Epidemiological evidence suggests that sex differences exist in type 2 diabetes. Men seem to be more susceptible than women to the consequences of obesity and sedentary lifestyle, possibly because of differences in insulin sensitivity and regional body fat deposition. Thus, lacking androgen receptor (AR) in male individuals may promote insulin resistance. To determine whether lacking AR in male individuals contributes to in vivo insulin resistance, an AR knockout model (AR−/y) was used to study the correlation between AR and insulin resistance. Progressive reduced insulin sensitivity and impaired glucose tolerance were seen in AR−/y mice with advancing age. Aging AR−/y mice displayed accelerated weight gain, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperglycemia, and loss of AR contributes to increased triglyceride content in skeletal muscle and liver. Leptin is higher in serum of AR−/y mice. Treatment with exogenous leptin fails to stimulate weight loss in AR−/y mice in advanced age, suggesting leptin resistance in the AR−/y/ mice. Exogenous dihydrotestosterone replacement fails to reverse the metabolic abnormalities and insulin resistance in AR−/y mice. Our in vivo studies demonstrate that androgen-AR plays key roles in the development of insulin and leptin resistance, which may contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

It is estimated that by the year 2030, there will be ∼366 million people affected by type 2 diabetes worldwide (1), with many of those affected in the elderly age group (2). Although the primary factors causing this disease are elusive, it is clear that insulin resistance and leptin insensitivity may play a major role in its development (3).

Epidemiological evidence suggests that sex differences exist in type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is higher in men than women (1), possibly because of differences in insulin sensitivity and regional body fat deposition (4,5). The detailed mechanisms of how sex hormones influence insulin sensitivity or fat deposition, however, remain unclear. Testosterone and its metabolite, dihydrotestosterone, can activate androgen receptor (AR) to exert their androgenic actions. Proper or maximal androgen action may require interaction with selective coregulators in selective tissues (6,7).

Leptin, the adipocyte-derived adipokine product of the ob gene, has been shown to induce a negative energy balance by reducing appetite and increasing energy expenditure (8). Leptin circulates in serum at levels that parallel the mass of body fat. However, obese individuals have been found to be resistant to the negative regulatory function of circulating leptin (9). Ob/ob and db/db mice that lack leptin or are leptin resistant, respectively, are profoundly hyperphagic and hypometabolic, leading to an obese phenotype, and they manifest numerous abnormalities, such as type 2 diabetes with severe insulin resistance, hypothermia and cold intolerance, infertility, and decrease in lean mass (1014).

However, to date, the relationship between androgen-AR and insulin sensitivity remains unclear, and little is known about the role of androgen-AR in age-related changes for regulation of leptin production. Therefore, we used a conditional knockout strategy to generate AR knockout mice (AR−/y) to study this relationship (15), and here we report the influences of loss of AR on insulin and leptin resistance.

All animal procedures were approved by the animal care and use committee of the University of Rochester School of Medicine, in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines. Construction of targeting vectors and generation of the chimera founder mice have been described previously (15). The strains of the mosaic founder mice were C57BL/6 and 129Sv background. β-Actin is a housekeeping gene and is universally expressed in every tissue; therefore, the β-actin promoter–driven Cre (ACTB-Cre; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) will express and delete floxed AR fragments in all of the tissues. The AR−/y mice were genotyped by PCR, as described previously (15). Animals were housed in pathogen-free facilities, maintained on a 12-h light/dark schedule (light on at 0600), and had free access to standard laboratory chow (no. 5010; PMI Lab Diet, St. Louis, MO) and water.

Histology.

Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Nonadjacent sections, separated by 70–80 μm, were obtained from perigonadal fat pads and analyzed systematically with respect to adipocyte size and number. Staining of the sections was performed with hematoxylin/eosin. Images were acquired using an E800 microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY) and a SPOT camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI) and were analyzed using SigmaScan Pro software (version 5.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL).

Analytical procedures.

Fasting blood samples were taken from mice 14 h after withdrawal of food. Blood samples designated as random-fed state were drawn 6 h after introducing food into the cages of mice that had been subjected to a preceding 14-h fast. Blood glucose concentrations were measured using a glucometer (One Touch Ultra; Lifescan, Milpitas, CA). Insulin levels and leptin levels were determined in duplicate 5-μl serum samples, using a mouse insulin and leptin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Crystal Chem, Downers Grove, IL) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels were determined in duplicate in 20-μl serum samples using a mouse TNF-α enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For the glucose tolerance test (GTT), after a 14-h fast, mice were given an oral bolus of d-glucose (2 g/kg body wt), and the blood glucose concentration was measured in samples taken at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after the glucose bolus. Insulin tolerance test (ITT) was performed on 6-h fasting mice by intraperitoneal injection of 1 unit/kg body wt human insulin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Blood glucose concentration was determined at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after insulin administration. Triglyceride levels in serum from fasting animals were determined using a GPO-Trinder assay (Sigma Aldrich). Serum free fatty acid levels in fasting animals were measured using a NEFA-Kit-U (Wako Pure Chemical, Richmond, VA). For determination of tissue triglyceride content, 50–100 mg tissue pieces were homogenized on ice in pH 7.3 extraction buffer (20 mmol/l Tris, 1 mmol/l β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mmol/l EDTA). After centrifugation, the glycerol content of the supernatants was determined using a GPO-Trinder assay (Sigma Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase activity.

Mice were subjected to 14-h fast, injected with saline or insulin (10 units/kg body wt i.p.) and sacrificed 3 min after injection. Tissues were collected and frozen. Phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase (PI3K) activity was measured in phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates (p-Tyr, Ab-4; EMD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) from white adipose tissue (WAT), skeletal muscle, and liver lysates, as previously described (16).

Intraperitoneal leptin administration.

Mice were divided into two groups and were treated once daily with equal volumes of intraperitoneally injected saline or mouse leptin (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) dissolved in saline at doses of 5 μg/g body wt for 6 days. Food intake and changes in body weight were measured to estimate the effects of exogenous leptin administration.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR.

Mouse WAT, skeletal muscles, and livers from wild-type and AR−/y were dissected and total RNA isolated, using a TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). cDNA synthesis and PCR were performed using Superscript RNase H reverse transcriptase and cDNA cycle kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR was performed using iCycler real-time PCR amplifier (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Each PCR contained 1 μl cDNA, 50 μmol/l primers, and 12.5 μl iQ SYBR Green Supermix reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and was triplicated, and 18s was used as an internal control. A list of the primer sequences for real-time PCR is available in Table 1.

Dihydrotestosterone replacement study.

A 60-day time-release 5α-dihydrotestosterone (5 mg) or placebo pellet (Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL) was inserted into a subcutaneous pocket (posterior neck region) of male wild-type and AR−/y mice, respectively. At 8 weeks after implantation of the pellet, the mice were killed to study serum hormones and metabolic parameters.

Statistical analyses.

All values are the means ± SE. Differences between two groups were assessed using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test or among more than two groups by ANOVA. In all statistical comparisons, P < 0.05 was defined as a significant difference. SigmaStat statistics software (version 2.0; SPSS) was used for all calculations.

Loss of AR is associated with fat accumulation and altered metabolic profiles.

Using Cre/loxP-mediated recombination by crossing AR-loxP mice with ACTB-Cre mice, we generated mice lacking functional AR in mixed C57BL/6/129Sv/FVB background (15). Male wild-type and knockout AR−/y mice were used for the present studies. Because the AR−/y mice were phenotypically female in appearance, we also used female wild-type mice as an additional comparison group for phenotypic analysis. The growth curves of male wild-type, female wild-type, and AR−/y mice showed that AR−/y mice exhibited a significant decrease in the body weight gain throughout the 20th week compared with male wild-type mice (Fig. 1A). The body weight of male wild-type and AR−/y mice was significantly greater at all time points after 8 weeks compared with female wild-type littermates. However, body weight gain was significantly greater in AR−/y mice after 22 weeks compared with their male and female wild-type littermates throughout the 40-week study period (male wild-type: 36.0 ± 1.3 g; female wild-type: 26.35 ± 0.59 g; AR−/y: 40.87 ± 1.0 g; P = 0.009 for male wild-type vs. AR−/y; n = 9). This was accompanied by significantly enlarged gonadal and perirenal fat pads compared with male and female wild-type counterparts (Figs. 1B and C, Table 2). Aging obesity profiles are consistent with previous findings (17,18). Circulating triglyceride levels of AR−/y mice was increased by twofold compared with male and female wild-type mice (Table 2). Notably, histological analysis of WAT after fixation (Fig. 1B) and quantification of adipocyte size (Fig. 1C) revealed that adipocytes from 35-week-old AR−/y mice were significantly larger than those in wild-type counterparts. The comparison data for muscle and bone mass showed no significant difference in those tissue masses between wild-type and AR−/y mice (data not shown). Although obvious enlargement of adipose tissues can be seen from intra-abdominal appearance in AR−/y mice, this only accounts for ∼15% increased body weight in AR−/y mice compared with wild-type mice. These results indicate that AR−/y mice had marked increased adiposity at an older age.

Development of insulin resistance in AR−/y mice.

Given the excess lipid deposition in WAT, we examined blood glucose and insulin levels in male wild-type, female wild-type, and AR−/y mice. AR−/y mice start to show elevated blood glucose at 20 weeks (Table 3), which persisted to at least 35 weeks under both the fasting and fed conditions (Table 2). The hyperglycemia occurred despite a marked increase in serum insulin levels in the fasting (∼60%) and fed (∼67%) states, indicating that AR−/y mice were more resistant to insulin than their wild-type counterparts under ambient conditions (Table 2).

To assess whole-body glucose homeostasis, we next performed oral bolus GTTs and intraperitoneal ITTs on these mice. Oral bolus GTTs demonstrated marked glucose intolerance and distinguishable area under the curve in AR−/y mice (Figs. 2A and B). Blood glucose levels of AR−/y mice were greater at all times during the test, and hyperglycemia was still apparent 2 h after the glucose bolus. ITTs showed that AR−/y mice were slightly resistant and highly resistant to the hypoglycemic effect of exogenous insulin at 25 and 35 weeks of age, respectively (Figs. 2C and D). The defect in whole-body insulin sensitivity was not caused by female-like phenotype in AR−/y mice because we detected no differences in response patterns of male and female wild-type mice.

Because insulin resistance can be correlated to the activity of PI3K, a signaling mediator needed for many metabolic effects of insulin, we examined insulin-stimulated PI3K activity using wild-type mice as controls. The PI3K activity on insulin stimulation in AR−/y mice was reduced by 60–63% in insulin target organs, such as skeletal muscle and liver (Fig. 2E), suggesting that AR−/y mice did have skeletal muscle and hepatic insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia with obesity.

Increased lipid deposition and leptin levels in AR−/y mice.

Serum free fatty acid levels in the fasting state are elevated in AR−/y mice (Table 2). Moreover, skeletal muscle and hepatic triglyceride content markedly increased by 2.6- and 1.9-fold, respectively, indicating that insulin resistance was associated with increasing triglyceride deposition in the skeletal muscle and liver (Fig. 2F). As expected from the increased WAT mass, fed serum leptin concentrations were higher in AR−/y mice at both 25 and 35 weeks of age (Fig. 3A). Moreover, serum leptin levels show elevated linear relationships with body weight in AR−/y mice compared with wild-type littermates (Fig. 3B). Surprisingly, fed serum leptin levels were also higher, even though AR−/y mice gained significantly less weight before 20 weeks of age (Fig. 3A), indicating that loss of AR may cause increased leptin earlier than increased body weight. Adiponectin, an insulin-sensitizing adipokine, was reduced in AR−/y mice (Fig. 3C), whereas there was no difference in TNF-α levels (Fig. 3D).

Development of leptin resistance in AR−/y mice.

We also found that food intake and body weight was significantly reduced after exogenously administrated leptin in wild-type mice, but not in AR−/y mice (Figs. 4A and B). Furthermore, food intake was not significantly different in AR−/y mice compared with wild-type mice before exogenous leptin administration, despite elevated leptin levels, indicating AR−/y mice were leptin resistant at 35 weeks of age. However, food intake and body weight were reduced after an exogenous load of leptin in both 20-week-old AR−/y mice and wild-type mice, whereas two control groups had similar body weight and adiposity (Figs. 4C and D). These results suggest that AR−/y mice develop leptin resistance that may be caused by the development of adiposity and the long-term absence of AR.

Loss of AR altered the lipid metabolic profiles.

To determine the mechanism of the increased lipid deposition in WAT, as well as skeletal muscle and hepatic triglyceride accumulation, mRNA from these tissues were further analyzed. The mRNA levels of four lipid metabolism genes, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)-γ (PPARγ), CCAAT/enhancer–binding protein-α (C/EBPα), adipocyte fatty acid–binding protein/adipocyte P2 (aP2), and sterol regulatory element–binding protein 1c (SREBP1c), were higher in WAT of AR−/y compared with wild-type mice (Table 4), suggesting that loss of AR may contribute to the increase of adipogenesis and lipogenesis via stimulation of several genes. Moreover, consistent with triglyceride accumulation, loss of AR reduced mRNA levels of PPAR-α (PPARα) in skeletal muscle and liver (Table 4). These results suggest that AR is directly or indirectly involved in lipid metabolism.

Dihydrotestosterone replacement failed to reverse the metabolic abnormalities and insulin resistance in AR−/y mice.

Because serum testosterone levels were markedly decreased as a result of atrophic testes in AR−/y mice, we could not exclude the possibility that the insulin resistance and metabolic abnormalities in AR−/y mice simply reflected the low levels of androgens. To address this issue, nonaromatizable androgen, dihydrotestosterone, was given to both 26- and 12-week-old AR−/y and wild-type littermates. Several serum hormones and metabolic parameters were assessed after 8 weeks of pellet implantation. Dihydrotestosterone replacement restored serum dihydrotestosterone levels to within the physiological range (0.6–0.9 ng/ml) in AR−/y mice. It is known that estradiol is converted not only from estrone but also testosterone; therefore, we could not exclude the possibility that the abnormalities in AR−/y mice simply reflected less estrogen converted from testosterone, although we found that serum estradiol levels, as well as levels of the prohormone androstenedione, remained unchanged in AR−/y mice compared with wild-type mice (Tables 3 and 5). Dihydrotestosterone replacement couldn’t reverse the metabolic abnormalities and insulin resistance in AR−/y mice in either age study group (Tables 3 and 5), which suggests that androgen actions directly mediated via AR are significant in insulin sensitivity.

Cross-sectional epidemiological studies have indicated a direct correlation between serum testosterone concentrations and insulin sensitivity (19). Low testosterone levels are associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in men (20,21). Because most androgens need to bind to AR to exert their androgenic biological functions, AR have been thought to function as a modulator of insulin sensitivity. Our current results demonstrate that mice lacking AR develop insulin and leptin resistance at an advanced age. Late onset of obesity, as we observed in AR−/y mice, was reported to be associated with insulin resistance (22). The marked hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia in AR−/y mice clearly demonstrate that loss of AR may reduce insulin sensitivity. A relatively small increase in body weight (∼15%) is associated with a remarkable reduction in insulin sensitivity (∼65%) in AR−/y mice and with insulin resistance that occurs as early as 20 weeks of age in nonobese AR−/y mice, suggesting that loss of AR may directly reduce insulin sensitivity in target tissues without first increasing body weight significantly.

The phenotypically female appearance of AR−/y mice is similar to that of Tfm (testicular feminized) mice, in which AR is functionally deficient by introduction of the Tfm mutation in the AR gene (23). Therefore, we added female wild-type mice for comparison, and these mice remain smaller and have less adiposity than both male wild-type and AR−/y mice. In addition, we found no significantly distinguishable metabolic pattern between female and male wild-type mice, whereas AR−/y mice exhibited severe insulin resistance and obesity. A previous study has showed that db/db Tfm/Y males develop severe diabetes. In contrast, female db/db littermates only exhibit mild hyperglycemia (24).

The excess fat mass in AR−/y mice may be caused by an impaired ability of skeletal muscle to use lipids as a fuel substrate and of liver to catabolize lipids, leading to a shunting of lipids to adipose tissue. In fact, the unchanged food intake in AR−/y mice suggests that the excess weight gain and adiposity may be caused by normal energy input coupled with reduced lipid oxidation and increased lipid storage. Indeed, impairment in hepatic lipid oxidation resulted in elevated circulating free fatty acid and hepatic steotosis in PPAR-α null mice (25). Activation of PPAR-α by fibrates reduces adiposity in fa/fa ZDF (Zucker diabetic fatty) rats via activation of several peroxisomal and mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation genes (26). Given that skeletal muscle and liver are the major sites of lipid oxidation and deposition, respectively, it is possible that loss of PPAR-α could produce such an effect. Consistent with this possibility, decreased PPAR-α expression in skeletal muscle, decreased hepatic lipid metabolism, and subsequent alterations in expression of genes that stimulate adipocyte differentiation (PPARγ [22], C/EBPα [27], and SREBP1c [28]) and lipid accumulation (aP2 [29]) in WAT were found in AR−/y mice. Furthermore, liver-specific AR knockout mice, which are more susceptible to high-fat diet–induced insulin resistance, showed lower hepatic PPAR-α expression (H.-Y.L., C.C., unpublished observations). Recent studies using hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps have shown that PPAR-α null mice are not protected against high-fat diet–induced insulin resistance (30). Thus, loss of PPAR-α expression in AR−/y mice may be a potential mechanism contributing to the decreased insulin sensitivity observed.

An alternative explanation is that skeletal muscle and hepatic insulin resistance in AR−/y mice might be secondary to altered release of adipokines. Leptin increased insulin sensitivity and concomitantly reduced triglyceride content by promoting lipid oxidation both in animal models of insulin resistance and in humans with lipodystrophic diabetes (31). The AR−/y mice with elevated leptin, however, have significant leptin resistance when exogenous leptin is administered. Related results have been observed in ZDF rats, ob/ob mice that lack leptin, db/db mice that have an inactive leptin receptor, and the livers of such mice are all steatotic (32,33). In ZDF rats, the skeletal muscle, pancreas, and heart are also steatotic (34). A strong correlation between intracellular triglyceride content and insulin resistance has been established in both human and animal studies of obesity-related insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (35). Consistent with this possibility, a substantial ectopic deposition of triglycerides in nonadipocytes, such as skeletal muscle and liver, in AR−/y mice is likely a central element. Triglyceride overload of nonadipocytes causes insulin resistance, lipotoxic heart disease, and adipogenic type 2 diabetes (36). We have also demonstrated, through PI3K activity assay after injection of insulin, that skeletal muscle and liver in AR−/y mice are insulin resistant. Interestingly, PPAR-α is necessary for the lipopenic action of hyperleptinemia on white adipose and liver tissues. In PPAR-α null mice infused with adenovirus-leptin, upregulation of carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 mRNA in fat, downregulation of acetyl CoA carboxylase in liver, and upregulation of PPAR-γ coactivator-1α mRNA in both tissues are abolished, as is the reduction in their triglyceride content, suggesting that leptin action may be mediated through PPAR-α (37). Thus, loss of PPAR-α in AR−/y mice may reduce leptin action, despite elevated leptin levels. In contrast, we found decreased adiponectin and no elevation of serum TNF-α (another adipokine that contributes to insulin resistance) (38) in AR−/y mice at 35 weeks of age, whereas mice lacking adiponectin exhibited severe insulin resistance (39). However, it is known that other adipokines also mediate the metabolism of lipids and contribute to the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanism of lipid profile elevation in AR−/y mice.

Although there is no evidence that androgen-AR can directly affect PPAR-α, indirect interactions of AR and PPAR-α through nuclear receptor coregulators are possible. ARA70 (AR-associated coregulator 70), a coactivator of AR, was able to physically interact with PPAR-α, as determined by coimmunoprecipitation. In the adrenal cell line Y1, ARA70 behaved as a repressor of PPAR-α (40). The mechanism of how leptin is regulated by androgen-AR remains elusive. An early study indicated that in primary rat adipocytes expressing AR, testosterone and dihydrotestosterone were able to suppress leptin mRNA and leptin secretion (41), suggesting a direct effect of testosterone on the regulation of leptin secretion in adipocytes. AR−/y mice not only have an AR deficiency, but they also have decreased serum levels of androgens. Thus, in AR−/y mice, treatment with nonaromatizable dihydrotestosterone restored the physiological serum dihydrotestosterone levels, whereas estrogen levels remained unchanged compared with wild-type mice. Therefore, the possibility that a of lack of estrogen receptor-α activation results in increased WAT, as seen in male mice deficient in either estrogen receptor-α or aromatase, can be excluded. Importantly, we found no reversed effect after dihydrotestosterone treatment, indicating that insulin resistance in AR−/y mice, as seen in the present study, is mediated directly via AR.

Taken together, these data suggest that loss of AR may contribute to an increase of leptin levels and leptin resistance, which may play important roles for the development of obesity and insulin resistance. A previous study using transgenic mice overexpressing leptin demonstrated that loss of leptin effectiveness in older transgenic mice might contribute to the accumulation of adipose mass (42). Consistent with this possibility, the AR−/y mice were progressively desensitized to leptin because of long-term elevated circulating leptin throughout the 40-week study period. In rats, testosterone was reported to be associated negatively with serum leptin, independent of BMI (43). Leptin levels are higher in aging men with lower testosterone (44). Furthermore, low testosterone may lead to the accumulation of visceral fat (45). As total body fat mass increases, resistance develops to both leptin and insulin. Elevated leptin fails to stimulate weight loss, and the hypogonadal-obesity cycle ensures further visceral obesity and insulin resistance. In our present study, AR−/y mice progressively develop leptin resistance and insulin resistance, resulting in obesity. This differs from the ob/ob and db/db mice that display early onset genetic obesity and have leptin inactivity from a very early stage (46). AR−/y mice have milder obesity because of the late onset of leptin and insulin resistance. However, leptin resistance in AR−/y mice is similar to that of db/db mice, and having dysfunctional leptin receptors is likely to be a major contributing factor. Progressive insulin resistance can then lead to type 2 diabetes and other diseases, such as high triglyceride–low HDL pattern dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome X, as well as an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (45). It has been reported that hypotestosteronemia may be a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men (47).

Interestingly, along with loss of AR, for which we demonstrated a resulting metabolic syndrome, both loss of estrogen receptor-α (48) and aromatase deficiency, which causes loss of the ability to synthesize estrogen (49), result in metabolic syndromes. These observations indicate the possibility that loss of both androgen and estrogen responsiveness disrupts energy homeostasis.

In summary, AR−/y mice provide an in vivo model showing that loss of AR increases serum leptin concentration and skeletal muscle/hepatic triglyceride content, which may result in the development of obesity, leptin resistance, and insulin resistance. Because obesity and progressive insulin resistance may lead to type 2 diabetes and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (50), a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved and dissection of the roles of androgen-AR in insulin and leptin resistance may help in the development of better therapeutic approaches to type 2 diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases.

FIG. 1.

The AR−/y mice developed excess adiposity. A: Growth curves of mice were determined at indicated time points between the ages of 5 and 40 weeks. Values are the means ± SE from 9–10 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, AR−/y vs. male wild-type (WT) mice. B: Epididymal and perirenal fat pads isolated from 35-week-old mice (upper panels). Sections of WAT are shown at 40× magnification (lower panels) of 35-week-old mice (scale bar = 200 μm). C: Distribution of cell size of epididymal WAT from 35-week-old mice.

FIG. 1.

The AR−/y mice developed excess adiposity. A: Growth curves of mice were determined at indicated time points between the ages of 5 and 40 weeks. Values are the means ± SE from 9–10 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, AR−/y vs. male wild-type (WT) mice. B: Epididymal and perirenal fat pads isolated from 35-week-old mice (upper panels). Sections of WAT are shown at 40× magnification (lower panels) of 35-week-old mice (scale bar = 200 μm). C: Distribution of cell size of epididymal WAT from 35-week-old mice.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

AR−/y mice are insulin resistant and glucose intolerant. A: GTT (oral bolus 2 mg/g body wt) of 35-week-old mice after 14-h fast. B: area under the curve analysis of GTT. C: ITT (1 unit/kg body wt i.p.) of 25-week-old mice. D: ITT (1 unit/kg body wt i.p.) of 35-week-old mice. Values are the means ± SE from 5–6 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, AR−/y vs. male wild-type mice. E: In vivo PI3K activity was measured in phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates prepared from skeletal muscles, adipose tissues, and livers from 14 h–fasted 35-week-old mice. Tissues were collected 3 min after intraperitoneal injection of insulin or isotonic saline. The results were quantified by phosphoimaging. Values are representative of three mice from each group. **P < 0.01, AR−/y with insulin vs. wild type with insulin. F: Skeletal muscles and livers were removed from 35-week-old ad libitum–fed mice. Values of each group were converted into milligrams of triglyceride per gram of tissue (wet weight) after comparison with a glycerol standard. Values are the means ± SE from five mice per group. ***P < 0.001, AR−/y vs. wild-type mice. PI(3)P, phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate; w/, with; w/o, without; WT, wild type.

FIG. 2.

AR−/y mice are insulin resistant and glucose intolerant. A: GTT (oral bolus 2 mg/g body wt) of 35-week-old mice after 14-h fast. B: area under the curve analysis of GTT. C: ITT (1 unit/kg body wt i.p.) of 25-week-old mice. D: ITT (1 unit/kg body wt i.p.) of 35-week-old mice. Values are the means ± SE from 5–6 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, AR−/y vs. male wild-type mice. E: In vivo PI3K activity was measured in phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates prepared from skeletal muscles, adipose tissues, and livers from 14 h–fasted 35-week-old mice. Tissues were collected 3 min after intraperitoneal injection of insulin or isotonic saline. The results were quantified by phosphoimaging. Values are representative of three mice from each group. **P < 0.01, AR−/y with insulin vs. wild type with insulin. F: Skeletal muscles and livers were removed from 35-week-old ad libitum–fed mice. Values of each group were converted into milligrams of triglyceride per gram of tissue (wet weight) after comparison with a glycerol standard. Values are the means ± SE from five mice per group. ***P < 0.001, AR−/y vs. wild-type mice. PI(3)P, phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate; w/, with; w/o, without; WT, wild type.

Close modal
FIG. 3.

Effects of AR deficiency on adipocyte-derived adipokine. A: Fed leptin concentrations in 8-, 25-, or 35-week-old mice. B: Relationship between fed leptin concentrations and body weight of 35-week-old mice. C: Adiponectin concentrations in 35-week-old mice. D: TNF-α concentrations in 35-week-old mice. Values are the means ± SE from five mice per group. In D, n = 8 for wild-type mice and n = 7 for AR−/y mice. Regression lines for both groups are shown. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, AR−/y vs. wild type. N.S., no significance; WT, wild type.

FIG. 3.

Effects of AR deficiency on adipocyte-derived adipokine. A: Fed leptin concentrations in 8-, 25-, or 35-week-old mice. B: Relationship between fed leptin concentrations and body weight of 35-week-old mice. C: Adiponectin concentrations in 35-week-old mice. D: TNF-α concentrations in 35-week-old mice. Values are the means ± SE from five mice per group. In D, n = 8 for wild-type mice and n = 7 for AR−/y mice. Regression lines for both groups are shown. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, AR−/y vs. wild type. N.S., no significance; WT, wild type.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Aging AR−/y mice developed leptin resistance but not younger mice. Two groups of 35- or 20-week-old mice received an intraperitoneal injection of either leptin (5 μg/g body wt) or isotonic saline. A: Food intake per 24 h of 35-week-old mice. B: Weight changes per 24 h of 35-week-old mice. C: Food intake per 24 h of 20-week-old mice. D: Weight changes per 24 h of 20-week-old mice. Values are the means ± SE from 3–4 mice per group. *P < 0.05, wild type with leptin vs. control; †P < 0.05, leptin treatment vs. control; ††P < 0.001, leptin treatment vs. control. N.S., no significance; WT, wild type.

FIG. 4.

Aging AR−/y mice developed leptin resistance but not younger mice. Two groups of 35- or 20-week-old mice received an intraperitoneal injection of either leptin (5 μg/g body wt) or isotonic saline. A: Food intake per 24 h of 35-week-old mice. B: Weight changes per 24 h of 35-week-old mice. C: Food intake per 24 h of 20-week-old mice. D: Weight changes per 24 h of 20-week-old mice. Values are the means ± SE from 3–4 mice per group. *P < 0.05, wild type with leptin vs. control; †P < 0.05, leptin treatment vs. control; ††P < 0.001, leptin treatment vs. control. N.S., no significance; WT, wild type.

Close modal
TABLE 1

Primers used for real-time PCR assays of mRNA expression of genes related to lipid metabolism in WAT, liver, and skeletal muscle

GeneAccess no.Forward primerReverse primerAmplicon (bp)
aP2 M13385 AAGGAAAGTGGCAGGCATGG CACGCCCAGTTTGAAGGAAATC 118 
C/EBPα BC028890 CAAGAACAGCAACGAGTACC AGGCGGTCATTGTCACTG 135 
PPARα X57638 CGGGAAAGACCAGCAACAAC TGGCAGCAGTGGAAGAATCG 142 
PPARγ NM011146 CGAGGACATCCAAGACAAC TGTGACGATCTGCCTGAG 124 
SREBP1c NM011480 CTGGCTGAGGCGGGATGA TACGGGCCACAAGAAGTAGA 290 
GeneAccess no.Forward primerReverse primerAmplicon (bp)
aP2 M13385 AAGGAAAGTGGCAGGCATGG CACGCCCAGTTTGAAGGAAATC 118 
C/EBPα BC028890 CAAGAACAGCAACGAGTACC AGGCGGTCATTGTCACTG 135 
PPARα X57638 CGGGAAAGACCAGCAACAAC TGGCAGCAGTGGAAGAATCG 142 
PPARγ NM011146 CGAGGACATCCAAGACAAC TGTGACGATCTGCCTGAG 124 
SREBP1c NM011480 CTGGCTGAGGCGGGATGA TACGGGCCACAAGAAGTAGA 290 
TABLE 2

Physiological and metabolic parameters of 35-week-old study groups

Genotype
Male wild typeFemale wild typeAR−/y
Mice (n10 
Body weight (g) 33.15 ± 1.2 25.81 ± 0.44 39.06 ± 2.7* 
Gonadal fat/body (%) 2.21 ± 0.14 0.34 ± 0.08 3.29 ± 0.23* 
Serum total triglycerides (mmol/l) 0.30 ± 0.04 0.32 ± 0.08 0.67 ± 0.1 
Serum nonesterified fatty acids (mEq/l) 0.25 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.04 
Serum cholesterol (mmol/l) 2.28 ± 0.05 2.28 ± 0.06 2.44 ± 0.05 
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) 6.46 ± 0.31 6.41 ± 0.27 7.94 ± 0.38* 
Fed blood glucose (mmol/l) 14.03 ± 0.54 14.93 ± 0.29 19.75 ± 0.78 
Fasting serum insulin (ng/ml) 0.55 ± 0.13 0.53 ± 0.33 0.88 ± 0.33* 
Fed serum insulin (ng/ml) 0.92 ± 0.17 1.12 ± 0.14 1.54 ± 0.16* 
Genotype
Male wild typeFemale wild typeAR−/y
Mice (n10 
Body weight (g) 33.15 ± 1.2 25.81 ± 0.44 39.06 ± 2.7* 
Gonadal fat/body (%) 2.21 ± 0.14 0.34 ± 0.08 3.29 ± 0.23* 
Serum total triglycerides (mmol/l) 0.30 ± 0.04 0.32 ± 0.08 0.67 ± 0.1 
Serum nonesterified fatty acids (mEq/l) 0.25 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.04 
Serum cholesterol (mmol/l) 2.28 ± 0.05 2.28 ± 0.06 2.44 ± 0.05 
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) 6.46 ± 0.31 6.41 ± 0.27 7.94 ± 0.38* 
Fed blood glucose (mmol/l) 14.03 ± 0.54 14.93 ± 0.29 19.75 ± 0.78 
Fasting serum insulin (ng/ml) 0.55 ± 0.13 0.53 ± 0.33 0.88 ± 0.33* 
Fed serum insulin (ng/ml) 0.92 ± 0.17 1.12 ± 0.14 1.54 ± 0.16* 

Data are the means ± SE. After a 14-h fast, animals were killed.

*

P < 0.05,

P < 0.01, and

P < 0.001, AR vs. male wild type.

TABLE 3

Effects of dihydrotestosterone treatment on serum hormones and metabolic parameters in 20-week-old study groups

Male wild-type 20-week-old (12–20 weeks) mice
AR−/y 20-week-old (12–20 weeks) mice
ShamPlaceboShamPlaceboDihydrotestosterone
Mice (n
Insulin resistance index 945.6 ± 22.6 1,095.1 ± 73.5 5,540.4 ± 182.7* 4,473.3 ± 255.1* 4,478.4 ± 394.4* 
IGTT AUC insulin (ng · ml−1 · min−144.50 ± 8.84 48.30 ± 6.55 178.55 ± 12.15* 152.16 ± 9.39* 136.40 ± 12.7* 
IGTT AUC glucose (g · dl−1 · min−121.25 ± 0.50 22.67 ± 1.52 31.61 ± 0.92 29.39 ± 1.67* 32.83 ± 2.89 
Serum insulin (ng/ml) 0.25 ± 0.06 0.29 ± 0.02 0.61 ± 0.01 0.71 ± 0.10 0.68 ± 0.04 
Blood glucose (mmol/l) 6.16 ± 0.09 5.99 ± 0.36 8.02 ± 0.53 8.00 ± 0.09 8.69 ± 0.49 
Leptin (ng/ml) 0.88 ± 0.17 0.69 ± 0.09 7.32 ± 0.32 7.82 ± 1.03 8.12 ± 0.82 
Cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.59 ± 0.07 1.73 ± 0.30 1.62 ± 0.11 1.68 ± 0.01 1.72 ± 0.16 
Nonesterified fatty acid (mEq/l) 0.18 ± 0.03 0.18 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.01* 0.36 ± 0.03* 0.30 ± 0.05 
Total triglycerides (mmol/l) 0.15 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.08 0.28 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.02 
Adiposity index (%) 1.34 ± 0.03 1.15 ± 0.06 1.72 ± 0.05 1.71 ± 0.09 1.74 ± 0.02 
Androstenedione (ng/ml) 0.58 ± 0.11 0.62 ± 0.07 0.64 ± 0.05 0.59 ± 0.14 0.63 ± 0.09 
Estradiol (pg/ml) 55.97 ± 5.48 54.65 ± 4.37 57.06 ± 1.72 59.82 ± 1.60 54.38 ± 1.41 
Dihydrotestosterone (ng/ml) 0.61 ± 0.05 0.58 ± 0.07 0.09 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.05 0.73 ± 0.09 
Male wild-type 20-week-old (12–20 weeks) mice
AR−/y 20-week-old (12–20 weeks) mice
ShamPlaceboShamPlaceboDihydrotestosterone
Mice (n
Insulin resistance index 945.6 ± 22.6 1,095.1 ± 73.5 5,540.4 ± 182.7* 4,473.3 ± 255.1* 4,478.4 ± 394.4* 
IGTT AUC insulin (ng · ml−1 · min−144.50 ± 8.84 48.30 ± 6.55 178.55 ± 12.15* 152.16 ± 9.39* 136.40 ± 12.7* 
IGTT AUC glucose (g · dl−1 · min−121.25 ± 0.50 22.67 ± 1.52 31.61 ± 0.92 29.39 ± 1.67* 32.83 ± 2.89 
Serum insulin (ng/ml) 0.25 ± 0.06 0.29 ± 0.02 0.61 ± 0.01 0.71 ± 0.10 0.68 ± 0.04 
Blood glucose (mmol/l) 6.16 ± 0.09 5.99 ± 0.36 8.02 ± 0.53 8.00 ± 0.09 8.69 ± 0.49 
Leptin (ng/ml) 0.88 ± 0.17 0.69 ± 0.09 7.32 ± 0.32 7.82 ± 1.03 8.12 ± 0.82 
Cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.59 ± 0.07 1.73 ± 0.30 1.62 ± 0.11 1.68 ± 0.01 1.72 ± 0.16 
Nonesterified fatty acid (mEq/l) 0.18 ± 0.03 0.18 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.01* 0.36 ± 0.03* 0.30 ± 0.05 
Total triglycerides (mmol/l) 0.15 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.08 0.28 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.02 
Adiposity index (%) 1.34 ± 0.03 1.15 ± 0.06 1.72 ± 0.05 1.71 ± 0.09 1.74 ± 0.02 
Androstenedione (ng/ml) 0.58 ± 0.11 0.62 ± 0.07 0.64 ± 0.05 0.59 ± 0.14 0.63 ± 0.09 
Estradiol (pg/ml) 55.97 ± 5.48 54.65 ± 4.37 57.06 ± 1.72 59.82 ± 1.60 54.38 ± 1.41 
Dihydrotestosterone (ng/ml) 0.61 ± 0.05 0.58 ± 0.07 0.09 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.05 0.73 ± 0.09 

Data are the means ± SE After a 14-h fast, animals were killed. The adiposity index was the ratio of epididymal adipose tissue to body weight for mice. The insulin resistance index is the product of glucose and insulin areas under the curve. Parentheses indicate the period of pellet implantation.

*

P < 0.05,

P < 0.01, and

P < 0.001, vs. sham male wild-type mice. AUC, area under the curve; IGTT, intraperitoneal GTT.

TABLE 4

Expression of lipid metabolism genes in WAT, liver, and skeletal muscle in AR−/y mice as quantified by real-time RT-PCR

GeneΔΔCT (average ΔCT − average ΔCT.WT)Normalized amount relative to wild type 2−ΔΔCT
WAT   
    PPARγ −1.40 ± 0.81 2.6 (1.5–4.6) 
    C/EBPα −3.98 ± 0.22 15.8 (13.5–18.4) 
    SREBP1c −2.28 ± 0.58 4.9 (3.2–7.3) 
    aP2 −0.43 ± 0.17 1.35 (1.20–1.52) 
Liver   
    PPARα 3.13 ± 0.45 0.11 (0.08–0.16) 
Skeletal muscle   
    PPARα 2.36 ± 0.13 0.19 (0.18–0.21) 
GeneΔΔCT (average ΔCT − average ΔCT.WT)Normalized amount relative to wild type 2−ΔΔCT
WAT   
    PPARγ −1.40 ± 0.81 2.6 (1.5–4.6) 
    C/EBPα −3.98 ± 0.22 15.8 (13.5–18.4) 
    SREBP1c −2.28 ± 0.58 4.9 (3.2–7.3) 
    aP2 −0.43 ± 0.17 1.35 (1.20–1.52) 
Liver   
    PPARα 3.13 ± 0.45 0.11 (0.08–0.16) 
Skeletal muscle   
    PPARα 2.36 ± 0.13 0.19 (0.18–0.21) 

CT, threshold cycle; CT.WT, threshold cycle for wild type.

TABLE 5

Effects of dihydrotestosterone treatment on serum hormones and metabolic parameters in 34-week-old study groups

Male wild-type 34-week-old (26–34 weeks) mice
AR−/y 34-week-old (26–34 weeks) mice
ShamPlaceboShamPlaceboDihydrotestosterone
Mice (n
Insulin resistance index 1,893.1 ± 27.4 1,742.1 ± 228.4 4,918.4 ± 390.6* 5,302.9 ± 237.1* 5,381.8 ± 329.2* 
IGTT AUC insulin (ng · ml−1 · min−173.15 ± 10.77 76.45 ± 5.59 144.83 ± 8.40* 151.60 ± 18.29* 148.7 ± 1.30* 
IGTT AUC glucose (g · dl−1 · min−125.88 ± 0.37 22.78 ± 2.98 33.96 ± 2.69 34.98 ± 1.56 36.19 ± 2.21 
Serum insulin (ng/ml) 0.48 ± 0.08 0.46 ± 0.02 0.78 ± 0.03 0.80 ± 0.01 0.80 ± 0.10 
Blood glucose (mmol/l) 6.21 ± 0.32 6.25 ± 0.17 8.41 ± 0.45 8.42 ± 0.53 8.75 ± 0.82 
Leptin (ng/ml) 1.19 ± 0.19 1.44 ± 0.58 9.83 ± 1.98* 9.70 ± 0.80* 10.38 ± 0.26* 
Cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.83 ± 0.30 2.03 ± 0.64 2.01 ± 0.49 2.08 ± 0.05 2.08 ± 0.26 
Nonesterified fatty acids (mEq/l) 0.23 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.12 0.53 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.07 
Total triglycerides (mmol/l) 0.19 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.06 0.55 ± 0.15 0.60 ± 0.08 0.62 ± 0.08 
Adiposity index (%) 1.56 ± 0.09 1.51 ± 0.19 2.76 ± 0.18* 2.79 ± 0.12* 2.43 ± 0.14* 
Androstenedione (ng/ml) 0.65 ± 0.06 0.71 ± 0.12 0.67 ± 0.08 0.66 ± 0.11 0.70 ± 0.06 
Estradiol (pg/ml) 58.94 ± 3.89 54.35 ± 3.07 57.02 ± 1.91 52.22 ± 2.27 55.44 ± 4.03 
Dihydrotestosterone (ng/ml) 0.81 ± 0.01 0.77 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.03* 0.12 ± 0.05* 0.77 ± 0.14 
Male wild-type 34-week-old (26–34 weeks) mice
AR−/y 34-week-old (26–34 weeks) mice
ShamPlaceboShamPlaceboDihydrotestosterone
Mice (n
Insulin resistance index 1,893.1 ± 27.4 1,742.1 ± 228.4 4,918.4 ± 390.6* 5,302.9 ± 237.1* 5,381.8 ± 329.2* 
IGTT AUC insulin (ng · ml−1 · min−173.15 ± 10.77 76.45 ± 5.59 144.83 ± 8.40* 151.60 ± 18.29* 148.7 ± 1.30* 
IGTT AUC glucose (g · dl−1 · min−125.88 ± 0.37 22.78 ± 2.98 33.96 ± 2.69 34.98 ± 1.56 36.19 ± 2.21 
Serum insulin (ng/ml) 0.48 ± 0.08 0.46 ± 0.02 0.78 ± 0.03 0.80 ± 0.01 0.80 ± 0.10 
Blood glucose (mmol/l) 6.21 ± 0.32 6.25 ± 0.17 8.41 ± 0.45 8.42 ± 0.53 8.75 ± 0.82 
Leptin (ng/ml) 1.19 ± 0.19 1.44 ± 0.58 9.83 ± 1.98* 9.70 ± 0.80* 10.38 ± 0.26* 
Cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.83 ± 0.30 2.03 ± 0.64 2.01 ± 0.49 2.08 ± 0.05 2.08 ± 0.26 
Nonesterified fatty acids (mEq/l) 0.23 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.12 0.53 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.07 
Total triglycerides (mmol/l) 0.19 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.06 0.55 ± 0.15 0.60 ± 0.08 0.62 ± 0.08 
Adiposity index (%) 1.56 ± 0.09 1.51 ± 0.19 2.76 ± 0.18* 2.79 ± 0.12* 2.43 ± 0.14* 
Androstenedione (ng/ml) 0.65 ± 0.06 0.71 ± 0.12 0.67 ± 0.08 0.66 ± 0.11 0.70 ± 0.06 
Estradiol (pg/ml) 58.94 ± 3.89 54.35 ± 3.07 57.02 ± 1.91 52.22 ± 2.27 55.44 ± 4.03 
Dihydrotestosterone (ng/ml) 0.81 ± 0.01 0.77 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.03* 0.12 ± 0.05* 0.77 ± 0.14 

Data are means ± SE. After a 14-h fast, animals were killed. The adiposity index was the ratio of epididymal adipose tissue to body weight for mice. The insulin resistance index is the product of glucose and insulin areas under the curve. Parentheses indicate the period of pellet implantation.

*

P < 0.05,

P < 0.01, and

P < 0.001, vs. sham male wild-type mice. AUC, area under the curve; IGTT, intraperitoneal GTT.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

This work was supported by grants from the George Whipple Endowment, the National Institutes of Health (DK60948), and the Dr. Shu-Shi Chang Neuroendocrinology Fund.

We thank K. Wolf, L. Collins, and T. Chang for manuscript help.

1.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H: Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.
Diabetes Care
27
:
1047
–1053,
2004
2.
American Diabetes Association: Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in
1997
.
Diabetes Care
21
:
296
–309,
1998
3.
Saad MF, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Nelson RG, Mott DM, Bennett PH: Sequential changes in serum insulin concentration during development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes.
Lancet
1
:
1356
–1359,
1989
4.
Gale EA, Gillespie KM: Diabetes and gender.
Diabetologia
44
:
3
–15,
2001
5.
Livingstone C, Collison M: Sex steroids and insulin resistance.
Clin Sci
(Lond) 
102
:
151
–166,
2002
6.
Chang CS, Kokontis J, Liao ST: Molecular cloning of human and rat complementary DNA encoding androgen receptors.
Science
240
:
324
–326,
1988
7.
Heinlein CA, Chang C: Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: an overview.
Endocr Rev
23
:
175
–200,
2002
8.
Friedman JM, Halaas JL: Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals.
Nature
395
:
763
–770,
1998
9.
Hamilton BS, Paglia D, Kwan AY, Deitel M: Increased obese mRNA expression in omental fat cells from massively obese humans.
Nat Med
1
:
953
–956,
1995
10.
Burks DJ, de Mora JF, Schubert M, Withers DJ, Myers MG, Towery HH, Altamuro SL, Flint CL, White MF: IRS-2 pathways integrate female reproduction and energy homeostasis.
Nature
407
:
377
–382,
2000
11.
Chen H, Charlat O, Tartaglia LA, Woolf EA, Weng X, Ellis SJ, Lakey ND, Culpepper J, Moore KJ, Breitbart RE, Duyk GM, Tepper RI, Morgenstern JP: Evidence that the diabetes gene encodes the leptin receptor: identification of a mutation in the leptin receptor gene in db/db mice.
Cell
84
:
491
–495,
1996
12.
Chua SCJ, Chung WK, Wu-Peng XS, Zhang Y, Liu SM, Tartaglia L, Leibel RL: Phenotypes of mouse diabetes and rat fatty due to mutations in the OB (leptin) receptor.
Science
271
:
994
–996,
1996
13.
Hausberg M, Morgan DA, Mitchell JL, Sivitz WI, Mark AL, Haynes WG: Leptin potentiates thermogenic sympathetic responses to hypothermia: a receptor-mediated effect.
Diabetes
51
:
2434
–2440,
2002
14.
Lee GH, Proenca R, Montez JM, Carroll KM, Darvishzadeh JG, Lee JI, Friedman JM: Abnormal splicing of the leptin receptor in diabetic mice.
Nature
379
:
632
–635,
1996
15.
Yeh S, Hu YC, Wang PH, Xie C, Xu Q, Tsai MY, Dong Z, Wang RS, Lee TH, Chang C: Abnormal mammary gland development and growth retardation in female mice and MCF7 breast cancer cells lacking androgen receptor.
J Exp Med
198
:
1899
–1908,
2003
16.
Goodyear LJ, Giorgino F, Sherman LA, Carey J, Smith RJ, Dohm GL: Insulin receptor phosphorylation, insulin receptor substrate-1 phosphorylation, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity are decreased in intact skeletal muscle strips from obese subjects.
J Clin Invest
95
:
2195
–2204,
1995
17.
Matsumoto T, Takeyama K, Sato T, Kato S: Androgen receptor functions from reverse genetic models.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
85
:
95
–99,
2003
18.
Sato T, Matsumoto T, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Kawano H, Kato S: Late onset of obesity in male androgen receptor-deficient (AR KO) mice.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
300
:
167
–171,
2003
19.
Endre T, Mattiasson I, Berglund G, Hulthen UL: Low testosterone and insulin resistance in hypertension-prone men.
J Hum Hypertens
10
:
755
–761,
1996
20.
Defay R, Papoz L, Barny S, Bonnot-Lours S, Caces E, Simon D: Hormonal status and NIDDM in the European and Melanesian populations of New Caledonia: a case-control study: the CALedonia DIAbetes Mellitus (CALDIA) Study Group.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
22
:
927
–934,
1998
21.
Haffner SM, Laakso M, Miettinen H, Mykkanen L, Karhapaa P, Rainwater DL: Low levels of sex hormone-binding globulin and testosterone are associated with smaller, denser low density lipoprotein in normoglycemic men.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
81
:
3697
–3701,
1996
22.
Kubota N, Terauchi Y, Miki H, Tamemoto H, Yamauchi T, Komeda K, Satoh S, Nakano R, Ishii C, Sugiyama T, Eto K, Tsubamoto Y, Okuno A, Murakami K, Sekihara H, Hasegawa G, Naito M, Toyoshima Y, Tanaka S, Shiota K, Kitamura T, Fujita T, Ezaki O, Aizawa S, Kadowaki T: PPAR gamma mediates high-fat diet-induced adipocyte hypertrophy and insulin resistance.
Mol Cell
4
:
597
–609,
1999
23.
He WW, Kumar MV, Tindall DJ: A frame-shift mutation in the androgen receptor gene causes complete androgen insensitivity in the testicular-feminized mouse.
Nucleic Acid Res
19
:
2373
–2378,
1991
24.
Prochazka M, Leiter EH: Effect of androgen insensitivity on diabetogenesis in db/db male mice with testicular feminization (Tfm).
Horm Metab Res
23
:
149
–154,
1991
25.
Kersten S, Seydoux J, Peters JM, Gonzalez FJ, Desvergne B, Wahli W: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha mediates the adaptive response to fasting.
J Clin Invest
103
:
1489
–1498,
1999
26.
Guerre-Millo M, Gervois P, Raspe E, Madsen L, Poulain P, Derudas B, Herbert JM, Winegar DA, Willson TM, Fruchart JC, Berge RK, Staels B: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activators improve insulin sensitivity and reduce adiposity.
J Biol Chem
275
:
16638
–16642,
2000
27.
Loftus TM, Lane MD: Modulating the transcriptional control of adipogenesis.
Curr Opin Genet Dev
7
:
603
–608,
1997
28.
Kim JB, Sarraf P, Wright M, Yao KM, Mueller E, Solanes G, Lowell BB, Spiegelman BM: Nutritional and insulin regulation of fatty acid synthetase and leptin gene expression through ADD1/SREBP1.
J Clin Invest
101
:
1
–9,
1998
29.
Hotamisligil GS, Johnson RS, Distel RJ, Ellis R, Papaioannou VE, Spiegelman BM: Uncoupling of obesity from insulin resistance through a targeted mutation in aP2, the adipocyte fatty acid binding protein.
Science
274
:
1377
–1379,
1996
30.
Haluzik M, Gavrilova O, LeRoith D: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha deficiency does not alter insulin sensitivity in mice maintained on regular or high-fat diet: hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp studies.
Endocrinology
145
:
1662
–1667,
2004
31.
Petersen KF, Oral EA, Dufour S, Befroy D, Ariyan C, Yu C, Cline GW, DePaoli AM, Taylor SI, Gorden P, Shulman GI: Leptin reverses insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in patients with severe lipodystrophy.
J Clin Invest
109
:
1345
–1350,
2002
32.
Lee Y, Wang MY, Kakuma T, Wang ZW, Babcock E, McCorkle K, Higa M, Zhou YT, Unger RH: Liporegulation in diet-induced obesity: the antisteatotic role of hyperleptinemia.
J Biol Chem
276
:
5629
–5635,
2001
33.
Shimomura I, Bashmakov Y, Horton JD: Increased levels of nuclear SREBP-1c associated with fatty livers in two mouse models of diabetes mellitus.
J Biol Chem
274
:
30028
–30032,
1999
34.
Flier JS: Leptin expression and action: new experimental paradigms.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
94
:
4242
–4245,
1997
35.
Unger RH, Orci L: Diseases of liporegulation: new perspective on obesity and related disorders.
FASEB J
15
:
312
–321,
2001
36.
Unger RH, Orci L: Lipotoxic diseases of nonadipose tissues in obesity.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
24 (Suppl. 4)
:
S28
–S32,
2000
37.
Lee Y, Yu X, Gonzales F, Mangelsdorf DJ, Wang MY, Richardson C, Witters LA, Unger RH: PPAR alpha is necessary for the lipopenic action of hyperleptinemia on white adipose and liver tissue.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
99
:
11848
–11853,
2002
38.
Hotamisligil GS: The role of TNFalpha and TNF receptors in obesity and insulin resistance.
J Intern Med
245
:
621
–625,
1999
39.
Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Waki H, Terauchi Y, Kubota N, Hara K, Mori Y, Ide T, Murakami K, Tsuboyama-Kasaoka N, Ezaki O, Akanuma Y, Gavrilova O, Vinson C, Reitman ML, Kagechika H, Shudo K, Yoda M, Nakano Y, Tobe K, Nagai R, Kimura S, Tomita M, Froguel P, Kadowaki T: The fat-derived hormone adiponectin reverses insulin resistance associated with both lipoatrophy and obesity.
Nat Med
7
:
941
–946,
2001
40.
Heinlein CA, Chang C: Induction and repression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha transcription by coregulator ARA70.
Endocrine
21
:
139
–146,
2003
41.
Machinal F, Dieudonne MN, Leneveu MC, Pecquery R, Giudicelli Y: In vivo and in vitro ob gene expression and leptin secretion in rat adipocytes: evidence for a regional specific regulation by sex steroid hormones.
Endocrinology
140
:
1567
–1574,
1999
42.
Qiu J, Ogus S, Lu R, Chehab FF: Transgenic mice overexpressing leptin accumulate adipose mass at an older, but not younger, age.
Endocrinology
142
:
348
–358,
2001
43.
Li H, Matheny M, Nicolson M, Tumer N, Scarpace PJ: Leptin gene expression increases with age independent of increasing adiposity in rats.
Diabetes
46
:
2035
–2039,
1997
44.
Luukkaa V, Pesonen U, Huhtaniemi I, Lehtonen A, Tilvis R, Tuomilehto J, Koulu M, Huupponen R: Inverse correlation between serum testosterone and leptin in men.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
83
:
3243
–3246,
1998
45.
Cohen PG: Aromatase, adiposity, aging and disease: the hypogonadal-metabolic-atherogenic-disease and aging connection.
Med Hypotheses
56
:
702
–708,
2001
46.
Tschop M, Heiman ML: Rodent obesity models: an overview.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes
109
:
307
–319,
2001
47.
Phillips GB, Pinkernell BH, Jing TY: The association of hypotestosteronemia with coronary artery disease in men.
Arterioscler Thromb
14
:
701
–706,
1994
48.
Heine PA, Taylor JA, Iwamoto GA, Lubahn DB, Cooke PS: Increased adipose tissue in male and female estrogen receptor-alpha knockout mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
97
:
12729
–12734,
2000
49.
Jones ME, Thorburn AW, Britt KL, Hewitt KN, Wreford NG, Proietto J, Oz OK, Leury BJ, Robertson KM, Yao S, Simpson ER: Aromatase-deficient (ArKO) mice have a phenotype of increased adiposity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
97
:
12735
–12740,
2000
50.
Fernandez-Real JM, Ricart W: Insulin resistance and chronic cardiovascular inflammatory syndrome.
Endocr Rev
24
:
278
–301,
2003