OBJECTIVE To investigate whether a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the mitochondrial gene for NADH dehydrogenase 2 (mt-Nd2) can modulate susceptibility to type 1 diabetes in NOD mice.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS NOD/ShiLtJ mice conplastic for the alloxan resistant (ALR)/Lt-derived mt-Nd2a allele (NOD.mtALR) were created and compared with standard NOD (carrying the mt-Nd2c allele) for susceptibility to spontaneous autoimmune diabetes, or to diabetes elicited by reciprocal adoptive splenic leukocyte transfers, as well as by adoptive transfer of diabetogenic T-cell clones. β-Cell lines derived from either the NOD (NIT-1) or the NOD.mtALR (NIT-4) were also created to compare their susceptibility to cytolysis by diabetogenic CD8+ T-cells in vitro.
RESULTS NOD mice differing at this single SNP developed spontaneous or adoptively transferred diabetes at comparable rates and percentages. However, conplastic mice with the mt-Nd2a allele exhibited resistance to transfer of diabetes by the CD4+ T-cell clone BDC 2.5 as well as the CD8+ AI4 T-cell clones from T-cell receptor transgenic animals. NIT-4 cells with mt-Nd2a were also more resistant to AI4-mediated destruction in vitro than NIT-1 cells.
CONCLUSIONS Conplastic introduction into NOD mice of a variant mt-Nd2 allele alone was not sufficient to prevent spontaneous autoimmune diabetes. Subtle nonhematopoietic type 1 diabetes resistance was observed during adoptive transfer experiments with T-cell clones. This study confirms that genetic polymorphisms in mitochondria can modulate β-cell sensitivity to autoimmune T-cell effectors.
Type 1 diabetes is a complex disease regulated by multiple genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors. In both human and animal models, genetic contributions to autoimmune diabetes have been linked to loci both in the nuclear as well as in mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) (1–5). While mtDNA polymorphisms can severely impair energy metabolism and lead to diabetes (6), only a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the mitochondrial gene for NADH dehydrogenase 2 (mt-ND2) has been associated with autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice and in humans (3–5).
Crossing the genetically related diabetes-prone NOD/ShiLt and diabetes-resistant alloxan resistant (ALR)/Lt mouse models (7,8) we previously mapped ALR-derived resistance against spontaneous diabetes to three nuclear loci and, by reciprocal outcrosses, to a mtDNA SNP in mt-Nd2 (4). ALR mice were selected for resistance to alloxan, a free radical generator and selective β-cell toxin (7). This selection process resulted in mice with unusually elevated cellular defenses both systemically and at the islet level, providing resistance to both free radicals (9,10) and autoimmune effectors (5,11). In an additional genetic study to define loci or genes that provided diabetes resistance at the β-cell level, the ALR-derived mt-Nd2a was significantly associated with resistance against alloxan-induced diabetes (9,12).
Sequence analysis of mtDNA revealed a SNP that distinguishes the ALR strain from NOD and all other strains whose mtDNA has been sequenced (5,13). ALR mice harbor a C to A nucleotide transversion and an amino acid substitution from leucine to methionine (5). In humans, there is a corresponding C to A SNP in mt-ND2 resulting in an identical amino acid substitution. The human mt-ND2c allele has also been reported to persist at a higher frequency in patients than control subjects (3). Allelism in mt-ND2a was initially proposed to alter scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (3). However, our studies did not substantiate a role in ROS dissipation, but rather we have established that the resistance allele of this gene reduces basal mitochondrial ROS production by ∼30% (14,15). Hence, it might be predicted that this change in mitochondrial ROS may significantly alter β-cell death. In the present study, we confirm that mt-Nd2a protects against β-cell death mediated by single T-cell clones but not against the full array of autoimmune effector mechanisms.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
NOD/ShiLtJ (NOD), ALR/LtJ (ALR), NOD.mtALR (15), and NOD.129S7(B6)-Rag1tm1Mom/J (NOD-Rag1) were bred in our mouse facility. Immunodeficient conplastic mice, NOD.mtALR-Rag1, were created by mating NOD.mtALR females to male NOD-Rag1, followed by backcrossing to NOD-Rag1 males and selecting mice homozygous for the disrupted allele of Rag1. To ensure the comparability of recipients for diabetogenic T-cells, we created an immunodeficient ALR/LtJ [ALR-Rag1] by outcrossing to NOD-Rag1 and then backcrossing for 10 generations to ALR. The congenic interval is from D2Mit15 to D2mit190. Genotyping for Rag1−/− was performed as described (www.jax.org). NOD.Cg-Tg(Ins2-TAg)1Lt Prkdcscid/DvsJ [NOD.RIP-Tag], NOD.Cg-Rag1tm1MomTg(TcraAI4)1Dvs/DvsJ [NOD-AI4a], and NOD.Cg-Rag1tm1MomTg(TcrbAI4)1Dvs/DvsJ [NOD-AI4b] were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and bred in our mouse facility. F1 hybrid progeny from matings of NOD-AI4a with NOD-AI4b [NOD-AI4a/b] develop diabetes at 3–5 weeks of age. All mice were housed in specific pathogen-free facilities and approved by the relevant institution's Animal Care and Use Committee.
Monitoring for spontaneous autoimmune diabetes onset and histological analysis.
Female and male mice were monitored for diabetes onset as previously described (4). For histological studies, pancreata were removed from female mice and fixed, embedded, and scored for insulitis as previously described (4,11).
Splenocytes from donor mice (diabetic female NOD, diabetic female NOD.mtALR, or young [3–5 weeks old] NOD-AI4a/b F1 hybrids) were collected, had the erythrocytes removed using hypotonic solution treatment, and were injected intravenously (tail vein) at 2 × 107 cells/mouse into age-matched female recipients (NOD-Rag1, ALR-Rag1 or NOD.mtALR-Rag1). For BDC2.5 T-cell clone transfers (kindly provided by Dr. Katie Haskins, University of Colorado, Denver), cells were prepared and injected as previously described into NOD, NOD.mtALR, or ALR/LtJ mice (16). Mice were followed for diabetes development after injection as described previously (11).
Generation of β-cell lines and cell-mediated lysis.
A novel β-cell line NIT-4 was derived in a similar fashion to NIT-1 (17) by mating NOD.mtALR females to NOD-RIP-Tag males. Islets were isolated from an 8-week-old female F1 offspring, dissociated, and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium modified for NIT-1 culture (17). Colonies were picked using cell cloning rings. NIT-1 and NIT-4 cells were genotyped for mt-Nd2 by pyrosequencing as described previously (5) (supplementary Fig. 1 in the online appendix available at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/db10-1241/DC1). For the included experiments, NIT-1 and NIT-4 cells were used at passage numbers P11-P20 and cultured as described (17). To test the sensitivity of β-cell lines to killing by AI4 T-cells in vitro, cell-mediated lysis (CML) assays were performed and calculated as described previously (18).
Survival analysis and Student t test were performed using Prizm-v5a (GraphPad Software, LaJolla, CA).
The mt-Nd2a allele alone does not affect the overall incidence of spontaneous diabetes in NOD mice.
Comparable rates of type 1 diabetes incidence were recorded for NOD and NOD.mtALR (Fig. 1). Although there was a trend toward slower incidence in male NOD.mtALR, the difference was not significant. A study of insulitis development in female NOD and NOD.mtALR mice from 4 to 16 weeks of age was also performed. Consistent with diabetes incidence, there were no differences in the histological scores comparing age-matched NOD with NOD.mtALR mice (data not shown).
Adoptive transfer of splenic leukocytes.
To identify effects of mt-Nd2a on immune functions versus an effect on pancreatic β-cells, reciprocal adoptive transfers were performed. Donors were either diabetic NOD females or diabetic NOD.mtALR females. All recipients were age-matched immunodeficient Rag1−/− females separately expressing each mt-Nd2 allotype. Neither allotype expressed by mitochondria in splenocytes from diabetic donors significantly affected adoptive transfer (Fig. 2). Similarly, the mt-Nd2 allotype expressed by the recipients had no significant effect on the adoptive transfer kinetics regardless of the allotype expressed by the transferred leukocytes. Thus, in the absence of other ALR-protective nuclear genes, the ALR-derived mt-Nd2a allele cannot deviate the attack mediated by the plethora of autoreactive T-cells present in spleens of diabetic donors.
Adoptive transfer study using diabetogenic CD8+ T-cells.
All NOD-Rag1 recipients developed diabetes after transfer of activated AI4a/b CD8+ T-cells (Fig. 3A). Not surprisingly, ALR-Rag1 mice were resistant to disease transfer by AI4 T-cells (Fig. 3A), consistent with published data showing that ALR/LtJ islets resist lysis by AI4 cells (11). NOD.mtALR-Rag1 mice, although clearly susceptible to AI4-mediated diabetes transfer, nevertheless exhibited a statistically significant retardation in disease development compared with NOD-Rag1 controls (P = 0.0036). Thus, when the T-cell attack is limited to recognition of a single β-cell autoantigen (AI4 recognizes an epitope of dystonia myotonica kinase), the ALR-derived mitochondrial genome confers some resistance, albeit incomplete in the absence of additional protective ALR-derived nuclear genes.
The only known genetic difference between NIT-1 and NIT-4 cell lines is the derivation of the mitochondrial population from ALR/Lt in the latter line. SNP typing has confirmed that the latter has the mt-Nd2a allele and NIT-1 has the mt-Nd2c allele (supplementary Fig. 1). NIT-1 cells were killed by activated AI4a/b CD8+ T-cells in a dose-dependent fashion whereas NIT-4 cells were resistant (Fig. 3B). Live cell confocal microscopy time series confirmed the susceptibility of NIT-1 cells to AI4-mediated killing as well as the resistance of NIT-4 cells to AI4-mediated lysis (supplementary Videos 2–5). However, priming NIT-4 cells with γ-interferon (IFN-γ) for 24 h before adding AI4-effector cells resulted in heightened sensitivity. We observed no statistical difference comparing the CML results of IFN-γ–treated NIT-1 and NIT-4 cells (Fig. 3C).
Adoptive transfer of cloned diabetogenic BDC2.5 CD4+ T-cell clones.
The diabetogenic CD4+ T-cell clone BDC2.5 transferred diabetes to all NOD mice within 5 days (Fig. 4). In marked contrast to NOD mice, all ALR and NOD.mtALR mice remained diabetes free after transfer of BDC2.5 cells for the 28-day follow-up period. This confirms that when the T-effector population is limited to a single β-cell autoantigen a significant contribution to resistance can be demonstrated.
Autoimmune diabetes is a polygenic disease. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and numerous non-MHC IDD/type 1 diabetes/Idd loci have been mapped in humans as well as rat and mouse models (rev. in 2). However, although multiple type 1 diabetes susceptibility and resistance loci have been identified, only a few of the responsible genes have been identified, and for the genes identified as responsible, the mechanism of action has yet to be elucidated. Using backcross and F2 hybrid breeding strategies in mouse models, we mapped the A allele of a SNP in the mitochondrially encoded mt-Nd2 gene as protective against both autoimmune and alloxan-induced free radical–mediated diabetes. These data suggested that the mt-Nd2a allotype provided protection at the β-cell level with ROS resistance as a potential mechanism (14). The current finding that substitution of the NOD allotype with its protective ALR/Lt counterpart failed to prevent spontaneous diabetes in NOD.mtALR mice (Fig. 1) is consistent with our previous observation with the alloxan model (9). This is not surprising given the complexity of autoimmune diabetes. In both the autoimmune (4) and alloxan-induced diabetes models (9), we identified multiple resistance loci, including mt-Nd2a. The specific interaction of mt-Nd2a with nuclear loci would provide a model to study genetic interactions between the two cellular genomes—nuclear and mitochondrial.
Because protection against diabetes was not observed when the mt-Nd2 SNP was substituted with its protective counterpart, we assessed subphenotypes in which this SNP could influence disease. Immune cell profiles were strikingly similar when comparing the two strains (supplementary Fig. 2), suggesting that this SNP does not affect immune cell development. To isolate any effect of this SNP within immune cells, we used reciprocal adoptive transfers. These transfer experiments demonstrated no statistically significant differences in diabetes onset (Fig. 2), suggesting that this SNP does not affect immune cell function. However, when we challenged mice with single diabetogenic T-cell clones (either the CD8+ AI4 or the CD4+ BDC2.5), mice with the mt-Nd2a allele responded differently than those with the mt-Nd2c allele. NOD.mtALR-Rag1 mice were more resistant to disease onset after the transfer of either diabetogenic T-cell clonotype (Figs. 3 and 4), suggesting this SNP modifies type 1 diabetes through nonhematopoietic factors.
CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes destroy pancreatic β-cells directly by recognition of autoantigens in the context of class I MHC and initiation of cytotoxicity by fatty acid synthase (FAS)-Ligand/FAS pathways and release of granzyme and perforin (19). Subtle changes in mitochondrial pathways downstream of these death pathways may explain the partial resistance to transfer of diabetes by AI4 T-cells to mt-Nd2a encoding NOD-mtALR-Rag1 mice. Likewise, when preactivated diabetogenic CD8+ AI4 T-cells were combined with β-cells in vitro the NOD-derived β-cell line NIT-1 was killed (Fig. 3B and supplementary Video 2), yet NIT-4 with the mt-Nd2a allele were resistant (Fig. 3B and supplementary Video 4). Resistance was eliminated when target β-cell lines were primed with IFN-γ before adding AI4 cells (Fig. 3C). IFN-γ priming induces MHC class I and FAS on the β-cell surface (20). The change that mt-Nd2a exerts on mitochondrial function through ROS modulation may alter ROS-dependent signaling of death receptor pathways as manifested as resistance of NIT-4 to autoreactive CD8+ AI4 cells in vitro and retarded disease transfer by AI4 in vivo. However, the resistance conferred by this SNP at the β-cell level is overridden by IFN-γ priming.
Unlike CD8+ T-cells, BDC2.5 CD4+ T-cells do not directly kill β-cells, such that killing is cytokine-dependent (21). Upon transfer into recipient mice, BDC2.5 T-cells require activation to initiate pancreatic β-cell destruction. β-Cell expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 1(TNFR1)-P50 is critical for activation of BDC2.5 cells (22). When these diabetogenic CD4+ T-cells were transferred to recipient mice, endogenous macrophages were recruited to the pancreas and activated to secrete cytokines (21). These cytokines include TNF-α. TNF-α induces both apoptosis and necrosis of cells through the TNFR1 (rev. in 23). During TNFR-induced cell death, mitochondria participate in a series of events including generating truncated BID locally, releasing cytochrome C, activating downstream caspases, and producing ROS (23). ROS production by mitochondria is an early event in TNFR-induced cell death (23). Therefore, mitochondrial participation through ROS production is likely indispensable in BDC2.5-mediated β-cell killing. The fact that a ROS scavenger inhibits the transfer of diabetes by BDC 2.5 clones (16) implicates ROS as mediators of β-cell death induced by BDC2.5.
In the current study, a substitution of a SNP in mitochondrially encoded mt-Nd2 cannot alter the overall spontaneous diabetes in NOD mice. However, subtle changes caused by this SNP (15) account for the greater resistance of the NOD.mtALR mice to BDC2.5 and AI4-mediated diabetes. In conclusion, this study confirms that genetic polymorphisms in mitochondria can modulate β-cell sensitivity to autoimmune T-cell effectors and raises the possibility that the mt-ND2a allotype in humans may provide similar protection.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants DK074656 and AI56374 (to C.E.M.), DK36175 and DK27722 (to E.H.L.), as well as by grants from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
J.C. and C.E.M. designed the research plan, performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. A.M.G. performed experiments and revised the manuscript. J.P. performed the BDC2.5 adoptive transfers. E.H.L. participated in the experimental design and edited the manuscript.
Parts of this study were presented in abstract form at the 70th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Orlando, Florida, 25–29 June 2010.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- Received September 2, 2010.
- Accepted October 12, 2010.
- © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association.
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.