Metabolic Flexibility in Response to Glucose is not Impaired in People with Type 2 Diabetes after Controlling for Glucose Disposal Rate

  1. Jose E. Galgani, PhD1,
  2. Leonie K. Heilbronn, PhD1,,2,
  3. Koichiro Azuma, MD3,
  4. David E. Kelley, MD3,
  5. Jeanine D. Albu, MD4,
  6. Xavier Pi-Sunyer, MD5,
  7. Steven R. Smith, MD1,
  8. Eric Ravussin, PhD (Eric.Ravussin{at}pbrc.edu)1 and
  9. the Look AHEAD Adipose Research Group
  1. 1Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, USA
  2. 2Garvan Institute of Medical Research, NSW, Australia
  3. 3Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
  4. 4Obesity Research Center, St. Louis Hospital, New York, USA
  5. 5St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, USA

    Abstract

    Introduction: Type 2 diabetic compared to non-diabetic subjects are metabolically inflexible with impaired fasting fat oxidation and impaired carbohydrate oxidation during a hyperinsulinemic clamp. We hypothesized that impaired insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation is a consequence of the lower cellular glucose uptake rate in type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we compared metabolic flexibility to glucose adjusted for glucose disposal rate in non-diabetic versus type 2 diabetic subjects, and in the latter group after 1-year lifestyle intervention (Look AHEAD).

    Research Design and Methods: Macronutrient oxidation rates under fasting and hyperinsulinemic conditions (clamp at 80 mU/m2/min), body composition (DXA, CT) and relevant hormonal/metabolic blood variables were assessed in 59 type 2 diabetic and 42 non-diabetic individuals matched for obesity, sex and race. Measures were repeated in diabetic participants after weight loss.

    Results: Metabolic flexibility to glucose (change in respiratory quotient; ΔRQ) was mainly related to insulin-stimulated glucose disposal rate (R2=0.46, p<0.0001) with an additional 3% of variance accounted for by plasma free-fatty acid concentration at the end of the clamp (p=0.03). The impaired metabolic flexibility to glucose observed in type 2 diabetic vs. non-diabetic subjects (ΔRQ: 0.06 ± 0.01 vs. 0.10 ± 0.01, respectively; p<0.0001) was no longer observed after adjusting for glucose disposal rate (p=0.19). Additionally, the increase in metabolic flexibility to glucose after weight loss was accounted for by the concomitant increase in insulin-stimulated glucose disposal rate.

    Conclusion: This study suggests that metabolic inflexibility to glucose in type 2 diabetic subjects is mostly related to defective glucose transport.

    Footnotes

      • Received January 11, 2008.
      • Accepted January 12, 2008.