Increased Fat Mass Compensates for Insulin Resistance in Abdominal Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
A Positron-Emitting Tomography Study
- Kirsi A. Virtanen1,
- Patricia Iozzo12,
- Kirsti Hällsten1,
- Risto Huupponen34,
- Riitta Parkkola5,
- Tuula Janatuinen1,
- Fredrik Lönnqvist6,
- Tapio Viljanen1,
- Tapani Rönnemaa7,
- Peter Lönnroth8,
- Juhani Knuuti1,
- Ele Ferrannini29 and
- Pirjo Nuutila17
- 1Turku PET Centre, Turku, Finland
- 2Position Emission Tomography (PET) Laboratory, National Research Council Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
- 3Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Turku, Finland
- 4Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Kuopio and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- 5Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- 6Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 7Department of Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- 8Department of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 9Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kirsi Virtanen, Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52 20521, Turku, Finland. E-mail: kirsi.virtanen{at}utu.fi
Abstract
To evaluate the relative impact of abdominal obesity and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes on insulin action in skeletal muscle and fat tissue, we studied 61 men with (n = 31) or without (n = 30) diabetes, subgrouped into abdominally obese or nonobese according to the waist circumference. Adipose tissue depots were quantified by magnetic resonance imaging, and regional glucose uptake was measured using 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose/positron emission tomography during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Across groups, glucose uptake per unit tissue weight was higher in visceral (20.5 ± 1.4 μmol · min−1 · kg−1) than in abdominal (9.8 ± 0.9 μmol min−1 · kg−1, P < 0.001) or femoral (12.3 ± 0.6 μmol · min−1 · kg−1, P < 0.001) subcutaneous tissue and ∼40% lower than in skeletal muscle (33.1 ± 2.5 μmol · min−1 · kg−1, P < 0.0001). Abdominal obesity was associated with a marked reduction in glucose uptake per unit tissue weight in all fat depots and in skeletal muscle (P < 0.001 for all regions). Recent type 2 diabetes per se had little additional effect. In both intra-abdominal adipose (r = −0.73, P < 0.0001) and skeletal muscle (r = −0.53, P < 0.0001) tissue, glucose uptake was reciprocally related to intra-abdominal fat mass in a curvilinear fashion. When regional glucose uptake was multiplied by tissue mass, total glucose uptake per fat depot was similar irrespective of abdominal obesity or type 2 diabetes, and its contribution to whole-body glucose uptake increased by ∼40% in obese nondiabetic and nonobese diabetic men and was doubled in obese diabetic subjects. We conclude that 1) in abdominal obesity, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake rate is markedly reduced in skeletal muscle and in all fat depots; 2) in target tissues, this reduction is reciprocally (and nonlinearly) related to the amount of intra-abdominal fat; 3) mild, recent diabetes adds little insulin resistance to that caused by abdominal obesity; and 4) despite fat insulin resistance, an expanded fat mass (especially subcutaneous) provides a sink for glucose, resulting in a compensatory attenuation of insulin resistance at the whole-body level in men.
- FFA, free fatty acid
- [18F]FDG, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- PET, positron emission tomography
- ROI, region of interest
Footnotes
-
- Accepted June 2, 2005.
- Received March 21, 2005.
- DIABETES











