Assessing Insulin Secretion by Modeling in Multiple-Meal Tests

Role of Potentiation

  1. Andrea Mari1,
  2. Andrea Tura1,
  3. Amalia Gastaldelli2 and
  4. Ele Ferrannini2
  1. 1C.N.R. (National Research Council) Institute of Systems Science and Biomedical Engineering, Padova
  2. 2C.N.R. Institute of Clinical Physiology and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Abstract

    We developed a mathematical model of the glucose control of insulin secretion capable of quantifying β-cell function from a physiological meal test. The model includes a static control, i.e., a secretion component that is a function of plasma glucose concentration (the dose-response function), and a dynamic control, i.e., a secretion component that is proportional to the positive values of the glucose concentration derivative. Furthermore, the dose-response function is assumed to be modulated by a time-varying potentiation factor. To test the model, nine nondiabetic control subjects and nine type 2 diabetic patients received three standardized mixed meals over a period of 14–15 h. Blood samples were drawn for the measurement of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentration. The dose-response function, the parameter of the dynamic control, and the potentiation factor were determined by fitting the model to glucose and C-peptide concentrations. In diabetic patients, the dose-response function was shifted to the right (glucose concentration at a reference insulin secretion of 300 pmol · min−1 · m−2 was 11.7 ± 1.1 vs. 7.2 ± 0.7 mmol/l; P < 0.05), and decreased in slope (53 ± 15 vs. 148 ± 38 pmol · min−1 · m−2 · mmol−1 · l; P < 0.05) and the parameter of the dynamic control was decreased (220 ± 67 vs. 908 ± 276 pmol · m−2 · mmol−1 · l; P < 0.05) compared with the nondiabetic control subjects. Furthermore, potentiation was markedly blunted and delayed: maximum potentiation was observed at the first meal in normal subjects and at the second meal (about 4 h later) in diabetic subjects; the mean time for the potentiation factor was higher (7.1 ± 0.2 vs. 5.9 ± 0.2 h; P < 0.01), and the size of potentiation was reduced (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 7.2 ± 1.5 fold increase; P < 0.005). In conclusion, our model of insulin secretion extracts multiple indexes of β-cell function from a physiological meal test. Use of the model in patients with type 2 diabetes retrieves known defects in insulin secretion but also uncovers new facets of β-cell dysfunction.

    Footnotes

    • Address correspondence and reprint requests tomari@ladseb.pd.cnr.it.

      Accepted for publication 21 June 2001.

      A.M. and E.F. have received grant support from the Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Courbevoie, France.

      The symposium and the publication of this article have been made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from Servier, Paris.

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents