Advertisement

Increased Fat Mass Compensates for Insulin Resistance in Abdominal Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

A Positron-Emitting Tomography Study

  1. Kirsi A. Virtanen1,
  2. Patricia Iozzo12,
  3. Kirsti Hällsten1,
  4. Risto Huupponen34,
  5. Riitta Parkkola5,
  6. Tuula Janatuinen1,
  7. Fredrik Lönnqvist6,
  8. Tapio Viljanen1,
  9. Tapani Rönnemaa7,
  10. Peter Lönnroth8,
  11. Juhani Knuuti1,
  12. Ele Ferrannini29 and
  13. Pirjo Nuutila17
  1. 1Turku PET Centre, Turku, Finland
  2. 2Position Emission Tomography (PET) Laboratory, National Research Council Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
  3. 3Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Turku, Finland
  4. 4Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Kuopio and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  5. 5Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  6. 6Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  7. 7Department of Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  8. 8Department of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  9. 9Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kirsi Virtanen, Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52 20521, Turku, Finland. E-mail: kirsi.virtanen{at}utu.fi

Abstract

To evaluate the relative impact of abdominal obesity and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes on insulin action in skeletal muscle and fat tissue, we studied 61 men with (n = 31) or without (n = 30) diabetes, subgrouped into abdominally obese or nonobese according to the waist circumference. Adipose tissue depots were quantified by magnetic resonance imaging, and regional glucose uptake was measured using 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose/positron emission tomography during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Across groups, glucose uptake per unit tissue weight was higher in visceral (20.5 ± 1.4 μmol · min−1 · kg−1) than in abdominal (9.8 ± 0.9 μmol min−1 · kg−1, P < 0.001) or femoral (12.3 ± 0.6 μmol · min−1 · kg−1, P < 0.001) subcutaneous tissue and ∼40% lower than in skeletal muscle (33.1 ± 2.5 μmol · min−1 · kg−1, P < 0.0001). Abdominal obesity was associated with a marked reduction in glucose uptake per unit tissue weight in all fat depots and in skeletal muscle (P < 0.001 for all regions). Recent type 2 diabetes per se had little additional effect. In both intra-abdominal adipose (r = −0.73, P < 0.0001) and skeletal muscle (r = −0.53, P < 0.0001) tissue, glucose uptake was reciprocally related to intra-abdominal fat mass in a curvilinear fashion. When regional glucose uptake was multiplied by tissue mass, total glucose uptake per fat depot was similar irrespective of abdominal obesity or type 2 diabetes, and its contribution to whole-body glucose uptake increased by ∼40% in obese nondiabetic and nonobese diabetic men and was doubled in obese diabetic subjects. We conclude that 1) in abdominal obesity, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake rate is markedly reduced in skeletal muscle and in all fat depots; 2) in target tissues, this reduction is reciprocally (and nonlinearly) related to the amount of intra-abdominal fat; 3) mild, recent diabetes adds little insulin resistance to that caused by abdominal obesity; and 4) despite fat insulin resistance, an expanded fat mass (especially subcutaneous) provides a sink for glucose, resulting in a compensatory attenuation of insulin resistance at the whole-body level in men.

Footnotes

    • Accepted June 2, 2005.
    • Received March 21, 2005.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement