Diabetes 56:1969-1976, 2007 DOI: 10.2337/db07-0127 © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
Adiponectin Resistance Exacerbates Insulin Resistance in Insulin Receptor Transgenic/Knockout Mice
1 Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York Address correspondence and reprint requests to Domenico Accili, MD, Columbia University Medical Center, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave., #238, New York, NY 10032. E-mail: da230{at}columbia.edu
Abbreviations:
AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; FoxO1, forkhead box O1; HGP, hepatic glucose production; IL, interleukin; Insr, insulin receptor; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor
OBJECTIVE— Adiponectin increases insulin sensitivity and contributes to insulin's indirect effects on hepatic glucose production. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— To examine adiponectin's contribution to insulin action, we analyzed adiponectin levels and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in insulin receptor transgenic/knockout mice (L1), a genetic model of resistance to insulin's indirect effects on hepatic glucose production.
RESULTS— In euglycemic, insulin-resistant L1 mice, we detected hyperadiponectinemia with normal levels of adiponectin receptor-1 and -2. Moreover, adiponectin administration is unable to lower glucose levels or induce activation of AMPK, consistent with a state of adiponectin resistance. In a subset of hyperglycemic L1 mice, we observed decreased mRNA expression of AdipoR2 in liver and muscle, as well as decreased peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) CONCLUSIONS— These data provide evidence for a mechanism of adiponectin resistance and corroborate the notion that adiponectin potentiates hepatic insulin sensitivity. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by insulin resistance and impaired pancreatic ß-cell function (1). Fasting hyperglycemia in diabetes results primarily from the inability of insulin to inhibit endogenous glucose production (2). Insulin regulates hepatic glucose production (HGP) through both direct (hepatic) and indirect (extrahepatic) mechanisms (3). Chronic effects of insulin are primarily mediated by direct mechanisms via hepatic insulin receptor (Insr)/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) signaling to suppress the expression of gluconeogenic enzymes (4). Acute effects of insulin on HGP are mediated by both direct and indirect mechanisms (5–9). Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to account for insulin's indirect effects on HGP, including glucagon (10,11), gluconeogenic substrates released from muscle (12) and fat (13), and hypothalamic signals (9,14). In addition, adipocytokines have been shown to either increase (e.g., resistin) or decrease (e.g., adiponectin) glucose production (15,16). In previous studies, we have carried out genetic reconstitution experiments with an allelic series of tissue-specific transgenes to disentangle the complex interactions underlying the integrated physiology of insulin action (17–20). These studies have emphasized the central role of the liver in insulin action (19,20) and the role of indirect mechanisms in insulin control of HGP (18). Thus, in mice in which insulin signaling is restricted to liver, selected regions of the brain and pancreatic ß-cells (referred to as L1) are, surprisingly, resistant to insulin's direct effect on HGP (18). In this study, we asked whether the impairment of insulin's indirect actions in the liver of L1 mice could be explained by altered adipocytokine action. We report that L1 mice display hyperadiponectinemia, associated with the inability to lower plasma glucose levels and blunted hepatic AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) response to adiponectin. These findings delineate a condition of "adiponectin resistance," previously recognized in IGF-1 receptor dominant-negative transgenic mice (21), that may contribute to the impairment of insulin's direct control of HGP, as previously reported (18).
Transgenic mice expressing human INSR cDNA from the transthyretin (Ttr) promoter were intercrossed with Insr+/– mice. The resulting progeny were further intercrossed to generate Insr–/– and Ttr-INSR (L1) mice and Insr+/+ littermates. Animals were maintained on a mixed background derived from 129/Sv, C57BL/6, and FVB. Genotyping was performed as previously described (19) with the following modification. Wild-type and null Insr alleles were detected using primers 5'-AGCTGTGCACTTCCCTGCTCAC-3', 5'-TTAAGGGCCAGCTCATTCCTCC-3', and 5'-TCTTTGCCTGTGCTCCACTCTCA-3'. The product of the wild-type allele is 232 bp in length and that of the null allele is 355 bp. All animal procedures have been approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Utilization Committee.
Metabolic analyses.
Adiponectin treatment.
RNA isolation and RT-PCR analyses.
Western blotting.
Immunohistochemistry.
General characteristics of the experimental animals. L1 mice lack endogenous Insr but carry an INSR transgene driven by the transthyretin promoter that reactivates INSR expression in liver, pancreatic ß-cells, and various brain regions (19). At 3 months of age, 65% of the male L1 mice showed normal glucose levels, while 35% were frankly diabetic. All L1 mice showed increased circulating insulin levels compared with wild-type mice under both fasting and fed conditions (19) (Fig. 1A), indicative of systemic insulin resistance. In addition, we have shown that despite restored insulin signaling in liver by transgenic expression of INSR, L1 mice remain resistant to insulin suppression of HGP during hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps (18).
Hyperadiponectinemia and normoresistinemia in L1 mice. We hypothesized that hepatic insulin resistance in L1 mice is due to impaired adipocytokine signaling. We measured plasma adiponectin levels in 3-month-old L1 mice and wild-type littermates under fed conditions and detected a 140% increase in L1 mice (Table 1 and Fig. 1C). Notably, every L1 mouse examined had higher adiponectin values than the mean wild-type value, and only two wild-type mice had adiponectin values in the low range of the L1 mice. Furthermore, we observed an inverse correlation between adiponectin and glucose values in L1 mice (Fig. 1D), indicating that falling adiponectinemia correlates with hyperglycemia. Resistin levels in 3-month-old L1 and wild-type mice were similar, but by 5 months of age, L1 mice had a 42% increase of resistin levels compared with wild-type littermates (Fig. 1B). This difference appears to result from diverging age-dependent trends, such that resistinemia decreased with age in wild-type (3.31 ng/ml at 3 months vs. 2.47 ng/ml at 5 months, P = 0.06) but not in L1 (3.76 ng/ml at 3 months vs. 3.51 ng/ml at 5 months, P = 0.53) mice. Since L1 mice exhibited hepatic insulin resistance at 3 months of age, when their resistinemia was similar to wild-type mice, it is unlikely that altered resistin levels contribute to insulin resistance in L1 mice. In addition, we previously showed that leptin levels are not significantly different between L1 and wild-type mice (18). Finally, there were no differences in mean body weight, fat mass, and fat-free mass between 3-month-old wild-type and normoglycemic L1 mice. Diabetic L1 mice displayed increased body weight that was largely accounted for by increased fat-free mass (Table 1). Histological analyses of skeletal muscle of diabetic L1 mice did not reveal significant changes in intramuscular lipid accumulation or in slow-twitch/fast-twitch fiber composition (data not shown). Postprandial free fatty acid and triglyceride levels were increased in both groups of L1 mice (Table 1), while fasting levels were similar to wild-type mice (18). Fasting ß-hydroxybutyrate levels were increased by 75% in normoglycemic L1 mice compared with wild-type mice (Table 1).
L1 mice are resistant to the rapid glucose-lowering action of adiponectin. The correlation between hyperadiponectinemia and hyperinsulinemia in L1 mice led us to hypothesize that hyperadiponectinemia is a marker of adiponectin resistance and that impaired adiponectin action contributes to hepatic insulin resistance in L1 mice. To test this hypothesis, we administered a single dose of purified recombinant full-length murine adiponectin by intravenous injections in 3-month-old normoglycemic L1 mice and wild-type littermates. The recombinant protein was produced in mammalian cells as previously described (22) and had normal distribution of trimer, hexamer, and high–molecular weight complexes (21 and data not shown). Consistent with previous reports (21,22), administration of an adiponectin bolus in wild-type mice resulted in a 38% decrease in glucose levels 2 h after injection (Fig. 2A), followed by a return to normal values by 6 h postinjection (Fig. 2A). In contrast, we detected no difference in glucose levels following adiponectin injection in L1 mice compared with saline-injected controls over an 8-h period (Fig. 2B). Adiponectin-treated L1 mice displayed a trend toward hyperglycemia at 2 days after injection (134% of basal glycemia, P = 0.08), while control (saline-injected) animals did not. These data indicate that L1 mice are resistant to the acute action of adiponectin to lower plasma glucose levels.
Reduced AdipoR2 expression correlates with diabetes susceptibility in L1 mice. The metabolic effects of adiponectin are mediated by two putative receptors, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2. The former is primarily expressed in muscle, while the latter is in liver (24). In addition, T-cadherin has been proposed to serve as an adiponectin receptor (25), although the metabolic effects of this interaction have not been studied. We investigated whether the decrease in adiponectin's ability to lower plasma glucose levels in L1 mice was due to decreased expression of AdipoR1 and/or -R2. We measured levels of mRNAs encoding AdipoR1 and -R2 in liver and skeletal muscle samples from 3-month-old normoglycemic and diabetic L1 mice, as well as wild-type littermates, by quantitative RT-PCR. Hepatic AdipoR1 mRNA levels were similar in L1 and wild-type mice. Hepatic AdipoR2 mRNA levels in normoglycemic L1 mice were also similar to those in wild-type mice, whereas diabetic L1 mice showed a 33 ± 9% reduction in hepatic AdipoR2 levels compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 3A). We observed a similar expression profile in skeletal muscle. AdipoR1 mRNA expression in muscle exhibited no significant difference between wild-type and L1 mice. AdipoR2 expression in muscle was unaffected in normoglycemic L1 mice but was reduced by 33 ± 11% in diabetic L1 mice compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 3B). These data suggest that the systemic "adiponectin resistance" observed in normoglycemic L1 mice (Fig. 2) is independent of mRNA expression levels of AdipoR1 and -R2 in liver or muscle. However, reduction in AdipoR2 mRNA in both liver and muscle is associated with hyperglycemia in L1 mice.
Adiponectin-induced AMPK phosphorylation and PPAR activation in L1 mice.Adiponectin has been shown to inhibit glucose production via activation of AMPK (26–28) and fatty acid oxidation via PPAR (24,29). We used Western blotting with a phospho-Thr172–specific antibody to examine AMPK activation in response to intravenous adiponectin injection in normoglycemic L1 and wild-type littermates. As expected, adiponectin treatment in wild-type mice significantly increased phospho-AMPK levels in liver (Fig. 4), without affecting AMPK expression. Interestingly, basal phospho-AMPK levels were elevated in liver of saline-injected L1 mice compared with wild-type mice, possibly resulting from hyperadiponectinemia. However, acute adiponectin treatment in L1 mice failed to enhance AMPK phosphorylation (Fig. 4). These data indicate that adiponectin resistance in L1 mice correlates with impaired hepatic AMPK activation by adiponectin.
The insulin-sensitizing effects of adiponectin can be partly explained by activation of PPAR (26). We examined PPAR mRNA expression in liver and skeletal muscle of L1 mice. Hepatic PPAR mRNA levels in both normoglycemic and diabetic L1 mice were similar to those in wild-type mice (Fig. 5A), as were those of PPAR target genes acyl-coA oxidase (Acox1) and carnitine palmitoyl-transferase 1 (Cpt1 ). In contrast, mRNA expression of both Acox1 and Cpt1 in liver of diabetic L1 mice was reduced compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 5A). Expression of CD36, another PPAR target gene, was not significantly altered in L1 mice (Fig. 5A). This suggests that PPAR expression/activity is not affected in normoglycemic L1 mice, while diabetic L1 mice may exhibit reduced PPAR activity; hence, there is reduced fatty acid oxidation, independent of PPAR mRNA levels. This is consistent with the trend toward increased hepatic triglycerides in diabetic L1 mice (15.4 ± 7.6 mg/g liver) compared with wild-type mice (4.6 ± 0.5 mg/g liver, P = 0.19) but not in normoglycemic L1 mice (4.4 ± 2.0 mg/g liver, n = 4 for all groups). Additionally, mRNA levels of PPAR , Acox1, Cpt1 , and CD36 in muscle of L1 mice and wild-type littermates showed no significant differences (Fig. 5B). Therefore, changes in PPAR expression and activity cannot account for adiponectin resistance in L1 mice.
Systemic inflammatory markers and reduced resident hepatic macrophages. A chronic, low-grade inflammatory stage, characterized by macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue and changes in circulating proinflammatory cytokines, has been demonstrated in insulin resistance, obesity, and diabetes (15). L1 mice macrophages lack Insr (30) and may therefore contribute to systemic inflammation and predispose to hepatic insulin resistance. To address this possibility, we measured circulating levels of interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and tumor necrosis factor- in plasma and found no significant difference between L1 mice and wild-type littermates (Table 2). In addition, histological surveys of macrophages in perigonadal adipose tissue by immunostaining for F4/80, a marker specific for mature macrophages (23,31), showed no morphometric differences between wild-type, normoglycemic L1, and diabetic L1 mice (data not shown). Quantitative analyses revealed that the percentage of F4/80-positive cells was similar between wild-type and normoglycemic L1 mice (6.8 ± 0.5% vs. 6.1 ± 0.6%, P = 0.35) but was moderately increased in the diabetic L1 group (8.1 ± 0.8%, P = 0.16 and 0.05 for wild-type and normoglycemic L1, respectively). Since no difference was detected between wild-type and normoglycemic L1 mice, these data indicate that systemic inflammation does not contribute to insulin resistance in L1 mice.
We next investigated whether there are alterations of Kupffer cell numbers or distribution in L1 mice, potentially leading to intrahepatic inflammation and cytokine production, thus causing hepatic insulin resistance. F4/80 immunostaining failed to reveal differences in Kupffer cell morphology between wild-type, normoglycemic L1, and diabetic L1 mice (Fig. 6A–C). Indeed, quantitative analyses revealed that both normoglycemic and diabetic L1 mice had fewer Kupffer cells than wild-type mice (80 and 61% of wild type, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) (Fig. 6D). We also examined expression of macrophage-specific transcripts in liver samples of L1 and wild-type mice. Hepatic CD36 expression failed to show significant differences between wild-type and normoglycemic or diabetic L1 mice (Fig. 5A). In addition, mRNA expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter G1, a macrophage-specific cholesterol efflux transporter, in liver of normoglycemic L1 mice was not significantly different from that of wild-type mice but was reduced by 60% in diabetic L1 mice (Fig. 6E). The transcriptional activity of PPAR is required for the activation of both CD36 and ABCg1 in macrophages (32,33). We did not detect differences in PPAR mRNA levels in liver lysates (Fig. 6F), although it is possible that changes in macrophage PPAR expression were masked by PPAR transcripts in hepatocytes. In summary, our data indicate that liver of L1 mice has a reduced Kupffer cell population, which correlates with decreases in macrophage-specific gene expression. Therefore, we found no evidence for local activation of inflammation, which may account for hepatic insulin resistance in L1 mice.
Tissue-specific insulin resistance is associated with hyperadiponectinemia and adiponectin resistance. The antidiabetic properties of adiponectin have attracted considerable attention. A number of studies in humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents have shown that hypoadiponectinemia is a common feature of obesity and insulin resistance (34). In contrast, L1 mice have elevated adiponectin levels. The association between hyperadiponectinemia and insulin resistance was previously reported in another model of selective Insr ablation, the adipocyte-specific Insr knockout (FIRKO) (35), suggesting that hyperadiponectinemia in L1 mice may be explained by the lack of Insr signaling in adipose cells. This hypothesis is also consistent with a recent study demonstrating that FoxO1, a transcription factor inhibited by insulin signaling, activates adiponectin gene transcription in adipocytes (36). Moreover, Kim et al. (21) have recently shown that mice with muscle-specific insulin resistance due to trans-dominant inhibition of Insr and IGF-1 receptors are also hyperadiponectinemic and adiponectin resistant. When considered with the present data, this burgeoning literature begins to outline a mechanism by which adiponectin production is controlled in response to changes in systemic insulin sensitivity. This mechanism is likely to be conserved in humans, as a recent study of patients with severe insulin resistance found that subjects with INSR mutations have elevated plasma adiponectin levels, whereas moderate insulin resistance correlates in hypoadiponectinemia (37). Since three major forms of adiponectin are present in circulation, potentially with different signaling activities (34), it will be interesting to determine whether all three are elevated in Insr-deficient models. In this study, we show that acute adiponectin treatment failed to lower glycemia in L1 mice (Fig. 2), consistent with systemic adiponectin resistance. The mechanism for this failure appears to correlate with a blunted response of AMPK activation but not with changes in AdipoR1 and -R2 mRNA expression. The reduced AMPK response is associated with increased basal AMPK phosphorylation. Therefore, although our data are consistent with adiponectin resistance in L1 mice, we cannot rule out the possibility that adiponectin/AMPK signaling is maximally activated in L1 mice under basal conditions and is no longer sensitive to acute increases in circulating adiponectin. Interestingly, mice with muscle-specific expression of dominant-negative IGF-1 receptor (muscle IGF-1 receptor K-[lysine]-R[arginine] mutant [MKR]) also display systemic adiponectin resistance, although adiponectin-induced AMPK activation was normal (21). Therefore, adiponectin resistance may occur via multiple mechanisms, and MKR mice may represent a state of "AMPK resistance."
Progressive reduction in adiponectin signaling and diabetes.
Inflammation in a nonobese model of insulin resistance. Previous studies have also suggested that activation of liver-resident macrophages, or Kupffer cells, plays a role in obesity/insulin resistance (42,43). Since L1 mice retained hepatic insulin resistance despite restored Insr signaling in hepatocytes, we investigated whether the neighboring Insr-deficient Kupffer cells contribute to local activation of inflammation and act in a paracrine fashion to cause insulin resistance. Interestingly, L1 mice showed a moderate decrease in Kupffer cell population compared with wild-type mice and a corresponding decrease in macrophage-specific gene expression in liver (Figs. 5 and 6). It is unclear whether this represents defects in Kupffer cell development and/or infiltration in the absence of Insr. In summary, our data suggest that insulin resistance in Kupffer cells does not play a major role in exacerbating hepatic insulin resistance in L1 mice.
Adiponectin signaling pathways and hepatic insulin sensitivity. The interactions between insulin and adiponectin are increasingly complex. In this study, we used L1 mice (18) to probe the contribution of adiponectin to insulin sensitivity in a model of tissue-specific insulin resistance. Our data indicate that insulin resistance can result in hyperadiponectinemia and adiponectin resistance. Moreover, stepwise decreases in adiponectin and AdipoR1 and -R2 levels are associated with the progression from insulin resistance to overt diabetes, raising the question of whether "adiponectin failure" is an integral component of the natural history of type 2 diabetes. Further work will be required to test this hypothesis in a mechanistic fashion.
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK58282 (to D.A.), DK071030 (to P.E.S.), and P30DK63608 (to the Columbia Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center). We thank members of the Accili, Scherer, Rossetti, and Shapiro laboratories for helpful discussions and critical review of the data.
Published ahead of print at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org on 2 May 2007. DOI: 10.2337/db07-0127. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Received for publication January 29, 2007 and accepted in revised form April 26, 2007
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||