Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Commentary

Going With the Flow: Adaptation of β-Cell Function to Glucose Fluxes After Bariatric Surgery

  1. Marzieh Salehi1 and
  2. David A. D’Alessio1,2⇑
  1. 1Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
  2. 2Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  1. Corresponding author: David A. D’Alessio, dalessd{at}ucmail.edu.
Diabetes 2013 Nov; 62(11): 3671-3673. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-1213
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery induces remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) at higher rates than restrictive bariatric surgeries (1) or intensive medical treatment (2). While weight loss induced by lifestyle interventions or bariatric surgery improves glucose tolerance gradually by enhancing insulin sensitivity (3–5), some of the antidiabetic effect of RYGB is immediate and independent of the amount of weight loss (5–7). The dramatic resolution of diabetes after RYGB is consistent with processes rapidly engaged by the restructured gastrointestinal system to alter postprandial glucose regulation.

Individuals with RYGB have larger postprandial glucose excursions, with higher and earlier peaks and lower glucose nadirs, as early as 1 week after surgery (7). In parallel with this change in glycemia, meal ingestion shifts the postprandial insulin response upward and to the left (7), with more rapid insulin secretion over a shorter period. It is not clear to what extent the increased β-cell secretion is a response to greater glycemic stimulus or whether other factors are at play. There is experimental support for greater stimulation by gastrointestinal hormones, especially glucagon-like peptide 1 (8), and neural inputs to the β-cell (9) following RYGB are increased. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, a majority of patients with T2D benefit from RYGB in the short term, and the enhanced insulin response is thought to contribute significantly to this outcome. Interestingly, beneficial effects of surgery on β-cell function are more difficult to ascertain in nondiabetic subjects after RYGB, since many measures of insulin secretion are actually diminished over time as insulin sensitivity improves (10). It is now apparent that RYGB also has a significant impact on glucagon secretion. The notable feature after surgery is postprandial hyperglucagonemia, a finding reported in several cohorts including both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects (8,11–13). The significantly greater glucagon concentrations after meals present a paradox given the improved glucose tolerance with surgery and the deleterious effects of relative hyperglucagonemia on postprandial glycemia (14).

In this issue, a new study by Camastra et al. (15) provides some new insights into islet function and glycemic regulation following RYGB. In this study, cohorts of T2D and nondiabetic subjects were examined before and 1 year following surgery with a mixed-meal test that included administration of glucose tracers to measure enteral, hepatic, and systemic glucose fluxes; β-cell function was assessed using a modeling approach that this group has developed and validated. The findings in this study confirm previous reports that postprandial peaks of glucose are greater and occur earlier in people with RYGB, and that this is the result of more rapid entry of intestinally absorbed glucose into the circulation (16). Additionally, meal-stimulated glucagon increased significantly after RYGB and was associated with apparent hepatic insulin resistance, with higher rates of endogenous glucose production during the test meal. Finally, sensitivity of peripheral glucose disposal to insulin improved, a finding associated with weight loss and consistent with previous studies (10). These effects were similar in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects.

While many responses to RYGB were common to diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, effects on β-cell function differed somewhat. Similar to previous reports, rates of fasting and prandial insulin secretion were decreased in nondiabetic subjects, with a significant reduction in β-cell glucose sensitivity, a measure of the insulin:glycemic dose response. However, RYGB increased the β-cell response to the rate of change in blood glucose, model-derived index of dynamic insulin secretion separate from glucose sensitivity (17). This change suggests an adaptive response to surgery whereby the principal glycemic driver of insulin secretion shifts to accommodate the dramatically increased appearance of enteral glucose caused by RYGB. β-Cell rate sensitivity also increased to a comparable degree in the T2D subjects, approximately threefold, supporting this as a generalized response to surgery. However, β-cell sensitivity to glucose also increased in this cohort, nearly doubling 1 year after RYGB, although not returning to nondiabetic levels. One straightforward explanation for the discrepancy in glucose sensitivity between the diabetic and nondiabetic subjects is the resolution of chronic hyperglycemia in the former group, who had a drop in HbA1c from 7.1 to 5.4%, and possibly resolution of glucose toxicity on β-cell function.

The findings reported here raise interesting questions about the alterations in physiology induced by RYGB and how the islet responds to these. The notion of distinct β-cell responses to changing glucose concentrations, and to the rate at which these occur, is incorporated into mathematical models like the one used by Camastra et al., but was originally advanced to explain patterns of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in vitro (18) and in physiologic studies of humans (19). That these parameters are changed significantly by RYGB in nondiabetic subjects speaks to an ability of β-cells to adapt to differences in glucose appearance, in this case to the “dumping-like” pattern of postprandial glycemia described by the authors. If this reciprocal adaptation can be verified it would provide a novel level of β-cell regulation, with potential applicability to other patterns of meal glucose appearance. The uncertainty here is that while the β-cell glucose and rate sensitivity changes are clear in this report, they are only suggested in other studies of bariatric surgery patients by this group (20,21), and confirmation of this hypothesis of β-cell adaptation will require directed studies.

While increased flux of glucose from the gut and transient systemic hyperglycemia might explain adaptations of β-cell function in subjects with RYGB, this is difficult to square with increased postprandial glucagon release. The usual response of the α-cell to increases in circulating glucose is decreased secretion of glucagon. Thus, in subjects with RYGB there seems to be a stimulus to the α-cell that overrides usual regulation. Autonomic control of glucagon secretion is important in hypoglycemic counter-regulation, and neural regulation could explain α-cell function in RYGB. Increased intestinal glucose flux is likely to elevate glycemia in the hepatic portal vein disproportionately, a setting previously demonstrated to activate portal glucose sensors and initiate reflexes important in metabolic regulation (22). Increased portal, compared with systemic, glycemia enhances the early insulin response (23) as well as shifting glucose uptake toward the liver and away from extrahepatic sites (22) (Fig. 1). Therefore one mechanism that could provide a unified explanation for the distinct effects of RYGB on islet function is activation of neural pathways by elevated glucose levels in the portal vein. While speculative at this point, this hypothesis is tractable and merits further consideration.

FIG. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Hypothetical model connecting increased appearance of meal glucose (RaOral) following RYGB and key regulatory steps for glucose metabolism. Increased rates of intestinal glucose uptake lead to higher glucose concentrations in the hepatic portal vein, initiating neural signals from portal glucose sensors that activate glucose uptake and islet hormone secretion.

Camastra et al. (15) include one more interesting observation. The calculation of prehepatic insulin and glucagon levels provides a novel parameter that can be related to hepatic glucose production. This ratio shifts rapidly in subjects with RYGB and is temporally compatible with the rise of endogenous glucose production earlier in the course of meal absorption. Thus, the pattern of islet hormone secretion induced by RYGB is reflected in hepatic glucose flux, which seems to compensate for greater rates of glucose clearance. While it is not clear how these processes are linked following RYGB, although a neural mechanism originating in the portal vein is also a possibility here (22), the new balance of glucose appearance and glucose disappearance maintains normal postabsorptive glycemia, at least in most patients.

Studies of the metabolic physiology of bariatric surgery have increased in recent years, driven in great part by the dramatic effects of procedures like RYGB to improve diabetes. Moreover, the increasing numbers of people having weight-loss surgery has provided impetus to understand their metabolism, particularly when they develop problems such as reactive hypoglycemia. However, the large changes in endocrine function and glucose fluxes seen in individuals with RYGB make this an excellent model to study glycemic regulation more broadly. The study by Camastra et al. in this issue is an excellent example of how observations in surgical patients can provide insights and stimulate hypotheses related to normal physiologic regulation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Footnotes

  • See accompanying original article, p. 3709.

  • © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2009;122:248–256.e5
  2. ↵
    1. Schauer PR,
    2. Kashyap SR,
    3. Wolski K,
    4. et al
    . Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1567–1576pmid:22449319
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Guldstrand M,
    2. Ahrén B,
    3. Adamson U
    . Improved beta-cell function after standardized weight reduction in severely obese subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003;284:E557–E565pmid:12556352
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Villareal DT, Banks MR, Patterson BW, Polonsky KS, Klein S. Weight loss therapy improves pancreatic endocrine function in obese older adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:1349–1354
  5. ↵
    1. Ferrannini E,
    2. Camastra S,
    3. Gastaldelli A,
    4. et al
    . Beta-cell function in obesity: effects of weight loss. Diabetes 2004;53(Suppl. 3):S26–S33pmid:15561918
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Schauer PR,
    2. Ikramuddin S,
    3. Gourash W,
    4. Ramanathan R,
    5. Luketich J
    . Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2000;232:515–529pmid:10998650
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Jørgensen NB, Jacobsen SH, Dirksen C, et al. Effects of gastric bypass surgery on glucose metabolism five days and three months after surgery in subjects with type 2 diabetes and normal glucose tolerance [Abstract]. Diabetes 2011;60(Suppl. 1):A16
  7. ↵
    1. Salehi M,
    2. Prigeon RL,
    3. D’Alessio DA
    . Gastric bypass surgery enhances glucagon-like peptide 1-stimulated postprandial insulin secretion in humans. Diabetes 2011;60:2308–2314pmid:21868791
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Salehi M, D'Alessio D. Neurally induced postprandial insulin secretion is enhanced similarly in patients with and without hypoglycemia after gastric bypass surgery [Abstract]. Diabetes 2013;62(Suppl. 1):A39
  9. ↵
    1. Bradley D,
    2. Conte C,
    3. Mittendorfer B,
    4. et al
    . Gastric bypass and banding equally improve insulin sensitivity and β cell function. J Clin Invest 2012;122:4667–4674pmid:23187122
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Laferrère B,
    2. Teixeira J,
    3. McGinty J,
    4. et al
    . Effect of weight loss by gastric bypass surgery versus hypocaloric diet on glucose and incretin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:2479–2485pmid:18430778
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Falkén Y,
    2. Hellström PM,
    3. Holst JJ,
    4. Näslund E
    . Changes in glucose homeostasis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for obesity at day three, two months, and one year after surgery: role of gut peptides. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:2227–2235pmid:21543426
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Jørgensen NB,
    2. Jacobsen SH,
    3. Dirksen C,
    4. et al
    . Acute and long-term effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on glucose metabolism in subjects with type 2 diabetes and normal glucose tolerance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2012;303:E122–E131pmid:22535748
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Shah P,
    2. Basu A,
    3. Basu R,
    4. Rizza R
    . Impact of lack of suppression of glucagon on glucose tolerance in humans. Am J Physiol 1999;277:E283–E290pmid:10444424
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Camastra S,
    2. Muscelli E,
    3. Gastaldelli A,
    4. et al
    . Long-term effects of bariatric surgery on meal disposal and β-cell function in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Diabetes 2013;62:3709–3717pmid:23835342
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Rodieux F,
    2. Giusti V,
    3. D’Alessio DA,
    4. Suter M,
    5. Tappy L
    . Effects of gastric bypass and gastric banding on glucose kinetics and gut hormone release. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:298–305pmid:18239636
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Mari A,
    2. Schmitz O,
    3. Gastaldelli A,
    4. Oestergaard T,
    5. Nyholm B,
    6. Ferrannini E
    . Meal and oral glucose tests for assessment of beta -cell function: modeling analysis in normal subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002;283:E1159–E1166pmid:12388151
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Grodsky GM
    . A new phase of insulin secretion. How will it contribute to our understanding of beta-cell function? Diabetes 1989;38:673–678pmid:2656336
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Chen M,
    2. Porte D Jr.
    . The effect of rate and dose of glucose infusion on the acute insulin response in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1976;42:1168–1175pmid:932179
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Nannipieri M,
    2. Mari A,
    3. Anselmino M,
    4. et al
    . The role of beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in the remission of type 2 diabetes after gastric bypass surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:E1372–E1379pmid:21778221
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Camastra S,
    2. Manco M,
    3. Mari A,
    4. et al
    . Beta-cell function in morbidly obese subjects during free living: long-term effects of weight loss. Diabetes 2005;54:2382–2389pmid:16046305
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Moore MC,
    2. Coate KC,
    3. Winnick JJ,
    4. An Z,
    5. Cherrington AD
    . Regulation of hepatic glucose uptake and storage in vivo. Adv Nutr 2012;3:286–294pmid:22585902
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Dunning BE,
    2. Moore MC,
    3. Ikeda T,
    4. Neal DW,
    5. Scott MF,
    6. Cherrington AD
    . Portal glucose infusion exerts an incretin effect associated with changes in pancreatic neural activity in conscious dogs. Metabolism 2002;51:1324–1330pmid:12370854
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes: 62 (11)

In this Issue

November 2013, 62(11)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Going With the Flow: Adaptation of β-Cell Function to Glucose Fluxes After Bariatric Surgery
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Going With the Flow: Adaptation of β-Cell Function to Glucose Fluxes After Bariatric Surgery
Marzieh Salehi, David A. D’Alessio
Diabetes Nov 2013, 62 (11) 3671-3673; DOI: 10.2337/db13-1213

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Going With the Flow: Adaptation of β-Cell Function to Glucose Fluxes After Bariatric Surgery
Marzieh Salehi, David A. D’Alessio
Diabetes Nov 2013, 62 (11) 3671-3673; DOI: 10.2337/db13-1213
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Lifting the Veil on the “Phosphate Flush,” a Cryptic Phenomenon of Experimental Pancreatic Islet Physiology
  • Window of Opportunity: Targeting ANGPTL4 Improves Triglyceride Levels in Maternal Obesity During Pregnancy
  • New Antidiabetes Agent Targeting Both Mitochondrial Uncoupling and Pyruvate Catabolism: Two Birds With One Stone
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes Care
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Print ISSN: 0012-1797, Online ISSN: 1939-327X.