Complications

Mechanism of Altered Metformin Distribution in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

  1. John D. Clarke 1 ,
  2. Anika L. Dzierlenga 1 ,
  3. Nicholas R. Nelson 1 ,
  4. Hui Li 1 ,
  5. Samantha Werts 1 ,
  6. Michael J. Goedken 2 and
  7. Nathan J. Cherrington 1 ⇑
  1. 1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
  2. 2Translational Sciences, Research Pathology Services, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
  1. Corresponding author: Nathan J. Cherrington, cherrington{at}pharmacy.arizona.edu.
Diabetes 2015 Sep; 64(9): 3305-3313. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-1947

Abstract

Metformin is an antihyperglycemic drug that is widely prescribed for type 2 diabetes mellitus and is currently being investigated for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH is known to alter hepatic membrane transporter expression and drug disposition similarly in humans and rodent models of NASH. Metformin is almost exclusively eliminated through the kidney primarily through active secretion mediated by Oct1, Oct2, and Mate1. The purpose of this study was to determine how NASH affects kidney transporter expression and metformin pharmacokinetics. A single oral dose of [14C]metformin was administered to C57BL/6J (wild type [WT]) and diabetic ob/ob mice fed either a control diet or a methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet. Metformin plasma concentrations were slightly increased in the WT/MCD and ob/control groups, whereas plasma concentrations were 4.8-fold higher in ob/MCD mice compared with WT/control. The MCD diet significantly increased plasma half-life and mean residence time and correspondingly decreased oral clearance in both genotypes. These changes in disposition were caused by ob/ob- and MCD diet–specific decreases in the kidney mRNA expression of Oct2 and Mate1, whereas Oct1 mRNA expression was only decreased in ob/MCD mice. These results indicate that the diabetic ob/ob genotype and the MCD disease model alter kidney transporter expression and alter the pharmacokinetics of metformin, potentially increasing the risk of drug toxicity.

Introduction

Metformin is recognized as a first-line antidiabetic drug used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that belongs to the biguanide class of drugs. In addition to its antidiabetic effects, metformin has also been reported to provide antiobesity, antihyperglycemic, antilipidemic, antineoplastic, and cardioprotective benefits to patients (1). These facts have made metformin one of the most prescribed drugs, with millions of prescriptions dispensed each year in the U.S. (1). Lactic acidosis is a severe, life-threatening, and dose-dependent adverse effect of metformin characterized by low arterial pH that has an incidence of approximately three cases per 100,000 patients per year (2). Lactic acidosis is caused by accumulation of metformin within the patient during the course of treatment and is known to be fatal in ∼50% of patients. Metformin is contraindicated in patients with renal disease or renal dysfunction because it is almost exclusively eliminated through the kidneys into the urine unchanged (3). Renal elimination of metformin is carried out primarily by active secretion, with total renal clearance reported to be five times higher than the glomerular filtration rate (4). In vitro and in vivo studies have implicated renal organic cation transporter 1 (Oct1) and Oct2 on the basolateral membrane of proximal tubule cells and multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 (Mate1) on the apical membrane as the major transporters involved in active secretion of metformin (2,5–7). Given the fact that metformin is dependent on renal elimination, there is a need to investigate other potential sources of variability in kidney function that may impact metformin disposition and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions.

There is a growing body of evidence to indicate that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) causes extrahepatic changes in the function of organs such as the kidney. NAFLD is now the most common liver disease in the U.S. and the most severe form of the disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), is estimated to be present in 5.7–17% of the adult U.S. population (8). T2DM is highly associated with NASH, with >60% of patients with NASH also reported to have T2DM, and patients with T2DM are at the greatest risk for progression of NAFLD to NASH (9). Recent research has shown that NAFLD and NASH are associated with the occurrence of chronic kidney disease (CKD), independent of other risk factors such as age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia (10–18). Lower glomerular filtration rate and a greater frequency of CKD has been reported in NASH patients compared with control patients matched for age, sex, and BMI (17,18). Currently it is not known what effect NAFLD has on the expression and function of transporters within the kidney and how this may impact elimination of drugs such as metformin. These data suggest that NASH patients may be an at-risk population for altered pharmacokinetics of renally excreted drugs.

In the current study, the hepatic and extrahepatic effects of liver disease on metformin pharmacokinetics were determined by modeling NASH with the methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet and the ob/ob diabetic mouse strain.

Research Design and Methods

Animal Study

C57BL/6J (wild type [WT]) and leptin-deficient (ob/ob) male mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) at 6 weeks of age (n = 5 for each group) and housed on a 12-h light and 12-h dark cycle in The University of Arizona animal care facility. The animal studies were approved by The University of Arizona Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were provided either an MCD diet or a control diet replete with methionine and choline (control) from Dyets Inc. (Bethlehem, PA) ad libitum. WT mice and ob/ob mice were fed the diets for 6 and 4 weeks, respectively. Mice were fasted for 12 h prior to receiving a single oral dose (10 mL/kg) of [14C]metformin (50 mg/kg and 100 µCi/kg). After dosing, mice were housed in metabolic cages by treatment group for 12 h in order to collect urine and feces. Blood was collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h into heparinized tubes and subjected to centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 1 min to isolate plasma. Approximately 50 mg of liver, kidney, and muscle tissue were collected and processed with 0.5 mL of Solvable (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) for 3.5 h at 60°C, followed by the addition of 5 mL of Ultima Gold (PerkinElmer). Radioactivity in plasma, liver, kidney, muscle, urine, and feces was measured by liquid scintillation counting. The pharmacokinetics of metformin was determined via noncompartmental analysis using PKSolver (19). Pharmacokinetics end points include plasma area under the curve (AUC), plasma half-life, plasma mean residence time, oral volume of distribution, and oral clearance.

Histopathological Analysis and Plasma Chemistries

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded liver and kidney tissues were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and scored by a board-certified veterinary pathologist. Liver tissues were scored for lipid accumulation, necrosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and biliary hyperplasia, and kidney tissues were scored for necrosis, tubule degeneration and regeneration, tubule dilation, tubule casts, and nephropathy. Pathology scores were as follows: 0, no significant lesions (0%); 1, minimal (<10%); 2, mild (10–25%); 3, moderate (25–40%); 4, marked (40–50%); and 5, severe (>50%). The remaining tissues were snap frozen for mRNA isolation and quantification. The terminal plasma collection was used to quantify insulin and glucose. The dose of metformin was low enough and the plasma collection long enough after the dose that metformin likely did not have an effect on blood glucose levels (20). Insulin was measured using an ELISA kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and glucose was measured using an absorbance-based assay kit (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), both according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

mRNA Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from mouse livers and kidneys using RNAzol B reagent from Tel-Test Inc. (Friendswood, TX) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The branched DNA assay was used to quantify mRNA transcripts using gene-specific oligonucleotide probes for Oct1, Oct2, and Mate1 (Supplementary Table 1). Total RNA (1 μg/μL; 10 μL per well) was added to each well of a 96-well plate containing 50 μL of the appropriate probe set. A QuantiGene 1.0 Discovery Assay Kit from Affymetrix Inc. (Santa Clara, CA) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol and as previously described (21). Luminescence was measured using a Quantiplex 320 branched DNA luminometer interfaced with Quantiplex Data Management Software (version 5.02).

Statistical Analysis

All results are represented as mean ± SEM. For all comparisons within the rodent studies, two-way ANOVA statistical analyses were used with a Bonferroni multiple comparisons posttest to compare between control and MCD mice within each genotype. Histopathological data were rank ordered before statistical analysis. An outlier test using a modified z score threshold of 3.5 was performed to identify potential outliers, and it was determined that one mouse in the WT/control group and one mouse from the ob/MCD group were outliers and were excluded from the analysis. All analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA).

Results

NASH Phenotype in MCD and ob/ob Models

To determine the effects of the MCD model of NASH and the ob/ob model of NASH and diabetes on liver and kidney pathology, hematoxylin-eosin–stained tissue sections were scored by a trained veterinary pathologist. The MCD diet induced characteristic histopathological steatosis and inflammation features of NASH in WT mice (Fig. 1A and C ). The ob/ob mice on the control diet had more severe steatosis but only minimal inflammation, whereas the ob/ob mice on the MCD diet had the most severe NASH phenotype (Fig. 1A and C ). No liver fibrosis was observed in mice from any group. In contrast to liver findings, no groups had evidence of kidney injury or pathology (Fig. 1B ), which is consistent with previous reports (22). To determine the presence of the diabetic phenotype, plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured in each group of mice. The MCD diet caused a reduction in the plasma glucose levels in both genotypes (Fig. 2A ). The ob/ob mice on the control diet had dramatically higher plasma insulin levels and there was an MCD diet effect on plasma insulin levels, although the effect was much greater in the ob/ob genotype than in the WT mice (Fig. 2B ). Furthermore, genotype caused a much lower glucose-to-insulin ratio in the ob/ob mice, indicating a higher degree of insulin resistance compared with the WT mice (Fig. 2C ).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Liver and kidney histology in WT and ob/ob mice. Hematoxylin-eosin–stained liver (A) and kidney (B) sections from WT or ob/ob mice fed either a control or MCD diet. Original magnification ×200. C: Pathology scores were as follows: 0, no significant lesions (0%); 1, minimal (<10%); 2, mild (10–25%); 3, moderate (25–40%); 4, marked (40–50%); and 5, severe (>50%). Data represent mean ± SEM. Boldface values in the table indicate P < 0.05. Control, n = 5; MCD, n = 4; ob/control, n = 5; ob/MCD, n = 5. *P value < 0.05 according to a two-way ANOVA Bonferroni posttest that was performed comparing control to MCD or ob/control to ob/MCD. Closed circles, control diet; open triangles, MCD diet.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Effect of MCD diet and ob/ob strain on glucose and insulin. Plasma samples from WT or ob/ob mice fed either a control diet or MCD diet analyzed for glucose (A) and insulin (B) concentrations. C: The glucose-to-insulin ratio was calculated by dividing the glucose concentration by the insulin concentration for each animal. Data represent mean ± SEM. Boldface values in the table indicate P < 0.05. Control, n = 5; MCD, n = 4; ob/control, n = 5; ob/MCD, n = 5. *P value < 0.05 according to a two-way ANOVA Bonferroni multiple comparison posttest. Black bars, control diet; white bars, MCD diet.

Metformin Exposure Is Increased in Disease Groups

To determine the effects of NASH on metformin disposition, an oral pharmacokinetic study was performed. The plasma time course for metformin throughout the 12-h study is shown in Fig. 3A . Both diet and genotype had significant effects on the plasma AUC for metformin, although the MCD diet caused dramatically higher plasma AUC in the ob/ob group than the MCD diet caused in the WT group (Fig. 3B ). There was a diet effect on both the plasma half-life and mean residence time, and there was also an effect of genotype on mean residence time (Fig. 3C ). Oral volume of distribution was increased only in the ob/control group, whereas the oral clearance of metformin was decreased by the MCD diet in both WT and ob/ob groups (Fig. 3D ). The MCD diet caused an increase in the concentration of metformin in liver, kidney, and muscle (Fig. 4). Genotype also caused an increase in metformin concentrations in the liver (Fig. 4). The percent of the metformin dose that was excreted in the feces was <10% for all treatment groups, indicating similar absorption in the intestine (Table 1). The WT/control, WT/MCD, and ob/control groups all excreted ≥60% of the metformin dose in the urine, whereas the ob/MCD group excreted only 28% of the dose during the course of the study (Table 1).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Altered pharmacokinetic parameters in diseased mice. Metformin was quantified in the plasma from mice dosed orally with metformin. A: Time course of metformin plasma concentrations. Black circles, control; white circles, MCD; black triangles, ob/control; white triangles, ob/MCD. B: Metformin plasma AUC. C: Metformin plasma half-life and mean residence time. D: Metformin oral volume of distribution (V/F) and oral clearance (Cl/F). Data represent mean ± SEM. Boldface values in the tables indicate P < 0.05. Control, n = 4; MCD, n = 4; ob/control, n = 5; ob/MCD, n = 4. *P value < 0.05 according to a two-way ANOVA Bonferroni multiple comparison posttest. Black bars, control diet; white bars, MCD diet.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Metformin concentrations are increased in liver, kidney, and muscle of diseased mice. Metformin was quantified in the liver, kidney, and muscle tissues from mice dosed orally with metformin. Data represent mean ± SEM. Boldface values in the table indicate P < 0.05. Control, n = 4; MCD, n = 4; ob/control, n = 5; ob/MCD, n = 4. *P value < 0.05 according to a two-way ANOVA Bonferroni multiple comparison posttest. Black bars, control diet; white bars, MCD diet.

View this table:
Table 1

Percentage of metformin dose excreted in urine and feces during the course of the study

Hepatic and Renal Transporters are Altered in Mice with Disease

Metformin is known to be a substrate for mouse Oct1, Oct2, and Mate1. Expression of hepatic Oct1 mRNA was increased in mice fed the MCD diet, whereas Mate1 mRNA was increased in the ob/ob mice fed either diet (Fig. 5). In the kidney, Oct1 mRNA was decreased in the ob/ob mice fed the MCD diet. Kidney Oct2 and Mate1 mRNA were both decreased by ob/ob genotype and by the MCD diet, where the lowest expression of both transporters was observed in the ob/ob mice fed the MCD diet (Fig. 6).

Figure 5
Figure 5

Hepatic transporter mRNA expression. Oct1 and Mate1 mRNA expression in the livers of WT or ob/ob mice fed either a control diet or MCD diet. Data represent mean ± SEM. Boldface values in the table indicate P < 0.05. Control, n = 4; MCD, n = 4; ob/control, n = 5; ob/MCD, n = 4. Black bars, control diet; white bars, MCD diet. RLU = relative light units.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Kidney transporter mRNA expression is altered in diseased mice. Oct1, Oct2, and Mate1 mRNA expression in the kidneys of WT or ob/ob mice fed either a control diet or MCD diet. Data represent mean ± SEM. Boldface values in the table indicate P < 0.05. Control, n = 4; MCD, n = 4; ob/control, n = 5; ob/MCD, n = 4. *P value < 0.05 according to a two-way ANOVA Bonferroni multiple comparison posttest. Black bars, control diet; white bars, MCD diet. RLU = relative light units.

Discussion

It is now accepted that NASH-associated changes in liver function and transporter expression can have a dramatic effect on drug metabolism and disposition and that there is a higher incidence of CKD in NAFLD patients, but there is a paucity of information regarding how NASH can effect kidney transporter expression and disposition of drugs excreted in the urine (10–12,14–18,23–31). Metformin is widely used for the management of T2DM and it has been suggested that the metformin dosage needs to be individualized in order to maximize therapeutic benefit and minimize adverse effects because of wide variability in pharmacokinetics (3,32). Metformin is almost entirely eliminated through the kidney and is currently being considered for its therapeutic effects on liver pathology associated with NASH. There are a number of adverse effects that are associated with metformin treatment, including the common reactions of diarrhea and nausea/vomiting and the rare and potentially fatal reaction of lactic acidosis (5). There is a great need to identify the risk factors for development of these adverse effects, and here we show for the first time that rodent models of NASH and diabetes have extrahepatic effects on kidney transporter expression, resulting in increased systemic exposure to metformin.

At physiological pH, metformin is primarily cationic and is dependent on transporters for passage through epithelial barriers within the body. Approximately 80% of the renal clearance of metformin is accomplished by active secretion mediated by OCT1, OCT2, and MATE1 (5,6,20,33,34). The OCTs are responsible for metformin uptake from the blood and are expressed on the basolateral side of hepatocytes (OCT1 and Oct1) and proximal tubule cells (OCT2, Oct1, and Oct2), whereas MATE1/Mate1 is responsible for efflux from cells on the apical side of hepatocytes and proximal tubule cells. OCT3 can also transport metformin but due to low expression of OCT3 in liver and kidney, only marginal nonsignificant changes in metformin plasma AUC have been observed in male Oct3 knockout mice (35,36). MATE2-K can also contribute to secretion of metformin but it is not expressed in rodent kidney and therefore it was not measured in these experiments (37). Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies indicates that changes in expression and function of these transporters can dramatically impact the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin.

Here we show that the combined NASH- and diabetes-associated changes in kidney expression of Oct1, Oct2, and Mate1 caused a 4.8-fold increase in plasma exposure for ob/MCD mice (Figs. 3 and 6). These data are in agreement with previously published data from preclinical models showing that a combination of changes in transporters is often required to elicit changes in metformin pharmacokinetics. For example, it has previously been shown that Oct1 knockout alone is insufficient to cause altered pharmacokinetics but due to functional redundancy of these transporters in the mouse kidney, double knockout of Oct1 and Oct2 caused 3.8-fold higher systemic metformin exposure (6,20). It has also been shown that heterozygous knockout of Mate1 in mice has no effect on metformin pharmacokinetics, whereas complete knockout of Mate1 increased metformin plasma AUC (twofold), decreased urinary excretion, decreased renal clearance, decreased renal secretory clearance, and caused severe lactic acidosis (33,34). These data are also consistent with our data showing that the MCD-associated decrease in Oct2 and Mate1 in WT mice or the ob/ob-associated decrease in these transporters (control diet) caused only a slight increase in plasma AUC of metformin, likely due to the compensatory activity of Oct1 in the kidney (Figs. 3 and 6). Collectively, these data suggest that these transporters work together in the clearance of metformin and should be considered together when evaluating the clinical factors that can alter metformin pharmacokinetics.

In addition to changes in plasma metformin concentrations, we also observed that the MCD diet caused increased liver, kidney, and muscle metformin concentrations in both WT and ob/ob strains. These data are consistent with the MCD diet–induced changes in metformin pharmacokinetics we observed (i.e., increased plasma exposure, increased plasma half-life and mean residence time, and decreased oral clearance). It is difficult to determine the precise cause of these changes in tissue concentrations from the data presented here but they do suggest that increased systemic exposure to metformin leads to higher tissue concentrations. These higher tissue concentrations could have implications for metformin’s glucose-lowering effect and toxicities, although this needs to be explored further in this model.

Numerous clinical pharmacogenetics studies have shown that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in OCT1, OCT2, and MATE1 can work alone or in combination to alter the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin. SNPs in hepatic OCT1 have been reported to increase plasma AUC, increase plasma maximal concentrations, reduce trough steady-state metformin plasma concentrations, and reduce the pharmacodynamic effect of metformin (6,32,38). Variants in OCT2 have also been shown to increase metformin plasma AUC, increase peak concentrations, and contribute to decreased oral clearance (39). For MATE1, it has been reported that individuals who are heterozygous for a series of reduced function alleles have no change in the pharmacokinetics of metformin (34). In contrast, another study found that one SNP (rs2289669) in MATE1 was associated with increased efficacy of metformin therapy, suggesting increased metformin exposure, although the pharmacokinetics of metformin was not evaluated in this study (40). A gene-by-gene interaction effect has been reported for MATE1 and OCT2 where the combination of the two SNPs caused a decrease in total renal clearance and renal secretory clearance (41). These data, in conjunction with the data presented here and our recent data highlighting the ability for multiple factors to interact and cause synergistic increases in drug exposure, suggest that the effect of NASH on metformin pharmacokinetics needs to be considered both alone and in combination with other factors that can increase metformin exposure (26). This assertion is supported by a recent population pharmacokinetics study that suggested that metformin may be safely administered to patients with renal impairment if the variables affecting metformin pharmacokinetics are known and appropriately accounted for (42). On the basis of the data presented here, we suggest that NASH may need to be included as one of these factors due to its effect on kidney function and potentially transporter function.

There have been a number of preclinical and clinical studies showing that metformin may be an effective treatment for the liver pathologies associated with NAFLD and NASH. However, these studies also suggest that NASH causes a nonsignificant increase in the risk of lactic acidosis that, when combined with other risk factors, may synergistically increase that risk. In clinical trials, plasma lactic acid is commonly used to monitor for the development of lactic acidosis. A number of studies have reported no adverse effects but, importantly, lactic acid was not reported (43–47). A retrospective study found that metformin improves the survival of NASH patients with diabetes but also noted that the most common reason for the discontinuation of metformin was the concern for development of lactic acidosis (48). In studies where lactic acid was measured and reported, there appears to be an increase in lactic acid concentrations in NAFLD patients. For example, in one study there was a mild increase in lactate levels noted during treatment that generally stayed within normal limits, but 1 patient (out of 15) had to withdraw due to lactate levels that increased beyond the upper limit (49). Another study found that lactic acid increased by 30% in patients treated with metformin and exceeded the upper limit in 1 patient (out of 14) (50). A third study found that metformin treatment increased lactic acid levels in 6 patients, with 3 exceeding the upper limit (out of 36), although the increase was not statistically significant at the end of the treatment (51). One study did not measure lactic acid but did report that the combination of metformin plus pentoxifylline was poorly tolerated, causing diarrhea and nausea in 40 and 10% of patients, respectively. Two patients discontinued treatment in the first months of treatment due to toxicities and it is unclear if these adverse reactions are due to metformin, pentoxifylline, or both (52). It is important to point out that most of these studies evaluating the efficacy of metformin were not designed to, nor did they have the statistical power to, capture the overlap of one or more risk variables for altered metformin pharmacokinetics and adverse effects. To date, there have been no pharmacokinetic studies to determine if NAFLD alters the disposition of metformin and this will be an important area of future research (53). Although our data are from a preclinical rodent model of NASH and diabetes, they accentuate the need for properly powered and designed studies to determine how NAFLD may work alone or in combination with other factors in individual variability to alter metformin pharmacokinetics and the risk of adverse effects.

In the current study, we show that the combined effects of MCD diet– and ob/ob-induced NASH phenotypes alter the expression of multiple kidney transporters and increase systemic exposure of metformin. The data presented suggest that as the clinical trials for metformin in NAFLD patients proceed, a careful consideration needs to be made to account for the numerous factors that can influence metformin pharmacokinetics in order to minimize the risk of adverse effects. In the absence of confirmed changes in human renal OCT2 and MATE1 transporters, the fact that impaired kidney function is known to occur in 25% of NASH patients highlights the need to account for genetic- and disease-associated changes in renal function (17). This work lays the groundwork for future studies into the safety of metformin in NAFLD patients.

Article Information

Funding. This work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Toxicology Training Grant (ES007091) and National Institutes of Health grants (HD062489, AI083927, and ES019487).

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. J.D.C., A.L.D., and N.J.C. participated in study design, conducted experiments, and analyzed the data. N.R.N. participated in study design. H.L. and S.W. conducted experiments and analyzed the data. M.J.G. performed histopathological analyses. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript. N.J.C. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Footnotes

  • Received December 26, 2014.
  • Accepted May 19, 2015.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Cicero AF ,
    2. Tartagni E ,
    3. Ertek S
    . Metformin and its clinical use: new insights for an old drug in clinical practice. Arch Med Sci 2012;8:907–917 pmid:23185203
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Wang DS ,
    2. Kusuhara H ,
    3. Kato Y ,
    4. Jonker JW ,
    5. Schinkel AH ,
    6. Sugiyama Y
    . Involvement of organic cation transporter 1 in the lactic acidosis caused by metformin. Mol Pharmacol 2003;63:844–848 pmid:12644585
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Graham GG ,
    2. Punt J ,
    3. Arora M , et al
    . Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet 2011;50:81–98 pmid:21241070
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Scheen AJ
    . Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet 1996;30:359–371 pmid:8743335
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Toyama K ,
    2. Yonezawa A ,
    3. Masuda S , et al
    . Loss of multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 (MATE1) is associated with metformin-induced lactic acidosis. Br J Pharmacol 2012;166:1183–1191 pmid:22242910
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Shu Y ,
    2. Brown C ,
    3. Castro RA , et al
    . Effect of genetic variation in the organic cation transporter 1, OCT1, on metformin pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;83:273–280 pmid:17609683
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Wang DS ,
    2. Jonker JW ,
    3. Kato Y ,
    4. Kusuhara H ,
    5. Schinkel AH ,
    6. Sugiyama Y
    . Involvement of organic cation transporter 1 in hepatic and intestinal distribution of metformin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002;302:510–515 pmid:12130709
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Ali R ,
    2. Cusi K
    . New diagnostic and treatment approaches in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Ann Med 2009;41:265–278 pmid:19353360
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Dixon JB ,
    2. Bhathal PS ,
    3. O’Brien PE
    . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis in the severely obese. Gastroenterology 2001;121:91–100 pmid:11438497
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Fabrizi F ,
    2. Aghemo A ,
    3. Messa P
    . Hepatorenal syndrome and novel advances in its management. Kidney Blood Press Res 2013;37:588–601 pmid:24356549
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Armstrong MJ ,
    2. Adams LA ,
    3. Canbay A ,
    4. Syn W-K
    . Extrahepatic complications of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2014;59:1174–1197 pmid:24002776
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Mikolasevic I ,
    2. Racki S ,
    3. Bubic I ,
    4. Jelic I ,
    5. Stimac D ,
    6. Orlic L
    . Chronic kidney disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease proven by transient elastography. Kidney Blood Press Res 2013;37:305–310 pmid:24029696
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Li Y ,
    2. Zhu S ,
    3. Li B , et al
    . Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic kidney disease in population with prediabetes or diabetes. Int Urol Nephrol 2014;46:1785–1791 pmid:25099524
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hamad AA ,
    2. Khalil AA ,
    3. Connolly V ,
    4. Ahmed MH
    . Relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and kidney function: a communication between two organs that needs further exploration. Arab J Gastroenterol 2012;13:161–165 pmid:23432982
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Targher G ,
    2. Chonchol M ,
    3. Zoppini G ,
    4. Abaterusso C ,
    5. Bonora E
    . Risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: is there a link? J Hepatol 2011;54:1020–1029 pmid:21145850
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Yilmaz Y ,
    2. Alahdab YO ,
    3. Yonal O , et al
    . Microalbuminuria in nondiabetic patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: association with liver fibrosis. Metabolism 2010;59:1327–1330 pmid:20096896
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Targher G ,
    2. Bertolini L ,
    3. Rodella S ,
    4. Lippi G ,
    5. Zoppini G ,
    6. Chonchol M
    . Relationship between kidney function and liver histology in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:2166–2171 pmid:20724519
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Yasui K ,
    2. Sumida Y ,
    3. Mori Y , et al
    . Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and increased risk of chronic kidney disease. Metabolism 2011;60:735–739 pmid:20817213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Zhang Y ,
    2. Huo M ,
    3. Zhou J ,
    4. Xie S
    . PKSolver: An add-in program for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis in Microsoft Excel. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2010;99:306–314 pmid:20176408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Higgins JW ,
    2. Bedwell DW ,
    3. Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ
    . Ablation of both organic cation transporter (OCT)1 and OCT2 alters metformin pharmacokinetics but has no effect on tissue drug exposure and pharmacodynamics. Drug Metab Dispos 2012;40:1170–1177 pmid:22407892
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Hardwick RN ,
    2. Fisher CD ,
    3. Canet MJ ,
    4. Lake AD ,
    5. Cherrington NJ
    . Diversity in antioxidant response enzymes in progressive stages of human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Drug Metab Dispos 2010;38:2293–2301 pmid:20805291
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Hudkins KL ,
    2. Pichaiwong W ,
    3. Wietecha T , et al
    . BTBR Ob/Ob mutant mice model progressive diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21:1533–1542 pmid:20634301
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Canet MJ ,
    2. Hardwick RN ,
    3. Lake AD ,
    4. Dzierlenga AL ,
    5. Clarke JD ,
    6. Cherrington NJ
    . Modeling human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-associated changes in drug transporter expression using experimental rodent models. Drug Metab Dispos 2014;42:586–595 pmid:24384915
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hardwick RN ,
    2. Fisher CD ,
    3. Street SM ,
    4. Canet MJ ,
    5. Cherrington NJ
    . Molecular mechanism of altered ezetimibe disposition in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Drug Metab Dispos 2012;40:450–460 pmid:22112382
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fisher CD ,
    2. Lickteig AJ ,
    3. Augustine LM , et al
    . Experimental non-alcoholic fatty liver disease results in decreased hepatic uptake transporter expression and function in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2009;613:119–127 pmid:19358839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Clarke JD ,
    2. Hardwick RN ,
    3. Lake AD , et al
    . Synergistic interaction between genetics and disease on pravastatin disposition. J Hepatol 2014;61:139–147 pmid:24613363
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lake AD ,
    2. Novak P ,
    3. Fisher CD , et al
    . Analysis of global and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination gene expression in the progressive stages of human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Drug Metab Dispos 2011;39:1954–1960 pmid:21737566
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hardwick RN ,
    2. Fisher CD ,
    3. Canet MJ ,
    4. Scheffer GL ,
    5. Cherrington NJ
    . Variations in ATP-binding cassette transporter regulation during the progression of human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Drug Metab Dispos 2011;39:2395–2402 pmid:21878559
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fisher CD ,
    2. Lickteig AJ ,
    3. Augustine LM , et al
    . Hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme alterations in humans with progressive stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Drug Metab Dispos 2009;37:2087–2094 pmid:19651758
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Clarke JD ,
    2. Hardwick RN ,
    3. Lake AD ,
    4. Canet MJ ,
    5. Cherrington NJ
    . Experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis increases exposure to simvastatin hydroxy acid by decreasing hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide expression. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2014;348:452–458 pmid:24403518
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Targher G ,
    2. Mantovani A ,
    3. Pichiri I , et al
    . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is independently associated with an increased incidence of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1729–1736 pmid:24696459
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Christensen MM ,
    2. Brasch-Andersen C ,
    3. Green H , et al
    . The pharmacogenetics of metformin and its impact on plasma metformin steady-state levels and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2011;21:837–850 pmid:21989078
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Tsuda M ,
    2. Terada T ,
    3. Mizuno T ,
    4. Katsura T ,
    5. Shimakura J ,
    6. Inui K
    . Targeted disruption of the multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 (mate1) gene in mice reduces renal secretion of metformin. Mol Pharmacol 2009;75:1280–1286 pmid:19332510
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Toyama K ,
    2. Yonezawa A ,
    3. Tsuda M , et al
    . Heterozygous variants of multidrug and toxin extrusions (MATE1 and MATE2-K) have little influence on the disposition of metformin in diabetic patients. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2010;20:135–138 pmid:20016398
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Lee N ,
    2. Duan H ,
    3. Hebert MF ,
    4. Liang CJ ,
    5. Rice KM ,
    6. Wang J
    . Taste of a pill: organic cation transporter-3 (OCT3) mediates metformin accumulation and secretion in salivary glands. J Biol Chem 2014;289:27055–27064 pmid:25107910
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Alnouti Y ,
    2. Petrick JS ,
    3. Klaassen CD
    . Tissue distribution and ontogeny of organic cation transporters in mice. Drug Metab Dispos 2006;34:477–482 pmid:16381671
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Chung J-Y ,
    2. Cho SK ,
    3. Kim TH , et al
    . Functional characterization of MATE2-K genetic variants and their effects on metformin pharmacokinetics. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2013;23:365–373 pmid:23652408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Shu Y ,
    2. Sheardown SA ,
    3. Brown C , et al
    . Effect of genetic variation in the organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) on metformin action. J Clin Invest 2007;117:1422–1431 pmid:17476361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Yoon H ,
    2. Cho H-Y ,
    3. Yoo H-D ,
    4. Kim S-M ,
    5. Lee Y-B
    . Influences of organic cation transporter polymorphisms on the population pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy subjects. AAPS J 2013;15:571–580 pmid:23417334
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Becker ML ,
    2. Visser LE ,
    3. van Schaik RHN ,
    4. Hofman A ,
    5. Uitterlinden AG ,
    6. Stricker BHC
    . Genetic variation in the multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 transporter protein influences the glucose-lowering effect of metformin in patients with diabetes: a preliminary study. Diabetes 2009;58:745–749 pmid:19228809
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Christensen MMH ,
    2. Pedersen RS ,
    3. Stage TB , et al
    . A gene-gene interaction between polymorphisms in the OCT2 and MATE1 genes influences the renal clearance of metformin. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2013;23:526–534 pmid:23873119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Duong JK ,
    2. Kumar SS ,
    3. Kirkpatrick CM , et al
    . Population pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: simulation of doses according to renal function. Clin Pharmacokinet 2013;52:373–384 pmid:23475568
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Loomba R ,
    2. Lutchman G ,
    3. Kleiner DE , et al
    . Clinical trial: pilot study of metformin for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;29:172–182 pmid:18945255
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. de Oliveira CPMS ,
    2. Stefano JT ,
    3. de Siqueira ERF , et al
    . Combination of N-acetylcysteine and metformin improves histological steatosis and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol Res 2008;38:159–165 pmid:18197877
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Idilman R ,
    2. Mizrak D ,
    3. Corapcioglu D , et al
    . Clinical trial: insulin-sensitizing agents may reduce consequences of insulin resistance in individuals with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;28:200–208 pmid:18445142
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shields WW ,
    2. Thompson KE ,
    3. Grice GA ,
    4. Harrison SA ,
    5. Coyle WJ
    . The effect of metformin and standard therapy versus standard therapy alone in nondiabetic patients with insulin resistance and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a pilot trial. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2009;2:157–163 pmid:21180541
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Bugianesi E ,
    2. Gentilcore E ,
    3. Manini R , et al
    . A randomized controlled trial of metformin versus vitamin E or prescriptive diet in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1082–1090 pmid:15842582
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Zhang X ,
    2. Harmsen WS ,
    3. Mettler TA , et al
    . Continuation of metformin use after a diagnosis of cirrhosis significantly improves survival of patients with diabetes. Hepatology 2014;60:2008–2016 pmid:24798175
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Nair S ,
    2. Diehl AM ,
    3. Wiseman M ,
    4. Farr GH Jr.,
    5. Perrillo RP
    . Metformin in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot open label trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:23–28 pmid:15225167
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Marchesini G ,
    2. Brizi M ,
    3. Bianchi G ,
    4. Tomassetti S ,
    5. Zoli M ,
    6. Melchionda N
    . Metformin in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Lancet 2001;358:893–894 pmid:11567710
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Uygun A ,
    2. Kadayifci A ,
    3. Isik AT , et al
    . Metformin in the treatment of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19:537–544 pmid:14987322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Sturm N ,
    2. Bronowicki J-P ,
    3. Maynard-Muet M , et al
    . Metformin plus pentoxifylline versus prescriptive diet in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a randomized controlled pilot trial. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2009;33:984–986 pmid:19646832
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Scheen AJ
    . Pharmacokinetic and toxicological considerations for the treatment of diabetes in patients with liver disease. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2014;10:839–857 pmid:24669954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Add to Selected Citations

Mechanism of Altered Metformin Distribution in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
John D. Clarke, Anika L. Dzierlenga, Nicholas R. Nelson, Hui Li, Samantha Werts, Michael J. Goedken, Nathan J. Cherrington
Diabetes Sep 2015, 64 (9) 3305-3313; DOI: 10.2337/db14-1947
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section