The CTRB1/2 Locus Affects Diabetes Susceptibility and Treatment via the Incretin Pathway
- Leen M. ‘t Hart1,2⇑,
- Andreas Fritsche3,
- Giel Nijpels4,5,
- Nienke van Leeuwen1,
- Louise A. Donnelly6,
- Jacqueline M. Dekker4,7,
- Marjan Alssema4,
- Joao Fadista8,
- Françoise Carlotti9,
- Anette P. Gjesing10,
- Colin N.A. Palmer6,
- Timon W. van Haeften11,
- Silke A. Herzberg-Schäfer3,
- Annemarie M.C. Simonis-Bik12,
- Jeanine J. Houwing-Duistermaat13,
- Quinta Helmer13,
- Joris Deelen2,
- Bruno Guigas1,14,
- Torben Hansen10,15,
- Fausto Machicao3,
- Gonneke Willemsen16,
- Robert J. Heine4,17,
- Mark H.H. Kramer18,
- Jens J. Holst19,
- Eelco J.P. de Koning9,20,21,
- Hans-Ulrich Häring3,
- Oluf Pedersen10,22,
- Leif Groop8,
- Eco J.C. de Geus4,16,
- P. Eline Slagboom2,23,
- Dorret I. Boomsma16,
- Elisabeth M.W. Eekhoff12,
- Ewan R. Pearson6 and
- Michaela Diamant12
- 1Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- 2Section of Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- 3Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angiology, Nephrology, and Clinical Chemistry, Department of Internal Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Member of the German Centre for Diabetes Research (DZD), Tübingen, Germany
- 4The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 5Department of General Practice, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 6Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Medicine, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, U.K.
- 7Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 8Lund University Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Diabetes, and Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- 9Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- 10The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Section of Metabolic Genetics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 11Department of Internal Medicine, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- 12Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 13Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- 14Department of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- 15Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- 16Department of Biological Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 17Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
- 18Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 19The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 20Department of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- 21Hubrecht Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- 22Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
- 23Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Corresponding author: Leen M. ‘t Hart, .
A.F., G.N., N.v.L., D.I.B., E.M.W.E., E.R.P., and M.D. contributed equally to this study.
The incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) promotes glucose homeostasis and enhances β-cell function. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, which inhibit the physiological inactivation of endogenous GLP-1, are used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Using the Metabochip, we identified three novel genetic loci with large effects (30–40%) on GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion during hyperglycemic clamps in nondiabetic Caucasian individuals (TMEM114; CHST3 and CTRB1/2; n = 232; all P ≤ 8.8 × 10−7). rs7202877 near CTRB1/2, a known diabetes risk locus, also associated with an absolute 0.51 ± 0.16% (5.6 ± 1.7 mmol/mol) lower A1C response to DPP-4 inhibitor treatment in G-allele carriers, but there was no effect on GLP-1 RA treatment in type 2 diabetic patients (n = 527). Furthermore, in pancreatic tissue, we show that rs7202877 acts as expression quantitative trait locus for CTRB1 and CTRB2, encoding chymotrypsinogen, and increases fecal chymotrypsin activity in healthy carriers. Chymotrypsin is one of the most abundant digestive enzymes in the gut where it cleaves food proteins into smaller peptide fragments. Our data identify chymotrypsin in the regulation of the incretin pathway, development of diabetes, and response to DPP-4 inhibitor treatment.
The incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is released after a meal by L cells in the distal parts of the gastrointestinal tract, and it potentiates glucose-dependent insulin secretion by the pancreas, which is known as the incretin effect. Furthermore, it reduces glucagon secretion and exerts beneficial effects on gut motility, satiety, and food intake (reviewed in 1,2). Based on these functions and the impaired incretin effect in type 2 diabetic patients, two novel incretin-based classes of glucose-lowering drugs have been developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (1). These include injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), which provide pharmacological levels of GLP-1, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, which inhibit the physiological inactivation of endogenous GLP-1. The enzyme DPP-4 rapidly inactivates endogenous GLP-1 by cleavage of the two NH2-terminal amino acids (1–4). In addition to their direct insulinotropic effects on the pancreas, injectable GLP-1 RAs, like endogenous GLP-1, lower blood glucose by inhibiting glucagon secretion and slow down gastric emptying in a glucose-dependent manner. Also, GLP-1 RAs promote satiety and weight loss. All these actions contribute to their therapeutic efficacy (1–4). Similarly, oral DPP-4 inhibitors lower blood glucose by stimulating insulin and inhibiting glucagon secretion but are considered weight neutral (1,4). Importantly, the treatment response to compounds of either drug class varies widely, and it is conceivable that both environmental and genetic factors may underlie these differences.
Previously, we showed that during hyperglycemic clamps, the insulin response to intravenous GLP-1 stimulation was affected by genetic factors (5) with an estimated heritability of 0.53 (0.33–0.70) (6). These findings indicate that genetic factors exert substantial effects on GLP-1–induced insulin response and, as a consequence, may affect an individual’s response to the GLP-1–based therapies.
In the current study, the Metabochip (200k single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) was used to identify genetic variants affecting GLP-1–induced insulin secretion during hyperglycemic clamps in 232 nondiabetic participants from two independent populations, the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) and the German Tübingen cohort (7,8). Subsequently, the influence of associated SNPs was tested on response to GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 inhibitor treatment in type 2 diabetic patients (n = 527) from the Netherlands (Diabetes Care System [DCS] West-Friesland) (9) and the U.K. (GoDARTS) (10). Finally, gene expression in the pancreas and pancreatic islets and functional tests in healthy volunteers were performed to further elucidate potential underlying mechanisms.
Our studies identify rs7202877 near CTRB1 and CTRB2, which both encode the digestive enzyme chymotrypsin, in the regulation of the incretin pathway, development of diabetes, and response to DPP-4 inhibitor treatment.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Study subjects and experimental procedures
Hyperglycemic clamp cohort.
We included 232 Caucasian subjects from two independent studies in the Netherlands and Germany. There were 126 subjects from the NTR, including 69 monozygotic (MZ) and 29 dizygotic twins as well as 28 of their nontwin siblings recruited from 54 families (120 normal glucose tolerant [NGT] and 6 impaired glucose tolerant [IGT]) (7). The German cohort consisted of 73 participants with NGT and 33 participants with IGT who were all unrelated (8). Clinical characteristics of both cohorts are given in Supplementary Table 1. All studies were approved by the local medical ethics review board, all subjects gave written informed consent, and the studies were performed according to the principles of the declaration of Helsinki.
All subjects underwent a modified hyperglycemic clamp with glucose and GLP-1 as previously described (11). In brief, subjects received a priming infusion of glucose to acutely raise blood glucose levels to 10 mmol/L. Variable glucose infusions were used to keep glucose levels constant throughout the whole procedure. After the 2nd hour, insulin secretion was further stimulated using intravenous GLP-1 infusion (4.5 pmol/kg bolus for 1 min at t = 120 followed by a continuous infusion of 1.5 pmol · kg−1 · min−1 for 1 h). In the Dutch NTR twin cohort, slightly lower GLP-1 concentrations were used (1.5 pmol/kg and 0.5 pmol · kg−1 · min−1, respectively). The near maximal insulin response was tested by injecting a bolus of 5 g arginine hydrochloride at t = 180 min. First and second phase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), insulin sensitivity index (ISI), and disposition index (DI) were calculated as described previously (7). GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion was measured as the incremental area under the curve during the last 20 min of the glucose + GLP-1 stimulation (t = 160–180). In order to increase the power and robustness of the analysis of GSIS in carriers of SNPs associated with GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion, we included another 216 subjects from two Dutch cohorts (Hoorn and Utrecht study cohorts) who underwent an identical hyperglycemic clamp but without the additional GLP-1 stimulation. Details of these cohorts can be found in ’t Hart et al. (7) and Supplementary Table 1.
Pharmacogenetic study cohort.
Type 2 diabetic patients participating in this study were from the Dutch DCS West-Friesland (n = 7,515) (9) and the U.K. Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research Tayside Scotland cohort (GoDARTS, n = 8,000+) (10). Patients were included in the current study if they were Caucasian and treated with either a GLP-1 RA or a DPP-4 inhibitor for at least 3 months (n = 527). In DCS, 22 patients were treated with a GLP-1 RA and another 49 patients with a DPP-4 inhibitor. In GoDARTS, 151 patients were treated with a GLP1-RA and another 305 patients were treated with a DPP-4 inhibitor. Patient characteristics of both study cohorts are depicted in Supplementary Table 2. Baseline A1C was defined as the measurement closest to the initiation of treatment (maximum 12 [DCS] or 6 [GoDARTS] months before). On treatment, A1C was defined as the minimum A1C measure between 3 and 24 (DCS) or 18 (GoDARTS) months after therapy initiation.
Metabochip genotyping and quality control.
All subjects participating in the hyperglycemic clamp study were genotyped using the Metabochip (www.illumina.com). The Metabochip was designed for replication (n = ∼66.000 SNPs) and fine mapping of regions on the genome (n = ∼120,000 SNPs) that have previously been associated with cardiovascular and/or metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes (12). Our analyses focused on the 66,000 SNPs for replication/follow-up. GenomeStudio software (Illumina, Inc., Eindhoven, the Netherlands) was used to visualize the data and SNP calling. For quality control (QC), we used a cutoff for the genotyping call rate of 95%, a minor allele frequency (MAF) in the combined cohort of 0.05, and the P value cutoff for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was set at 10−4. In total, 13.0% (8,465) of the SNPs on the Metabochip where monomorphic or had a MAF <0.05, and another 5.4% (3,526) of the SNPs failed the other QC criteria. In total, 53,354 SNPs passed QC, which is comparable to previous reports (12). We computed the genomic inflation factor (λ) as previously described (12,13). Given the low λ of 1.014 (Supplementary Fig. 1), the test statistics were not further adjusted.
The top loci (P ≤ 1 × 10−4) were visually inspected for SNPs with a low number of homozygous mutant alleles (n < 5), and these SNPs were subsequently reanalyzed using a carrier model (11 vs. 12 + 22). The Sequenom MassARRAY iPlex Gold platform (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA) was used for validation genotyping of our top SNPs and one proxy for each of them (r2 >0.9) and for two samples that failed QC on the Metabochip (concordance >99.9%). Taqman SNP genotyping assays (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, the Netherlands) were used to genotype subjects participating in the other studies except for the GoDARTS pharmacogenetic study where data were extracted from a genome-wide association study and Metabochip dataset (14).
Gene expression studies.
Human cadaveric donor pancreata (n = 35) were procured through a multiorgan donor program. Tissue samples from the pancreata were used in the study if research consent was present and pancreata could not be used in clinical β-cell therapy programs according to national laws. Tissue samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Tissues were first incubated overnight in RNAlater-ICE (Life Technologies), and subsequently RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). Gene expression was quantified using Taqman gene expression assays (Life Technologies). The β-2-microglobulin (B2M, Hs00984230_m1) gene was used as reference, but similar data were obtained when using other housekeeping genes such as GAPDH or ACTB. CTRB gene expression was tested using a probe detecting both copies of the gene (Hs00157181_m1), and BCAR1 was detected with probe Hs01547079_m1. Expression levels were given as arbitrary units relative to the expression of B2M.
Islets from cadaver donors (n = 45) were provided by the Nordic Islet Transplantation Program (http://www.nordicislets.org). Purity of islets was assessed as described previously (15). RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the standard Illumina mRNA-Seq protocol, and sequencing was performed in an Illumina HiSEq 2000 machine. The FASTQ output files generated were then aligned to the human reference genome (UCSC hg19) with TopHat (16). The annotated GTF transcript and fasta genome files were from University of California, Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, California) and were downloaded from http://cufflinks.cbcb.umd.edu/igenomes.html. Gene expression was then considered as the normalized sum of expression of all its exons. The htseq count script (http://www-huber.embl.de/users/anders/HTSeq/doc/count.html) was used by counting uniquely mapped reads in each exon using the mode “intersection-nonempty.” Gene expression normalization was then performed using the trimmed mean of M values (TMM) method (17), and further normalization was applied by adjusting the expression to gene length.
Chymotrypsin activity study.
In order to quantify chymotrypsin activity in carriers and noncarriers of rs7202877 near CTRB1/2 we used stool samples from 40 carriers of the G allele and 40 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched noncarriers, which were all unrelated. They were nondiabetic German subjects at increased risk for type 2 diabetes (positive family history and overweight) participating in an ongoing intervention study using different types of lifestyle interventions. Clinical characteristics of this study group are given in Supplementary Table 3. A fresh stool sample was collected prior to participation in the intervention study and immediately frozen at −80°C. Fecal chymotrypsin activity was measured using a standard procedure first described by Kaspar et al. (18). Chymotrypsin activity is expressed as units per gram stool at 25°C. Sensitivity of chymotrypsin activity for proteolysis by human DPP-4 has been tested after a 30-min preincubation of the stool suspension (10 μL) with or without 0.1 units of DPP-4 (BPS Biosciences, San Diego, CA) in a total volume of 40 μL of 50 mmol/L Tris buffer (pH 7.5) at 37°C.
If necessary, outcome variables were log transformed prior to analysis to obtain normality. To take into account the family relatedness in the twin sample, we used linear generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assuming additive models in Bioconductor R (GEEpack, www.bioconductor.org). The analyses of glucose and GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, study center, glucose tolerance status (NGT/IGT), and ISI. For the analysis of ISI and DI, ISI was removed from the covariates. Additional adjustment for the prevailing insulin levels did not alter our results (data not shown). For the MZ twin pairs, we used the mean of the individual β-cell responses and covariates for both twins in a pair. This approach yields similar results compared with the inclusion of one randomly chosen twin from an MZ pair. GEE (SPSS, Inc., Amsterdam, the Netherlands) was also used to calculate the estimated means adjusted for the above-mentioned covariates. We computed the genomic inflation factor (Supplementary Fig. 1) using SNPs included for the QT interval as previously described (12,13). Quantile-quantile plots were constructed using Bioconductor R (SNPmatrix, www.bioconductor.org). LocusZoom was used to generate regional association plots of the loci of interest (19). The study-wide significance threshold was set at P < 9 × 10−7 based on the number of SNPs tested in this study (53,000).
Efficacy of GLP-1–based treatment in type 2 diabetic patients was tested by linear regression analysis. The difference between baseline and the lowest on treatment A1C measurement or the lowest on treatment A1C itself was used as the dependent variable. Age, sex, BMI, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were obtained at baseline. In order to take into account the possible effects of other glucose-lowering medication, which in some cases was discontinued at initiation of GLP-1–based therapy, we used “stopped medication” (yes/no) as additional covariate. In addition to the above-mentioned covariates, time between baseline and treatment A1C, diabetes duration, and dose of GLP-1–based drugs were considered as other potential covariates. For DPP-4 inhibitor users, a stepwise regression analysis showed significant effects of baseline A1C, time between baseline and treatment A1C, stopped other medication, and BMI as significant covariates in the model, and these were subsequently included together with the genotype. BMI was no longer a significant predictor in those using a GLP-1 RA and was thus dropped from the model. For meta-analysis of the results obtained in the two separate cohorts, we used CMA version 2 software (www.meta-analysis.com).
A paired Student t test was used to compare differences in fecal chymotrypsin activity between age-, sex-, and BMI-matched carriers and noncarriers of rs7202877. Fecal chymotrypsin activity was logarithmically transformed prior to analysis to obtain normality. For the above statistical analyses, SPSS version 20 (SPSS, Inc.) was used, and a P ≤ 0.05 was regarded significant unless stated otherwise.
GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion.
Three loci showed genome or study-wide significance for association with the magnitude of GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion (all P ≤ 8.8 × 10−7) (Table 1). The regional plots for each locus are given in Supplementary Fig. 2. To check the robustness of the associations, we also analyzed the data from Dutch and German subjects separately and found that the effect sizes and directions were comparable (all P ≤ 1 × 10−3).
At chromosome 10q22.1, several SNPs showed evidence for association, with rs4148941 being genome-wide significant. rs4148941 is located in the 3′ untranslated region of the second exon of the CHST3 gene. However, the linkage disequilibrium (LD) block also includes the nearby genes SPOCK2 and ASCC1. Carriers of the C allele at rs4148941 (MAF = 0.39) had a 32% reduced GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion (P = 3.9 × 10−8). Our second signal is represented by rs7202633, which is located on chromosome 16p13.2, 84 kb upstream of TMEM114 (P = 2.0 × 10−7). Homozygous carriers of the minor allele of rs7202633 (MAF = 0.44) had an almost twofold increased response during stimulation with GLP-1. Finally the third most significant locus was tagged by rs7202877 near CTRB1, CTRB2, and BCAR1 (MAF = 0.11) at chromosome 16q23.1, which has recently been identified as a locus that protects from type 2 diabetes (13). Subjects carrying the G allele showed a 33% increased GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion (P = 1.9 × 10−6). To check whether these SNPs also associate with other measures of β-cell function, we also examined the effect of these SNPs on response to glucose- and arginine-stimulated insulin secretion. rs7202633 near TMEM114 also showed an increased response to arginine stimulation during hyperglycemia (P = 5.6 × 10−4), but none of these SNPs were significantly associated with GSIS (all P > 0.01) (Supplementary Table 4).
GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 inhibitor treatment study in type 2 diabetic patients.
In total, 527 patients were included, from the Dutch DCS West-Friesland and the U.K. GoDARTS studies (Supplementary Table 2). In both cohorts, patients carrying the G allele of rs7202877 near CTRB1/2 showed a significantly smaller decrease in A1C levels after DPP-4 inhibitor treatment compared with TT carriers (n = 354) (Table 2 and Supplementary Tables 5–7). Meta-analysis of both cohorts showed that carriers of the G allele had an absolute 0.51 ± 0.16% (5.6 ± 1.7 mmol/mol) smaller decrease in A1C after adjustment for potential confounders (P = 0.0015) (Table 2). None of the other two loci showed significant association with DPP-4 inhibitor treatment response. In type 2 diabetic patients treated with a GLP-1 RA (n = 173), none of the SNPs showed a significant association; although rs4148941, located in CHST3, showed a trend toward lower treatment response in C-allele carriers (0.24 ± 0.13% [2.6 ± 1.4 mmol/mol]; P = 0.08) (Table 2 and Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). In contrast to those treated with a DPP-4 inhibitor, carriers of the rs7202877 G allele treated with a GLP-1 RA showed a response comparable to carriers of the TT genotype (P = 0.58) (Table 2). There were no significant SNP × drug interactions.
Given the results described above and the overlap with genetic loci for type 1 (20) and type 2 (13) diabetes, we focused our next steps on rs7202877 at chromosome 16q23.1. rs7202877 is located ∼6 kb from the start of both CTRB1 and CTRB2, which both encode for the digestive enzyme chymotrypsinogen, and ∼54 kb from BCAR1 encoding breast cancer antiestrogen resistance-1 (Supplementary Fig. 3).
Gene expression in pancreas and islets.
In order to further elucidate the potential working mechanism, we examined whether rs7202877 acted as an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) by examining if it was associated with gene expression in RNA isolated from whole pancreas and isolated pancreatic islets. In 35 whole pancreata, the minor G allele at rs7202877 increases mRNA expression of CTRB1/2 (P = 0.01) but not BCAR1 (Fig. 1A). We next tested whether this SNP also acts as an eQTL in isolated islets from normal (n = 24) and hyperglycemic (n = 21) subjects. Using RNAseq data, we confirmed the observation from whole pancreatic tissue showing that the SNP also acts as an eQTL for CTRB1 and CTRB2 but not BCAR1 in islets, which was independent from A1C level, age, sex, and BMI (P ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 1B and C).
Chymotrypsin activity measurements.
Given the enhanced expression of both CTRB genes, we tested whether rs7202877 was associated with altered chymotrypsin activity. In an analysis of 40 carriers of the G allele, compared with 40 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched noncarriers, the rs7202877 G allele was associated with an increased chymotrypsin activity in stool samples (P = 0.023) (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, chymotrypsin has been identified as a target for DPP-4 in mice (21). A 30-min preincubation of the stool samples with 0.1 units of DPP-4 resulted in a small but significantly lower chymotrypsin activity in TT carriers but not in carriers of the G allele (−5.3% [P = 0.01] and −2.1% [P = 0.26], respectively) (Fig. 2B).
In a unique sample of deeply phenotyped subjects who received GLP-1 during a hyperglycemic clamp to measure insulin secretion, we identified three loci that influence GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion. The loci on chromosomes 10q22.1 (in CHST3 and near ASCC1 and SPOCK2) and 16p13.2 (near TMEM114) have not previously been implicated in β-cell function, type 2 diabetes susceptibility, or related phenotypes. However, in publically available gene expression data from the MuTHER consortium, rs4148941 acts as eQTL for CHST3 in lymphoblast cell lines (P = 5 × 10−51) and SPOCK2 in both adipose tissue (P = 1 × 10−21) and lymphoblast cell line (P = 3 × 10−4) (22). Given the additional trend toward association with GLP-1 RA treatment response in diabetic patients, further research is warranted to establish its role in diabetes development and treatment.
Previously, the G allele of rs7202877 near CTRB1/2 on chromosome 16q23.1 has been identified as a risk factor in a genome-wide association study for type 1 diabetes (20) and as a protective factor for development of type 2 diabetes (13). We now report positive effects of the G allele of rs7202877 on GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion, which likely explains the protective effect of this allele on type 2 diabetes susceptibility. Furthermore, we observed decreased glucose reduction in patients treated with DPP-4 inhibitors. Our observations are further supported by the fact that the SNP increases gene expression of CTRB1/2 in islets and pancreata and enzyme activity in stool, placing CTRB1/2 in a key role of the enteroendocrine system.
rs7202877 is located in an intergenic region between CTRB1 and CTRB2, encoding chymotrypsinogen B1 and B2, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3). In an in silico functional analysis using the regulome database, there is no known functional effect of rs7202877, indicated by a regulomeDB score of 5 (www.regulomedb.org) (23). At least 50 SNPs are in high LD (r2 >0.8) with rs7202877, some of which might affect gene expression but require further detailed study. The linkage disequilibrium block also encompasses the breast cancer antiestrogen resistance protein 1 gene (BCAR1); for which it has been shown that rs7202877 acts as an eQTL in blood (13), although this was not confirmed in the MuTHER consortium data (22). BCAR1 is ubiquitously expressed in many tissues, including the pancreas. However, given that the SNP acts as eQTL for CTRB1/2 but not BCAR1 in the pancreas and alters chymotrypsin activity in the gut, CTRB1 and CTRB2 are the most likely candidate genes in this region, although a role of BCAR1 cannot be excluded (24). The chymotrypsinogens (EC 184.108.40.206) belong to a family of serine proteases that are secreted by the pancreas into the gastrointestinal tract as inactive precursors, which are then activated by proteolytic cleavage with trypsin. Chymotrypsin cleaves food proteins into smaller peptides suitable for further digestion. Chymotrypsinogens are highly expressed in the exocrine pancreas, but expression in β-cells has also been shown (25), which is confirmed in this study and in INS1E cells. Interestingly, in a study in mice, chymotrypsin has been identified as a target for DPP-4 (21). A peptide fragment (VPAIQPVLTG) containing the DPP-4 H2N-Xaa-Pro consensus motif was found at a 10-fold higher level in gut tissue from DPP-4−/− versus DPP-4+/+ mice. Our in vitro findings, showing reduced chymotrypsin activity after preincubation with DPP-4, confirm this observation in humans and may add to the observed differences in chymotrypsin activity.
As previously shown, altered exposure of intestinal L cells to nutrients, resulting from changes in food composition, point of entry (after gastric bypass), rate of gastric emptying, and gut motility, may affect GLP-1 secretion (1,4,26). It could be hypothesized that the observed increase in fecal chymotrypsin activity may be associated with alterations in L-cell stimulation and/or gastric emptying as a result of increased nutrient digestion. However, incretin secretion during oral glucose tolerance test in nondiabetic subjects was not significantly different (n = 457) (Supplementary Table 8). It has been shown that oral treatment with chymotrypsin inhibitors slows gastric emptying and acutely reduces glucose and insulin levels after a meal in type 2 diabetic patients (27). Prolonged use of these inhibitors in a phase IIa cancer chemoprevention trial significantly reduced glucose levels in nondiabetic cancer patients (28). Interestingly, various vegetables, including potatoes and soybeans, contain high levels of trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitors, and high intake of soy has been associated with reduced risk of diabetes (29). These results support the observation that rs7202877 genotype, enhancing pancreatic chymotrypsin expression and enzyme activity in the gut, alters diabetes risk.
The divergent effect of rs7202877 on treatment response to DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 RA is intriguing. At present, our study design and sample size, especially regarding GLP-1 RA–treated subjects (∼50% power to detect an effect with similar size to the DPP-4 inhibitor group), does not allow us to establish the robustness of the difference in treatment response between GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 inhibitors and/or whether these findings have clinical consequences. To this end, a well-powered genotype-selected prospective clinical trial would be required. It is, however, of note that the G allele at rs7208277 has opposing effects on type 1 and type 2 diabetes risk (13,20), which may hint at divergent effects at the level of the pancreas and other tissues, most likely the gut, differently affecting type 1 and type 2 diabetes susceptibility and GLP-1–based treatment responses, but this requires further exploration.
Type 2 diabetes, of which pancreatic endocrine dysfunction is a hallmark, has also been associated with pancreatic exocrine dysfunction (30). Furthermore, GLP-1–based therapies exert insulinotropic effects, but their use has also been linked to pancreatic exocrine disturbances, including pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer (31–33). In this respect, the present finding is of interest as it identifies a genetic factor encoding a pancreatic digestive enzyme at the crossroad of pancreatic endocrine function and the response to GLP-1–based therapies. It is of further note that there is suggestive evidence from the PanScan consortium that SNPs, including rs7202877, near the CTRB1/CTRB2 region are linked to pancreatic neoplasms (34). Studies into the interrelationship of these genetic factors and phenotypic defects are mandatory to help increase our insight into the complex pathophysiology of diabetes and its comorbidities as well as our understanding of the regulation and physiological function of the incretin pathway.
Limitations of this study include the following. Due to the unique and comprehensive deep phenotypes, the sample sizes are relatively small, although results are replicated and size and directionally consistent in all independent cohorts. A further limitation is that most studies presented here only involve nondiabetic individuals, and thus our results do not necessarily represent the situation in diabetic states. The power in our pharmacogenetic studies is limited, and larger, better-powered studies are needed to check the robustness and clinical utility of our associations. Finally, the Metabochip focuses on loci previously implicated in metabolic and cardiovascular phenotypes, and although this increases power, it is likely that other loci exist that are not captured with this chip.
In conclusion, several loci are associated with GLP-1–stimulated insulin secretion in healthy nondiabetic volunteers. One of the loci, CTRB1/2 on chromosome 16q23.1, was further associated with a reduced response to treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetic patients. Carriers of the G allele at rs7202877 additionally showed increased chymotrypsin mRNA expression and activity in the pancreas and feces, respectively. These results highlight the importance of chymotrypsin in the incretin response and regulation of glucose homeostasis and may provide novel targets for preventive and therapeutic strategies in the combat of diabetes.
This research was supported by grants from the Dutch hub of the Biobanking and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure (BBMRI-NL, NWO 184.021.007, Grant CP1), the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (Grant 2006.00.060), an unrestricted investigator-initiated grant of Merck Sharp & Dohme, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01GI0925 and 0315381B). The Wellcome Trust provides support for Wellcome Trust U.K. Type 2 Diabetes Case Control Collection (GoDARTS, 099177/Z/12/Z). Metabochip genotyping of GoDARTS was funded by the U.K. Medical Research Council (G0601261), and the informatics support was provided by the Chief Scientist Office and the Wellcome Trust–funded Scottish Health Informatics Programme.
A.F., G.N., J.M.D., E.J.P.d.K., E.R.P., and M.D. have indicated that they have a potential duality of interest as they serve on advisory boards or act as a consultant or speaker or have received grants from (pharmaceutical) companies who may either gain or lose from this publication. These companies include Abbott, Amylin, Astra-BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Poxel Pharma. None of these companies were involved in this work or during the writing process. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
L.M.t.H., A.F., G.N., N.v.L., E.J.C.d.G., D.I.B., E.M.W.E., E.R.P., and M.D. researched data and wrote the manuscript. L.A.D., M.A., J.F., F.C., A.P.G., T.W.v.H., S.A.H.-S., A.M.C.S.-B., J.J.H.-D., Q.H., J.D., B.G., F.M., G.W., and J.J.H. researched data. J.M.D., C.N.A.P., T.H., R.J.H., M.H.H.K., E.J.P.d.K., H.-U.H., O.P., L.G., and P.E.S. contributed to the discussion and reviewed and edited the manuscript. L.M.t.H. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
This study has been submitted for presentation at the 49th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, Barcelona, Spain, 23–27 September 2013.
The authors thank all participants for their cooperation.
This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/db13-0227/-/DC1.
See accompanying commentary, p. 3019.
- Received February 8, 2013.
- Accepted April 30, 2013.
- © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association.
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.