Functional assessment of pancreatic beta-cell area in humans

  1. Juris J. Meier (juris.meier{at}rub.de)1,
  2. Bjoern A. Menge1,
  3. Thomas G. K. Breuer1,
  4. Christophe A. Müller2,
  5. Andrea Tannapfel3,
  6. Waldemar Uhl2,
  7. Wolfgang E. Schmidt1 and
  8. Henning Schrader1
  1. 1: Department of Medicine I, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
  2. 2: Department of Surgery, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
  3. 3: Department of Pathology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany

    Abstract

    Objective: Beta-cell mass declines progressively during the course of diabetes, and various antidiabetic treatment regimens have been suggested to modulate beta-cell mass. However, imaging methods allowing to monitor changes in beta-cell mass in vivo have not yet become available. We addressed whether pancreatic beta-cell area can be assessed by functional test of insulin secretion in humans.

    Research design and methods: 33 patients with chronic pancreatitis (n = 17), benign pancreatic adenomas (n = 13), and tumours of the ampulla of Vater (n = 3) at various stages of glucose tolerance were examined with an oral glucose load prior to undergoing pancreatic surgery. Indices of insulin secretion were calculated and compared to the fractional beta-cell area of the pancreas.

    Results: Beta-cell area was related to fasting glucose concentrations in an inverse linear fashion (r = −0.53, p = 0.0014), and to 120 min post-challenge glycaemia in an inverse exponential fashion (r = −0.89). Beta-cell area was best predicted by a C-peptide/glucose ratio determined 15 min after the glucose drink (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001). However, a fasting C-peptide/glucose ratio already yielded a reasonably close correlation (r = 0.63, p < 0.0001). HOMA beta-cell function was unrelated to beta-cell area.

    Conclusions: Glucose control is closely related to pancreatic beta-cell area in humans. A C-peptide/glucose ratio after oral glucose ingestion appears to better predict beta-cell area than fasting measures, such as the HOMA index.

    Footnotes

      • Received November 25, 2008.
      • Accepted March 5, 2009.