EXTENSION OF TYPE 2 DIABETES GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION SCAN RESULTS IN THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM

  1. Allan F. Moore1,2,3,4,
  2. Kathleen A. Jablonski5,
  3. Jarred B. McAteer1,4,
  4. Richa Saxena1,4,
  5. Toni I. Pollin6,
  6. Paul W. Franks7,
  7. Robert L. Hanson8,
  8. Alan R. Shuldiner6,
  9. William C. Knowler8,
  10. David Altshuler1,2,3,4,9 and
  11. Jose C. Florez (jcflorez{at}partners.org) For The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group1,2,3,4
  1. 1Center for Human Genetic Research and
  2. 2Diabetes Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  3. 3Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  4. 4Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  5. 5The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland
  6. 6Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Nutrition University of Maryland School of Medicine
  7. 7Genetic Epidemiology & Clinical Research Group, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
  8. 8Diabetes Epidemiology and Clinical Research Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, Arizona
  9. 9Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

    Abstract

    Objective: Genome-wide association scans (GWAS) have identified novel diabetes-associated genes. We evaluated how these variants impact diabetes incidence, quantitative glycemic traits, and response to preventive interventions in 3,548 subjects at high risk of type 2 diabetes enrolled in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), which examined the effects of lifestyle intervention, metformin, and troglitazone versus placebo.

    Research Design & Methods: We genotyped selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in or near diabetes-associated loci including EXT2, CDKAL1, CDKN2A/B, IGF2BP2, HHEX, LOC387761, and SLC30A8 in DPP participants and performed Cox regression analyses using genotype, intervention, and their interactions as predictors of diabetes incidence. We evaluated their effect on insulin resistance and secretion at one year.

    Results: None of the selected SNPs were associated with increased diabetes incidence in this population. After adjustments for ethnicity, baseline insulin secretion was lower in subjects with the risk genotype at HHEX rs1111875 (P=0.01); there were no significant differences in baseline insulin sensitivity. Both at baseline and one year, subjects with the risk genotype at LOC387761 had paradoxically increased insulin secretion; adjustment for self-reported ethnicity abolished these differences. In ethnicity-adjusted analyses, we noted a nominal differential improvement in β-cell function for carriers of the protective genotype at CDKN2A/B after one year of troglitazone treatment (P=0.01) and possibly lifestyle modification (P=0.05).

    Conclusions: We were unable to replicate the GWAS findings regarding diabetes risk in the DPP. We did observe genotype associations with differences in baseline insulin secretion at the HHEX locus and a possible pharmacogenetic interaction at CDKNA2/B.

    Footnotes

      • Received February 28, 2008.
      • Accepted June 1, 2008.