Advertisement

iNKT-cell control of Type-1 Diabetes: a Dendritic Cell Genetic Decision of a Silver Bullet or Russian Roulette

  1. John P. Driver*,
  2. Felix Scheuplein*,
  3. Yi-Guang Chen*,
  4. Alexandra E. Grier*,
  5. S. Brian Wilson and
  6. David V. Serreze (dave.serreze{at}jax.org)*
  1. *The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609 USA and
  2. Diabetes Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, MA 02138

    Abstract

    Objective: In part, activation of invariant natural killer T (iNKT)-cells with the superagonist α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) inhibits the development of T-cell-mediated autoimmune type 1 diabetes (T1D) in NOD mice by inducing the downstream differentiation of antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DC) to an immunotolerogenic state. However, in other systems iNKT-cell activation has an adjuvant-like effect that enhances rather than suppresses various immunological responses. Thus, we tested if in some circumstances genetic variation would enable activated iNKT-cells to support rather than inhibit T1D development.

    Research Design and Methods: We tested whether iNKT-conditioned DC in NOD mice and a major histocompatibility complex matched C57BL/6 (B6) background congenic stock differed in capacity to inhibit T1D induced by the adoptive transfer of pathogenic AI4 CD8 T-cells.

    Results: Unlike those of NOD origin, iNKT-conditioned DC in the B6 background stock matured to a state that actually supported rather than inhibited AI4 T-cell induced T1D. The induction of a differing activity pattern of T-cell co-stimulatory molecules varying in capacity to override programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitory effects contributes to the respective ability of iNKT-conditioned DC in NOD and B6 background mice to inhibit or support T1D development. Genetic differences inherent to both iNKT-cells and DC contribute to their varying interactions in NOD and B6.H2g7 mice.

    Conclusion: This great variability in the interactions between iNKT-cells and DC in two inbred mouse strains should raise a cautionary note about considering manipulation of this axis as a potential T1D prevention therapy in genetically heterogeneous humans.

    Footnotes

      • Received July 29, 2009.
      • Accepted October 20, 2009.
    Advertisement