures, considering the main effects of the between-groups factor (normoalbuminuria vs. microalbuminuria) and the time factor as well as the time-group interaction.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Baseline
Progression to microalbuminuria.
Altogether, the 146 patients with type 1 diabetes involved in the study were followed for a mean of 9.5 ± 4.4 years (mean ± SD, range 2–16 years). Microalbuminuria developed in 27 of 146 patients with type 1 diabetes (18.5%) after a follow-up of 8.1 ± 3.4 years (2–15 years). During this period, albumin excretion rate increased from 7.9 ± 3.9 to 110.4 ± 21.5 µg/min (P = 0.0001). Mean age and duration of diabetes at the onset of microalbuminuria were, respectively, 24.8 ± 4.0 and 17.7 ± 3.4 years.

On the other hand, in 119 of 146 patients with type 1 diabetes (81.5%), albumin excretion rate remained within the normal range (from 6.3 ± 4.4 to 7.4 ± 3.6 µg/min, P = NS) after a follow-up of 9.8 ± 4.6 years (range 2–16). To simplify reporting, the 119 patients with type 1 diabetes who, at the end of the follow-up, remained normoalbuminuric and the 27 patients with type 1 diabetes who developed microalbuminuria will be referred to, respectively, as the normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria groups.

Clinical characteristics of the subjects at baseline.
As shown in Table 1, at baseline, control subjects and patients with type 1 diabetes in both the normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria groups were comparable with respect to age, sex distribution, BMI, blood pressure, triglyceride levels, and creatinine levels. Normo- and microalbuminuria groups were also similar for duration of diabetes and albumin excretion rate. HbA1c (A1C) levels were slightly increased (P = 0.048) in the microalbuminuria group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Clinical features of nondiabetic control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes evaluated at baseline (first evaluation of renal volume) and divided according to renal status at the end of the study

 
Kidney volume and GFR at baseline.
Kidney volume was increased in patients with type 1 diabetes compared with that in control subjects (287.2 ± 48.7 vs. 236.8 ± 41.6 ml/1.73 m2, P = 0.00001). As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1A, when patients with type 1 diabetes were divided according to renal status at the end of follow-up, the microalbuminuria group showed an increased kidney volume compared with the normoalbuminuria group and with control subjects (312.8 ± 52.6 vs. 281.4 ± 46.1 vs. 236.8 ± 41.6 ml/1.73 m2, P < 0.05 for all pairs after correcting for multiple comparisons by Tukey-Kramer test).


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Kidney volume and GFR at baseline in 30 nondiabetic control subjects and in 146 subjects with type 1 diabetes divided according to renal status at the end of follow-up. A: Kidney volume was significantly different in the three groups considered (*P < 0.05 for all pairs after correcting for multiple comparisons by Tukey-Kramer test). Dotted line indicates the 99th percentile of kidney volume of control subjects. B: GFR was different between the microalbuminuria group and the nondiabetic control subjects (*P < 0.05) but similar in the other cases.

 
GFR was also increased in patients with type 1 diabetes compared with that in control subjects (118.3 ± 18.9 vs. 110.7 ± 9.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P = 0.03). As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1B, when patients with type 1 diabetes were divided according to renal status at the end of follow-up, the GFR of the microalbuminuria group was similar to that of the normoalbuminuria group (121.7 ± 18.3 vs. 117.6 ± 19.0 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P > 0.05), but higher than that of control subjects (121.7 ± 18.3 vs. 110.7 ± 9.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P < 0.05).

Effect of kidney volume on the progression to microalbuminuria.
A kidney volume >99th percentile in control subjects (327.6 ml/1.73 m2) was defined as increased and is indicated by a dotted line in Fig. 1A. Thirty-six of 146 patients with type 1 diabetes (24.6%) were shown to have an increased kidney volume. During the follow-up, microalbuminuria developed in 15 of 110 patients with type 1 diabetes with normal kidney volume (13.6%) and in 12 of 36 patients with type 1 diabetes with increased kidney volume (33.3%).

Accordingly, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the risk of progression to microalbuminuria was significantly higher in patients with type 1 diabetes and increased kidney volume when compared with those with normal kidney volume (P = 0.0058) (Fig. 2). Patients with normal and increased kidney volumes were similar for age (16.3 ± 3.9 vs. 17.3 ± 3.6 years, P = 0.10), duration of diabetes (9.3 ± 4.2 vs. 9.9 ± 4.2 years, P = 0.49), A1C (9.1 ± 1.8 vs. 9.4 ± 1.4%, P = 0.40), BMI (20.7 ± 2.8 vs. 21.1 ± 3.3 kg/m2, P = 0.30), albumin excretion rate (7.1 ± 4.4 vs. 8.3 ± 3.8 µg/min, P = 0.12), and systolic (116.8 ± 11.2 vs. 120.6 ± 11.0 mmHg, P = 0.12) and diastolic (72.7 ± 8.1 vs. 75.0 ± 5.3 mmHg, P = 0.16) blood pressure. GFR (126.3 ± 20.4 vs. 115.8 ± 16.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P = 0.002) was higher in patients with type 1 diabetes and increased kidney volume. In multiple regression analysis, considering all patients with type 1 diabetes and including the variables that at baseline were found to correlate to kidney volume after simple regression (GFR, age, A1C, albumin excretion rate, and BMI), only GFR (F = 12.3, P = 0.0007), A1C (F = 8.0, P = 0.0056), and age (F = 6.7, P = 0.0108) were confirmed to be independent factors associated with kidney volume.


Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showing the risk of developing microalbuminuria in patients divided according to normal or increased kidney volume. The probability of microalbuminuria differed significantly between the two groups (P = 0.0058 by the log-rank test; {chi}2 = 7.599 with 1 degree of freedom).

 
Second evaluation
Clinical characteristics of the subset of patients with type 1 diabetes who underwent a second evaluation of kidney volume and GFR.
Clinical characteristics of the subset of 68 (of 146) patients with type 1 diabetes who repeated the measurement of kidney volume and GFR are shown in Table 2. Both at baseline and at the second evaluation, clinical parameters were similar for the normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria groups. The 68 patients with type 1 diabetes of this subset were younger (14.7 ± 3.2 vs. 16.7 ± 3.9 years, P = 0.004) compared with the 146 patients with type 1 diabetes considered at baseline but with similar duration of diabetes (8.3 ± 3.4 vs. 9.5 ± 4.3 years, P = 0.06). In this subset, at the end of follow-up, microalbuminuria developed in 16 of 68 patients with type 1 diabetes (23.5%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Clinical features of the subgroup of 68 individuals who underwent two renal evaluations, divided according to renal status at the end of the study

 
Kidney volume and GFR at baseline and at the second evaluation in the subset of patients with type 1 diabetes.
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed both at baseline (P = 0.03) and at the second evaluation (P = 0.004) that risk of progression to microalbuminuria was significantly higher in patients with increased kidney volume. Figure 3 and Table 2 show the change in kidney volume (Fig. 3A) and GFR (Fig. 3B) of normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria groups between baseline and the second evaluation. During this period (4 years), kidney volume remained increased in the microalbuminuria group (from 311.0 ± 59.9 to 328.2 ± 64.7 ml/1.73 m2) compared with that in the normoalbuminuria group (from 279.7 ± 43.3 to 283 ± 45.5 ml/1.73 m2) as confirmed by a significant (F = 9.5, P = 0.003) between-groups difference paralleled by a nonsignificant difference in time (F = 1.5, P = 0.2) and in time-group interaction (F = 0.9, P = 0.4).


Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Kidney volume and GFR between baseline and second evaluation. A: Kidney volume in normoalbuminuria (•) and microalbuminuria ({circ}) groups at baseline and 4 years later (second evaluation). *P = 0.003 compared with normoalbuminuria. B: GFR in normoalbuminuria (•) and microalbuminuria ({circ}) groups at baseline and 4 years later (second evaluation). *P = 0.01 compared with normoalbuminuria; {dagger}P = 0.0001 compared with baseline.

 
Kidney volume at baseline was significantly correlated to kidney volume at the second evaluation (r2 = 0.31, P = 0.0001). GFR decreased significantly between baseline and the second evaluation in both groups (normoalbuminuria, from 124.4 ± 17.2 to 115.3 ± 15.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and microalbuminuria, from 126.1 ± 19.4 to 102.9 ± 18.2 ml/min per 1.73 m2) as confirmed by a significant (F = 27.7, P = 0.0001) time difference paralleled by a nonsignificant group difference (F = 1.8, P = 0.2). The decline was, however, more accentuated in the microalbuminuria group as indicated by a significant time-group interaction (F = 6.4, P = 0.01).

When calculated as the change ({Delta}) between GFR at baseline and at the second evaluation, the rate of decline of GFR was faster in the microalbuminuria group (0.48 ± 0.47 vs. 0.19 ± 0.37 ml · min–1 · month–1, P = 0.01). Finally, kidney volume at baseline was directly correlated to rate of decline of GFR between baseline and the second evaluation (r2 = 0.13, P = 0.02), in line with the hypothesis that increased kidney volume may predispose to faster decline of GFR.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present study shows that long-term increases of kidney volume and accelerated declines of GFR cluster in the subgroup of normoalbuminuric patients with type 1 diabetes predisposed to develop microalbuminuria. This evidence supports the hypothesis that renal hypertrophy, via increased tubular reabsorption, is the primary dysfunction in the development of diabetic nephropathy and that GFR increases as a secondary event. Through the years, hypertrophy is maintained, but although the tubule survives overworking, the glomerulus progressively loses its activity.

As described above, the fact that increased kidney volume and faster GFR during the first years of diabetes are tightly linked to a poorer renal prognosis has been known for a number of years (412). The novel finding of our study is the demonstration that these two dysfunctions dissociate from each other through time, thus allowing the clarification of their respective role during the early phases of diabetic nephropathy.

A few considerations immediately follow from these findings. Our results support the notion that the biological mechanisms controlling kidney volume, in particular those affected by hyperglycemia (20), should be regarded as potentially involved also in the pathogenesis of nephropathy. In addition, increased kidney volume, as a consistent, reproducible, and persistent marker of diabetic nephropathy, appears to be of potential use for the early identification of individuals at risk for this complication.

Among the factors potentially involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy, predisposition to essential hypertension has been suggested as a major candidate (3133). Although our results do not show a direct association between kidney volume and blood pressure, we cannot currently rule out the possibility that an underlying predisposition to hypertension might nonetheless affect kidney volume. This is not only due to the fact that, unfortunately, intermediate phenotypes and genetic markers of essential hypertension were not evaluated in this study, but also based on the recent evidence that only nocturnal blood pressure measurements appear to be informative for the early identification of patients with type 1 diabetes predisposed to microalbuminuria (34).

A recent report has demonstrated that in patients with type 1 diabetes, regression of microalbuminuria reached a 6-year cumulative incidence of 58% (35). This finding may suggest that microalbuminuria may not represent a useful marker of future development of diabetic nephropathy. In our case, however, patients with type 1 diabetes predisposed to develop microalbuminuria also show a significant reduction in GFR, a marker of diabetic glomerulopathy independent on the level of microalbuminuria (25).

Finally, whether pharmacological treatment aimed to reduce kidney volume during normoalbuminuria may protect from the subsequent development of microalbuminuria is currently unknown. In animal models of diabetes, prevention of early hyperfiltration/hypertrophy has already been shown to avoid the subsequent development of diabetic nephropathy (36,37). Prospectively, a similar approach in humans could allow identification of new therapeutic approaches of use for the primary prevention of diabetic nephropathy.

In conclusion, our findings support the hypothesis that renal hypertrophy is the primary dysfunction in the development of diabetic nephropathy. Further studies are now required to evaluate whether the prevention/remission of this early renal dysfunction may beneficially affect the natural history of diabetic nephropathy.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health (to G.Z.).

We are indebted to Daniela Gabellini for technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received for publication May 2, 2006 and accepted in revised form June 15, 2006


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. American Diabetes Association: Nephropathy in diabetes (Position statement). Diabetes Care 27 (Suppl. 1):S79–S83, 2004
  2. Mogensen CE, Andersen MJF: Increased kidney size and glomerular filtration rate in early juvenile diabetes. Diabetes 22:706–712, 1973[Medline]
  3. Christiansen JS, Gammelgaard J, Frandsen M, Parving HH: Increased kidney size, glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow in short-term insulin-dependent diabetics. Diabetologia 20:451–456, 1981[Medline]
  4. Mogensen CE, Christiansen CK: Predicting diabetic nephropathy in insulin-dependent patients. N Engl J Med 311:89–93, 1984[Abstract]
  5. Mogensen CE: Early glomerular hyperfiltration in insulin dependent diabetics and late nephropathy. Scand J Clin Invest 46:201–206, 1986[Medline]
  6. Mogensen CE, Christensen CK: Blood pressure changes and renal function in incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy. Hypertension 7:64–73, 1985
  7. Lawson LM, Sochett EB, Chait PG, Balfe JW, Daneman D: Effect of puberty on markers of glomerular hypertrophy and hypertension in IDDM. Diabetes 45:51–55, 1996[Abstract]
  8. Bognetti E, Zoja A, Meschi F, Paesano PL, Chiumello G: Relationship between kidney volume, microalbuminuria and duration of diabetes mellitus (Letter). Diabetologia 39:1409, 1996[Medline]
  9. Baumgartl HJ, Sigl G, Banholzer P, Haslbeck M, Standl E: On the prognosis of IDDM patients with large kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:630–634, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dahlquist G, Stattin EL, Rudberg S: Urinary albumin excretion rate and glomerular filtration rate in the prediction of diabetic nephropathy: a long-term follow-up study of childhood onset type-1 diabetic patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:1382–1386, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Amin R, Turner C, van Aken S, Bahu TK, Watts A, Lindsell DR, Dalton RN, Dunger DB: The relationship between microalbuminuria and glomerular filtration rate in young type 1 diabetic subjects: the Oxford Regional Prospective Study. Kidney Int 68:1740–1749, 2005[Medline]
  12. Steinke JM, Sinaiko AR, Kramer MS, Suissa S, Chavers BM, Mauer M, the International Diabetic Nephopathy Study Group: The early natural history of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. III. Predictors of 5-year urinary albumin excretion rate patterns in initially normoalbuminuric patients. Diabetes 54:2164–2171, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. O’Bryan GT, Hostetter TH: The renal hemodynamic basis of diabetic nephropathy. Semin Nephrol 17:93–100, 1997[Medline]
  14. Hostetter TH: Hypertrophy and hyperfunction of the diabetic kidney. J Clin Invest 107:161–162, 2001[Medline]
  15. Fine L: The biology of renal hypertrophy. Kidney Int 29:619–634, 1986[Medline]
  16. Ditzel J, Brøchner-Mortensen J: Tubular reabsorption rates as related to elevated glomerular filtration in diabetic children. Diabetes 32 (Suppl. 2):28–33, 1983
  17. Thomson SC, Deng A, Bao D, Satriano J, Blantz RC, Vallon V: Ornithine decarboxylase, kidney size, and the tubular hypothesis of glomerular hyperfiltration in experimental diabetes. J Clin Invest 107:217–224, 2001[Medline]
  18. Bak M, Thomsen K, Christiansen T, Flyvbjerg A: Renal enlargement precedes renal hyperfiltration in early experimental diabetes in rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:1287–1292, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Vallon V, Blantz RC, Thomson SC: Glomerular hyperfiltration and the salt paradox in early type 1 diabetes mellitus: a tubulo-centric view. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:530–537, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wolf G, Ziyadeh FN: Molecular mechanisms of diabetic renal hypertrophy. Kidney Int 56:393–405, 1999[Medline]
  21. Rasch R, Dørup J: Quantitative morphology of the rat kidney during diabetes mellitus and insulin treatment. Diabetologia 40:802–809, 1997[Medline]
  22. Thomas MC, Burns WC, Cooper ME: Tubular changes in early diabetic nephropathy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 12:177–186, 2005[Medline]
  23. Wiseman MJ, Saunders AJ, Keen H, Viberti GC: Effect of blood glucose control on increased glomerular filtration rate and kidney size in insulin-dependent diabetes. N Engl J Med 312:617–621, 1985[Abstract]
  24. Christensen CK, Christiansen JS, Christensen T, Hermansen K, Mogensen CE: The effect of six months continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on kidney function and size in insulin-dependent diabetics. Diabet Med 3:29–32, 1986[Medline]
  25. Caramori ML, Fioretto P, Mauer M: Low glomerular filtration rate in normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients: an indicator of more advanced glomerular lesions. Diabetes 52:1036–1040, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Frazer FL, Palmer LJ, Clarey A, Thonell S, Byrne GC: Relationship between renal volume and increased albumin excretion rates in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 14:875–881, 2001[Medline]
  27. Bakker J, Olree M, Kaatee R, de Lange EE, Moons KG, Beutler JJ, Beek FJ: Renal volume measurements: accuracy and repeatability of US compared with that of MR imaging. Radiology 211:623–628, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Bartrum RJ Jr, Smith EH, D’Orsi CJ, Dantono J: The ultrasonic determination of renal transplant volume. J Clin Ultrasound 2:281–285, 1974[Medline]
  29. Bognetti E, Meschi F, Bonfanti R, Gianolli L, Chiumello G: Decrease of glomerular hyperfiltration in short-term diabetic adolescents without microalbuminuria. Diabetes Care 16:120–124, 1993[Abstract]
  30. Brøchner-Mortensen J: A simple method for the determination of glomerular filtration rate. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 30:271–274, 1972[Medline]
  31. Krolewski AS, Canessa M, Warram JH, Laffel LM, Christlieb AR, Knowler WC, Rand LI: Predisposition to hypertension and susceptibility to renal disease in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 318:140–145, 1988[Abstract]
  32. Mangili R, Bending JJ, Scott G, Li LK, Gupta A, Viberti GC: Increased sodium-lithium countertransport activity in red cells of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 318:146–150, 1988[Abstract]
  33. Zerbini G, Gabellini D, Ruggieri D, Maestroni A: Increased Na-Li countertransport activity, a cellular dysfunction common to essential hypertension and diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:S81–S84, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lurbe E, Redon J, Kesani A, Pascual JM, Tacons J, Alvarez V, Batlle D: Increase in nocturnal blood pressure and progression to microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 347:797–805, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Silva KH, Finkelstein DM, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 348:2285–2293, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. de Vriese AS, Tilton RG, Elger M, Stephan CC, Kriz W, Lameire NH: Antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor improve early renal dysfunction in experimental diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:993–1000, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Yamamoto Y, Maeshima Y, Kitayama H, Kitamura S, Takazawa Y, Sugiyama H, Yamasaki Y, Makino H: Tumstatin peptide, an inhibitor of angiogenesis, prevents glomerular hypertrophy in the early stage of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes 53:1831–1840, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
L. Gnudi, S. M. Thomas, and G. Viberti
Mechanical Forces in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Trigger for Impaired Glucose Metabolism
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 2226 - 2232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zerbini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chiumello, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zerbini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chiumello, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum