Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Methodology Review

β-Cell Fate in Human Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes: A Perspective on Islet Plasticity

  1. Teresa Mezza1,2,
  2. Francesca Cinti1,2,
  3. Chiara Maria Assunta Cefalo1,2,
  4. Alfredo Pontecorvi1,2,
  5. Rohit N. Kulkarni3⇑ and
  6. Andrea Giaccari1,2⇑
  1. 1U.O.C. Endocrinologia e Diabetologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
  2. 2Istituto di Patologia Speciale Medica e Semeiotica Clinica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
  3. 3Islet Cell & Regenerative Biology, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  1. Corresponding authors: Andrea Giaccari, andrea.giaccari{at}unicatt.it, and Rohit N. Kulkarni, rohit.kulkarni{at}joslin.harvard.edu
  1. T.M. and F.C. contributed equally to this work.

Diabetes 2019 Jun; 68(6): 1121-1129. https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-0856
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Although it is well established that type 2 diabetes (T2D) is generally due to the progressive loss of β-cell insulin secretion against a background of insulin resistance, the actual correlation of reduced β-cell mass to its defective function continues to be debated. There is evidence that a compensatory increase in β-cell mass, and the consequent insulin secretion, can effectively cope with states of insulin resistance, until hyperglycemia supervenes. Recent data strongly indicate that the mechanisms by which islets are able to compensate in response to insulin resistance in peripheral tissues is secondary to hyperplasia, as well as the activation of multiple cellular machineries with diverse functions. Importantly, islet cells exhibit plasticity in altering their endocrine commitment; for example, by switching from secretion of glucagon to secretion of insulin and back (transdifferentiation) or from an active secretory state to a nonsecretory quiescent state (dedifferentiation) and back. Lineage tracing (a method used to track each cell though its differentiation process) has demonstrated these potentials in murine models. A limitation to drawing conclusions from human islet research is that most studies are derived from human autopsy and/or organ donor samples, which lack in vivo functional and metabolic profiling. In this review, we specifically focus on evidence of islet plasticity in humans—from the normal state, progressing to insulin resistance to overt T2D—to explain the seemingly contradictory results from different cross-sectional studies in the literature. We hope the discussion on this intriguing scenario will provide a forum for the scientific community to better understand the disease and in the long term pave the way for personalized therapies.

α- and β-Cells in Humans: The Current Contradictory Scenario

Although the mechanisms responsible for type 2 diabetes (T2D) are still not completely understood, it is now well established that hyperglycemia is generally due to a progressive loss of β-cell insulin secretion against a background of insulin resistance. Investigating how β-cells and α-cells change in terms of number and/or secretory function is a rational approach to understanding the natural history of this complex and multifaceted disease (1).

In Tables 1 and 2, we summarize the reports on the quantification of human β-cells and α-cells. It is interesting to note that the results are often contradictory. Although some authors describe 52% β-cells per islet in control subjects (2), others found the same percentage in samples from individuals with diabetes (3,4). A similar contradiction is evident regarding the quantification of α-cells: some studies describe an increase in α-cells in individuals with diabetes (3,5), whereas others do not (4,6,7). These data make it challenging for readers to interpret results at a time when even β-cells have been classified into subpopulations (8–10).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

The present scenario: β-cell/area and quantification data on human pancreata

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

The present scenario: α-cell/area and quantification data on human pancreata

In a previous study (11), we examined islet morphology in a subset of patients without diabetes, subclassified according to their insulin sensitivity (i.e., insulin resistant compared with non–insulin resistant) (Table 2). We observed that the ratio of α-cell to β-cell area was higher in insulin-resistant subjects without diabetes, due to a relatively greater increase in α-cell area (by approximately five times) compared with the increase in β-cell area. Interestingly, the α-cell area was inversely correlated with insulin sensitivity, meaning that the greater the insulin resistance, the greater the α-cell mass (11). Whatever the underlying mechanism, it is evident that not all subjects without diabetes have the same α-cell and β-cell masses, as each is strongly influenced by individual insulin resistance (and the secretory consequences).

In this context, it is important for the reader to interpret the basis for considering 52% β-cells per islet as “normal” in some studies (2,5), while 53% is labeled as “reduced” in others (3,4). When one carefully examines the control groups used in these studies, it might be inferred that the lower percentage of β-cell mass (2,5) is due to the selection of more insulin-sensitive subjects, in whom β-cell mass is sufficient to guarantee euglycemia; while the greater percentage of β-cell mass described in other studies (3,4) is due to the presence of relatively more insulin-resistant subjects, in whom the β-cell mass increases to compensate for the increased insulin demand.

Similarly, the reports describing α-cell mass also vary significantly. For example, although some studies report an increase in α-cells in patients with diabetes, others have observed a comparable α-cell mass between groups, attributing the increase in the α-cell/β-cell ratio to the reduced β-cell mass, rather than to an absolute increase in α-cells (Table 2).

Applying the same logic as above, one needs to consider the difference between the two groups of patients without diabetes (i.e., insulin sensitive vs. insulin resistant) as contributing to the contradictory results observed in T2D groups compared with “control groups.” Thus, the studies that describe an increase in α-cell mass may have compared T2D subjects with a homogeneous control group, which included relatively more insulin-sensitive control subjects (3,5), whereas the other studies, which reported comparable α-cell mass between groups, may have included both insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant subjects and/or mostly insulin-resistant subjects as control subjects (1,4,6,7). Of course, other hypotheses cannot be excluded.

These studies provide examples of how crucial information may be missed if one does not adequately characterize control groups before assessing islet cell mass and, indirectly, this can potentially explain the lack of an increase in α-cell mass in some pancreas samples from patients with diabetes. Thus, the current contradictions might be only apparent.

Insulin Resistance and Islet Plasticity: The Emerging Scenario

Although the contradictory results in the studies discussed above are potentially due to lack of “uniform control subjects” across all studies, another variable that requires careful consideration in such studies is prediabetes.

Yoneda et al. (12) were among the first to “subclassify” control subjects (Table 1). In this study, pancreatic surgical samples from 42 patients were analyzed, and 32 of these patients were subjected to an oral glucose tolerance test. Subjects were then classified into the following groups: normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or T2D. The authors reported a progressive decrease in the percentage of β-cell area across the groups with the largest decrease in patients with long-standing T2D. Considering that the greatest variation in β-cell mass was between NGT and IGT subjects, the major reduction in the percentage β-cell area was observed in the prediabetic phase, suggesting that significant changes in islet cell function and/or morphology occur during this period.

T2D is characterized by insulin resistance, which typically begins several years prior to hyperglycemia, and is detectable over the entire course of the disease. On the other hand, β-cell secretory function has a compensatory phase during which insulin secretion rises to compensate for insulin resistance, thereby maintaining euglycemia, and then falls off, leading to the increase in plasma glucose levels (13–15). Insulin resistance therefore seems to be the driver of the early compensative phase. Insulin resistance, however, is not limited to skeletal muscle, liver, adipose tissue, and other insulin-sensitive tissues as traditionally believed; indeed, it has been described in insulin-secreting β-cells (16,17) or α-cells (18), where it could modulate insulin secretion (19). It is therefore possible that insulin resistance in the same islet cells contributes, in part, to the failure of cell growth and secretory function during the euglycemic compensatory phase (20). However, it should be noted that insulin resistance is not invariably associated with subsequent hyperglycemia, since the triad insulin resistance plus increased insulin plus increased β-cell mass without hyperglycemia has been observed in several conditions, including obesity (21,22), pregnancy (23,24), and polycystic ovary syndrome (25). Thus, β-cells are able to compensate for insulin demand that occurs in different conditions. When the compensation mechanisms are lost, hyperglycemia appears.

Mechanisms of Compensation

Several studies (26–28) provide indirect evidence that islet cell mass is dynamic and capable of adapting to physiological or pathological conditions to maintain normoglycemia. In pregnant women, for example, there is a 40% increase in the relative volume of β-cells (percentage of β-cells/pancreas). Another model of pathophysiological β-cell compensation is obesity, which can lead to a 30-fold increase in β-cell mass in mice (29), but only an ∼30% increase in humans (1,30).

This capacity of the islet to modify its architecture and function (i.e., islet plasticity) has been described in several metabolic conditions. Our group has observed similar changes in pancreatic samples from individuals without diabetes (11,31). In these studies, we classified individuals on the basis of insulin sensitivity (measured with the gold standard euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp) and observed that chronic insulin resistance, in the absence of hyperglycemia, directly impacts islets. This was evident from the 50% increase in the percentage of β-cell area in insulin-resistant subjects compared with insulin-sensitive control subjects. Insulin resistance did not directly modify β-cell size, suggesting that the increase in β-cell area is unlikely to be due to cell hypertrophy (11).

Although direct evidence in the context of human islet morphology is still limited, findings in murine and in vitro models, reviewed by Migliorini et al. (32), reveal that endocrine and exocrine cell types within the pancreas preserve a level of cellular plasticity. In particular, rodent models of insulin resistance (reviewed by Mezza and Kulkarni [33]) show increased β-cell mass and proliferation largely in an attempt to compensate for increasing insulin demand. Further, analyses of α-IRKO mice have demonstrated the significance of insulin signaling in the regulation of α-cell function and mass, where the mutant mice exhibited hyperglucagonemia, glucose intolerance, and an age-dependent progressive increase in β-cell area, whereas α-cell area was unchanged, leading to a relative decrease in cell area (18).

The precise origin of potential new β-cells in insulin resistance continues to be a topic of active investigation. Replication, neogenesis, and transdifferentiation (i.e., transdifferentiation of α-cells into β-cells and/or acinar/ductal transdifferentiation into insulin-producing cells) are all potential sources and warrant further investigation (Fig. 1) (11,31,34,35).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the hypothetical scenario of islet plasticity. Islet plasticity is the capacity of the islet to modify its morphology and function according to different metabolic conditions. A potential explanation of the present scenario is as follows: when insulin resistance increases insulin demand, islet plasticity guarantees a twofold increase in β-cells, whose origins are still debated but some hypotheses are transdifferentiation from centroacinar and duct cells (duct red cells and centroacinar violet cells), replication (red cell Ki67+), and neogenesis from an unknown source (white to red cell); a twofold increase in the α-cells transdifferentiated into insulin-producing cells (yellow double-positive cells); and a fivefold increase in the α-cells via neogenesis, with a consequent increase of a potential GLP-1 source (white to green cell). As with any compensatory mechanism, in a chronic condition, it is bound to fail. The exhausted β-cells undergo dedifferentiation (Dedif) (a resting state, red to gray cells), the double-positive cell switches back into the original α-cell (yellow cells to green cells), and the overstressed β-cells transdifferentiate into α-cells (red cell to green cell).

In contrast to data in rodents (36,37), studies in humans, to date, have found no evidence of replication or apoptosis of β-cells in insulin resistance–induced islet remodeling, whereas increased proportions of small islets, increased numbers of insulin+ cells within the ducts, and increased numbers in singlet insulin+ cells have all been observed in both pregnant and insulin-resistant individuals (11,27). Nevertheless, it is worth noting that human β-cells are receptive to proliferation in vitro as reported by multiple groups (34,35,38–42), despite data describing a lower rate of proliferation obtained through more intense stimulations.

Findings in mice have revealed plasticity and a potential for intraislet (e.g., α-cell) and extraislet (acinar and ductal) cell transdifferentiation in order to produce insulin (reviewed by Aguayo-Mazzucato and Bonner-Weir [43]). In humans, pancreatic ductal cells have been proposed as a possible source of these new β-cells. For example, a threefold increase in cells coexpressing insulin and the duct marker cytokeratin 19 has been observed in individuals with insulin resistance or IGT (11,12). Since the majority of human studies are cross-sectional, the origin of the insulin+ duct cell in humans continues to be a mystery. In this context, it is worth noting that pancreatic duct cells have been reported to serve as a pool for progenitors of both islet and acinar tissues after birth and during adulthood (44–46). Compelling as this evidence on human pancreatic sections and isolated human duct cells is, we should consider the ability of a pool of duct cells to transdifferentiate into insulin-producing cells, as a possible compensatory mechanism in insulin resistance–induced remodeling of islets.

Another potential origin of “new” β-cells is the pool of α-cells themselves. Transdifferentiation of α-cells into β-cells has been observed in several studies and different experimental settings (47–49). Single gene manipulations have been reported to suffice to induce α-cell conversion into β-cells, using an ectopic Pax4 overexpression model by Collombat et al. (48). In humans, an increase in α-cells has been reported in insulin-resistant subjects (11), where a greater increase in α-cell area compared with the increase in β-cell area explained the increase in the ratio. The mechanisms underlying this apparent increase in α-cell mass in humans remains unclear. However, various studies analyzing disruption in glucagon signaling induced in animal models (50–52) have found that α-cell hyperplasia, similar to that in insulin resistance, is due to an increase in α-cell proliferation and hormone production in states of glucagon resistance. Further, a hepatic–α-islet cell axis, where glucagon regulates serum amino acid availability, seems to induce elevated plasma amino acid levels and compensatory glucagon hypersecretion involving the expansion of pancreatic α-cell mass (53,54). In addition, the contribution of hyperinsulinemia to α-cell hyperplasia is supported by observations that IRS2 KO mice exhibit reduced α-cell mass and glucagon secretion (55), whereas in vitro insulin treatment of α-TC1 cells leads to increased α-cell proliferation by triggering mammalian target of rapamycin (56). In the context of increased α-cell mass observed in experimental conditions of glucagon and insulin resistance, an increase in the percentage of insulin/glucagon double-positive cells reported in individuals with insulin resistance and IGT links α-cell and β-cell function in vivo (11,12,31). The evidence of bihormonal cells has been interpreted as confirmation of α-cell transdifferentiation into β-cells; however, the exact significance and fate of these cells in the context of prediabetes in humans are important areas for further investigation. Of note, this increase in bihormonal cells was more apparent in larger islets compared with smaller ones, suggesting a continuing attempt to respond to greater insulin demand despite the already increased islet size. In vivo β-cell dysfunction has been correlated with islet dimensions and with the percentage of α-cell to β-cell transdifferentiation, suggesting that the β-cells themselves emit signals to induce their own regeneration (31). Thus, dysfunctional β-cells could drive the increase of β-cell mass, but also promote the process of producing new β-cells, thereby expanding the cell mass when secretory function decreases. However, few of these studies include comprehensive molecular and functional analyses to attest to the efficacy of reprogrammed β-cell populations. The recent identification of urocortin3−, insulin-expressing β-cells (1–2% of all β-cells) that are transcriptionally and functionally immature, suggests a naturally occurring α-cell to β-cell conversion process as part of islet homeostasis (57). Lineage-tracing studies have revealed that these cells represent an intermediate stage in both the transdifferentiation of α-cells to mature β-cells and in the inverse transition (57). The transcriptional profile of double hormone-positive cells could provide insights into the mechanisms underlying α-cell to β-cell conversion and unravel regulatory factors that allow this transition. Indeed, such rare double hormone-positive cells were captured by single-cell RNA-sequencing studies, but this observation was not further commented on or excluded as potential evidence of double hormone-positive cells (58,59). Recent reports have identified activation of the GABA signaling pathway as a means to induce transdifferentiation of pancreatic α-cells into β-cells. Whether the role of GABA in the transdifferentiation process is context dependent and/or requires very precise experimental conditions must be determined by further studies (60,61).

An additional contribution to compensation by α-cells is the intraislet production of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) (62), which could potentially impact islet function and remodeling. As already known, GLP-1 enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (63) and inhibits glucagon release (64). Interestingly, it has been suggested that the presence of GLP-1 in the islet has other effects, including the differentiation of progenitor cells into β-cells in the pancreatic duct epithelium (65,66), and the direct stimulation of proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis of β-cells (67–69). Therefore, the production of incretin hormones in the pancreatic islets might be an adaptive mechanism to improve β-cell function and survival under stress (70). Further, it has been recently suggested that GLP-1 stimulates β-cell autophagy and that this plays a role in the inhibition of apoptosis in human islets (71). Several groups have found that islet cells produce GLP-1 under various stress conditions, including obesity (72,73). Among other pathways, recent reports suggest that in vitro and in vivo factors or signals can promote the transdifferentiation of α-cells into β-cells (11,48,74,75), and that this transdifferentiation is driven by intraislet GLP-1 secretion. Pancreas extracts from glucagon receptor knockout mice (52) exhibit an increase in GLP-1 levels associated with an up to 10-fold increase in circulating levels of GLP-1 amide, the active form of the incretin hormone, whereas no changes were observed in GLP-1 levels in intestinal extracts, suggesting that the pancreas is one of the sources of circulating GLP-1. These reports have refueled research on the in vivo function of α-cells in both prediabetes and diabetes that is aimed at investigating the potential role of these cells in islet homeostasis.

Neogenesis from exocrine cells (including duct and centroacinar cells) and transdifferentiation (including α-cells to β-cells) promoted by insulin resistance and potentially driven by intraislet GLP-1 secretion might be one of the important mechanisms underlying the compensatory response to increased insulin demand.

Collectively, these results and other models (recently reviewed by Aguayo-Mazzucato and Bonner-Weir [43]) have demonstrated an extraordinary plasticity of islet and exocrine cells triggered by insulin resistance in order to maintain euglycemia in the prediabetic state.

Failure of Compensation

Despite the attempts at compensation discussed above, the natural history of diabetes is typically characterized by a progressive steep decline in β-cell function preceding the onset of overt disease (76). Until a few years ago, β-cell demise was considered the principal mechanism underlying this decline (2); however, data from rodents and correlative human studies have introduced a new alternative: β-cell dedifferentiation. The process of dedifferentiation was first described in vitro wherein culture conditions prompt mature β-cells to attain a mesenchymal cell phenotype while retaining the potential to redifferentiate into β-cells (77,78). Subsequently, lineage-tracing experiments in mice have demonstrated that stress switches off the β-cell gene leader FOXO1 and that the stunned β-cell, instead of dying, undergoes dedifferentiation by returning to a progenitor-like state.

In human pancreatic samples, a dedifferentiated β-cell has been defined as one that no longer contains pancreatic hormones, although still retaining endocrine features (i.e., synaptophysin and/or chromogranin A immunoreactivity) and the expression of progenitor markers such as ALDH1a3. The fact that dedifferentiated β-cells account for 30% of β-cells in patients with diabetes and ∼10% in “control subjects” suggests that dedifferentiation plays a role in insufficient insulin secretion in patients with diabetes (3,4,79,80). These recent data have been interpreted in different ways and raised several questions that need to be addressed: for example, are the dedifferentiated cells just degranulated or have they lost their identity? Should we consider these cells as attempting to regenerate (81)?

Importantly, findings in murine models (82,83) reveal that dedifferentiated β-cells have the ability to revert into insulin-producing cells under different experimental conditions, suggesting that even dedifferentiation contributes to the continuous process of islet remodeling from normal/prediabetes stages to overt diabetes. On the other hand, if the chronic metabolic inflexibility persists, the failure of dedifferentiation coupled with transdifferentiation of β-cells into other hormone-producing cells (e.g., α-cells) likely nullifies the extraordinary attempts at compensation (84).

Taken together, these data provide an alternative perspective on the changes in islet cell identity over the natural history of T2D. Although the increase in α-cells observed in insulin resistance acts as a potential source of β-cells to compensate for increased insulin demand (and the transition phase is characterized by the presence of insulin/glucagon double-positive cells), the persistence of metabolic inflexibility finally leads the β-cells to revert to the original α-cells, likely causing the hyperglucagonemia observed in T2D (Fig. 1) (3).

The Need to Link Function and Morphology: The Final Scenario

Most of the studies discussed in previous sections have evaluated autopsy pancreata or organs from donors (1,2,85,86). Despite the advantage of using the entire organ, the autopsied pancreatic specimens likely exhibit postmortem degeneration as a consequence of variable cold ischemia times (i.e., the time between organ removal and freezing of tissues, usually >24 h). This factor in turn could lead to tissue autolysis due to poor stability of cellular components and, therefore, limit the morphological quality of the samples (87–89), although replication and inflammation are probably not affected (90).

Beyond the variable morphology, the lack of detailed medical history and metabolic profiling precludes accurate classification of donors as control subjects and subclassification of patients with diabetes. Indeed, studies in which individuals with prediabetes were subclassified on the basis of glucose tolerance (NGT vs. IGT) or insulin sensitivity, and where pancreatic samples were collected after surgery for morphological studies, indicate that duct and α-cell transdifferentiation occur in insulin-sensitive and normal glucose-tolerant individuals. This suggests that islet remodeling represents a continuous process during the transition from normal to prediabetes to overt diabetes (11). Furthermore, among donors with diabetes, differences in disease duration and therapeutic approach could also affect islet plasticity (i.e., one can hypothesize that GLP-1 mimetics amplify the effects displayed by intraislet GLP-1). However, the latter has never been investigated in human cadavers.

These data support the hypothesis that a combination of insulin resistance and increased β-cell demand determine rapid changes in islet morphology and function, suggesting that the accurate subclassification of control subjects is the only way to trace a complete roadmap of islet plasticity.

The proposed outlook represents a plausible hypothesis that needs a point-to-point link between ex vivo islet morphology and in vivo functional markers of islets cells. To date, a continuing challenge in investigating human islet biology is the lack of accurate in vivo metabolic and hormonal profiling coupled with human tissue samples of appropriate quality for analyses. Moreover, since islet morphology and cellular composition may vary throughout the pancreas (91), only samples collected from the same pancreatic region should be compared. Furthermore, an accurate metabolic profiling needs sensitive, specific, and proven in vivo tools. The oral glucose tolerance test, hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic, and hyperglycemic clamp procedures and mixed meal tests performed using standard procedures, as previously reported (92–95), are promising solutions to understanding the metabolic features of patients whose pancreatic samples will be analyzed ex vivo (11).

Conclusions

The present scenario based on human in vivo and ex vivo data from the nondiabetic condition through to diabetes onset suggests that the seeming contradictions of quantification reports can be explained by the lack of an accurate in vivo metabolic characterization of subjects, who are not just patients with diabetes or without diabetes but who could also be insulin resistant or insulin sensitive and maybe more. There are currently extraordinary islet plasticity reports from different studies and in different metabolic conditions (3,11,12). The evolving scenario demonstrates the remarkable attempts of the human body to compensate for pathological conditions and slow the progression of disease by promoting higher rates of neogenesis and/or plasticity to redifferentiate insulin-producing cells. Investigating the modifications occurring in different metabolic conditions provides an excellent opportunity to identify possible targets to prevent, or possibly deviate, the natural history of T2D. One suitable approach to gain insights into signaling pathways in human islet cells is the time-consuming, yet unique, method of collecting islet samples in vivo from patients without diabetes and patients with diabetes who have undergone accurate metabolic and hormonal profiling.

All available data require further investigation: our interpretation (Fig. 1) of the present scenario is that, moving from an early defect in β-cell function, islet remodeling increases the number of insulin-producing cells potentially derived from duct cells, acinar cells, and/or proliferation of neogenesis from an unrevealed source. The α-cells, also involved in the increased cell count of islet remodeling, could become β-cells, but may also produce GLP-1. Intraislet GLP-1 could both potentiate β-cell survival and functions and also stimulate the transdifferentiation of duct cells and α-cells into new β-cells. When this attempt at compensation fails, the exhausted β-cell undergoes dedifferentiation. In a chronic metabolic inflexibility condition (e.g., long-standing diabetes), even dedifferentiation fails, nullifying all the extraordinary attempts at compensation (Fig. 1).

The emerging insights on islet plasticity evident in diverse metabolic conditions that manifest over the course of the development of overt diabetes will provide an excellent opportunity to design personalized therapies to potentiate compensatory processes, and/or prevent the mechanisms that trigger failure, to arrest the progression toward overt T2D.

Article Information

Acknowledgments. The authors thank Serena Rotunno (Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia), who provided editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding. This study was supported by grants to T.M. from the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD)/Novo Nordisk, EFSD/Lilly, and EFSD/AstraZeneca; to F.C. from the EFSD/AstraZeneca; and to A.G. from the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Fondi Ateneo Linea D.3.2 Sindrome Metabolica and Linea D.1 2018) and from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (PRIN 2015373Z39_006).

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. T.M. and F.C. contributed equally to the writing of the manuscript. C.M.A.C. and A.P. contributed to the discussion and reviewed/edited the manuscript. R.N.K. and A.G. reviewed/edited the manuscript.

  • Received August 6, 2018.
  • Accepted March 17, 2019.
  • © 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.
http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Rahier J,
    2. Guiot Y,
    3. Goebbels RM,
    4. Sempoux C,
    5. Henquin JC
    . Pancreatic beta-cell mass in European subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2008;10(Suppl. 4):32–42pmid:18834431
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Butler AE,
    2. Janson J,
    3. Bonner-Weir S,
    4. Ritzel R,
    5. Rizza RA,
    6. Butler PC
    . β-Cell deficit and increased β-cell apoptosis in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2003;52:102–110pmid:12502499
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Cinti F,
    2. Bouchi R,
    3. Kim-Muller JY, et al
    . Evidence of β-cell dedifferentiation in human type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:1044–1054pmid:26713822
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Marselli L,
    2. Suleiman M,
    3. Masini M, et al
    . Are we overestimating the loss of beta cells in type 2 diabetes? Diabetologia 2014;57:362–365pmid:24233056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Yoon KH,
    2. Ko SH,
    3. Cho JH, et al
    . Selective beta-cell loss and alpha-cell expansion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:2300–2308pmid:12727989
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Henquin JC,
    2. Rahier J
    . Pancreatic alpha cell mass in European subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2011;54:1720–1725pmid:21465328
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Inaishi J,
    2. Saisho Y,
    3. Sato S, et al
    . Effects of obesity and diabetes on α- and β-cell mass in surgically resected human pancreas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:2874–2882pmid:27070277
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Benninger RKP,
    2. Hodson DJ
    . New understanding of β-cell heterogeneity and in situ islet function. Diabetes 2018;67:537–547pmid:29559510
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nasteska D,
    2. Hodson DJ
    . The role of beta cell heterogeneity in islet function and insulin release. J Mol Endocrinol 2018;61:R43–R60pmid:29661799
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Gutierrez GD,
    2. Gromada J,
    3. Sussel L
    . Heterogeneity of the pancreatic beta cell. Front Genet 2017;8:22pmid:28321233
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Mezza T,
    2. Muscogiuri G,
    3. Sorice GP, et al
    . Insulin resistance alters islet morphology in nondiabetic humans. Diabetes 2014;63:994–1007pmid:24215793
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Yoneda S,
    2. Uno S,
    3. Iwahashi H, et al
    . Predominance of β-cell neogenesis rather than replication in humans with an impaired glucose tolerance and newly diagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:2053–2061pmid:23539729
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Bailey T
    . Options for combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: comparison of the ADA/EASD position statement and AACE/ACE algorithm. Am J Med 2013;126(Suppl. 1):S10–S20pmid:23953074
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ramlo-Halsted BA,
    2. Edelman SV
    . The natural history of type 2 diabetes. Implications for clinical practice. Prim Care 1999;26:771–789pmid:10523459
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Nathan DM
    . Clinical practice. Initial management of glycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1342–1349pmid:12397193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Kulkarni RN,
    2. Brüning JC,
    3. Winnay JN,
    4. Postic C,
    5. Magnuson MA,
    6. Kahn CR
    . Tissue-specific knockout of the insulin receptor in pancreatic beta cells creates an insulin secretory defect similar to that in type 2 diabetes. Cell 1999;96:329–339pmid:10025399
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Accili D
    . Insulin action research and the future of diabetes treatment: the 2017 Banting Medal for Scientific Achievement Lecture. Diabetes 2018;67:1701–1709pmid:30135131
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Kawamori D,
    2. Kurpad AJ,
    3. Hu J, et al
    . Insulin signaling in alpha cells modulates glucagon secretion in vivo. Cell Metab 2009;9:350–361pmid:19356716
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Halperin F,
    2. Lopez X,
    3. Manning R,
    4. Kahn CR,
    5. Kulkarni RN,
    6. Goldfine AB
    . Insulin augmentation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion is impaired in insulin-resistant humans. Diabetes 2012;61:301–309pmid:22275085
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Okada T,
    2. Liew CW,
    3. Hu J, et al
    . Insulin receptors in beta-cells are critical for islet compensatory growth response to insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:8977–8982pmid:17416680
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Bagdade JD,
    2. Bierman EL,
    3. Porte D Jr.
    . The significance of basal insulin levels in the evaluation of the insulin response to glucose in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. J Clin Invest 1967;46:1549–1557pmid:6061732
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. DeFronzo RA
    . Lilly lecture 1987. The triumvirate: β-Cell, muscle, liver. A collusion responsible for NIDDM. Diabetes 1988;37:667–687pmid:3289989
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kühl C
    . Insulin secretion and insulin resistance in pregnancy and GDM. Implications for diagnosis and management. Diabetes 1991;40(Suppl. 2):18–24pmid:1748255
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Kautzky-Willer A,
    2. Prager R,
    3. Waldhausl W, et al
    . Pronounced insulin resistance and inadequate β-cell secretion characterize lean gestational diabetes during and after pregnancy. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1717–1723pmid:9353615
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Dunaif A,
    2. Graf M,
    3. Mandeli J,
    4. Laumas V,
    5. Dobrjansky A
    . Characterization of groups of hyperandrogenic women with acanthosis nigricans, impaired glucose tolerance, and/or hyperinsulinemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987;65:499–507pmid:3305551
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Saisho Y,
    2. Butler AE,
    3. Manesso E,
    4. Elashoff D,
    5. Rizza RA,
    6. Butler PC
    . β-Cell mass and turnover in humans: effects of obesity and aging. Diabetes Care 2013;36:111–117pmid:22875233
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Butler AE,
    2. Cao-Minh L,
    3. Galasso R, et al
    . Adaptive changes in pancreatic beta cell fractional area and beta cell turnover in human pregnancy. Diabetologia 2010;53:2167–2176pmid:20523966
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Patti ME,
    2. McMahon G,
    3. Mun EC, et al
    . Severe hypoglycaemia post-gastric bypass requiring partial pancreatectomy: evidence for inappropriate insulin secretion and pancreatic islet hyperplasia. Diabetologia 2005;48:2236–2240pmid:16195867
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Brüning JC,
    2. Winnay J,
    3. Bonner-Weir S,
    4. Taylor SI,
    5. Accili D,
    6. Kahn CR
    . Development of a novel polygenic model of NIDDM in mice heterozygous for IR and IRS-1 null alleles. Cell 1997;88:561–572pmid:9038347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Klöppel G,
    2. Löhr M,
    3. Habich K,
    4. Oberholzer M,
    5. Heitz PU
    . Islet pathology and the pathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus revisited. Surv Synth Pathol Res 1985;4:110–125pmid:3901180
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Mezza T,
    2. Sorice GP,
    3. Conte C, et al
    . β-Cell glucose sensitivity is linked to insulin/glucagon bihormonal cells in nondiabetic humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:470–475pmid:26649619
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Migliorini A,
    2. Bader E,
    3. Lickert H
    . Islet cell plasticity and regeneration. Mol Metab 2014;3:268–274pmid:24749056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Mezza T,
    2. Kulkarni RN
    . The regulation of pre- and post-maturational plasticity of mammalian islet cell mass. Diabetologia 2014;57:1291–1303pmid:24824733
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Dirice E,
    2. Walpita D,
    3. Vetere A, et al
    . Inhibition of DYRK1A stimulates human β-cell proliferation. Diabetes 2016;65:1660–1671pmid:26953159
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Kondegowda NG,
    2. Fenutria R,
    3. Pollack IR, et al
    . Osteoprotegerin and denosumab stimulate human beta cell proliferation through inhibition of the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand pathway. Cell Metab 2015;22:77–85pmid:26094891
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Dor Y,
    2. Brown J,
    3. Martinez OI,
    4. Melton DA
    . Adult pancreatic beta-cells are formed by self-duplication rather than stem-cell differentiation. Nature 2004;429:41–46pmid:15129273
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Teta M,
    2. Rankin MM,
    3. Long SY,
    4. Stein GM,
    5. Kushner JA
    . Growth and regeneration of adult beta cells does not involve specialized progenitors. Dev Cell 2007;12:817–826pmid:17488631
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Shirakawa J,
    2. Fernandez M,
    3. Takatani T, et al
    . Insulin signaling regulates the FoxM1/PLK1/CENP-a pathway to promote adaptive pancreatic β cell proliferation. Cell Metab 2017;25:868–882.e5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dhawan S,
    2. Dirice E,
    3. Kulkarni RN,
    4. Bhushan A
    . Inhibition of TGF-β signaling promotes human pancreatic β-cell replication. Diabetes 2016;65:1208–1218pmid:26936960
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wang P,
    2. Alvarez-Perez JC,
    3. Felsenfeld DP, et al
    . A high-throughput chemical screen reveals that harmine-mediated inhibition of DYRK1A increases human pancreatic beta cell replication. Nat Med 2015;21:383–388pmid:25751815
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. El Ouaamari A,
    2. O-Sullivan I,
    3. Shirakawa J, et al
    . Forkhead box protein O1 (FoxO1) regulates hepatic serine protease inhibitor B1 (serpinB1) expression in a non-cell-autonomous fashion. J Biol Chem 2019;294:1059–1069
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Bender A,
    3. Wang P, et al
    . Insights into beta cell regeneration for diabetes via integration of molecular landscapes in human insulinomas. Nat Commun 2017;8:767pmid:28974674
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Aguayo-Mazzucato C,
    2. Bonner-Weir S
    . Pancreatic β cell regeneration as a possible therapy for diabetes. Cell Metab 2018;27:57–67pmid:28889951
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Bonner-Weir S,
    2. Toschi E,
    3. Inada A, et al
    . The pancreatic ductal epithelium serves as a potential pool of progenitor cells. Pediatr Diabetes 2004;5(Suppl. 2):16–22pmid:15601370
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bonner-Weir S,
    2. Aguayo-Mazzucato C,
    3. Weir GC
    . Dynamic development of the pancreas from birth to adulthood. Ups J Med Sci 2016;121:155–158pmid:26998806
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Inada A,
    2. Nienaber C,
    3. Katsuta H, et al
    . Carbonic anhydrase II-positive pancreatic cells are progenitors for both endocrine and exocrine pancreas after birth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:19915–19919pmid:19052237
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Thorel F,
    2. Népote V,
    3. Avril I, et al
    . Conversion of adult pancreatic alpha-cells to beta-cells after extreme beta-cell loss. Nature 2010;464:1149–1154pmid:20364121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Collombat P,
    2. Xu X,
    3. Ravassard P, et al
    . The ectopic expression of Pax4 in the mouse pancreas converts progenitor cells into alpha and subsequently beta cells. Cell 2009;138:449–462pmid:19665969
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Courtney M,
    2. Gjernes E,
    3. Druelle N, et al
    . The inactivation of Arx in pancreatic α-cells triggers their neogenesis and conversion into functional β-like cells. PLoS Genet 2013;9:e1003934pmid:24204325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Liang Y,
    2. Osborne MC,
    3. Monia BP, et al
    . Reduction in glucagon receptor expression by an antisense oligonucleotide ameliorates diabetic syndrome in db/db mice. Diabetes 2004;53:410–417pmid:14747292
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chen M,
    2. Gavrilova O,
    3. Zhao WQ, et al
    . Increased glucose tolerance and reduced adiposity in the absence of fasting hypoglycemia in mice with liver-specific Gs alpha deficiency. J Clin Invest 2005;115:3217–3227pmid:16239968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Gelling RW,
    2. Du XQ,
    3. Dichmann DS, et al
    . Lower blood glucose, hyperglucagonemia, and pancreatic alpha cell hyperplasia in glucagon receptor knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:1438–1443pmid:12552113
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Kim J,
    2. Okamoto H,
    3. Huang Z, et al
    . Amino acid transporter Slc38a5 controls glucagon receptor inhibition-induced pancreatic alpha cell hyperplasia in mice. Cell Metab 2017;25:1348–1361.e8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Dean ED,
    2. Li M,
    3. Prasad N, et al
    . Interrupted glucagon signaling reveals hepatic α cell axis and role for L-glutamine in α cell proliferation. Cell Metab 2017;25:1362–1373.e5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Cantley J,
    2. Choudhury AI,
    3. Asare-Anane H, et al
    . Pancreatic deletion of insulin receptor substrate 2 reduces beta and alpha cell mass and impairs glucose homeostasis in mice. Diabetologia 2007;50:1248–1256pmid:17393136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Kim W,
    3. Chen Z, et al
    . Insulin and glucagon regulate pancreatic α-cell proliferation. PLoS One 2011;6:e16096pmid:21283589
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. van der Meulen T,
    2. Mawla AM,
    3. DiGruccio MR, et al
    . Virgin beta cells persist throughout life at a neogenic niche within pancreatic islets. Cell Metab 2017;25:911–926.e6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Segerstolpe Å,
    2. Palasantza A,
    3. Eliasson P, et al
    . Single-cell transcriptome profiling of human pancreatic islets in health and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab 2016;24:593–607pmid:27667667
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Wang YJ,
    2. Schug J,
    3. Won KJ, et al
    . Single-cell transcriptomics of the human endocrine pancreas. Diabetes 2016;65:3028–3038pmid:27364731
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Ackermann AM,
    2. Moss NG,
    3. Kaestner KH
    . GABA and artesunate do not induce pancreatic α-to-β cell transdifferentiation in vivo. Cell Metab 2018;28:787–792.e3
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. van der Meulen T,
    2. Lee S,
    3. Noordeloos E, et al
    . Artemether does not turn α cells into β cells. Cell Metab 2018;27:218–225.e4
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Marchetti P,
    2. Lupi R,
    3. Bugliani M, et al
    . A local glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) system in human pancreatic islets. Diabetologia 2012;55:3262–3272pmid:22965295
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Baggio LL,
    2. Drucker DJ
    . Biology of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2131–2157pmid:17498508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    1. Seino Y,
    2. Yabe D
    . Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1: incretin actions beyond the pancreas. J Diabetes Investig 2013;4:108–130pmid:24843641
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Cao X,
    3. Li LX,
    4. Brubaker PL,
    5. Edlund H,
    6. Drucker DJ
    . β-Cell Pdx1 expression is essential for the glucoregulatory, proliferative, and cytoprotective actions of glucagon-like peptide-1. Diabetes 2005;54:482–491pmid:15677506
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Zhou A,
    3. Dey A, et al
    . Disruption of PC1/3 expression in mice causes dwarfism and multiple neuroendocrine peptide processing defects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:10293–10298pmid:12145326
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Farilla L,
    2. Bulotta A,
    3. Hirshberg B, et al
    . Glucagon-like peptide 1 inhibits cell apoptosis and improves glucose responsiveness of freshly isolated human islets. Endocrinology 2003;144:5149–5158pmid:12960095
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Li Y,
    2. Hansotia T,
    3. Yusta B,
    4. Ris F,
    5. Halban PA,
    6. Drucker DJ
    . Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor signaling modulates beta cell apoptosis. J Biol Chem 2003;278:471–478pmid:12409292
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Buteau J,
    2. El-Assaad W,
    3. Rhodes CJ,
    4. Rosenberg L,
    5. Joly E,
    6. Prentki M
    . Glucagon-like peptide-1 prevents beta cell glucolipotoxicity. Diabetologia 2004;47:806–815pmid:15095038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    1. Linnemann AK,
    2. Davis DB
    . Glucagon-like peptide-1 and cholecystokinin production and signaling in the pancreatic islet as an adaptive response to obesity. J Diabetes Investig 2016;7(Suppl. 1):44–49pmid:27186355
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Zummo FP,
    2. Cullen KS,
    3. Honkanen-Scott M,
    4. Shaw JAM,
    5. Lovat PE,
    6. Arden C
    . Glucagon-like peptide 1 protects pancreatic β-cells from death by increasing autophagic flux and restoring lysosomal function. Diabetes 2017;66:1272–1285pmid:28232493
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Kilimnik G,
    2. Kim A,
    3. Steiner DF,
    4. Friedman TC,
    5. Hara M
    . Intraislet production of GLP-1 by activation of prohormone convertase 1/3 in pancreatic α-cells in mouse models of ß-cell regeneration. Islets 2010;2:149–155pmid:20657753
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Linnemann AK,
    2. Neuman JC,
    3. Battiola TJ,
    4. Wisinski JA,
    5. Kimple ME,
    6. Davis DB
    . Glucagon-like peptide-1 regulates cholecystokinin production in β-cells to protect from apoptosis. Mol Endocrinol 2015;29:978–987pmid:25984632
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Ben-Othman N,
    2. Vieira A,
    3. Courtney M, et al
    . Long-term GABA administration induces alpha cell-mediated beta-like cell neogenesis. Cell 2017;168:73–85.e11
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Casteels T,
    3. Frogne T, et al
    . Artemisinins target GABAA receptor signaling and impair α cell identity. Cell 2017;168:86–100.e15
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group
    . Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) [published correction appears in Lancet 1999;354:602]. Lancet 1998;352:837–853pmid:9742976
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    1. Weinberg N,
    2. Ouziel-Yahalom L,
    3. Knoller S,
    4. Efrat S,
    5. Dor Y
    . Lineage tracing evidence for in vitro dedifferentiation but rare proliferation of mouse pancreatic β-cells. Diabetes 2007;56:1299–1304pmid:17303800
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Lechner A,
    2. Nolan AL,
    3. Blacken RA,
    4. Habener JF
    . Redifferentiation of insulin-secreting cells after in vitro expansion of adult human pancreatic islet tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;327:581–588pmid:15629153
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. Talchai C,
    2. Xuan S,
    3. Lin HV,
    4. Sussel L,
    5. Accili D
    . Pancreatic β cell dedifferentiation as a mechanism of diabetic β cell failure. Cell 2012;150:1223–1234pmid:22980982
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. ↵
    1. Sun J,
    2. Ni Q,
    3. Xie J, et al
    . β cell dedifferentiation in patients with T2D with adequate glucose control and nondiabetic chronic pancreatitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;104:83–94
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Butler AE,
    2. Dhawan S,
    3. Hoang J, et al
    . β-Cell deficit in obese type 2 diabetes, a minor role of β-cell dedifferentiation and degranulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:523–532pmid:26700560
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Ishida E,
    2. Kim-Muller JY,
    3. Accili D
    . Pair feeding, but not insulin, phloridzin, or rosiglitazone treatment, curtails markers of β-cell dedifferentiation in db/db mice. Diabetes 2017;66:2092–2101pmid:28506962
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. York NW,
    3. Nichols CG,
    4. Remedi MS
    . Pancreatic β cell dedifferentiation in diabetes and redifferentiation following insulin therapy. Cell Metab 2014;19:872–882pmid:24746806
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    1. Accili D,
    2. Talchai SC,
    3. Kim-Muller JY, et al
    . When β-cells fail: lessons from dedifferentiation. Diabetes Obes Metab 2016;18(Suppl. 1):117–122pmid:27615140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Opie EL
    . The relation of diabetes mellitus to lesions of the pancreas. Hyaline degeneration of the islands of Langerhans. J Exp Med 1901;5:527–540pmid:19866956
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Richardson SJ,
    2. Morgan NG,
    3. Foulis AK
    . Pancreatic pathology in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pathol 2014;25:80–92pmid:24522639
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Campbell-Thompson M
    . Organ donor specimens: what can they tell us about type 1 diabetes? Pediatr Diabetes 2015;16:320–330pmid:25998576
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Marchetti P,
    2. Suleiman M,
    3. Marselli L
    . Organ donor pancreases for the study of human islet cell histology and pathophysiology: a precious and valuable resource. Diabetologia 2018;61:770–774pmid:29354869
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Sullivan BA,
    2. Hollister-Lock J,
    3. Bonner-Weir S,
    4. Weir GC
    . Reduced Ki67 staining in the postmortem state calls into question past conclusions about the lack of turnover of adult human β-cells. Diabetes 2015;64:1698–1702pmid:25488899
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Kusmartseva I,
    2. Beery M,
    3. Philips T, et al
    . Hospital time prior to death and pancreas histopathology: implications for future studies. Diabetologia 2018;61:954–958pmid:29128936
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Misawa R,
    3. Zielinski MC, et al
    . Regional differences in islet distribution in the human pancreas--preferential beta-cell loss in the head region in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 2013;8:e67454pmid:23826303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Mari A
    . Mathematical modeling in glucose metabolism and insulin secretion. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2002;5:495–501pmid:12172472
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. DeFronzo RA,
    2. Tobin JD,
    3. Andres R
    . Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol 1979;237:E214–E223pmid:382871
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Meier JJ,
    2. Gallwitz B,
    3. Siepmann N, et al
    . Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) dose-dependently stimulates glucagon secretion in healthy human subjects at euglycaemia. Diabetologia 2003;46:798–801pmid:12764578
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  84. ↵
    1. Deacon CF,
    2. Nauck MA,
    3. Meier J,
    4. Hücking K,
    5. Holst JJ
    . Degradation of endogenous and exogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide in healthy and in type 2 diabetic subjects as revealed using a new assay for the intact peptide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:3575–3581pmid:11061504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes: 68 (6)

In this Issue

June 2019, 68(6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
β-Cell Fate in Human Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes: A Perspective on Islet Plasticity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
β-Cell Fate in Human Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes: A Perspective on Islet Plasticity
Teresa Mezza, Francesca Cinti, Chiara Maria Assunta Cefalo, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Rohit N. Kulkarni, Andrea Giaccari
Diabetes Jun 2019, 68 (6) 1121-1129; DOI: 10.2337/db18-0856

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

β-Cell Fate in Human Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes: A Perspective on Islet Plasticity
Teresa Mezza, Francesca Cinti, Chiara Maria Assunta Cefalo, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Rohit N. Kulkarni, Andrea Giaccari
Diabetes Jun 2019, 68 (6) 1121-1129; DOI: 10.2337/db18-0856
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • α- and β-Cells in Humans: The Current Contradictory Scenario
    • Insulin Resistance and Islet Plasticity: The Emerging Scenario
    • Mechanisms of Compensation
    • Failure of Compensation
    • The Need to Link Function and Morphology: The Final Scenario
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Building Biomimetic Potency Tests for Islet Transplantation
  • Viral and Nonviral Transfer of Genetic Materials to Adipose Tissues: Toward a Gold Standard Approach
  • Energy Regulation Mechanism and Therapeutic Potential of Asprosin
Show more Methodology Review

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes Care
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Print ISSN: 0012-1797, Online ISSN: 1939-327X.