Occurrence of Spontaneous Pancreatic Lesions in Normal and Diabetic Rats: A Potential Confounding Factor in the Nonclinical Assessment of Glucagon-Like Peptide (GLP)-1-Based Therapies

  1. Timothy P. Reilly4
  1. 1Drug Safety Evaluation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New Brunswick, New Jersey;
  2. 2Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  3. 3Discovery Toxicology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Hopewell, New Jersey;
  4. 4Drug Safety Evaluation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, New Jersey;
  5. 5Nonclinical Drug Safety, Amylin LLC, San Diego, California
  1. Corresponding Author: Dr. Kristina D. Chadwick, E-mail: kristina.chadwick{at}bms.com

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)-based therapies, collectively described as incretins, produce glycemic benefits in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Recent publications raised concern for a potential increased risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer with incretins based in part on findings from a small number of rodents. However, extensive toxicology assessments in a substantial number of animals dosed up to 2 years at high multiples of human exposure do not support these concerns. We hypothesized that the lesions being attributed to incretins are commonly observed background findings and endeavored to characterize the incidence of spontaneous pancreatic lesions in three rat strains (Sprague-Dawley [SD], Zucker diabetic fatty [ZDF], and HIP rats [rats expressing human islet amyloid polypeptide]; n=36/group) on a normal or high-fat diet over 4 months. Pancreatic findings in all groups included focal exocrine degeneration, atrophy, inflammation, ductular cell proliferation, and/or observations in large pancreatic ducts similar to those described in the literature, with an incidence of exocrine atrophy/inflammation seen in SD (42%–72%), HIP (39%), and ZDF (6%) rats. These data indicate that the pancreatic findings attributed to incretins are common background findings, observed without drug treatment and independent of diet or glycemic status, suggesting a need to exercise caution when interpreting the relevance of some recent reports to human safety.

  • Received August 16, 2013.
  • Accepted November 5, 2013.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

This article has not yet been cited by other articles.

No Related Web Pages

This Article

  1. Diabetes
  1. Supplementary Data
  2. All Versions of this Article:
    1. db13-1268v1
    2. 63/4/1303 most recent