Diabetes 56:2124-2134, 2007 DOI: 10.2337/db07-0030 © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
The Actions of a Novel Potent Islet ß-Cell–Specific ATP-Sensitive K+ Channel Opener Can Be Modulated by Syntaxin-1A Acting on Sulfonylurea Receptor 1
1 Departments of Medicine and Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Address correspondence and reprint requests to Herbert Y. Gaisano, Room 7226 Medical Science Building, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8. E-mail: herbert.gaisano{at}utoronto.ca
Abbreviations:
EC50, half-maximal effective concentration; KATP, ATP-sensitive K+ channel; GFP, green fluorescence protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; IKATP, ATP-sensitive K+ current; NNC55-0462, 6-chloro-3-(1-methylcyclobutyl)amino-4H-thieno[3,2-e]-1,2,4-thiadiazine 1,1-dioxide; SNARE, soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor; SUR, sulfonylurea receptor
Islet ß-cell–specific ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel openers thiadiazine dioxides induce islet rest to improve insulin secretion, but their molecular basis of action remains unclear. We reported that syntaxin-1A binds nucleotide binding folds of sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) in ß-cells to inhibit KATP channels. As a strategy to elucidate the molecular mechanism of action of these KATP channel openers, we explored the possibility that 6-chloro-3-(1-methylcyclobutyl)amino-4H-thieno[3,2-e]-1,2,4-thiadiazine 1,1-dioxide (NNC55-0462) might influence syntaxin-1A–SUR1 interactions or vice versa. Whole-cell and inside-out patch-clamp electrophysiology was used to examine the effects of glutathione S-transferase (GST)-syntaxin-1A dialysis or green fluorescence protein/syntaxin-1A cotransfection on NNC55-0462 actions. In vitro pull-down binding studies were used to examine NNC55-0462 influence on syntaxin-1A–SUR1 interactions. Dialysis of GST–syntaxin-1A into the cell cytoplasm reduced both potency and efficacy of extracellularly perfused NNC55-0462 in a HEK cell line stably expressing Kir6.2/SUR1 (BA8 cells) and in rat islet ß-cells. Moreover, inside-out membrane patches excised from BA8 cells showed that both GST–syntaxin-1A and its H3 domain inhibited KATP channels previously activated by NNC55-0462. This action on KATP channels is isoform-specific to syntaxin-1A because syntaxin-2 was without effect. Furthermore, the parent compound diazoxide showed similar sensitivity to GST–syntaxin-1A inhibition. NNC55-0462, however, did not influence syntaxin-1A–SUR1 binding interaction. Our results demonstrated that syntaxin-1A interactions with SUR1 at its cytoplasmic domains can modulate the actions of the KATP channel openers NNC55-0462 and diazoxide on KATP channels. The reduced levels of islet syntaxin-1A in diabetes would thus be expected to exert a positive influence on the therapeutic effects of this class of KATP channel openers. Chronic exposure to hyperglycemia in diabetes can impair insulin secretory function (1) and accelerate apoptosis (2) in islet ß-cells. Expression levels of soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins, the critical machinery for insulin granule exocytosis (3), particularly in first-phase secretion (4), are severely reduced in islets of rodent models and human patients with type 2 diabetes (5–8). Hyperglycemia further reduced SNARE protein levels in Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats, but levels could be partially restored by normoglycemia (6). Restoration of SNARE protein levels partially normalized insulin secretion in these animal models (6,7). In addition to direct glucotoxic effects, chronic hyperglycemia can lead to ß-cell overstimulation (9). Prolonged exposure to high glucose and other secretagogues induces desensitization of islet ß-cells to subsequent stimuli, with Ca2+ influx–induced toxicity (10) and insulin stores depletion (11) suggested as possible mechanisms. In diabetes, chronic hyperglycemia and insulin resistance increase insulin secretory demand, and failure of ß-cells to sustain this compensatory increase in workload may contribute to disease progression (12). A novel therapeutic approach, therefore, is to pharmacologically induce "ß-cell rest" by ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel openers to preserve residual secretory function and insulin stores (13). Pancreatic KATP channels are octamers of four sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) subunits in complex with four pore-forming Kir6.2 subunits, which act to modulate cell membrane potential, linking glucose-mediated changes in the ATP-to-ADP ratio to insulin secretion (14,15). The opening of KATP channels leads to membrane hyperpolarization sufficient to induce ß-cell rest. The nonselective KATP channel opener diazoxide can protect ß-cells of humans and rodents against hyperglycemia-induced desensitization in vitro (16,17), restoring first-phase and pulsatile insulin release (18), and can protect against streptozotocin-induced injury (18,19). Remarkably, diazoxide treatment also preserves residual insulin secretion in patients with type 1 (20,21) and type 2 (22) diabetes. However, clinical use of diazoxide is limited because of its nonselective opening of extrapancreatic KATP channels, causing cardiovascular side effects (23). Recently, a class of islet ß-cell–specific KATP channel openers (thiadiazine dioxides) being developed (24–27) have been shown to be capable of inducing ß-cell rest in rodent (10,28,29) and human islets (30,31), improving insulin stores and secretory responses, and protecting against autoimmune injury in an animal model of type 1 diabetes (32). These ß-cell–specific KATP channel openers interact with cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of the SUR1 subunit and displace 3H-glibenclamide binding to HEK cells stably expressing human Kir6.2/SUR1 (BA8 cells) (24,27). Their precise molecular mechanism of action, however, remains unknown (13). We recently reported that the plasma membrane–bound SNARE protein syntaxin-1A directly binds the cytoplasmic nucleotide binding folds of SUR proteins of ß-cells (SUR1) (33,34) and cardiac myocytes (SUR2A) (35) to modulate KATP channels. We further demonstrated that the COOH-terminal H3 domain of syntaxin-1A is the putative domain mediating KATP channel inhibition (33). In the current study, we explored the molecular basis by which a novel islet ß-cell (SUR1)-specific KATP channel opener, 6-chloro-3-(1-methylcyclobutyl)amino-4H-thieno[3,2-e]-1,2,4-thiadiazine 1,1-dioxide (NNC55-0462) (Fig. 1), modulates KATP channel opening. NNC55-0462 is very potent in inhibiting insulin release from rat islets, being >100 times more potent than its parent compound diazoxide (27). Using rat islet ß-cells and BA8 cells, we now examined the possibility that NNC55-0462 actions on pancreatic KATP channels could modulate or be modulated by syntaxin-1A–SUR1 interactions.
The constructs pcDNA3–syntaxin-2 and pcDNA3–syntaxin-1A were from Richard Scheller (Genentech, San Francisco, CA), pGEX-4T-1–syntaxin-1A from W. Trimble (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada), and pcDNA3–syntaxin-1B from G. Zamponi (University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). The coding sequences corresponding to syntaxin-1A (amino acid 1–266, without transmembrane domain), syntaxin-1A–Habc domain (amino acid 1–160), and syntaxin-1A–H3 domain (amino acid 191–256) were amplified by PCR and cloned into pGEX-4T-1 expression vector for generation of glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. GST fusion protein expression, purification, and thrombin (Sigma) cleavage were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ).
Cell culture and transfection.
Preparation of rat islet ß-cells.
Electrophysiology.
In vitro binding assay and Western blotting analysis.
Data analysis.
Syntaxin-1A decreases the KATP opening action of NNC55-0462 in BA8 cells. Previously, we had reported that syntaxin-1A inhibited Kir6.2/SUR1 currents by its actions on nucleotide binding fold-1 and -2 of SUR1 (33,34). Here, we examined the possibility that NNC55-0462, belonging to a class of thiadiazine dioxide KATP channel openers (Fig. 1) and acting on distinct domains in SUR1 (23,27), might influence the actions of syntaxin-1A on the nucleotide binding folds, or vice versa. To examine the direct functional effects of syntaxin-1A on KATP channels, we again first used BA8 cells, a HEK cell line stably expressing human Kir6.2/SUR1 (24,27) that does not contain endogenous syntaxin-1A (33), and dialyzed into the cytoplasm of these cells soluble GST–syntaxin-1A lacking its transmembrane domain. Here, external perfusion of NNC55-0462 dose-dependently activated Kir6.2/SUR1 KATP channels, effective starting at 0.1 µmol/l and achieving maximum effect at 1 µmol/l (Fig. 2A). A higher concentration of NNC55-0462 (3 µmol/l) did not elicit a further increase in channel amplitude; instead, it induced channel rundown. GST–syntaxin-1A (100 nmol/l) (Fig. 2B), when compared with GST control (Fig. 2A), reduced the ability of NNC55-0462 to open KATP channels. We analyzed the data in several ways to show that syntaxin-1A (10 and 100 nmol/l) reduced both drug potency (Fig. 2C) and efficacy (Fig. 2D).
Figure 2C examines drug potency, where dose-response curves were normalized to each group's maximal channel activation at 1 µmol/l NNC55-0462, which demonstrated a rightward shift in potency caused by GST–syntaxin-1A dialysis. This is further illustrated in Fig. 2E, showing the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of NNC55-0462 in GST control group was 0.11 ± 0.02 µmol/l (n = 7), whereas GST–syntaxin-1A dialysis at 10 and 100 nmol/l increased it to 0.15 ± 0.05 µmol/l (n = 5, not significant) and 0.21 ± 0.04 µmol/l (n = 7, P < 0.05), respectively. Fig. 2D examines drug efficacy, where dose-response curves were normalized to the maximum channel activation observed with the GST-dialyzed control group, which demonstrated a downward shift in efficacy caused by GST–syntaxin-1A dialysis. This is further illustrated in Fig. 2E, where maximum current density activated by NNC55-0462 was 283 ± 14 pA/pF (n = 7) with GST dialysis, whereas syntaxin-1A dialysis at 10 and 100 nmol/l decreased it to 256 ± 28 pA/pF (n = 5, not significant) and 194 ± 12 pA/pF (n = 7, P < 0.01), respectively, with the latter being a significant reduction of 31 ± 4%. To reiterate, these modulatory effects of syntaxin-1A on the effectiveness of NNC55-0462 on BA8 KATP channels are caused by direct interactions with the SUR1 protein because BA8 cells are devoid of endogenous syntaxin-1A and syntaxin-1A–interacting proteins (33). Note that the concentrations of GST–syntaxin-1A required likely represent an overestimation because of suboptimal targeting of soluble GST–syntaxin-1A to the sites of KATP channels on the plasma membrane.
Syntaxin-1A decreases the KATP opening action of NNC55-0462 in rat islet ß-cells.
Consistent with the BA8 results (Fig. 2), both potency (Fig. 3C) and efficacy (Fig. 3D) of NNC55-0462 in opening islet ß-cell KATP channels were decreased by dialysis of GST–syntaxin-1A into the ß-cell cytoplasm. Here, GST–syntaxin-1A (1 µmol/l) increased the EC50 of NNC55-0462 from 0.050 ± 0.009 µmol/l (n = 10) to 0.11 ± 0.03 µmol/l (n = 7, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3E). With respect to efficacy, the maximum current density activated by NNC55-0462 was suppressed by GST–syntaxin-1A dialysis from 157 ± 8 pA/pF (n = 10) to 110 ± 4 pA/pF (n = 7, P < 0.01), which is a 30 ± 3% reduction (Fig. 3E). It is possible that soluble GST–syntaxin-1A lacking the transmembrane domain could bind a number of syntaxin-1A binding proteins in ß-cells that might have independent effects on KATP channels or, alternatively, sequester syntaxin-1A (i.e., endogenous v-SNAREs on insulin granules) to reduce the amount of GST–syntaxin-1A available for KATP channel interaction. Although we could not rule out these possibilities, their contributions are not likely to be significant in our study because the results of dialyzed syntaxin-1A on ß-cell KATP channel opener potency and efficacy were remarkably similar to those of BA8 cells, albeit the KATP channel density is much higher in the KATP-overexpressing BA8 cell line.
Syntaxin-1A, but not syntaxin-2, reduces the efficacy of NNC55-0462 in BA8 cells.
BA8 cells were transiently transfected with green fluorescence protein (GFP) alone as control, or cotransfected with full-length (including transmembrane domain) syntaxin-1A or -2 to localize the expressed syntaxin to the plasma membrane, where KATP channels are located. Fig. 4B shows representative current-voltage relationships demonstrating that maximum current density activated by 1 µmol/l NNC55-0462 was specifically reduced in the syntaxin-1A–but not the syntaxin-2–transfected group. Activated currents were confirmed to be of IKATP by their sensitivity to tolbutamide inhibition (Fig. 4C), applied in the presence of NNC55-0462 after maximal channel activation had occurred. Fig. 4D summarizes these results, showing that the maximum current density activated by NNC55-0462 (at –120 mV) was reduced by GFP/syntaxin-1A transfection to 206 ± 14 pA/pF (n = 10, P < 0.01) from 323 ± 14 pA/pF in the GFP control group (n = 9), which is a 36% reduction. The lack of effect of GFP/syntaxin-2 transfection on KATP channel opening (349 ± 17 pA/pF, n = 11, not significant), despite its high homology to syntaxin-1A, indicates that syntaxin-1A effects on KATP channels are isoform specific within the syntaxin family in ß-cells.
Syntaxin-1A reverses the KATP opening action of NNC55-0462 in inside-out membrane patches.
Syntaxin-1A decreases the KATP opening action of diazoxide in rat islet ß-cells. We next examined whether the effect of syntaxin-1A is specific to this particular KATP channel opener compound. We chose to study the parent compound, diazoxide, which shares the same backbone structure as NNC55-0462 (Fig. 1) but interacts with SUR1 at slightly different domains. We repeated the experiment performed with NNC55-0462 on rat islet ß-cells, but instead we perfused increasing concentrations of diazoxide (3–300 µmol/l). Similar to the NNC55-0462 study (Fig. 3), GST–syntaxin-1A (Fig. 6B) dialyzed into the cytoplasm of rat islet ß-cells significantly reduced the potency and efficacy of diazoxide, compared with GST dialysis (Fig. 6A). Analysis of drug potency (Fig. 6C and E) shows the EC50 of diazoxide was increased from 21 ± 5 µmol/l (n = 10) to 42 ± 7 µmol/l (n = 7, P < 0.05) by GST–syntaxin-1A dialysis. Analysis of drug efficacy (Fig. 6D and E) shows the maximum current density activated by diazoxide was reduced by GST–syntaxin-1A from 136 ± 4 pA/pF (n = 10) to 92 ± 5 pA/pF (n = 7, P < 0.01), which is a 32% inhibition. These results together suggest that the effect of syntaxin-1A on the opening of KATP channels by KATP channel openers is not specific to NNC55-0462 alone, but rather is shared among different dioxide compounds.
NNC55-0462 does not affect syntaxin-1A–SUR1 binding interactions. Because we showed that NNC55-0462 was effective when applied not only extracellularly but also intracellularly, the latter suggests the possibility that this KATP channel opener might share common binding domains with syntaxin-1A on SUR1 nucleotide binding folds to influence KATP channel opening. We therefore examined whether this KATP channel opener could affect syntaxin-1A–SUR1 binding interactions. GST–syntaxin-1A bound to glutathione agarose beads was able to pull down the same amount of SUR1 protein from BA8 cell lysate extract with increasing NNC55-0462 concentrations (up to 10 µmol/l) both in the absence (Fig. 7A) or presence of 0.3 mmol/l ATP (Fig. 7B) or 5 mmol/l ATP (Fig. 7C). ATP at 5 mmol/l appeared to reduce the amount of SUR1 pulled down by GST–syntaxin-1A at all concentrations of NNC55-0462 (Fig. 7C). A positive control with increasing concentrations of thrombin-cleaved syntaxin-1A (instead of NNC55-0462) showed that the assay used is indeed capable of detecting competitive binding inhibition (Fig. 7D). A negative control experiment showed that GST bound to beads could not pull down SUR1, representing nonspecific binding (Fig. 7E); however, glutathione agarose beads alone did bind a small amount of SUR1 ( 20% of that bound by GST–syntaxin-1A). This inability of NNC55-0462 to modulate syntaxin-1A binding to SUR1 suggests that this KATP channel opener does not likely bind the same domains that syntaxin-1A binds to in SUR1 at its nucleotide binding folds (33,34). The ability of syntaxin-1A to block this KATP channel opener action on KATP channels suggests that syntaxin-1A could modulate NNC55-0462 binding to the SUR1 protein. However, because of the lack of a radiolabeled NNC55-0462, we were unable to investigate this possibility.
The current study is the first to demonstrate an effect of the SNARE protein syntaxin-1A on the actions of NNC55-0462, a member of a novel class of thiadiazine dioxide KATP channel openers, and its parent compound diazoxide. Our results showed that syntaxin-1A reduces the potency and, more significantly, the efficacy of NNC55-0462 and diazoxide. In inside-out membrane patches, syntaxin-1A can also inhibit channels previously activated by NNC55-0462. Within the syntaxin family present in ß-cells, these actions were specific to syntaxin-1A because syntaxin-2, which shares >70% homology with syntaxin-1A (39), had no effect on KATP channels. We further determined that the H3 domain, and not the Habc domain, is the putative syntaxin-1A domain that modulated the KATP channel opener's actions on the KATP channel. Because syntaxin-1A also influenced the KATP channel–opening actions of diazoxide, a nonspecific KATP channel opener, this would suggest that syntaxin-1A might also influence the other KATP channel openers actions on SUR2 proteins, which will require further study. The isoform specificity of syntaxin-1A's inhibition on NNC55-0462–mediated KATP channel opening is in line with previous studies examining other syntaxin-1A–ion channel interactions. Studies with Lc- and N-type calcium channels showed similar results, with the basis of such specificity mapped out to two critical cysteine residues found in syntaxin-1A but not in syntaxin-2 (41). However, these cysteine residues on the transmembrane domain of syntaxin-1A are unlikely candidates for the basis of its actions toward KATP channel modulation because: 1) a soluble GST–syntaxin-1A fusion protein lacking the transmembrane domain inhibited NNC55-0462–mediated KATP channel opening as efficaciously as expression of the full-length syntaxin-1A, and 2) the soluble GST–syntaxin-1A–H3 domain induced a similar inhibition as syntaxin-1A, consistent with our previous study, which mapped out the nucleotide binding fold–interacting domain to be the H3 domain (33). Nonetheless, that report (41) does point out that differences as small as one to two amino acid residues are enough to produce isoform-specific action. Moreover, a study of syntaxin-1A versus syntaxin-1B, which shares 93% homology, shows that only syntaxin-1A is capable of mediating tonic voltage-dependent inhibition on N-type calcium channels (42). With regard to other K+ channels, we previously reported that syntaxin-1A, but not syntaxin-2, reduced Kv2.1 current density by direct actions on specific Kv2.1 cytoplasmic domains and by inhibiting channel trafficking (43). Although the mechanisms of action of syntaxin-1A on calcium channel regulation have been well characterized, those involved in KATP channel modulation are less clear. We postulated three possibilities: 1) syntaxin-1A may influence these KATP channel openers interaction with SUR1, 2) conversely, these KATP channel openers may influence syntaxin-1A interactions with SUR1, or 3) syntaxin-1A may influence the mechanism of action of KATP channel openers by interfering with adenosine nucleotide binding and/or hydrolysis. For the first possibility, syntaxin-1A interacting with the nucleotide binding folds may induce conformational changes to SUR1 that affect the affinity of NNC55-0462 to its binding sites. Unfortunately, NNC55-0462 could not be labeled to directly test this possibility. Nonetheless, direct competitive inhibition is unlikely because of the inability of increasing concentrations of NNC55-0462 to overcome the reduced efficacy caused by syntaxin-1A. The SUR1 domains critical to the actions of a closely related compound, NNC55–9216, were mapped out to transmembrane domains 8–11 and both nucleotide binding folds (24). Because syntaxin-1A can bind both nucleotide binding folds of SUR1 (33,34), such interactions may induce negative allosteric modulation onto the KATP channel opener binding sites of SUR1, thereby decreasing the KATP channel opener binding affinity. In addition, previous studies have determined the sites of action of diazoxide to be transmembrane domains 6–11 and nucleotide binding fold-1 (44). Therefore, it is not surprising that syntaxin-1A is capable of influencing the effects of both KATP channel openers because of potential overlapping binding or signal transduction sites. Further mutational studies will be required to elucidate these sites. For the second possibility, NNC55-0462 may act to relieve syntaxin-1A inhibition on KATP channels, and thus increased levels of syntaxin-1A would reduce the effectiveness of this KATP channel opener. Our in vitro binding studies showed that increasing concentrations of NNC55-0462 did not affect syntaxin-1A binding to SUR1 protein, thus eliminating this possibility. For the third possibility, the binding and activity of a wide range of KATP channel openers are dependent on the presence of Mg2+ and hydrolyzable ATP (45–47), and a postulated mechanism of action of these compounds is the acceleration of nucleotide hydrolysis by nucleotide binding folds (48). Syntaxin-1A may affect KATP channel openers by interfering with this mechanism, either via slowing the rate of nucleotide hydrolysis or by affecting the binding of Mg-ATP or Mg-ADP to their respective nucleotide binding folds. In support of this, NNC55-9216 required both nucleotide binding folds (24), whereas diazoxide required nucleotide binding fold-1 to exert their KATP channel opening action (44). Our in vitro binding study revealed reduced syntaxin-1A binding to SUR1 when the Mg-ATP concentration was increased to 5 mmol/l, which suggests competitive binding displacement at the nucleotide binding folds. Should syntaxin-1A influence the efficacy of these KATP channel openers via this postulated mechanism, further modulating effects may be observed with combinations of adenosine nucleotides and Mg2+. These complex interactions are not within the scope of the current study and will require much further investigation.
Our previous report on syntaxin-1A–overexpressing mice showed that a moderate increase of
The converse, however, may not be true—that is, when islet syntaxin-1A levels become reduced. Alemzadeh et al. (50) reported that 6 weeks of treatment with NN414, a SUR1-specific KATP channel opener of the same family as NNC55-0462, led to improvements in fasting and post–intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test glucose levels in Zucker obese diabetic rats but not in lean control rats, which was postulated to be attributable to lower insulin levels in lean animals during basal conditions and after NN414 treatment. We propose an alternative explanation. Islet syntaxin-1A levels are severely reduced in type 2 diabetic rodent models and human patients (percent of normal controls:
H.Y.G. has received support from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR MOP-69083) and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (T-6064). B.N is supported by studentships from the Ontario Graduate Studentship and the Banting and Best Diabetes Center (University of Toronto). Y.H. is supported by a postdoctoral award from the Janssen-Ortho/Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. We thank X. Gao for technical assistance in preparing the rat pancreatic islets and R. Tsushima and Y.-M. Leung for active discussion.
Published ahead of print at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org on 11 May 2007. DOI: 10.2337/db07-0030. Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db07-0030. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Received for publication January 9, 2007 and accepted in revised form May 8, 2007
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||