Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print published online ahead of print December 27, 2007
DOI: 10.2337/db07-1315

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
db07-1315v1
57/5/1340    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muscelli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrannini, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muscelli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrannini, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Research

Separate impact of obesity and glucose tolerance on the incretin effect in normal subjects and type 2 diabetic patients.

Elza Muscelli1, Andrea Maria, Arturo Casolaro1, Stefania Camastra1, Giuseppe Seghierib, Amalia Gastaldelli1, Jens J Holstc, and Ele Ferrannini1

1Department of Internal Medicine and C.N.R. Institute of Clinical Physiology, University of Pisa, Italy
a C.N.R. Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Padova, Italy
b Division of Internal Medicine, Spedali Riuniti, Pistoia, Italy
c Department of Medical Physiology, Panum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark

Objective: To quantitate the separate impact of obesity and hyperlycemia on the incretin effect, i.e. the gain in β-cell function after oral glucose vs intravenous glucose.

Research Design and Methods: Isoglycemic oral (75 g) and IV glucose administration was performed in 51 subjects (24 NGT, 17 IGT and 10 type 2 DM), with a wide range of BMI (20-61 kg.m–2). C-peptide deconvolution was used to reconstruct insulin secretion rates, and β-cell glucose sensitivity (=slope of the insulin secretion/glucose concentration dose-response curve) was determined by mathematical modeling. The incretin effect was defined as the oral/IV ratio of responses. In 8 NGT and 10 DM, oral glucose appearance was measured by the double-tracer technique.

Results: The incretin effect on total insulin secretion and β-cell glucose sensitivity, and the GLP-1 response to oral glucose were significantly reduced in DM compared to NGT or IGT (p≤0.05). The results were similar when subjects were stratified by BMI tertile (p≤0.05). In the whole dataset, each manifestation of the incretin effect was inversely related to both glucose tolerance (=2-hour plasma glucose levels) and BMI (partial r =0.27-0.59, p≤0.05) in an independent, additive manner. Oral glucose appearance did not differ between DM and NGT, and was positively related to the GLP-1 response (r=0.53, p<0.01). Glucagon suppression during the OGTT was blunted in DM patients.

Conclusions: Potentiation of insulin secretion, glucose sensing, GLP-1 release, and glucagon suppression are physiological manifestations of the incretin effect. The incretin effect is impaired as an independent function of both glucose tolerance and obesity.


Correspondence: ferranni{at}ifc.pi.cnr.it

Key Words: Incretin effect • GLP-1 • GIP • glucose tolerance • obesity • insulin secretion • β-cell function.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.