Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes Care
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Diabetes COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Diabetes Symposium 2020
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Article CommentaryCommentaries
Open Access

Postprandial Suppression of Glucagon Secretion: A Puzzlement

Nori Geary
DOI: 10.2337/dbi16-0075 Published 1 May 2017
Nori Geary
Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ndg47@hotmail.com

Pancreatic glucagon is a 29–amino acid hormone processed from proglucagon by prohormone convertase 2 in the pancreatic α-cells (1). Glucagon’s best-established function is to defend against decreases in glucose availability during fasting, stress, and exercise by stimulating hepatic glycogenolysis phasically and hepatic gluconeogenesis tonically (1–5).

Glucagon also increases phasically during mixed-nutrient meals (6,7). Although many individual controls of glucagon secretion have been identified (Fig. 1), their interaction under physiological conditions is poorly understood.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Some controls of glucagon secretion that may be involved in glucagon nonsuppression or tonically increased fasting glucagon levels in insulin resistance or diabetes (note that receptor mechanisms are not shown). As reviewed in detail elsewhere (1–5,26–28), nutrient, neural, endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine effects control glucagon secretion. The dynamic interactions among these controls are poorly understood. As the figure indicates, there are many possibilities for positive- and negative-feedback loops (e.g., glucagon stimulates both hepatic glucose production and insulin secretion, and both glucose and insulin inhibit glucagon secretion), for indirect effects (e.g., the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP-1] stimulates insulin and amylin secretion, both of which inhibit glucagon secretion, both by acting directly on the α-cells and by reducing gastric emptying), and for antagonistic effects (one example is that the incretin hormone GLP-1 inhibits glucagon secretion but the incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP] stimulates it; another example is that mixed-nutrient meals increase both plasma glucose, which inhibits glucagon secretion, and plasma amino acids, which stimulates glucagon secretion, with the net result a brief stimulation of glucagon secretion). Somatostatin may contribute in situations in which insulin and glucagon secretion do not change in a simple inverse fashion, such as after mixed-nutrient meals. Finally, central and peripheral glucose-sensing neurons converge onto sympathetic and vagal efferents that drive insulin and glucagon secretion. α, pancreatic α-cell (glucagon); β, pancreatic β-cell (insulin); δ, pancreatic δ-cell (somatostatin); arrows, stimulatory inputs; T-ends, inhibitory inputs.

Glucagon secretion is disturbed in diabetes (1,3–5,8,9). In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), fasting plasma glucagon levels are typically increased ∼25%, leading to increases in hepatic glucose production and plasma glucose. Furthermore, glucagon levels do not decrease as much following mixed-nutrient or glucose ingestion as they do in healthy individuals (“glucagon nonsuppression”). Fasting plasma glucagon is also increased in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and in the streptozotocin mouse model of T1D, prevention of glucagon action by knockdown of the glucagon receptor prevented diabetes from developing (10). These and other data support the “bihormonal hypothesis of diabetes” that a relative lack of insulin secretion coupled to a relative surfeit of glucagon secretion leads to excessive hepatic glucose production and diabetes (5,9).

The role of postprandial glucagon nonsuppression in the progression to T2D is unclear. If glucagon nonsuppression appears early in the progression, it may provide useful insights as to specific pathophysiological changes that increase diabetes risk. Furthermore, understanding its mechanism may provide novel targets for antidiabetes therapy. For these reasons, two groups recently investigated glucagon nonsuppression during oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) and reported their findings in Diabetes (11,12). Both were cross-sectional studies involving considerably larger numbers of individuals (1,437 and 4,194, respectively) than studied heretofore (13–19) and including individuals with prediabetes. Nevertheless, the outcomes of the two studies were surprisingly different.

In the first study, Færch et al. (11) found that fasting glucagon levels were increased and postprandial glucagon suppression was reduced 30 min after glucose ingestion in individuals with T2D or prediabetes compared with healthy individuals. The data were similar when stratified by insulin sensitivity; i.e., better insulin sensitivity was associated with lower fasting glucagon levels and better 30-min postglucose glucagon suppression. By 120 min, however, glucagon levels were similar in all three groups. Overall, these findings suggest that defective 30-min postprandial glucagon suppression is a relatively early aspect of diabetes risk that is related to insulin insensitivity.

In the second new study, presented in this issue of Diabetes, Wagner et al. (12) studied individuals with normal glucose tolerance or prediabetes. Their data appear quite different from the data from Færch et al. (11). First, Wagner et al. found that that many individuals had higher plasma glucagon levels 120 min after ingesting glucose, whereas Færch et al. found that by 120 min, essentially all participants had lower glucagon levels. Second, Wagner et al. found that individuals with 120-min nonsuppression had lower fasting glucagon levels rather than the association between higher fasting glucagon levels and 30-min glucagon nonsuppression reported by Færch et al. Third, again in contrast to the 30-min data from Færch et al., Wagner et al. found that individuals in whom glucagon was not reduced at 120 min were more insulin sensitive and had a lower risk of impaired glucose tolerance compared with individuals in whom glucagon was reduced. Wagner et al. fail to bring these apparent discrepancies between their data and those from Færch et al. into sharp focus but do provide an interesting discussion of how glucagon nonsuppression might be related mechanistically to improved glucose metabolism.

How might this controversy be resolved? Subject variables may have some influence on the data but seem unlikely to account fully for the differences. For example, patients with prediabetes in the study by Færch et al. (11) had significantly higher mean fasting glucose levels than their normal control subjects (6.3 vs. 5.6 mmol/L), whereas there was no such difference in the study by Wagner et al. (12). Fasting glucagon levels were also lower in all of the groups from Færch et al. (∼9–11 pmol/L) than in the groups from Wagner et al. (∼18–22 pmol/L), but this is likely due to differences in the assays used and would not vitiate comparisons based on relative changes. It should be noted, however, that assaying plasma glucagon remains difficult, and many commercial assays are not sufficiently sensitive to measure the low glucagon concentrations occurring in glucagon suppression tests (5,20).

A long-term longitudinal approach may best contribute to resolving the controversial relationships among postprandial glucagon suppression, fasting glucagon levels, insulin sensitivity, and T2D. Such a study should determine whether changes in postprandial glucagon suppression precede changes in insulin sensitivity or not and whether they are predictive of the development of fasting hyperglucagonemia or T2D. If altered postprandial glucagon suppression precedes the development of insulin sensitivity or predicts development of fasting hyperglucagonemia or T2D, then the phenomenon seems worthy of intense investigation. But if it does not, it seems unlikely to be of major clinical significance (at least early on in diabetes progression; other mechanisms may contribute to clinically relevant glucagon nonsuppression later in T2D or in T1D [21]).

Of course, longitudinal studies should be complemented by studies to determine 1) whether changes in prandial insulin secretion associated with the development of insulin insensitivity and diabetes alter glucagon’s potency to stimulate hepatic glucose production, as indicated by a classic study by Shah et al. (22), and 2) what mechanisms underlie alterations in postprandial glucagon secretion (Fig. 1 summarizes some candidates).

It would also be useful for future research to include studies of glucagon dynamics after mixed-nutrient meals in addition to OGTT. As mentioned above (6,7), glucagon secretion normally increases briefly during mixed-nutrient meals, so postprandial glucagon suppression should be more marked after such meals than after glucose ingestion. In addition, measures of gastric emptying would be useful. This is because intersubject variability in gastric emptying of glucose accounts for significant amounts of the variability in plasma glucose responses in OGTT in both healthy subjects and patients with T2D (23,24). More generally, gastrointestinal motor function and endocrine changes during and after meals are intimately and bidirectionally related, so that one cannot be understood fully without the other (25).

Article Information

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Footnotes

  • § Retired.

  • See accompanying article, p. 1373.

  • © 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.
http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

    1. Sandoval DA,
    2. D’Alessio DA
    . Physiology of proglucagon peptides: role of glucagon and GLP-1 in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2015;95:513–548pmid:25834231
    1. Habegger KM,
    2. Heppner KM,
    3. Geary N,
    4. Bartness TJ,
    5. DiMarchi R,
    6. Tschöp MH
    . The metabolic actions of glucagon revisited. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010;6:689–697pmid:20957001
    1. Jiang G,
    2. Zhang BB
    . Glucagon and regulation of glucose metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003;284:E671–E678pmid:12626323
    1. Ramnanan CJ,
    2. Edgerton DS,
    3. Kraft G,
    4. Cherrington AD
    . Physiologic action of glucagon on liver glucose metabolism. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011;13(Suppl. 1):118–125pmid:21824265
    1. Wewer Albrechtsen NJ,
    2. Kuhre RE,
    3. Pedersen J,
    4. Knop FK,
    5. Holst JJ
    . The biology of glucagon and the consequences of hyperglucagonemia. Biomarkers Med 2016;10:1141–1151pmid:27611762
    1. Langhans W,
    2. Pantel K,
    3. Müller-Schell W,
    4. Eggenberger E,
    5. Scharrer E
    . Hepatic handling of pancreatic glucagon and glucose during meals in rats. Am J Physiol 1984;247:R827–R832pmid:6496769
    1. Unger RH,
    2. Orci L
    . Physiology and pathophysiology of glucagon. Physiol Rev 1976;56:778–826pmid:185634
    1. Dunning BE,
    2. Gerich JE
    . The role of alpha-cell dysregulation in fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev 2007;28:253–283pmid:17409288
    1. Unger RH,
    2. Cherrington AD
    . Glucagonocentric restructuring of diabetes: a pathophysiologic and therapeutic makeover. J Clin Invest 2012;122:4–12pmid:22214853
  1. Lee Y, Wang MY, Du XQ, Charron MJ, Unger RH. Glucagon receptor knockout prevents insulin-deficient type 1 diabetes in mice. Diabetes 2011;60:391–397
    1. Færch K,
    Vistisen D, Pacini G, et al. Insulin resistance is accompanied by increased fasting glucagon and delayed glucagon suppression in individuals with normal and impaired glucose regulation. Diabetes 2016;65:3473–3481pmid:27504013
    1. Wagner R,
    2. Hakaste LH,
    3. Ahlqvist E, et al
    . Nonsuppressed glucagon after glucose challenge as a potential predictor for glucose tolerance. Diabetes 2017;66:1373–1379pmid:6390086
    1. Borghi VC,
    2. Wajchenberg BL,
    3. Cesar FP
    . Plasma glucagon suppressibility after oral glucose in obese subjects with normal and impaired glucose tolerance. Metabolism 1984;33:1068–1074pmid:6390086
    1. Knop FK,
    2. Vilsbøll T,
    3. Madsbad S,
    4. Holst JJ,
    5. Krarup T
    . Inappropriate suppression of glucagon during OGTT but not during isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusion contributes to the reduced incretin effect in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2007;50:797–805pmid:17225124
    1. Mitrakou A,
    2. Kelley D,
    3. Mokan M, et al
    . Role of reduced suppression of glucose production and diminished early insulin release in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 1992;326:22–29pmid:1727062
    1. Reaven GM,
    2. Chen Y-DI,
    3. Golay A,
    4. Swislocki ALM,
    5. Jaspan JB
    . Documentation of hyperglucagonemia throughout the day in nonobese and obese patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987;64:106–110pmid:3536980
    1. Shah P,
    2. Vella A,
    3. Basu A,
    4. Basu R,
    5. Schwenk WF,
    6. Rizza RA
    . Lack of suppression of glucagon contributes to postprandial hyperglycemia in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:4053–4059pmid:11095432
    1. Toft-Nielsen MB,
    2. Damholt MB,
    3. Madsbad S, et al
    . Determinants of the impaired secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:3717–3723pmid:11502801
    1. Unger RH,
    2. Aguilar-Parada E,
    3. Müller WA,
    4. Eisentraut AM
    . Studies of pancreatic alpha cell function in normal and diabetic subjects. J Clin Invest 1970;49:837–848pmid:4986215
  2. Bak MJ, Albrechtsen NW, Pedersen J, et al. Specificity and sensitivity of commercially available assays for glucagon and oxyntomodulin measurement in humans. Eur J Endocrinol 2014;170:529–538
    1. Cryer PE
    . Minireview: glucagon in the pathogenesis of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in diabetes. Endocrinology 2012;153:1039–1048pmid:22166985
    1. Shah P
    , Basu A, Basu R, Rizza R. Impact of lack of suppression of glucagon on glucose tolerance in humans. Am J Physiol 1999;277:E283–E290pmid:10444424
    1. Horowitz M,
    2. Edelbroek MA,
    3. Wishart JM,
    4. Straathof JW
    . Relationship between oral glucose tolerance and gastric emptying in normal healthy subjects. Diabetologia 1993;36:857–862pmid:8405758
    1. Marathe CS,
    2. Horowitz M,
    3. Trahair LG, et al
    . Relationships of “early” and “late” glycemic responses with gastric emptying during an oral glucose tolerance test. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:3565–3571pmid:26171801
    1. Steinert RE,
    2. Feinle-Bisset C,
    3. Asarian L,
    4. Horowitz M,
    5. Beglinger C,
    6. Geary N
    . Ghrelin, CCK, GLP-1, and PYY(3-36): secretory controls and physiological roles in eating and glycemia in health, obesity, and after RYGB. Physiol Rev 2017;97:411–463pmid:28003328
    1. Gylfe E
    , Gilon P. Glucose regulation of glucagon secretion. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103:1–10pmid:24367972
    1. Watts M
    , Ha J, Kimchi O, Sherman A. Paracrine regulation of glucagon secretion: the β/α/δ model. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2016;310:E597–E611pmid:26837808
  3. Verberne AJ, Sabetghadam A, Korim WS. Neural pathways that control the glucose counterregulatory response. Front Neurosci 2014;8:38

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes Care
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Print ISSN: 0012-1797, Online ISSN: 1939-327X.