Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Obesity Studies

Human Adipocytes Induce Inflammation and Atrophy in Muscle Cells During Obesity

  1. Vanessa Pellegrinelli 1 , 2 ⇑ ,
  2. Christine Rouault 1 , 2 , 3 ,
  3. Sergio Rodriguez-Cuenca 4 ,
  4. Victorine Albert 1 , 2 , 3 ,
  5. Frédérique Edom-Vovard 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ,
  6. Antonio Vidal-Puig 4 ,
  7. Karine Clément 1 , 2 , 3 ,
  8. Gillian S. Butler-Browne 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 and
  9. Danièle Lacasa 1 , 2 , 3
  1. 1INSERM, U1166 Nutriomique, Paris, France
  2. 2Sorbonne Universités, University Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, UMR S 1166, Paris, France
  3. 3Institut Cardiométabolisme et Nutrition, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
  4. 4Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
  5. 5Sorbonne Universités, University Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMR 974, Paris, France
  6. 6INSERM, U974, Paris, France
  7. 7CNRS FRE 3617, Paris, France
  8. 8Institut de Myologie, Paris, France
  1. Corresponding author: Vanessa Pellegrinelli, vp332{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Diabetes 2015 Sep; 64(9): 3121-3134. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0796
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Human adipocyte secretions and myotube phenotype. A: Human differentiated muscle cells were cultured in the presence of lean SAT CM or obese VAT CM for 5 days. Cells were incubated with an antibody specific for desmin, which was revealed using an Alexa Fluor 488–coupled goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (green). Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst staining (blue). A representative photomicrograph is presented. Scale bar = 200 µm. B: Myotube thickness was quantified using ImageJ software measuring intensity of the desmin staining in 10 random fields (×20) in three independent cultures. C: Fusion index: the number of nuclei in differentiated myotubes (more than two myonuclei) were calculated as a percentage of the total number of nuclei (mononucleated and plurinucleated). A total of 1,000 nuclei/dish was counted in three independent cultures. The counting was performed with blind lectures by different investigators (V.A. and F.E.-V.). D: Cell lysates were immunoblotted to detect the heavy chain of myosin II (MF20; 200 kDa), troponin (24 kDa), and emerin (37 kDa; used as normalization control). Graphs represent the quantification of the immunoblots. Data are the mean ± SEM of five independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, control vs. lean SAT CM or obese VAT CM. A.U., arbitrary units.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Gene expression profile of myocytes cocultured with human adipocytes. Muscle cells were differentiated in the 3D hydrogel for 3 days, and then VAT adipocytes in the 3D hydrogel were added for an additional period of 1 day. Cells were then collected for RNA extraction obtained after reverse transcription cDNAs. A: cDNAs were analyzed using a human myogenesis and myopathy PCR array. The graph represents the percentage of decreased gene expression in myocytes cocultured with adipocytes (MYO+AD) compared with myocytes alone (control, MYO). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of five independent experiments. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, MYO+AD vs. MYO. B and C: Cells were also fixed and stained using antibody directed against titin (green, Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated anti-mouse IgG) and phalloidin (red, Alexa Fluor 546 phalloidin). A representative photomicrograph from confocal microscopy is presented. Scale bars: C, 20 µm; D, 10 µm. D–F: Muscle cells were differentiated for 3 days, and then 3D adipocytes from SAT or VAT from paired biopsy samples of obese subjects were added for an additional period of 3 days. Cells were fixed and stained using antibody directed against desmin, troponin, or titin (green, Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated anti-mouse IgG). Graphs represent quantifications of myotube thickness (D), troponin staining (E), and titin staining (F). Data are the mean ± SEM of six to eight independent experiments. *P < 0.05, MYO+VAT AD vs. MYO. CAV-3, caveolin-3; MuSK, muscle-specific kinase; NEB, nebulin; SGCA, α-sarcoglycan; TTN, titin.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Inflammatory profile of cocultured human adipocytes and myocytes: IL-6 and IL-1β as key factors. Muscle cells were differentiated in the 3D hydrogel for 3 days, and then SAT or VAT adipocytes from obese subjects, cultured in the 3D hydrogel, were added for an additional period of 3 days. Media were then collected for the measurement of cytokine and chemokine secretion by a multiplex assay. A: Significant changes in the secretory profile in the 3D cultures of muscle cells and obese VAT adipocytes (AD+MYO) compared with AD as control and MYO are presented in the graph. Data are expressed as fold variations between AD (white bars), AD+MYO (black bars) and MYO (gray bars) to take into account human interindividual variations. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of seven independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 AD+MYO vs. AD. B: Significant changes in the secretory profile in the 3D cultures of muscle cells and obese SAT (MYO+SAT AD) or obese VAT adipocytes (MYO+VAT AD) are presented in the graph. Data are expressed as fold variations between MYO (control) and MYO+SAT AD (white bars) or MYO+VAT AD (black bars). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of eight independent experiments. C: Gene expression of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β in muscle cells cultured alone (control, MYO, white bars) or exposed to adipocytes from paired biopsy samples of obese SAT (MYO+SAT AD, gray bars) or VAT adipocytes (MYO+VAT AD, black bars), estimated by real-time PCR. Data (fold over control, MYO) are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent experiments performed with different adipocyte preparations. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 MYO+VAT AD vs. MYO. #P < 0.05, MYO+SAT AD vs. MYO+VAT AD. D: 3D VAT adipocytes were added for an additional period of 3 days and were treated with neutralizing antibodies of IL-6 (2.5 µg/mL) and IL-1β (0.5 µg/mL) (MYO+AD+abIL-6/IL-1β) IgG1 (control MYO+AD IgG) in the 3D setting. Media were then collected for multiplex assay. Black bars represent the percentage decrease in secretions in MYO+AD+abIL-6/IL-1β cocultures compared with control MYO+AD IgG cocultures. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of five independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, MYO+AD IgG vs. MYO+AD+abIL-6/IL-1β. E: Multiplex assay of the inflammatory secretome of myocytes treated (MYO IL-6/IL-1β, black bars) or not (MYO, white bars) with recombinant IL-6 (10 ng/mL) and IL-1β (1 ng/mL) over 3 days. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of five independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 MYO IL-6/IL-1β vs. MYO. ab, antibodies; FRK, fractalkine; IP-10, interferon-γ–induced protein-10; MIP1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; ns, nonsignificant; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    IGF-II and IGFBP-5 rescue the atrophy of myotubes induced by adipocytes. A–D: Muscle cells were differentiated in the 3D hydrogel for 3 days without (MYO) or with 3D VAT adipocytes (from obese subjects) (MYO+AD) added for an additional period of 3 days in the presence or absence of IGF-II (50 ng/mL) and IGFBP-5 (200 ng/mL) (MYO+AD+IGF-II/IGFBP-5). Cells were fixed and stained with the corresponding antibodies. A: Myotube thickness was quantified using ImageJ software measuring the intensity of the desmin staining in 10 random fields (×20) in six independent cultures. Quantification of immunofluorescence was performed using ImageJ software measuring intensity of the MF20 (B) and titin (C) staining in five random fields (×20). D: Immunostaining of titin (green, Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated anti-mouse IgG) and nuclei (blue, DAPI). A representative photomicrograph of titin staining is presented (scale bar = 50 µm). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent experiments. **P < 0.01, MYO+AD vs. MYO or MYO+AD+IGF-II/IGFBP-5. E and F: Differentiated muscle cells exposed or not to obese VAT adipocytes were stimulated with IGF-II (50 ng/mL) and IGFBP-5 (200 ng/mL) for 10 min at 37°C. Serine 473 phosphorylation of Akt (pS 473 Akt, 56 kDa), serine 65 of 4E-BP1 (pS65 4E-BP1, 21 kDa), and serine 240 and 244 phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein (pS 240/244 S6 ribosomal protein, 32 kDa) were detected using the corresponding antibodies. E: A representative Western blot is presented among the five different experiments. F: The graph represents quantifications of the immunoblots in IGF-II/IGFBP-5–stimulated conditions normalized to total proteins. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of five to seven independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, MYO+AD vs. MYO. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, without vs. with IGF-II/IGFBP-5 treatment.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Skeletal muscle characteristics of HFD-induced obese mice. Serum cytokine level (A) and gastrocnemius gene expression (B) evaluated in 20-week-old mice after 12 weeks of being fed a standard diet (chow, white bars) or an HFD (black bars). n = 8 mice per experimental group. C–E: Histological analysis of the gastrocnemius muscle obtained from 24-week-old mice (n = 9 mice per experimental group) after 16 weeks of being fed a standard diet (chow) or an HFD. C: Representative microphotographs of a cross-section (right panel) and a longitudinal section (left panel). Scale bar = 100 μm. D: Measurement of variance coefficients of the fiber size in the cross-sectional samples of chow-fed and HFD-fed mice using Feret’s diameter as the geometrical parameter. n = 61 (minimum) to 201 (maximum) fibers were analyzed for each sample (three random fields/mouse, ×10). E: Quantification of adipocyte spots in the longitudinal section samples of chow-fed and HFD-fed mice (total biopsy sample). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, chow-fed vs. HFD-fed mice. A.U., arbitrary units; CV, coefficient of variation; ns, nonsignificant.

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Scheme representing the proposed cross talk between obese adipocytes and muscle cells, which could trigger inflammation and muscle dysfunctions.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Spearman correlations between the gene expression of muscle markers in the skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) and the expression of leptin/IL-6 in both epididymal adipose tissue and skeletal muscle

    GastrocnemiusFat mass %Epididymal adipose tissueGastrocnemius muscle
    LeptinIL-6LeptinIL-6
    RPRPRPRPRP
    MyoD −0.729 0.001 −0.747 0.001 −0.708 0.001 −0.618 0.006 0.4270.051
    MyoG−0.2790.147−0.0530.424−0.0300.454−0.0530.4240.0090.489
    β-Actin−0.4150.056 −0.788 0.000 −0.720 0.001 −0.435 0.047 0.2710.155
    Titin −0.5357 0.0396 −0.41070.1283 −0.6452 0.0094 −0.34290.21090.16790.5499
    IGF-II −0.577 0.011 −0.744 0.001 −0.664 0.003 −0.588 0.009 0.453 0.040
    IGFBP-5 −0.6264 0.0165 −0.6791 0.0076 −0.6865 0.0067 −0.51210.06120.45490.1022
    PGC-1α0.0680.4100.1520.3030.2130.2300.0200.4760.1600.292
    PGC-1β−0.3500.101 −0.646 0.006 −0.459 0.042 −0.3320.1130.4180.061
    • The mice used were 20 weeks old (n = 16). Significant correlations appear in boldface.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes: 64 (9)

In this Issue

September 2015, 64(9)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Human Adipocytes Induce Inflammation and Atrophy in Muscle Cells During Obesity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Human Adipocytes Induce Inflammation and Atrophy in Muscle Cells During Obesity
Vanessa Pellegrinelli, Christine Rouault, Sergio Rodriguez-Cuenca, Victorine Albert, Frédérique Edom-Vovard, Antonio Vidal-Puig, Karine Clément, Gillian S. Butler-Browne, Danièle Lacasa
Diabetes Sep 2015, 64 (9) 3121-3134; DOI: 10.2337/db14-0796

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Human Adipocytes Induce Inflammation and Atrophy in Muscle Cells During Obesity
Vanessa Pellegrinelli, Christine Rouault, Sergio Rodriguez-Cuenca, Victorine Albert, Frédérique Edom-Vovard, Antonio Vidal-Puig, Karine Clément, Gillian S. Butler-Browne, Danièle Lacasa
Diabetes Sep 2015, 64 (9) 3121-3134; DOI: 10.2337/db14-0796
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Glucose Sensing Mediated by Portal Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Is Markedly Impaired in Insulin-Resistant Obese Animals
  • Muscular G9a Regulates Muscle-Liver-Fat Axis by Musclin Under Overnutrition in Female Mice
  • Manipulation of Dietary Amino Acids Prevents and Reverses Obesity in Mice Through Multiple Mechanisms That Modulate Energy Homeostasis
Show more Obesity Studies

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes Care
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Print ISSN: 0012-1797, Online ISSN: 1939-327X.