A Reduced-Fat Diet and Aerobic Exercise in Japanese Americans With Impaired Glucose Tolerance Decreases Intra-Abdominal Fat and Improves Insulin Sensitivity but not β-Cell Function
- Darcy B. Carr1,
- Kristina M. Utzschneider2,
- Edward J. Boyko3,
- Pamela J. Asberry2,
- Rebecca L. Hull2,
- Keiichi Kodama2,
- Holly S. Callahan4,
- Colleen C. Matthys4,
- Donna L. Leonetti5,
- Robert S. Schwartz6,
- Steven E. Kahn2 and
- Wilfred Y. Fujimoto2
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- 2Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- 3Epidemiologic Research and Information Center and Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- 4General Clinical Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- 5Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- 6Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Darcy B. Carr, MD, Assistant Professor, Dept. of ObstetricsGynecology, Box 356460, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-6460. E-mail: darcarr{at}u.washington.edu
Abstract
Lifestyle modification reduces the risk of developing type 2 diabetes and may have its effect through improving insulin sensitivity, β-cell function, or both. To determine whether diet and exercise improve insulin sensitivity and/or β-cell function and to evaluate these effects over time, we quantified insulin sensitivity and the acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg) in 62 Japanese Americans (age 56.5 ± 1.3 years; mean ± SE) with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) who were randomized to the American Heart Association (AHA) Step 2 diet plus endurance exercise (n = 30) versus the AHA Step 1 diet plus stretching (n = 32) for 24 months. β-Cell function (disposition index [DI]) was calculated as Si × AIRg, where Si is the insulin sensitivity index. The incremental area under the curve for glucose (incAUCg) was calculated from a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Intra-abdominal fat (IAF) and subcutaneous fat (SCF) areas were measured by computed tomography. At 24 months, the Step 2/endurance group had lower weight (63.1 ± 2.4 vs. 71.3 ± 2.9 kg; P = 0.004) and IAF (75.0 ± 7.9 vs. 112.7 ± 10.4 cm2; P = 0.03) and SCF (196.5 ± 18.0 vs. 227.7 ± 19.9 cm2; P < 0.001) areas, greater Si (4.7 ± 0.5 vs. 3.3 ± 0.3 × 10−5 min · pmol−1 · l−1; P = 0.01), and a trend toward lower AIRg (294.9 ± 50.0 vs. 305.4 ± 30.0 pmol/l; P = 0.06) and incAUCg (8,217.3 ± 350.7 vs. 8,902.0 ± 367.2 mg · dl−1 · 2 h−1; P = 0.08) compared with the Step 1/stretching group after adjusting for baseline values. There was no difference in the DI (P = 0.7) between the groups. Si was associated with changes in weight (r = −0.426, P = 0.001) and IAF (r = −0.395, P = 0.003) and SCF (r = −0.341, P = 0.01) areas. Thus, the lifestyle modifications decreased weight and central adiposity and improved insulin sensitivity in Japanese Americans with IGT. However, such changes did not improve β-cell function, suggesting that this degree of lifestyle modifications may be limited in preventing type 2 diabetes over the long term.
- AHA, American Heart Association
- AIRg, acute insulin response to glucose
- CT, computed tomography
- DI, disposition index
- DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program
- ESD, extreme studentized deviate
- FSIGTT, frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test
- IAF, intra-abdominal fat
- IGT, impaired glucose tolerance
- OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test
- SCF, subcutaneous fat
- UKPDS, U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study
Footnotes
-
- Accepted October 29, 2004.
- Received April 20, 2004.
- DIABETES
