Assessing the combined impact of 18 common genetic variants of modest effect sizes on type 2 diabetes risk
- Hana Lango1,2,
- The UK Type 2 Diabetes Genetics Consortium,
- Colin NA Palmer3,
- Andrew D Morris4,
- Eleftheria Zeggini5,
- Andrew T Hattersley1,2,
- Mark I McCarthy5,6,
- Timothy M Frayling1,2 and
- Michael N Weedon (Michael.Weedon{at}pms.ac.uk)1,2
- 1 Genetics of Complex Traits, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Peninsula Medical School, Magdalen Road, Exeter, UK
- 2 Diabetes Genetics, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Peninsula Medical School, Barrack Road, Exeter, UK
- 3 Population Pharmacogenetics Group, Biomedical Research Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, UK
- 4 Diabetes Research Group, Division of Medicine and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, UK
- 5 Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK
- 6 Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
Abstract
Objectives: Genome-wide association studies have dramatically increased the number of common genetic variants that are robustly associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A possible clinical use of this information is to identify individuals at high risk of developing the disease, so that preventative measures may be more effectively targeted. Here we assess the ability of 18 confirmed T2D variants to differentiate between T2D cases and controls.
Research design and methods: We assessed index SNPs for the 18 independent loci in 2598 controls and 2309 cases from the GoDARTS study. The discriminatory ability of the combined SNP information was assessed by grouping individuals based on number of risk alleles carried and determining relative odds of T2D, and by calculating the area-under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: Individuals carrying more risk alleles had higher risk of T2D. For example, 1.2% of individuals with >24 risk alleles had an odds ratio of 4.2 (95% CI: 2.11, 8.56) against the 1.8% with 10-12 risk alleles. The AUC (a measure of discriminative accuracy) for these variants was 0.60. The AUC for age, BMI and gender was 0.78, and adding the genetic risk variants only marginally increased this to 0.80.
Conclusions: Currently, common risk variants for T2D do not provide strong predictive value at a population level. However, the joint effect of risk variants identified sub-groups of the population at substantially different risk of disease. Further studies are needed to assess whether individuals with extreme numbers of risk alleles may benefit from genetic testing.
Footnotes
-
- Received April 16, 2008.
- Accepted June 24, 2008.
- Copyright © American Diabetes Association














