Diabetes 56:3006-3013, 2007 DOI: 10.2337/db07-0697 © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
Incretin Receptors for Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 and Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Are Essential for the Sustained Metabolic Actions of Vildagliptin in MiceFrom the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, and the Banting and Best Diabetes Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Daniel J. Drucker, Mount Sinai Hospital, SLRI Room 975C, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada. E-mail: d.drucker{at}utoronto.ca
Abbreviations:
BrdU, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; GLP, glucagon-like peptide; GLP-1R, GLP-1 receptor
OBJECTIVE—Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors lower blood glucose in diabetic subjects; however, the mechanism of action through which these agents improve glucose homeostasis remains incompletely understood. Although glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) represent important targets for DPP4 activity, whether additional substrates are important for the glucose-lowering actions of DPP4 inhibitors remains uncertain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We examined the efficacy of continuous vildagliptin administration in wild-type (WT) and dual incretin receptor knockout (DIRKO) mice after 8 weeks of a high-fat diet. RESULTS—Vildagliptin had no significant effect on food intake, energy expenditure, body composition, body weight gain, or insulin sensitivity in WT or DIRKO mice. However, glycemic excursion after oral glucose challenge was significantly reduced in WT but not in DIRKO mice after vildagliptin treatment. Moreover, vildagliptin increased levels of glucose-stimulated plasma insulin and reduced levels of cholesterol and triglycerides in WT but not in DIRKO mice. Vildagliptin treatment reduced the hepatic expression of genes important for cholesterol synthesis and fatty acid oxidation, including phospho-mevalonate kinase (Mvk), acyl-coenzyme dehydrogenase medium chain (Acadm), mevalonate (diphospho)decarboxylase (Mvd), and Acyl-CoA synthetase (Acsl1), in WT but not in DIRKO mice. However, vildagliptin also reduced levels of hepatic mRNA transcripts for farnesyl di-phosphate transferase (Fdft1), acetyl coenzyme A acyltransferase 1 (Acaa1), and carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (Cpt 1) in DIRKO mice. No direct effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists was detected on cholesterol or triglyceride synthesis and secretion in WT hepatocytes. CONCLUSIONS—These findings illustrate that although GLP-1 and GIP receptors represent the dominant molecular mechanisms for transducing the glucoregulatory actions of DPP4 inhibitors, prolonged DPP4 inhibition modulates the expression of genes important for lipid metabolism independent of incretin receptor action in vivo. Incretins are peptide hormones secreted after meal ingestion that potentiate glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. The two predominant incretins are glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1. GIP and GLP-1 act via specific receptors on ß-cells to increase insulin biosynthesis and secretion, thereby maintaining the ability of the endocrine pancreas to regulate the disposal and storage of energy after nutrient absorption (1). Both GIP and GLP-1 also exert actions on other cell types that affect energy homeostasis. GIP enhances energy storage in adipocytes, whereas GLP-1 regulates glucose homeostasis via inhibition of glucagon secretion and gastric emptying, and induction of satiety leading to long-term control of body weight (1). The multiple actions of GLP-1 that promote reduction of blood glucose have fostered attempts to use the native peptide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Intermittent or continuous administration of GLP-1 reduced blood glucose and A1C and improved ß-cell function, demonstrating the feasibility of using GLP-1 therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (2,3). Nevertheless, as bioactive GLP-1 is rapidly eliminated from the circulation because of a combination of enzymatic degradation and renal clearance (4,5), there is considerable interest in strategies that enhance GLP-1 action without the need for continuous administration of the native peptide. One such approach involves the administration of degradation-resistant GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, such as exendin-4 (6). Synthetic exendin-4 (Exenatide) has been evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes not adequately controlled on one or more antidiabetic agents. Twice-daily administration of Exenatide via subcutaneous injection for 6 months significantly lowered blood glucose and A1C, in association with weight loss in the majority of treated subjects (7). Hence, there is increasing interest in developing long-acting GLP-1R agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. An alternative approach for enhancing incretin action involves the development of inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), the principal enzyme responsible for inactivation of both GIP and GLP-1. Both incretin peptides contain an alanine residue at position 2 and are rapidly inactivated by NH2-terminal cleavage after secretion from gut endocrine cells (8–10). The importance of endogenous DPP4 for glucose homeostasis is illustrated by the phenotype of mice with targeted inactivation of the DPP4 gene. DPP4 knockout mice exhibit reduced glycemic excursion after glucose loading, enhanced levels of GLP-1 and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and resistance to diet-induced obesity (11,12). Furthermore, DPP4 inhibitors lower levels of blood glucose and improve ß-cell function in human subjects with type 2 diabetes (13; rev. in 7 and 14). Accordingly, there is considerable interest in understanding the mechanism of action and therapeutic potential of DPP4 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetes. Although GLP-1 and GIP are important targets for the acute glucoregulatory actions of DPP4 inhibitors, numerous additional peptides may also be DPP4 substrates and represent putative mediators of the antidiabetic actions of DPP4 (15). For example, inhibition of DPP4 activity augmented insulin secretion after exogenous administration of GLP-1, GIP, gastrin-releasing peptide, and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide in mice (16). Furthermore, the proglucagon-derived peptide oxyntomodulin is also a substrate for DPP4 (17) and is capable of stimulating insulin secretion in vivo (18). Hence, the extent to which additional substrates, beyond GLP-1 and GIP, contribute to the glucoregulatory actions of DPP4 inhibitors remains uncertain (19). To ascertain the importance of specific DPP4 substrates for the action of DPP4 inhibitors in vivo, we have used a genetic approach in mice. The actions of four chemically distinct DPP4 inhibitors on glycemic excursion and insulin secretion were examined in wild-type (WT) mice and in mice with genetic disruption of incretin receptor genes. Acute inhibition of DPP4 activity was associated with reduction of glycemic excursion after oral glucose loading in WT mice and in both Glp1r–/– and Gipr–/– mice (20). In contrast, double incretin receptor knockout (DIRKO) mice failed to exhibit enhancement of insulin secretion or reduction of blood glucose after inhibition of DPP4 activity, implying that the GLP-1 and GIP receptors together are essential for the acute glucoregulatory actions of DPP4 inhibitors (20). Nevertheless, it remains possible that more sustained inhibition of DPP4 activity is associated with the recruitment and emergence of additional pathways, in addition to the GLP-1 and GIP receptors, that contribute to glucoregulatory actions in vivo. Accordingly, we have now examined the metabolic consequences of chronic administration of the DPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin for 8 weeks in high fat–fed WT and DIRKO mice.
The generation and characterization of DIRKO mice have been described previously (20,21). Male WT (C57BL/6; Charles River, Montreal, PQ, Canada) and DIRKO mice were housed one mouse per cage under a light/dark cycle of 12 h in the Toronto General Hospital animal facility with free access to food and water, except where noted. All WT mice used for these studies were acclimatized to the animal facility for several weeks before analysis. Four-week-old mice were fed ad libitum a high-fat diet, with 45% kcal from fat (Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ) for 6 weeks, after which groups of mice were randomized to receive either regular water or water continuously supplemented with 1 µmol/ml vildagliptin for 8 weeks. Assessment of fat and lean mass was carried out using a whole-body magnetic resonance analyzer (Echo Medical Systems, Houston, TX). All procedures were conducted according to protocols and guidelines approved by the Toronto General Hospital and Mount Sinai Hospital Animal Care Committees.
Glucose tolerance tests and measurement of plasma insulin, glucagon, and lipid levels.
Analysis of ß-cell area and ß-cell proliferation.
Insulin tolerance tests.
Pancreatic insulin content.
Assessment of food intake.
Indirect calorimetry.
RNA preparation and quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
Assessment of plasma DPP4 activity.
Isolation of mouse primary hepatocytes.
cAMP production in mouse primary hepatocytes.
Lipid synthesis and secretion in mouse primary hepatocytes.
Statistical analysis.
To ascertain whether continuous administration of vildagliptin (supplied at 1 µmol/ml in the drinking water) was associated with suppression of plasma DPP4 activity, we measured DPP4 activity after 8 weeks of vildagliptin administration. Plasma DPP4 activity was significantly reduced in WT mice treated with vildagliptin (Fig. 1, P < 0.001). Furthermore, baseline plasma DPP4 activity was even lower in DIRKO mice relative to WT mice and even more markedly suppressed in DIRKO mice treated with vildagliptin (Fig. 1). These findings illustrate that continuous administration of vildagliptin suppresses plasma DPP4 activity in both WT and DIRKO mice.
Vildagliptin treatment for 7 weeks significantly reduced glycemic excursion after oral glucose loading in WT mice, in association with an increase in plasma levels of insulin (Fig. 2A–C). In contrast, vildagliptin had no effect on glycemic excursion or levels of plasma insulin in DIRKO mice (Fig. 2A–C). Although plasma glucagon levels were not significantly different after chronic vildagliptin therapy in WT or DIRKO mice (Fig. 2D), acute administration of vildagliptin was associated with marked suppression of plasma glucagon in WT but not DIRKO mice (data not shown).
To determine whether the improvement in glucose tolerance observed in WT mice after vildagliptin therapy was due in part to incretin-mediated changes in body weight and/or insulin sensitivity, we assessed energy expenditure, food intake, body weight, and the glycemic response to insulin administration in WT and DIRKO mice. Although body weight gain was significantly greater in high fat–fed WT versus DIRKO mice as described (21), vildagliptin treatment had no effect on body weight, food intake, or energy expenditure in WT or DIRKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 1A–D [available in an online-only appendix at http://doi.org/10.2337/db07-0697]). Moreover, fat mass and lean body mass were comparable in WT versus DIRKO mice at the start of the study, and we did not detect changes in these parameters after vildagliptin treatment of WT or DIRKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 1G and H). Although DIRKO mice were more sensitive to exogenous insulin administration as previously described (21), vildagliptin had no effect on the rate of reduction or recovery of plasma glucose observed after insulin administration in WT or DIRKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 2). As exogenous administration of GLP-1 or GIP has been associated with expansion of islet mass via enhancement of ß-cell proliferation and survival (24), we examined islet histology in WT and DIRKO mice. No differences in ß-cell area or ß-cell replication were observed in WT or DIRKO mice after vildagliptin administration (Fig. 3A–D), although vildagliptin-treated WT mice exhibited a modest but nonsignificant increase in ß-cell area after 8 weeks of therapy (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, no differences in ß-cell replication were observed in WT or DIRKO mice after vildagliptin administration (Fig. 3A–D), and vildagliptin had no significant effect on levels of A1C (Fig. 3E) or pancreatic insulin content (Fig. 3F). We next analyzed the expression of a panel of genes known to be important for the function of differentiated islet cells, some of which have been shown to be induced after administration of GLP-1R agonists (1). Vildagliptin treatment had no significant effect on levels of mRNA transcripts for insulin, glucagon, amylin, glucokinase, cyclic AMP response element binding protein, or pancreatic and duodenal homeobox-1 in WT or DIRKO mice (Fig. 4).
Vildagliptin administration for 4 weeks improved plasma lipid profiles in subjects with type 2 diabetes (25). Accordingly, we assessed plasma lipids in WT and DIRKO mice. Vildagliptin therapy was associated with a significant reduction in levels of plasma cholesterol in WT mice (Fig. 5A). In contrast, although levels of plasma cholesterol and triglycerides were lower in DIRKO versus WT mice, no changes in plasma lipids were observed after vildagliptin treatment in DIRKO mice (Fig. 5A and B).
To determine whether the reduction in plasma lipids observed in vildagliptin-treated WT mice was associated with changes in the expression of hepatic genes encoding enzymes important for lipid biosynthesis or oxidation, we compared the levels of specific mRNA transcripts in liver from vildagliptin- or vehicle-treated WT and DIRKO mice (Table 1 and Fig. 5C and D). Several distinct gene expression profiles were observed in liver RNA samples from WT and DIRKO mice. A significant reduction in levels of hepatic mRNA transcripts for phosphomevalonate kinase (MVK), diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase (MVD), farnesyl diphosphate transferase 1 (Fdft1), acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (ACADM), and long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase (Acsl1) was observed after vildagliptin treatment of WT mice (Fig. 5C and D). In contrast to the lack of effect of vildagliptin on glucose tolerance or plasma lipids in DIRKO mice, vildagliptin therapy was associated with reduction in levels of Fdft1, acetyl-coenzyme A acyltransferase (Acaa1), and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT1) mRNA transcripts in DIRKO mice (Fig. 5D). A third grouping of mRNA transcripts encoding for enzymes involved in the lipid biosynthesis or oxidation pathways represented genes whose expression patterns were not changed by vildagliptin treatment in either WT or DIRKO mice, including squalene epoxidase, acyl-coenzyme A carboxylase ß, stearoyl CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1), fatty acid desaturase 1 and 2 (Fads1 and Fads2), and carnitine acetyltransferase (Crat) (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).
As human studies have demonstrated that vildagliptin administration to subjects with type 2 diabetes was associated with reduction in plasma levels of intestinal-derived triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (25), we examined whether vildagliptin treatment of WT or DIRKO mice was associated with changes in the expression of genes encoding key enzymes involved in intestinal lipid transport and/or biosynthesis. Vildagliptin had no effect on levels of intestinal mRNA transcripts for microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP), fatty acid transport protein 1 (FATP1), apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (Apobec)-1, or lipoprotein lipase (Lpl) (Fig. 5E). We hypothesized that vildagliptin, by enhancing levels of bioactive GLP-1, might directly modulate hepatic lipid synthesis or secretion. As GLP-1 and exendin-4 were reported to regulate the expression of genes encoding enzymes involved in lipid synthesis and oxidation in rat hepatocytes through a GLP-1 receptor–dependent pathway (26), we assessed whether the GLP-1R agonist exendin-4 was capable of directly regulating lipid synthesis or secretion in WT murine hepatocytes in vitro. In contrast to data obtained with rat hepatocytes, exendin-4 had no effect on cholesterol, cholesterol ester, free fatty acid, or triglyceride synthesis (Fig. 6, upper panels) or secretion (Fig. 6, lower panels) in murine hepatocytes. Furthermore, we did not detect GLP-1R mRNA. transcripts by PCR analysis of RNA isolated from cultured murine hepatocytes (data not shown), and we were unable to detect any stimulation of cyclic AMP formation after incubation of murine hepatocytes with GLP-1 or exendin-4. In contrast, both glucagon and forskolin significantly increased levels of hepatocyte cyclic AMP in the same experiments (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Because therapy with DPP4 inhibitors such as vildagliptin and sitagliptin has been associated with increased plasma levels of GLP-1 and GIP in both the fasting and postprandial states (27,28), we assessed whether vildagliptin modulates incretin biosynthesis by examining the levels of mRNA transcripts for GIP and proglucagon in the duodenum and ileum of WT mice. No changes in the relative levels of proglucagon, GIP, or DPP4 mRNA transcripts were detected in the small bowel of mice treated with vildagliptin for 8 weeks relative to vehicle-treated control mice, indicating that chronic DPP4 inhibition is not associated with induction of incretin gene expression (Supplementary Fig. 5).
DPP4 is a ubiquitously expressed protease that exists as both a membrane-anchored protein and a soluble form widely distributed in the circulation. Both molecular species of DPP4 retain their catalytic activity and are capable of cleaving a broad spectrum of peptides with an alanine or proline at position 2 (29). The best characterized DPP4 substrates with glucoregulatory activity are the incretin peptides GIP and GLP-1. Circulating levels of intact GLP-1 and GIP are dependent on the presence of DPP4 activity, since DPP4–/– mice exhibit increased circulating levels of intact incretin peptides (11) and therapy with DPP4 inhibitors is associated with increased levels of bioactive GIP and GLP-1. These findings, taken together with the demonstration that the acute glucose-lowering actions of DPP4 inhibitors are abrogated in DIRKO mice (20), strongly implicate an important role for GIP and GLP-1 as key transducers of the antidiabetic actions of DPP4 inhibitors. Nevertheless, the observation that multiple additional DPP4 substrates regulate food intake and ß-cell function, including enterostatin, pituitary adenylate cyclase–activating polypeptide, gastrin-releasing peptide, PYY, and oxyntomodulin, raises the possibility that DPP4 inhibition may lower blood glucose and/or produce other biological actions via modulation of peptide activity beyond GLP-1 and GIP (15,29). Furthermore, although DPP4 inhibitors fail to lower blood glucose in acute short-term studies in normoglycemic DIRKO mice (20), it remains possible that chronic therapy with DPP4 inhibitors in high fat–fed DIRKO mice may recruit additional substrates that contribute to the reduction in glycemia observed after prolonged DPP4 inhibition in vivo. Our data demonstrating complete absence of glucose regulation in high fat–fed DIRKO mice after chronic continuous vildagliptin administration suggests that the GIP and GLP-1 receptors represent the predominant molecular targets for glucoregulation after sustained DPP4 inhibition in vivo. Continuous vildagliptin administration was not associated with reduction of blood glucose, inhibition of plasma glucagon, or stimulation of insulin secretion in DIRKO mice.
An important limitation of the current studies is the degree of glucose intolerance achieved after chronic high-fat feeding in our experiments. Although plasma glucose levels ranged from 8 to 10 mmol/l in the fasting state and rose to In this regard, it is perhaps surprising that DPP4 inhibition was not associated with induction of incretin-responsive genes in the pancreas (such as pdx-1, insulin, or glucokinase), and we did not detect significant stimulation of ß-cell proliferation or expansion of ß-cell mass after vildagliptin therapy in our experiments. One simple explanation may be that the degree of DPP4 inhibition achieved in WT mice in our experiments may not be sufficient to achieve required levels of plasma incretins necessary for optimal effects on ß-cell mass. Other studies have shown that DPP4 inhibition was associated with normalization but not expansion of ß-cell mass in high fat–fed mice treated with des-fluoro-sitagliptin after streptozotocin administration (30). Similarly, chronic vildagliptin treatment of mice with ß-cell expression of human islet amyloid polypeptide improved islet topography but did not result in significant expansion of ß-cell mass (31). Hence, these studies imply that pharmacological levels of GLP-1 or GLP-1R agonists, not achieved with DPP4 inhibition, may be required for optimal expansion of ß-cell mass in preclinical experiments. Consistent with findings that vildagliptin lowers plasma cholesterol and triglycerides in subjects with type 2 diabetes (25), vildagliptin decreased levels of plasma cholesterol and triglycerides in WT mice. These findings were associated with significant changes in levels of hepatic enzymes important for cholesterol biosynthesis and/or lipid oxidation in both WT and DIRKO mice. Nevertheless, we did not observe any direct effect of GLP-1 on cholesterol or triglyceride synthesis or secretion in isolated murine hepatocytes. Hence, the reduction of plasma cholesterol observed after chronic DPP4 inhibition may be related in part to as yet unexplained effects of GLP-1 on intestinal lipid synthesis or secretion as postulated in human studies (25) or to indirect actions reflecting improved plasma glucose in vildagliptin-treated mice. In contrast to the lack of vildagliptin-induced changes in parameters regulating glucose homeostasis in DIRKO mice, vildagliptin therapy selectively reduced the hepatic expression of Fdft1, Acaa1, and Cpt1 in DIRKO mice. These data illustrate that the mechanisms underlying the reduction in levels of cholesterol and triglycerides observed in conjunction with DPP4 inhibitor therapy (25) are likely complex, reflecting both the glucoregulatory actions of GIP and GLP-1 and additional as yet unidentified DPP4-sensitive substrates. Although DPP4 is known to be expressed in hepatocytes, there is currently no data linking changes in liver DPP4 activity to enzymatic regulation of lipid synthesis and secretion. An important caveat of our studies is that we examined the effects of only a single DPP4 inhibitor, vildagliptin, and hence we cannot be certain that some of the findings we observed were not specific to vildagliptin alone. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the GIP and GLP-1 receptors are essential for many but not all of the changes in metabolic parameters observed after chronic inhibition of DPP4. Our data suggest that additional studies characterizing the importance of DPP4 in the control of hepatic lipid synthesis and oxidation appear warranted.
These studies were supported in part by grants from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, the Canadian Diabetes Association, and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. G.F. is supported by a Canada Graduate Studentship Award from the CIHR. D.J.D. is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Regulatory Peptides.
Published ahead of print at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org on 23 August 2007. DOI: 10.2337/db07-0697. D.D. has served as an advisor to or consultant for Amgen, Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Arisaph Pharmaceuticals, Chugai, Conjuchem, Eli Lilly, Emlsphere Technologies, Glaxo Smith Kline, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Isis Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Research Laboratories, Merck Fr., Phenomix, Takeda, and Transition Pharmaceuticals. Laboratory research for D.D. was supported in part by Merck, Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://doi.org/10.2337/db07-0697. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Received for publication May 22, 2007 and accepted in revised form August 20, 2007
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||