Insulin Therapy Improves Insulin-Stimulated Endothelial Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Ischemic Heart Disease

  1. Christian Rask-Madsen1,
  2. Nikolaj Ihlemann1,
  3. Thure Krarup2,
  4. Erik Christiansen3,
  5. Lars Kober4,
  6. Caroline Nervil Kistorp5 and
  7. Christian Torp-Pedersen1
  1. 1Department of Cardiology P, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Medicine F, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. 3Department of Endocrinology, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  4. 4Rigshospitalet Heart Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
  5. 5Department of Cardiology and Endocrinology E, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Abstract

    Blunted insulin-stimulated endothelial function may be a mechanism for the development of atherothrombotic disease in type 2 diabetes, but it is unknown whether hypoglycemic drug therapy can modulate this abnormality. We studied patients with type 2 diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease (n = 28) and lean, healthy control subjects (n = 31). Forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography during dose-response studies of acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) infused into the brachial artery. In the patients and 10 healthy control subjects, ACh was repeated after intrabrachial infusion of insulin. Patients were restudied after 2 months of insulin therapy with four daily subcutaneous injections (treatment group, n = 19) or without hypoglycemic drug therapy (time control group, n = 9). Insulin infusion raised venous serum insulin in the forearm to high physiological levels (133 ± 14.6 mU/l in patients) with a minor increase in systemic venous serum insulin. This increased the ACh response by 149 ± 47, 110 ± 33, 100 ± 45, and 106 ± 44% during the four ACh doses in healthy control subjects (P < 0.0001) but had no effect in patients (P = 0.3). After 2 months, HbA1c in the treatment group had decreased from 10.0 ± 0.4 to 7.5 ± 0.2%. Although neither the ACh response (P = 0.09) nor the SNP response (P = 0.4) had changed significantly, insulin stimulation had a significant effect, as the ACh response increased by 58 ± 25, 84 ± 66, 120 ± 93, and 69 ± 36% (P = 0.0002). In the time control group, insulin stimulation remained without effect after 8 weeks (P = 0.7). In conclusion, insulin therapy partly restores insulin-stimulated endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease.

    Footnotes

    • Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Christian Rask-Madsen, Gentofte University Hospital, Department of Cardiology P, Post 4210, Niels Andersensvej 65, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark. E-mail: crm{at}heart.dk.

      Received for publication 11 January 2001 and accepted in revised form 15 August 2001.

      ACh, acetylcholine; DIGAMI, Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction; eNOS, endothelial NO synthase; IRK, insulin receptor kinase; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; l-NMMA, NG-monomethyl-l-arginine acetate; NO, nitric oxide; PI3K, phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; UKPDS, U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study.

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents