Perspectives in Diabetes

Type 1 Diabetes in STAT Protein Family Mutations: Regulating the Th17/Treg Equilibrium and Beyond

  1. Marco Fabbri1,2,
  2. Mikaela Frixou3,
  3. Massimo Degano4 and
  4. Georgia Fousteri1⇑
  1. 1Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  2. 2Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
  3. 3School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, U.K.
  4. 4Biocrystallography Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  1. Corresponding author: Georgia Fousteri, fousteri.georgia{at}hsr.it
Diabetes 2019 Feb; 68(2): 258-265. https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-0627

Abstract

Improvements in the immunological, molecular, and genetic technologies such as next-generation sequencing have led to an exponential increase in the number of monogenic immune dysregulatory syndromes diagnosed, where type 1 diabetes (T1D) forms part of the autoimmune manifestations. Here, we reviewed the mutations in the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) protein family, namely gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in STAT1 and STAT3 as well as STAT5b deficiency, that show strong association to T1D susceptibility. The equilibrium of T-helper 17 (Th17) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) is often found altered in patients affected by STAT GOF mutations. While the increased number of Th17 cells and the concomitant decrease in Treg cells may explain T1D in STAT3 GOF patients, the reduced number of Th17 cells found in those carrying STAT1 GOF mutations added a new level of complexity on the exact role of Th17 in the pathogenesis of T1D. Here, we describe the possible mechanisms through which STAT3 and STAT1 GOF mutations may perturb the fate and function of Th17 and Tregs and explore how this may lead to the development of T1D. We propose that the study of monogenic diseases, and in particular STAT mutations, may not only improve our understanding of the function of the human immune system but also shed light onto the pathogenic mechanisms of T1D and the genetic variants that confer predisposition to the disease.

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a multifactorial disease caused by the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells. In recent years, genome-wide association studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in multiple susceptibility loci including INS, PTPN22, CTLA4, and IL2RA (1–3) that underlie the polygenic nature of T1D. These SNPs together with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles that are strongly associated to T1D have given rise to a genetic risk score (GRS) that is used to predict T1D in susceptible individuals (4). Autoantibodies (AAbs) against islet antigens such as GAD, insulin, and IA-2 are used today as markers of diagnosis and disease risk (5). Since their role in the pathogenesis of T1D has been questioned, the majority of research efforts are concentrated on understanding the T-cell–mediated β-cell recognition and killing.

Autoreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are considered the primary drivers of β-cell loss (6). Within CD4+ T cells, T-helper 1 (Th1) and Th17 cells are considered the primary effector subsets involved in the disease pathogenesis (7,8). Th17 cells release proinflammatory cytokines (predominantly interleukin-17 [IL-17]) that directly compromise β-cell function. Additionally, they recruit and activate monocytes that also contribute to β-cell loss (9,10). Numerous data from animal studies have shown that inhibition of Th17 cells in NOD mice (IL-17 deficient) results in a significantly suppressed development of diabetes, a delayed onset of pathology, and a concomitant reduced insulitis (11–13). The effector function of Th17 cells is counterregulated by that of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs are the master regulators of immune tolerance and are capable of halting the induction, proliferation, and effector function of Th17 cells, restoring the immune balance. Alterations in Treg number or function have been associated with the development of T1D and other autoimmune manifestations (14,15).

The development of Th17 and Treg cells is regulated by the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family of signal transducers. Interestingly, monogenic mutations in STAT family members give rise to primary immunodeficiencies and other immune dysregulatory syndromes, which are characterized by the co-occurrence of autoimmunity and often T1D. STAT proteins play an active role in immune-cell genesis and regulation. They are known to be fundamental for the development and maintenance of human memory T cells, and, as we will further discuss, are crucial in determining Th17 skewing and accumulation as well as regulating Treg fate (16). Interestingly, patients with mutations in STATs have a low T1D GRS, suggesting that a single genetic “hit” is able to significantly increase susceptibility to T1D (17). Here, we discuss how the STAT genes perturb the Th17:Treg equilibrium and how their mutation might be the root of the increased susceptibility of these patients to T1D.

The STAT Protein Family of Signal Transducers

The STAT family comprises seven proteins (STAT1, −2, −3, −4, −5a, −5b, and −6), which are all tightly cross-regulated (18). Cytokine receptor binding initiates the JAK-STAT cascade with Janus kinase (JAK) proteins leading to STAT phosphorylation and dimerization. STAT dimers translocate to the nucleus, where they bind to DNA and activate the transcription of many target genes (19). Mutations in genes encoding STAT1, −2, −3, and −5b impair their function and have been linked to immune dysregulatory syndromes both in the form of autoimmunity and immunodeficiency in past years (20). Gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in STAT1 and STAT3 as well as STAT5b deficiency have been specifically linked to T1D. For the latter, a correlation with T1D has been so far documented solely in mouse models (21).

T1D and STAT3 Mutations

STAT3 is a cytosolic signal transducer involved in many biological processes including cell growth, apoptosis, organogenesis, inflammation, infection, and oncogenesis (22,23). IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-21 together with transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) are among the most important cytokines that activate the JAK-STAT3 cascade (24). There are 127 known genetic variants in the STAT3 gene, the majority of which are single-nucleotide substitutions (source: Human Gene Mutation Database, www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk). STAT3 protein deficiency due to loss-of-function (LOF) mutations has been documented mainly in hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome (HIES) and other immune dysregulation syndromes (25,26). Patients with HIES are characterized by reduced production of IL-17 by CD4+ T cells and, consequently, an increased susceptibility to recurrent debilitating infections by Staphylococcus aureus and fungi (27). Defects in Th17 responses and especially in IL-21R signaling might be responsible for the highly elevated IgE levels in this disorder (28).

On the other hand, STAT3 GOF mutations, inherited as autosomal dominant traits, lead to a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes. These include early-onset T1D, autoimmune enteropathy, autoimmune cytopenia, juvenile-onset arthritis, and autoimmune interstitial lung disease (29,30). A total of six patients with STAT3 GOF and T1D have been described so far (Table 1), and five additional patients have recently been identified in Exeter, U.K. (A. Hattersley and M. Johnson, personal communication). According to these reports, the prevalence of T1D in STAT3 GOF mutation–positive population is ∼30% (30–32).

View this table:
Table 1

Cases of T1D in patients with STAT3 GOF mutations currently described in the literature

Some patients with STAT3 GOF mutations showed an increased Th17 frequency and a diminished number of Tregs, which could explain their autoimmune manifestations (30,32). The polyautoimmune clinical phenotype that is common in these patients could be attributed to the impaired function of Tregs. Haapaniemi et al. (31) performed quantitative and qualitative analyses in Tregs and described a decreased number of circulating FOXP3+ Treg cells with impaired functional suppressive capacity compared with STAT3 wild-type (WT) control subjects. This further supports the key role of Treg and Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of T1D in this monogenic syndrome. Several studies have addressed the HLA haplotype in patients with STAT3 GOF–presenting T1D. While two patients possessed the high-risk HLA allele, two other patients developed T1D in the context of low-risk HLA, and one of them was also AAb negative (Table 1). The STAT3-mutated patients recently identified in Exeter showed similar clinical phenotypes and no association with high-risk HLA (A. Hattersley and M. Johnson, personal communication).

In an effort to understand the development of autoimmunity and T1D in these patients, below we summarize all the cellular alterations that may be introduced by STAT3 GOF (Fig. 1). IL-6, IL-21, and TGF-β instruct naive T cells toward a Th17 phenotype. In conditions of hyperactive STAT3, IL-21 can induce a marked increase in the expression of IRF4 promoting IL-21–mediated Th17 differentiation (33,34). Similarly, IL-6 together with TGF-β induces the Th17 phenotype via STAT3, bypassing IRF4 (35,36). In addition, Th17 cells release IL-21, further amplifying their Th17 skewing in an autocrine manner (37).

Figure 1
Figure 1

The altered balance between Th17 and Tregs in patients with STAT3 GOF and the potential mechanisms underlying it. In the context of STAT3 GOF, an increase in IRF4 expression induction is able to drive the skewing of Th17. At the same time, TGF-β and IL-6 together with IL-21 are able to induce a similar amplification of the induction of this cell type. There are two possible ways through which STAT3 GOF could instead affect Tregs development: directly via STAT3 inhibition of FOXP3 or indirectly via SOCS3-dependent inhibition of FOXP3. R, receptor.

To explain the decrease in Tregs in patients with GOF mutations in STAT3, we provide two models, a direct and an indirect one (Fig. 1). According to the first direct hypothetical model, STAT3 directly binds a silencer element within the FOXP3 locus resulting in reduced binding by SMAD3, a known transcription factor required for Treg development (38,39). The second, indirect model is corroborated by data from Milner et al. (32), who showed that STAT3 GOF promotes the expression of SOCS3. Elevated levels of SOCS3 in turn inhibit STAT5 phosphorylation in response to IL-2, providing a plausible explanation for the decrease in Treg numbers observed in these patients (40–42).

In order to obtain insight into the possible effect of the known missense GOF mutations in STAT3, we mapped the amino acid substitutions in the crystal structures of homodimeric, phosphorylated (PDB code 1BG1), and nonphosphorylated murine STAT3b core protein bound to double-stranded DNA (PDB code 4E68) (Fig. 2) (43,44). Arginine 152 is located in the N-terminal four-helix bundle of STAT3; its substitution with a tryptophan introduces a hydrophobic patch that could modify the local structure of the protein, although it is unclear how it could enhance its function. Amino acids Glu415 and Asn646 are both in close proximity with the DNA, and their substitution with positively charged lysines likely enhances the DNA binding affinity of STAT3 and may even modify its binding specificity. The amino acid Thr716 corresponds to Phe716 in the murine STAT3b, thus the effect of the mutation cannot be directly evaluated. However, the residue is part of an extended peptide that contributes to the dimerization interface of the protein. Thus, the substitution of a hydrophilic threonine with a hydrophobic methionine at the interface may affect the quaternary structure of STAT3b, both by destabilizing the Stat3b homodimerization and perhaps enhancing the formation of heterodimers with selected partners. The effect of the conservative Lys392Arg substitution is unclear, and further studies will be required to clarify its effect on the function of STAT3.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Location of the pathogenic mutations of STAT3b. The crystal structure of STAT3b bound to double-stranded DNA (PDB code 4E68) was visualized using the software Pymol (www.pymol.org). The STAT3b chains in the homodimer are shown as light blue and cyan cartoon, the double-stranded DNA is colored orange. The location of the mutations in the structure is shown with red (Glu415Lys and Asn646Lys, affecting DNA binding), yellow (Arg152Trp, affecting the helical region), green (Lys392Arg, whose effect is at the present unclear), and pink (Thr716Met, modifying the dimerization surface).

T1D and STAT1 Mutations

STAT1 is a cytosolic protein involved in signal transduction from type I interferon (IFN) (IFN-α and IFN-β) and IFN-γ. Other known STAT1 activators are IL-6, IL-10, IL-27, and IL-35 (24). Patients with autosomal dominant STAT1 LOF mutations are more prone to mycobacterial and other bacterial infections (45,46). Patients with autosomal recessive STAT1 LOF mutations are primarily susceptible to mycobacterial and viral infections as reported in some case reports (47,48). Both possibly reflect the failure of IFN-γ–mediated immunity. On the other hand, STAT1 autosomal dominant GOF mutations have been primarily associated with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and immunodysregulation polyendocrinopathy enteropathy X-linked (IPEX)-like syndromes (49,50). Patients with STAT1 GOF–associated chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis are characterized by a predisposition to chronic noninvasive infections of the skin, nails, and mucous membranes as well as autoimmune manifestations. Concomitant T1D has been documented only in a minority of cases, with a prevalence of 4%, according to a recent review (51,52).

IPEX-like syndromes are characterized by multiorgan immune dysregulation including T1D, thyroiditis, and other autoimmune phenomena. In a recent study, a cohort of five patients with IPEX-like features but WT FOXP3 were genetically screened for underlying STAT1 GOF mutations. Three of these patients had GOF defects in STAT1 and presented with concomitant T1D (50). A total of 12 patients with coexisting STAT1 GOF mutations and T1D have been reported. Interestingly, only a minority of these patients were positive for islet-specific AAbs (50–52). This is in line with the current idea that in some patients, T1D can evolve in the absence of AAbs. In some of these patients, Th17 and Tregs were investigated as potential contributors to their immunological dysregulation. Paradoxically, Th17 reduction was a common finding in STAT1 GOF patients, but it remains unclear how STAT1 GOF affects Th17 development. We hypothesize that STAT1 affects Th17 development via a T-cell intrinsic and a T-cell extrinsic mechanism. In the T-cell intrinsic mechanism (Fig. 3A), STAT1 induces SOCS3 upon IFN-γ stimulation. SOCS3 in turn inhibits STAT3 activity and consequently suppresses Th17 development (53). In the T-cell extrinsic mechanism (Fig. 3B), STAT1 induces programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which prevents Th17 development in trans (54,55).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Models linking STAT1 GOF to Th17 deficiency. In the intrinsic model (A), STAT1 GOF inhibits STAT3 activity via SOCS3 and consequently impairs Th17 development. In the T-cell extrinsic model (B), inhibition of Th17 occurs in trans, via PD-L1 overexpression in neighboring cells. It is currently unknown how a reduction in Th17 cells may increase susceptibility to T1D. R, receptor.

Although a deficiency in Th17 explains the increased susceptibility to Candida albicans in STAT1 GOF patients, it remains puzzling how a reduction in Th17 cells can lead to autoimmunity. With the intent to understand the susceptibility to autoimmunity in these patients, a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Tregs was undertaken by Uzel et al. (50). No differences in Tregs were observed between STAT1-mutated and WT controls (50). In a recent study conducted in natural killer cells, STAT1 GOF mutants impaired STAT5b phosphorylation and reduced natural killer cell proliferation after stimulation with IL-2 and IL-15, suggesting that STAT1 may also control how Tregs respond to IL-2R signaling (56). More work is necessary for elucidating the role of Tregs, Th17, and perhaps other cellular pathways in the immune dysregulation and susceptibility to T1D that characterize patients with STAT1 GOF mutations.

T1D and STAT5b Deficiency

STAT5b is a cytosolic signal transducer involved in multiple cell functions. STAT5b deficiency is very rare, and only a handful of patients with the deficiency have been described; however, its real prevalence may be underestimated in endocrine clinics. Growth defects, Treg-related primary immune deficiencies, and endocrine abnormalities are all possible manifestations described in STAT5b-deficient patients (57). The cytokines IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21 have a central role in the initiation of the JAK-STAT5b pathway (24). In particular, IL-2 induces phosphorylation of STAT5 (both STAT5a and STAT5b), which is a necessary step for the induction of FOXP3+ Tregs (58). Given its pivotal role in the generation of Treg cells, STAT5 has become an interesting topic of research in recent years, particularly for understanding the pathogenesis of T1D. Despite there being no cases in the literature describing patients with a diagnosis of T1D and a concomitant defect in STAT5b, STAT5b is known to be fundamental in the accumulation of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells (59). The importance of the STAT5b pathway was highlighted by studies on NOD mice, where an overexpression of STAT5b was found to be protective against T1D (21). According to Jin et al. (21), the upregulation of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells resulting from the hyperactivity of STAT5b might explain the decreased incidence of T1D in NOD mice (60). Therefore, the role of STAT5b in human T1D pathogenesis cannot be excluded, even though more research is needed to clarify the function of STAT5b in Treg regulation and its interplay with other STAT family proteins.

Screening for STAT Protein Family Mutations in Patients With T1D

According to recent findings, a number of patients might benefit from genetic screening for STAT. In our opinion, STAT-targeted sequencing (or whole-exome sequencing) should be performed in certain patients with T1D, such as 1) patients with T1D presenting with reduced C-peptide and neonatal T1D irrespective of their AAb status who test negative for the known genes of monogenic diabetes (alternatively, the screening gene panel for neonatal diabetes could be modified to accommodate STAT1, STAT3, IL2R, FOXP3, CTLA4, LRBA, and AIRE); 2) all patients diagnosed with T1D under 5 years of age presenting with/without growth retardation concomitantly and with at least one additional autoimmunity (e.g., autoimmune enteropathy and autoimmune disorders, especially of the endocrine system) showing familiarity; and 3) patients with T1D and a low T1D GRS (17).

Discerning the Role of STAT Protein Family Mutations in Islet Autoimmunity and Beyond

STAT proteins are not exclusively expressed by the immune cells. They are also expressed by β-cells, and, as it was recently shown, they play a key role in β-cell differentiation. Saarimäki-Vire et al. (61) showed that an activating mutation of STAT3 causes premature endocrine differentiation through direct induction of NEUROG3 expression, leading to pancreatic hypoplasia. This suggests that the some of the clinical features seen in STAT3 GOF patients, such as T1D and perhaps growth retardation, may be due to organ-specific effects of the mutation.

To dissect the role of STATs on the development and functions of the immune system and that of the β-cells, future research is necessary. Genetically modified mice, i.e., knock-in for the corresponding human mutations, could be generated with CRISPR/Cas9 technology in the NOD or autoimmune- resistant background. The impact of STAT mutations could be also addressed in human T and B cells by in vitro isogenic systems. In these systems, cells are manipulated by CRISPR/Cas9 to express the mutated form of STAT and probed for their activation, proliferation, and function.

Conclusions

Here, we reviewed how STAT monogenic mutations may predispose to T1D. Quantitative changes in Th17 and Treg cells were often present, with Tregs sometimes altered also from a qualitative point of view. While an increased number of Th17 cells with a concomitant decrease in Treg cells explain T1D susceptibility in STAT3 GOF patients, different mechanisms are likely responsible for the onset of T1D in patients with STAT1 GOF mutations who show a reduction in Th17 cells and no alterations in their Treg numbers (Table 2). Currently, many fundamental aspects of STAT biology, and therefore the mechanisms underlying T1D, remain unanswered. The paradoxical and complicated functions of STATs are challenging questions that are directly linked to our understanding of the immunological mechanisms that lead to T1D. We could use these experiments of nature to learn whether specific mutations in STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5b correlate with the immunological and clinical phenotypes of T1D and, furthermore, to broaden our understanding of the differences between polygenic T1D and that caused by mutations in single genes. We believe that determination of the HLA genotype, T1D GRS, AAb status, ethnicity, BMI, and HbA1c, combined with a comprehensive immunological analysis, are necessary for the future reports as they could inform us on the genetic, molecular, and immunoregulatory barriers that define susceptibility to T1D. From a therapeutic clinical perspective, small molecules that interfere with STAT function may be of great potential as we learned by the therapeutic effect of STAT5b overexpression in NOD mice. Currently, some promising results have been obtained in the field of cancer treatment and other conditions with chronic inflammation, such as psoriasis (62). Thus, studying the role of STAT family of transcription factors in T1D pathogenesis could be the focus of future research as it may open novel therapeutic avenues.

View this table:
Table 2

Summary showing the altered Th17/Tregs equilibrium described in STAT1 GOF and STAT3 GOF

Article Information

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

  • Received June 12, 2018.
  • Accepted November 11, 2018.
http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Barratt BJ,
    2. Payne F,
    3. Lowe CE, et al
    . Remapping the insulin gene/IDDM2 locus in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2004;53:1884–1889
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ueda H,
    2. Howson JMM,
    3. Esposito L, et al
    . Association of the T-cell regulatory gene CTLA4 with susceptibility to autoimmune disease. Nature 2003;423:506–511
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Vella A,
    2. Cooper JD,
    3. Lowe CE, et al
    . Localization of a type 1 diabetes locus in the IL2RA/CD25 region by use of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 2005;76:773–779
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Redondo MJ,
    2. Geyer S,
    3. Steck AK, et al.; Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group
    . A type 1 diabetes genetic risk score predicts progression of islet autoimmunity and development of type 1 diabetes in individuals at risk. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1887–1894
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Jahromi MM,
    2. Eisenbarth GS
    . Cellular and molecular pathogenesis of type 1A diabetes. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007;64:865–872
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Burrack AL,
    2. Martinov T,
    3. Fife BTT
    . T cell-mediated beta cell destruction: autoimmunity and alloimmunity in the context of type 1 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017;8:343
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Shao S,
    2. He F,
    3. Yang Y,
    4. Yuan G,
    5. Zhang M,
    6. Yu X
    . Th17 cells in type 1 diabetes. Cell Immunol 2012;280:16–21
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Noack M,
    2. Miossec P
    . Th17 and regulatory T cell balance in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:668–677
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kolls JK,
    2. Lindén A
    . Interleukin-17 family members and inflammation. Immunity 2004;21:467–476
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Davidson MG,
    2. Alonso MN,
    3. Yuan R, et al
    . Th17 cells induce Th1-polarizing monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 2013;191:1175–1187
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Jain R,
    2. Tartar DM,
    3. Gregg RK, et al
    . Innocuous IFNγ induced by adjuvant-free antigen restores normoglycemia in NOD mice through inhibition of IL-17 production. J Exp Med 2008;205:207–218
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Emamaullee JA,
    2. Davis J,
    3. Merani S, et al
    . Inhibition of Th17 cells regulates autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. Diabetes 2009;58:1302–1311
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Kuriya G,
    2. Uchida T,
    3. Akazawa S, et al
    . Double deficiency in IL-17 and IFN-γ signalling significantly suppresses the development of diabetes in the NOD mouse. Diabetologia 2013;56:1773–1780
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Sakaguchi S,
    2. Yamaguchi T,
    3. Nomura T,
    4. Ono M,
    5. Regulatory T
    . Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 2008;133:775–787
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Homann D,
    2. von Herrath M
    . Regulatory T cells and type 1 diabetes. Clin Immunol 2004;112:202–209
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Siegel AM,
    2. Heimall J,
    3. Freeman AF, et al
    . A critical role for STAT3 transcription factor signaling in the development and maintenance of human T cell memory. Immunity 2011;35:806–818
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Johnson MB,
    2. Patel KA,
    3. De Franco E, et al
    . A type 1 diabetes genetic risk score can discriminate monogenic autoimmunity with diabetes from early-onset clustering of polygenic autoimmunity with diabetes. Diabetologia 2018;61:862–869
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Stark GR,
    2. Darnell JE Jr.
    . The JAK-STAT pathway at twenty. Immunity 2012;36:503–514
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Rawlings JS,
    2. Rosler KM,
    3. Harrison DA
    . The JAK/STAT signaling pathway. J Cell Sci 2004;117:1281–1283
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Goswami R,
    2. Kaplan MH
    . STAT transcription factors in T cell control of health and disease. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2017;331:123–180
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Jin Y,
    2. Purohit S,
    3. Chen X,
    4. Yi B,
    5. She J-X
    . Over-expression of Stat5b confers protection against diabetes in the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice via up-regulation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012;424:669–674
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Subramaniam A,
    2. Shanmugam MK,
    3. Perumal E, et al
    . Potential role of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 signaling pathway in inflammation, survival, proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;1835:46-60
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Wang Y-H,
    2. Huang M-L
    . Organogenesis and tumorigenesis: insight from the JAK/STAT pathway in the Drosophila eye. Dev Dyn 2010;239:2522–2533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Delgoffe GM,
    2. Vignali DAA
    . STAT heterodimers in immunity: a mixed message or a unique signal? JAK-STAT 2013;2:e23060
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Holland SM,
    2. DeLeo FR,
    3. Elloumi HZ, et al
    . STAT3 mutations in the hyper-IgE syndrome. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1608–1619
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Lorenzini T,
    2. Dotta L,
    3. Giacomelli M,
    4. Vairo D,
    5. Badolato R
    . STAT mutations as program switchers: turning primary immunodeficiencies into autoimmune diseases. J Leukoc Biol 2017;101:29–38
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Ma CS,
    2. Chew GYJ,
    3. Simpson N, et al
    . Deficiency of Th17 cells in hyper IgE syndrome due to mutations in STAT3. J Exp Med 2008;205:1551–1557
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Mogensen TH
    . STAT3 and the Hyper-IgE syndrome: clinical presentation, genetic origin, pathogenesis, novel findings and remaining uncertainties. JAK-STAT 2013;2:e23435
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Forbes LR,
    2. Milner J,
    3. Haddad E
    . Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3: a year in review. Curr Opin Hematol 2016;23:23–27
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Flanagan SE,
    2. Haapaniemi E,
    3. Russell MA, et al
    . Activating germline mutations in STAT3 cause early-onset multi-organ autoimmune disease. Nat Genet 2014;46:812–814
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Haapaniemi EM,
    2. Kaustio M,
    3. Rajala HLM, et al
    . Autoimmunity, hypogammaglobulinemia, lymphoproliferation, and mycobacterial disease in patients with activating mutations in STAT3. Blood 2015;125:639–648
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Milner JD,
    2. Vogel TP,
    3. Forbes L, et al
    . Early-onset lymphoproliferation and autoimmunity caused by germline STAT3 gain-of-function mutations. Blood 2015;125:591–599
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Huber M,
    2. Brüstle A,
    3. Reinhard K, et al
    . IRF4 is essential for IL-21-mediated induction, amplification, and stabilization of the Th17 phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:20846–20851
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Eddahri F,
    2. Denanglaire S,
    3. Bureau F, et al
    . Interleukin-6/STAT3 signaling regulates the ability of naive T cells to acquire B-cell help capacities. Blood 2009;113:2426–2433
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Kimura A,
    2. Kishimoto T
    . IL-6: regulator of Treg/Th17 balance. Eur J Immunol 2010;40:1830–1835
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Dominitzki S,
    2. Fantini MC,
    3. Neufert C, et al
    . Cutting edge: trans-signaling via the soluble IL-6R abrogates the induction of FoxP3 in naive CD4+CD25 T cells. J Immunol 2007;179:2041–2045
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Dienz O,
    2. Rincon M
    . The effects of IL-6 on CD4 T cell responses. Clin Immunol 2009;130:27–33
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Xu L,
    2. Kitani A,
    3. Stuelten C,
    4. McGrady G,
    5. Fuss I,
    6. Strober W
    . Positive and negative transcriptional regulation of the Foxp3 gene is mediated by access and binding of the Smad3 protein to enhancer I. Immunity 2010;33:313–325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Tone Y,
    2. Furuuchi K,
    3. Kojima Y,
    4. Tykocinski ML,
    5. Greene MI,
    6. Tone M
    . Smad3 and NFAT cooperate to induce Foxp3 expression through its enhancer. Nat Immunol 2008;9:194–202
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Lee CK,
    2. Raz R,
    3. Gimeno R, et al
    . STAT3 is a negative regulator of granulopoiesis but is not required for G-CSF-dependent differentiation. Immunity 2002;17:63–72
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Brender C,
    2. Nielsen M,
    3. Kaltoft K, et al
    . STAT3-mediated constitutive expression of SOCS-3 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2001;97:1056–1062
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Pillemer BBL,
    2. Xu H,
    3. Oriss TB,
    4. Qi Z,
    5. Ray A
    . Deficient SOCS3 expression in CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells and SOCS3-mediated suppression of Treg function. Eur J Immunol 2007;37:2082–2089
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Becker S,
    2. Groner B,
    3. Müller CW
    . Three-dimensional structure of the Stat3β homodimer bound to DNA. Nature 1998;394:145–151
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Nkansah E,
    2. Shah R,
    3. Collie GW, et al
    . Observation of unphosphorylated STAT3 core protein binding to target dsDNA by PEMSA and X-ray crystallography. FEBS Lett 2013;587:833–839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Dupuis S,
    2. Dargemont C,
    3. Fieschi C, et al
    . Impairment of mycobacterial but not viral immunity by a germline human STAT1 mutation. Science 2001;293:300–303
  46. ↵
    1. Tsumura M,
    2. Okada S,
    3. Sakai H, et al
    . Dominant-negative STAT1 SH2 domain mutations in unrelated patients with Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease. Hum Mutat 2012;33:1377–1387
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Kong X-F,
    2. Ciancanelli M,
    3. Al-Hajjar S, et al
    . A novel form of human STAT1 deficiency impairing early but not late responses to interferons. Blood 2010;116:5895–5906
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Chapgier A,
    2. Wynn RF,
    3. Jouanguy E, et al
    . Human complete Stat-1 deficiency is associated with defective type I and II IFN responses in vitro but immunity to some low virulence viruses in vivo. J Immunol 2006;176:5078–5083D
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Depner M,
    2. Fuchs S,
    3. Raabe J, et al
    . The extended clinical phenotype of 26 patients with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis due to gain-of-function mutations in STAT1. J Clin Immunol 2016;36:73–84
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Uzel G,
    2. Sampaio EP,
    3. Lawrence MG, et al
    . Dominant gain-of-function STAT1 mutations in FOXP3 wild-type immune dysregulation-polyendocrinopathy-enteropathy-X-linked-like syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013;131:1611–1623 .054
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    1. Toubiana J,
    2. Okada S,
    3. Hiller J, et al.; International STAT1 Gain-of-Function Study Group
    . Heterozygous STAT1 gain-of-function mutations underlie an unexpectedly broad clinical phenotype. Blood 2016;127:3154–3164
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Egan M,
    2. Cunningham-Rundles C
    . P193 A case of chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis due to a stat1 mutation. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2016;117:S79
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Yoshimura A,
    2. Suzuki M,
    3. Sakaguchi R,
    4. Hanada T,
    5. Yasukawa H
    . SOCS, inflammation, and autoimmunity. Front Immunol 2012;3:20
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. D’Addio F,
    2. Riella LV,
    3. Mfarrej BG, et al
    . The link between the PDL1 costimulatory pathway and Th17 in fetomaternal tolerance. J Immunol 2011;187:4530–4541
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Hirahara K,
    2. Ghoreschi K,
    3. Yang X-P, et al
    . Interleukin-27 priming of T cells controls IL-17 production in trans via induction of the ligand PD-L1. Immunity 2012;36:1017–1030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Vargas-Hernández A,
    2. Mace EM,
    3. Zimmerman O, et al
    . Ruxolitinib partially reverses functional natural killer cell deficiency in patients with signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) gain-of-function mutations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018;141:2142–2155
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Hwa V
    . STAT5B deficiency: impacts on human growth and immunity. Growth Horm IGF Res 2016;28:16–20
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Burchill MA,
    2. Yang J,
    3. Vogtenhuber C,
    4. Blazar BR,
    5. Farrar MA
    . IL-2 receptor β-dependent STAT5 activation is required for the development of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2007;178:280–290
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Kanai T,
    2. Jenks J,
    3. Nadeau KC
    . The STAT5b pathway defect and autoimmunity. Front Immunol 2012;3:234
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Piccirillo CA,
    2. Tritt M,
    3. Sgouroudis E,
    4. Albanese A,
    5. Pyzik M,
    6. Hay V
    . Control of type 1 autoimmune diabetes by naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T lymphocytes in neonatal NOD mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1051:72–87
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Saarimäki-Vire J,
    2. Balboa D,
    3. Russell MA, et al
    . An activating STAT3 mutation causes neonatal diabetes through premature induction of pancreatic differentiation. Cell Reports 2017;19:281–294
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Calautti E,
    2. Avalle L,
    3. Poli V
    . Psoriasis: a STAT3-centric view. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:171
    OpenUrl
Back to top
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Add to Selected Citations

Type 1 Diabetes in STAT Protein Family Mutations: Regulating the Th17/Treg Equilibrium and Beyond
Marco Fabbri, Mikaela Frixou, Massimo Degano, Georgia Fousteri
Diabetes Feb 2019, 68 (2) 258-265; DOI: 10.2337/db18-0627
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section