Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Commentaries

LDL Cholesterol and Dysglycemia: an Intriguing Physiological Relationship

  1. Jordi Merino1,2,3,4⇑ and
  2. Jerome I. Rotter5,6,7
  1. 1Diabetes Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
  2. 2Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
  3. 3Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  4. 4Research Unit on Lipids and Atherosclerosis, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Reus, Spain
  5. 5Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Torrance, CA
  6. 6Division of Genomic Outcomes, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
  7. 7Departments of Pediatrics and Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
  1. Corresponding author: Jordi Merino, jmerino{at}mgh.harvard.edu
Diabetes 2020 Oct; 69(10): 2058-2060. https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi20-0031
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

It is an unexpected but pleasant surprise when new clinical relationships are identified, and one of the most interesting is the inverse association between LDL cholesterol (LDLc) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk. Evidence from both randomized clinical trials and genetic studies indicates that regulation of plasma lipids and glycemic control is more closely linked than previously assumed, yet in a counterintuitive, one could even say paradoxical, manner. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials have found that drugs designed to reduce LDLc, in addition to their hypolipidemic and cardioprotective effects, appear to also modestly increase T2D risk (1,2). Furthermore, naturally occurring genetic variation in molecular targets of LDLc-lowering therapy, such as genetic variants in or near HMGCR, NCP1L1, and PCSK9 genes, have been found to be associated with impaired insulin sensitivity and new-onset T2D, particularly among people with impaired fasting glucose levels (3–6). Further supporting that this is a fundamental biologic relationship, individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia, a dominantly inherited disease characterized by high plasma levels of LDLc due to genetic mutations in LDLR or APOB genes, appear to have a lower prevalence of diabetes than unaffected relatives (7). However, not all genetic variants that raise LDLc have similar effects on glycemic control (8). This suggests that the mechanism by which LDLc is reduced might have relevant implications for glycemic deterioration and reveal potential important mechanisms for diabetogenesis in general.

As reported in this issue of Diabetes, Klimentidis et al. (9) conducted a study to examine the phenotypic and genotypic relationships between LDLc and T2D (Fig. 1). Using data from the UK Biobank (n = 431,167), they confirmed findings from previous reports that LDLc is inversely associated with T2D prevalence, in this case with an odds ratio of 0.41 [95% CI 0.39, 0.43] per each mmol/L increase in LDLc, which they term an “opposite direction of effect.” Although the magnitude of their observed association was higher than in other studies considering T2D incidence as opposed to T2D prevalence (1,2,10,11), these findings remained similar in several sensitivity analyses taking into account potential bias such as incomplete case ascertainment or the presence of a collider. The phenotypic associations also showed a paradoxical relationship of increased LDLc with increased HbA1c, which may be an indication of the difficulties of studying the relationship between these complex phenotypes in a cross-sectional study.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Overview of main study findings. In a cross-sectional study within the UK Biobank (n = 431,167), Klimentidis et al. (9) reported that LDLc is inversely associated with T2D prevalence (odds ratio 0.41 [95% CI 0.39, 0.43] per each mmol/L increase in LDLc). Using genetic data from UK Biobank and DIAGRAM (n = 898,130), Klimentidis et al. identified 44 genomic regions, with opposite associations between LDLc and T2D (31 of them then replicated) enriched for genes associated with NAFLD. Their findings suggest that the diabetogenic effect of lipid-lowering medications is in part mediated by increased liver fat content.

To identify genetic variants with opposite effects on LDLc and T2D prevalence, Klimentidis et al. conducted a cleverly designed two-stage genome-wide association study. They first identified genetic variants associated with LDLc in UK Biobank. Then, to confirm those dual LDLc-T2D variant associations, they used T2D summary statistics data from the Diabetes Genetics Replication and Meta-Analysis (DIAGRAM) consortium (n = 898,130). This led to the initial identification of 44 genomic regions with opposite associations between LDLc and T2D, and 31 of them then replicated in the independent data sets for their association with LDLc. A number of the genomic regions identified by Klimentidis et al. were previously known or suspected to be inversely associated with circulating LDLc and T2D (HMGCR, NPC1L1, APOE), but the authors also identified 14 genomic regions without evidence of previous association with LDLc or T2D. Thus, first of all, this is a novel way to identify new LDLc and T2D loci. Computational characterization of identified genomic regions suggests that genetic variants that have an opposite effect on LDLc and T2D are enriched for genes associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Of particular interest is the observation that for some of the identified genomic regions, the same exact variant that has the joint effect on LDLc and T2D is the variant associated with increased NAFLD (i.e., GCKR, PNPLA3, PPP1R3B, or TM6SF2), highlighting the relevance of liver metabolism on plasma lipids and glycemic control.

There are some limitations to the study. First, this version of UK Biobank is a cross-sectional study, and it will be of interest to repeat these analyses when prospective data become available. For example, it is possible that T2D cases are more likely to be newly diagnosed patients not yet under lipid-lowering therapy, those with intolerance to lipid-lowering medications, people misreporting lipid-lowering medications, or older T2D individuals not requiring lipid-lowering medications. Propensity score analyses were implemented to account for this potential bias, but confounding could still exist (12). Second, this is not a traditional joint-phenotype genetic study in which the same participants have the phenotype of interest. By including data for LDLc from participants within the UK Biobank, and a separate data set to investigate whether these genetic variants associated with LDLc have a divergent effect on T2D, it is possible that differences in genome-wide association study characteristics may introduce some noise. Third, while mapping variants to genes is difficult, and only some of these loci exhibited colocalization of the association signals, it is still the case that we often infer that the closest gene is the most likely causal gene. Emerging data indicate that this is not always the case (13).

Overall, findings from Klimentidis et al. provide a new perspective on the debate regarding the intriguing physiological relationship between lipids and dysglycemia and put liver metabolism in the spotlight. Animal and human physiological studies have found that fat accumulation in the liver leads to hepatic insulin resistance and that direct and indirect mechanisms exist to control insulin’s regulation of hepatic glucose and fat production (14,15). The observation that T2D signals identified for their dual association with low LDLc are mainly insulin-resistance loci, as opposite to the growing number of T2D loci primarily associated with insulin secretion, is well aligned with previous physiological data linking insulin resistance with hepatic fatty acid uptake and adipose tissue dysfunction. In this context, lipid-lowering strategies promoting adipose tissue expandability might have relevant implications to reduce glycemic deterioration associated with reducing LDLc, as it has been recently demonstrated for both gain- and loss-of-function variants in the LPL gene and T2D risk (16). Evidence from the current study may foster new lines of investigation to gain insights, not only into the underlying mechanisms responsible for the diabetogenic effect of LDLc-lowering medications, but into the etiology of T2D itself. Such knowledge will hopefully be used to inform public health and individual strategies to leverage more personalized and efficient approaches to manage dyslipidemia among people with impaired fasting glucose levels.

Article Information

Funding. J.M. is supported by European Commission Horizon 2020 program grant H2020-MSCA-IF-2015-703787 and National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant P30 DK040561. J.I.R. is supported in part by NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UCLA CTSI Grant Number UL1TR001881 and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Diabetes Research Center grant DK063491 to the Southern California Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center. J.I.R. is also supported in part by NIH grant R01-HL151855–01.

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Footnotes

  • See accompanying article, p. 2194.

  • © 2020 by the American Diabetes Association
https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sattar N,
    2. Preiss D,
    3. Murray HM, et al
    . Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet 2010;375:735–742
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Swerdlow DI,
    2. Preiss D,
    3. Kuchenbaecker KB, et al.; DIAGRAM Consortium; MAGIC Consortium; InterAct Consortium
    . HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibition, type 2 diabetes, and bodyweight: evidence from genetic analysis and randomised trials. Lancet 2015;385:351–361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Lotta LA,
    2. Sharp SJ,
    3. Burgess S, et al
    . Association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering genetic variants and risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2016;316:1383–1391
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ference BA,
    2. Robinson JG,
    3. Brook RD, et al
    . Variation in PCSK9 and HMGCR and risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2144–2153
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schmidt AF,
    2. Swerdlow DI,
    3. Holmes MV, et al.; LifeLines Cohort study group; UCLEB consortium
    . PCSK9 genetic variants and risk of type 2 diabetes: a mendelian randomisation study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:97–105
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Goodarzi MO,
    2. Rotter JI
    . Genetics insights in the relationship between type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease. Circ Res 2020;126:1526–1548
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Besseling J,
    2. Kastelein JJP,
    3. Defesche JC,
    4. Hutten BA,
    5. Hovingh GK
    . Association between familial hypercholesterolemia and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2015;313:1029–1036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Liu DJ,
    2. Peloso GM,
    3. Yu H, et al.; Charge Diabetes Working Group; EPIC-InterAct Consortium; EPIC-CVD Consortium; GOLD Consortium; VA Million Veteran Program
    . Exome-wide association study of plasma lipids in >300,000 individuals. Nat Genet 2017;49:1758–1766
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Klimentidis YC,
    2. Arora A,
    3. Newell M, et al
    . Phenotypic and genetic characterization of lower LDL cholesterol and increased type 2 diabetes risk in the UK Biobank. Diabetes 2020;69:2194–2205
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Andersson C,
    2. Lyass A,
    3. Larson MG,
    4. Robins SJ,
    5. Vasan RS
    . Low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and risk of incident diabetes: epidemiological and genetic insights from the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetologia 2015;58:2774–2780
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Feng Q,
    2. Wei W-Q,
    3. Chung CP, et al
    . Relationship between very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations not due to statin therapy and risk of type 2 diabetes: a US-based cross-sectional observational study using electronic health records. PLoS Med 2018;15:e1002642
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Munafò MR,
    2. Tilling K,
    3. Taylor AE,
    4. Evans DM,
    5. Davey Smith G
    . Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations. Int J Epidemiol 2018;47:226–235
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Barroso I,
    2. McCarthy MI
    . The genetic basis of metabolic disease. Cell 2019;177:146–161
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Birkenfeld AL,
    2. Shulman GI
    . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatic insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Hepatology 2014;59:713–723
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Stefan N,
    2. Häring H-U,
    3. Cusi K
    . Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: causes, diagnosis, cardiometabolic consequences, and treatment strategies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019;7:313–324
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Stitziel NO,
    2. Stirrups KE,
    3. Masca NGD, et al.; Myocardial Infarction Genetics and CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortia Investigators
    . Coding variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the risk of coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1134–1144
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes: 69 (10)

In this Issue

October 2020, 69(10)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
LDL Cholesterol and Dysglycemia: an Intriguing Physiological Relationship
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
LDL Cholesterol and Dysglycemia: an Intriguing Physiological Relationship
Jordi Merino, Jerome I. Rotter
Diabetes Oct 2020, 69 (10) 2058-2060; DOI: 10.2337/dbi20-0031

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

LDL Cholesterol and Dysglycemia: an Intriguing Physiological Relationship
Jordi Merino, Jerome I. Rotter
Diabetes Oct 2020, 69 (10) 2058-2060; DOI: 10.2337/dbi20-0031
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Adipose Tissue Malfunction Drives Metabolic Dysfunction in Alström Syndrome
  • Staying Connected: Transcriptomics in the Search for Novel Diabetic Kidney Disease Treatments
  • Going in Early: Hypoxia as a Target for Kidney Disease Prevention in Diabetes?
Show more Commentaries

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Genetics-Type 2 Diabetes

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes Care
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Print ISSN: 0012-1797, Online ISSN: 1939-327X.